Core Viewpoint - Multiple public fund products have been identified as experiencing style drift, which may lead to investor losses due to discrepancies between actual investment styles and those stipulated in fund contracts [2][7]. Group 1: Style Drift Identification - In the second quarter of this year, 10 products were recognized for style drift, with an additional 3 products penalized for style drift in the first quarter [2]. - Notable funds affected include Qianhai Kaiyuan Great Security Mixed, Jinxin Intelligent China 2025 Mixed (A/C classes), and Taixin Modern Service Industry Mixed [2]. Group 2: Fund Definitions and Investment Focus - The Jinxin Intelligent China 2025 Mixed fund focuses on sectors related to intelligent production and services, with a minimum of 80% of non-cash assets invested in defined "Intelligent China 2025" themes [3]. - The Taixin Modern Service Industry Mixed fund allocates 60-95% of its assets to stocks, emphasizing productive and life service industries, including financial services, logistics, and healthcare [5][6]. Group 3: Fund Responses to Style Drift Concerns - Jinxin Fund representatives argue that their high allocation to bank stocks aligns with the intelligent service theme, citing low valuations and high dividend yields as justifications [4]. - Taixin Fund maintains that its investments in new technologies and services are consistent with the fund's definition of modern service industries, addressing concerns about style drift [6].