华夏时报记者 于玉金 北京报道 近几个月，头部艺人与经纪公司之间的解约纠纷愈演愈烈，前有赵露思与银河酷娱"闹掰"，今有鞠婧祎 与丝芭传媒"口诛笔伐"、对簿公堂。 双方就合约年限及收入分配等问题公开"过招"后，丝芭传媒于12月18日上午再度发文称，"我司将以长 期以来所掌握的大量事实和你们（鞠婧祎方）的种种劣迹为依据，将就你本人和你的关联人涂某某等涉 嫌严重经济犯罪的行为，择日向国家相关监管机构，媒体和社会公众进行全网公开实名举报。" 对于目前丝芭传媒与艺人鞠婧祎之间的纷争，北京京师律师事务所律师许浩认为，该事件已超出"口水 战""以打促谈"的模式，进入司法诉讼与舆论战同时进行、相互影响的阶段。他表示，根据媒体公开报 道，2024年7月鞠婧祎方已提起诉讼，法院两次鉴定均无法确认签名是否为其本人所写；丝芭传媒起诉 第三方合作品牌，现又公开表示将实名举报经济犯罪，双方目前并无实质谈判迹象。 "口水战"升级 这次鞠婧祎与丝芭传媒的纷争，可以从12月15日的一则声明谈起。当日，鞠婧祎工作室在官微发布声明 称，鞠婧祎与丝芭传媒的经纪合约已于2024年6月终止，丝芭传媒无权再干涉鞠婧祎的演艺活动。 "我方在此严正抗议丝芭传 ...

本报（chinatimes.net.cn）记者于玉金 北京报道 近几个月，头部艺人与经纪公司之间的解约纠纷愈演愈烈，前有赵露思与银河酷娱"闹掰"，今有鞠婧祎 与丝芭传媒"口诛笔伐"、对簿公堂。 双方就合约年限及收入分配等问题公开"过招"后，丝芭传媒于12月18日上午再度发文称，"我司将以长 期以来所掌握的大量事实和你们（鞠婧祎方）的种种劣迹为依据，将就你本人和你的关联人涂某某等涉 嫌严重经济犯罪的行为，择日向国家相关监管机构，媒体和社会公众进行全网公开实名举报。" 对于目前丝芭传媒与艺人鞠婧祎之间的纷争，北京京师律师事务所律师许浩认为，该事件已超出"口水 战""以打促谈"的模式，进入司法诉讼与舆论战同时进行、相互影响的阶段。他表示，根据媒体公开报 道，2024年7月鞠婧祎方已提起诉讼，法院两次鉴定均无法确认签名是否为其本人所写；丝芭传媒起诉 第三方合作品牌，现又公开表示将实名举报经济犯罪，双方目前并无实质谈判迹象。 "口水战"升级 这次鞠婧祎与丝芭传媒的纷争，可以从12月15日的一则声明谈起。当日，鞠婧祎工作室在官微发布声明 称，鞠婧祎与丝芭传媒的经纪合约已于2024年6月终止，丝芭传媒无权再干涉鞠婧祎的演艺 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the need to strengthen the crackdown on tax-related crimes, which harm national tax interests and disrupt economic order, while also indicating a shift from "invoice-based tax management" to "data-driven tax regulation" [1][2][3] Group 1: Tax Crime Types - The typical cases highlighted include tax evasion through accepting fraudulent VAT invoices, which results in significant losses to national tax revenue [2] - Tax evasion and tax fraud are distinguished by their intent and impact, with tax fraud being more severe and warranting stricter penalties [2] - The use of "yin-yang contracts" for tax evasion is noted for its increased concealment and difficulty in detection, posing a significant threat to tax revenue [3] Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Response - The Supreme People's Court plans to enhance the uniformity of judicial standards and improve case handling efficiency in addressing tax-related crimes [1][3] - The court has actively adjudicated various tax-related criminal cases, reinforcing the protection of national tax security [3] - A strong message is sent to society regarding compliance with tax laws and integrity in business practices through the legal repercussions of tax evasion [3]

Core Points - The article highlights the illegal sale of homemade aircraft in regions like Sichuan and Hebei, where sellers use deceptive contracts to evade regulations while actually selling complete aircraft [1] - A specific case in Yunnan reveals a seemingly legitimate aircraft manufacturing company using car engines in their planes and lacking necessary production licenses, also engaging in illegal sales under the guise of "DIY sales" [1] Group 1 - Homemade aircraft are being sold under the pretense of "component kits" and "for display only" contracts to avoid regulatory scrutiny, posing significant safety risks [1] - The lack of quality assurance in these aircraft raises concerns about potential accidents and their severe consequences [1] Group 2 - The Yunnan company, despite its organized appearance, does not have the required model certification from authorities and cannot provide a production license [1] - This company exemplifies how some manufacturers exploit regulatory loopholes to operate illegally while presenting themselves as legitimate businesses [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Los Angeles Clippers, considered a top contender for the NBA championship, are facing a serious issue involving star player Kawhi Leonard and a potential violation of the salary cap regulations due to a controversial endorsement deal [2][6]. Group 1: Allegations and Investigations - Kawhi Leonard is alleged to have signed a $28 million endorsement deal that may constitute a "yin-yang" contract, which is essentially a false endorsement agreement [2]. - The NBA is aware of the media reports regarding the Clippers' potential violations and has initiated an investigation into the matter [2]. - The Clippers and owner Steve Ballmer have denied any wrongdoing, asserting that they have not evaded the salary cap or engaged in any improper conduct related to the endorsement deal [2][6]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The NBA salary cap for the 2025-26 season is set at $154.647 million, with a luxury tax threshold of $187.895 million [3]. - If the Clippers are found to have violated salary cap rules, they could face a maximum fine of $4.5 million and the potential loss of several future first-round draft picks [6]. - Leonard's contract, valued at $152.4 million over three years, could be at risk of cancellation, which would significantly impact the team's championship aspirations [3][6]. Group 3: Owner's Background - Steve Ballmer, the owner of the Clippers, has a net worth exceeding $1.1 trillion, ranking him 8th on the 2025 Hurun Global Rich List [4]. - Ballmer purchased the Clippers for $2 billion in 2014, setting a record for the highest price paid for an NBA team at that time [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Los Angeles Clippers, considered a top contender for the NBA championship, are facing a serious issue involving star player Kawhi Leonard and a potentially illegal endorsement deal worth $28 million, which is under investigation by the NBA [3][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Investigations - Kawhi Leonard is accused of signing a "shadow contract" related to a $28 million endorsement deal, which allegedly requires him to remain with the Clippers to receive the full amount [3]. - The NBA is aware of the media reports regarding the Clippers' alleged violations and has initiated an investigation into the matter [3]. - The Clippers and owner Steve Ballmer have denied any wrongdoing, asserting that they have not evaded salary cap regulations or engaged in improper conduct [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The NBA salary cap for the 2025-26 season is set at $154.647 million, with a luxury tax threshold of $187.895 million, aimed at maintaining competitive balance among teams [4]. - If the Clippers are found guilty of attempting to circumvent the salary cap, they could face a maximum fine of $4.5 million and the loss of several future first-round draft picks [7]. - Historical context is provided by a previous incident in 1998 involving a similar "shadow contract" that led to significant penalties for the Minnesota Timberwolves, including the loss of draft picks [7][8]. Group 3: Owner's Background - Steve Ballmer, the owner of the Clippers, has a net worth exceeding ¥1.1 trillion, ranking him 8th on the 2025 Hurun Global Rich List [5]. - Ballmer purchased the Clippers for $2 billion in 2014, setting a record for the highest price paid for an NBA team at that time [5].

Core Points - The article discusses a legal case involving a real estate transaction where the buyer attempted to evade taxes by signing multiple contracts with different prices, leading to a dispute over the payment of the remaining balance [4][7][10] Group 1: Transaction Details - Zhang, a seller, sold a 126 square meter house to Liu for 1,250 yuan per square meter, totaling 157,500 yuan, with an initial payment of 110,250 yuan [4] - To reduce tax liabilities, Liu requested a second contract at a price of 600 yuan per square meter, totaling 75,600 yuan, which was signed on April 1 [5] - A third contract was signed on April 3, reflecting a new evaluation price of 850 yuan per square meter, totaling 107,100 yuan, which was used for tax calculations [6] Group 2: Legal Dispute - After the transaction, Liu refused to pay the remaining balance of 46,250 yuan, claiming the third contract was the only valid one [7][8] - The court found that the first contract was valid, as it reflected the true market value of the property, which was between 1,200 and 1,300 yuan per square meter [9] - The court ruled in favor of Zhang, ordering Liu to pay the remaining balance and covering the court costs [9][10] Group 3: Implications and Lessons - The case highlights the risks associated with tax evasion strategies in real estate transactions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal standards [10] - Zhang expressed the emotional and financial toll of the legal battle, indicating that attempts to evade taxes can lead to significant complications and losses [10]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the misuse of "yin-yang contracts" to evade legal obligations and the subsequent legal actions taken to enforce a court ruling and protect the rights of the creditor [1][3]. Group 1: Case Background - The debtor, Zhou family, borrowed over 12 million yuan from the creditor, Sun, and failed to repay, leading to a court ruling in favor of Sun [1]. - After the court confirmed the mediation agreement, the Zhou family did not comply, prompting Sun to apply for enforcement [1][2]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - Investigators discovered that Zhou sold a property for 6 million yuan, while the actual transaction value was 10.1 million yuan, indicating the use of a "yin-yang contract" to conceal the true sale price [2][4]. - The hidden payment of 4.1 million yuan raised suspicions, leading to further investigation into the financial transactions [2]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Outcomes - The West Lake District Prosecutor's Office recommended legal action against the Zhou family for evading the court ruling, which was accepted by the court [3]. - Zhou was prosecuted for refusing to comply with the court's decision, resulting in a sentence of 11 months in prison, suspended for one year [3].