Workflow
阴阳合同
icon
Search documents
NBA顶级巨星涉嫌阴阳合同 年薪超3.5亿元 球队:全力配合调查!老板是全球前8富豪 身家超1万亿元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-04 08:58
Core Viewpoint - The Los Angeles Clippers, considered a top contender for the NBA championship, are facing a serious issue involving star player Kawhi Leonard and a potential violation of the salary cap regulations due to a controversial endorsement deal [2][6]. Group 1: Allegations and Investigations - Kawhi Leonard is alleged to have signed a $28 million endorsement deal that may constitute a "yin-yang" contract, which is essentially a false endorsement agreement [2]. - The NBA is aware of the media reports regarding the Clippers' potential violations and has initiated an investigation into the matter [2]. - The Clippers and owner Steve Ballmer have denied any wrongdoing, asserting that they have not evaded the salary cap or engaged in any improper conduct related to the endorsement deal [2][6]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The NBA salary cap for the 2025-26 season is set at $154.647 million, with a luxury tax threshold of $187.895 million [3]. - If the Clippers are found to have violated salary cap rules, they could face a maximum fine of $4.5 million and the potential loss of several future first-round draft picks [6]. - Leonard's contract, valued at $152.4 million over three years, could be at risk of cancellation, which would significantly impact the team's championship aspirations [3][6]. Group 3: Owner's Background - Steve Ballmer, the owner of the Clippers, has a net worth exceeding $1.1 trillion, ranking him 8th on the 2025 Hurun Global Rich List [4]. - Ballmer purchased the Clippers for $2 billion in 2014, setting a record for the highest price paid for an NBA team at that time [4].
NBA顶级巨星涉嫌阴阳合同,年薪超3.5亿元,球队:全力配合调查!老板是全球前8富豪,身家超1万亿元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-04 08:51
每经编辑|段炼 休赛期做出续约哈登、"白菜价"签下比尔、保罗等精彩操作后,被认为是新赛季NBA总冠军最大热门之一的洛杉矶快船及其当家球星伦纳德,近期摊上大 事了。 图片来源:视觉中国(资料图) 伦纳德涉嫌阴阳合同 球队:全力配合调查 北京时间9月4日,据多家媒体报道,NBA顶级巨星、洛杉矶快船队当家球星科怀·伦纳德(Kawhi Leonard)签下的一份2800万美元代言协议涉嫌阴阳合 同。媒体称这实际上是一个虚假代言,并且协议中规定,伦纳德必须一直留在快船才能拿走全部的2800万美元,如果换队或退役合同就会提前终止。而更 重要的是,这家公司与快船队老板鲍尔默有关联。 据报道,NBA联盟称已知晓有关快船涉嫌违规操作的媒体报道,目前正针对此事启动调査程序。 据报道,快船队及其老板史蒂夫·鲍尔默否认了关于伦纳德因不存在职位获得2800万美元报酬的指控。"无论是鲍尔默先生还是快船队,都未曾规避工资帽 或在与Aspiration事务中存在任何不当行为,"快船声明称,"任何相反说法都可被证明是虚假的:球队早在2022-23赛季Aspiration违约时就已终止合作。在 政府启动调查前,我们从未知晓Aspiration或 ...
“房价缩水”的尴尬
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-18 05:13
1 1 174 13 12 12 the 32 s t is a last the Prop 16 The The 49 14 1997 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S Area and and a and and a long the latest · Wair · F Read The 2005 11 11 at the are : AC : 8945 1900 140 - 14 - 11 - The Section r 20 20 the ri t a 12 / 1 s at 11:40 1 Phone The Program 1007 the provin 14 110 22 14 - - 437 span a = 1999 - 19 - 1992 . 200 1 1000 . 15 alance of the Page 3.0 ar a stren land 4 11:25 0 1 8 - 20 r a province s the state of the 15 60 ==== a F 2012 1918 I E CHARAL S 17 201 1.195 y l r = 11 ...
花了1000多万,为何合同上只写600万?
Ren Min Wang· 2025-05-14 01:12
Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the misuse of "yin-yang contracts" to evade legal obligations and the subsequent legal actions taken to enforce a court ruling and protect the rights of the creditor [1][3]. Group 1: Case Background - The debtor, Zhou family, borrowed over 12 million yuan from the creditor, Sun, and failed to repay, leading to a court ruling in favor of Sun [1]. - After the court confirmed the mediation agreement, the Zhou family did not comply, prompting Sun to apply for enforcement [1][2]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - Investigators discovered that Zhou sold a property for 6 million yuan, while the actual transaction value was 10.1 million yuan, indicating the use of a "yin-yang contract" to conceal the true sale price [2][4]. - The hidden payment of 4.1 million yuan raised suspicions, leading to further investigation into the financial transactions [2]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Outcomes - The West Lake District Prosecutor's Office recommended legal action against the Zhou family for evading the court ruling, which was accepted by the court [3]. - Zhou was prosecuted for refusing to comply with the court's decision, resulting in a sentence of 11 months in prison, suspended for one year [3].