《生态环境保护督察工作条例》
Search documents
发挥督察利剑作用离不开纪律监督
Zhong Guo Huan Jing Bao· 2025-07-31 00:23
Core Viewpoint - The formal issuance of the "Regulations on Ecological Environment Protection Supervision Work" signifies the further improvement of the system and mechanism for ecological environment protection supervision [1] Group 1: Strengthening Political Leadership and Mission Responsibility - The importance of strengthening the Party's leadership and deeply understanding Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought is emphasized, recognizing ecological environment protection supervision as a crucial institutional arrangement by the Party Central Committee [1] - There is a call to enhance the sense of mission and responsibility among supervisory agencies, ensuring alignment with national strategies and reinforcing professional awareness [1] Group 2: Improving Work Mechanisms and Strict Accountability - The establishment of a "Corruption Risk Prevention Checklist" is highlighted, focusing on high-risk areas such as on-site inspections and data verification to prevent issues like "personal favoritism" and "selective supervision" [2] - Continuous participation of disciplinary inspection personnel in supervision work is recommended, including dynamic supervision methods and establishing a comprehensive supervision mechanism [2] Group 3: Conducting Warning Education and Strengthening Discipline Awareness - The integration of warning education with party discipline learning and business training is suggested to foster a culture of integrity and compliance [3] - Emphasis is placed on cultivating the ability to analyze issues from a political perspective and reinforcing the awareness of the bottom line of integrity through regular learning [3] Group 4: Clarifying Responsibilities and Focusing on Supervision Priorities - The focus of disciplinary inspection work should be on political supervision, ensuring adherence to the Party Central Committee's decisions regarding ecological environment protection [4] - Key areas of supervision include compliance with "Party and government responsibilities" and addressing issues such as "non-action" and "misconduct" [4] Group 5: Strengthening Team Building and Enhancing Supervision Capabilities - The selection of personnel familiar with ecological environment protection and disciplinary inspection work for supervisory agencies is recommended, along with the establishment of a rotation system to prevent the solidification of supervisory power [4] - The need to attract talents from various fields and enhance training for disciplinary inspectors is emphasized to strengthen the backup workforce [4]
信长星主持召开中央生态环境保护督察整改推进会强调求真务实全力以赴抓好督察整改 标本兼治持续提升生态环境治理水平
Xin Hua Ri Bao· 2025-07-10 23:32
Core Viewpoint - The meeting focused on advancing the rectification of issues identified in the central ecological environment protection inspection, emphasizing the importance of implementing the "Ecological Environment Protection Inspection Work Regulations" to enhance ecological governance and promote sustainable development in Jiangsu [1][2]. Group 1: Key Actions and Strategies - The provincial leadership stressed the need for a pragmatic approach to ensure thorough rectification of inspection issues, with a focus on systematic and comprehensive measures to address problems effectively [2]. - Emphasis was placed on the importance of accountability, with a clear delineation of responsibilities among party and government officials to ensure effective implementation of rectification measures [2][3]. - Continuous monitoring and emergency response mechanisms are to be strengthened to combat pollution and ensure the safety of water bodies, particularly Lake Tai, during the summer [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework and Governance - The "Ecological Environment Protection Inspection Work Regulations" were highlighted as a crucial framework for standardizing inspection processes and enhancing the effectiveness of ecological governance [1][4]. - The meeting included discussions on the progress of rectification efforts across various cities and departments, indicating a collaborative approach to addressing ecological issues [4]. - The need for innovation and reform in ecological governance was emphasized, with a focus on integrating technology to improve monitoring and problem-solving capabilities [3].