Workflow
主动权益类公募基金
icon
Search documents
主动的力量|摩根资产管理中国:集全球智慧,以实力领跑
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 05:31
Core Insights - Since 2025, domestic actively managed equity public funds have gained significant attention due to their impressive performance, showcasing the value of active management in the market [2][17]. - The active equity funds have demonstrated a clear ability to generate alpha, outperforming major indices in 2025 [18][19]. Performance Metrics - As of November 30, 2025, the performance of various fund indices is as follows: - Wind Mixed Equity Fund Index: 29.23% - Wind Ordinary Stock Fund Index: 29.29% - Wind Stock Index Fund Index: 25.15% - CSI 300 Index: 15.04% [3][19]. - The average return of actively managed equity funds established before 2025 reached 27.52%, with a median return of 24.25% [18]. Development Initiatives - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" released in May 2025 emphasizes the establishment of a floating management fee mechanism, linking performance to management fees to align the interests of managers and investors [20][19]. Morgan Asset Management's Position - Morgan Asset Management, a global asset management giant under JPMorgan, has a global asset management scale of nearly 30 trillion RMB (approximately 4.1 trillion USD) as of September 2025, with equity investments nearing 9 trillion RMB (approximately 1.26 trillion USD) [21][22]. - In 2024, Morgan Asset Management ranked first globally in net inflows for active management, active equity, and active ETFs [21]. Research and Team Expertise - The average tenure of equity fund managers at Morgan Asset Management is about 20 years, with over 500 research analysts, many having over 15 years of industry experience [22]. - The local equity research team in China was established in 2004, with an average experience of over 12 years, focusing on long-term performance and reducing short-term market volatility impacts [22]. Fund Performance Highlights - Several funds under Morgan Asset Management have significantly outperformed their benchmarks over the past three years, with examples including: - Morgan Emerging Power A: 58.04% return vs. benchmark growth of 21.75% - Morgan Core Growth A: 52.34% return vs. benchmark growth of 19.34% [23][26]. Future Outlook - The Chinese equity market is at a critical juncture, with ongoing asset revaluation and structural opportunities emerging in sectors like AI, high-end manufacturing, and new consumption [27]. - Morgan Asset Management anticipates that the technology growth style will maintain relative advantages in 2026, driven by the ongoing transformation of the Chinese economy [28]. - The focus will be on sectors benefiting from supply constraints and cash flow optimization, as well as high-end manufacturing companies expanding into overseas markets [29].
公募基金告别“旱涝保收” 业绩比较基准成硬标尺
Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" aims to enhance the binding force of performance benchmarks for fund products, transforming them into crucial metrics for investment behavior, product performance evaluation, and fund positioning [1][3]. Group 1: Importance of Performance Benchmarks - The industry has historically undervalued performance benchmarks due to a focus on overall market rankings, leading to issues such as style drift among fund managers and concentrated industry allocations [2][3]. - Data indicates that a significant number of actively managed equity funds have underperformed their benchmarks, with 2,532 out of 4,243 funds failing to beat their benchmarks over the past year, and nearly half underperforming by over 10 percentage points over three years [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures - The Action Plan proposes to strengthen the regulatory framework surrounding performance benchmarks, including guidelines for setting, modifying, disclosing, and continuously evaluating benchmarks [3][4]. - Fund managers whose products underperform their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points for three years will see a significant decrease in performance compensation, while those who exceed benchmarks may receive reasonable increases [3]. Group 3: Industry Transformation - The Action Plan is viewed as a new pillar for the high-quality development of the fund industry, adding a "benchmark as anchor" concept to the existing foundational structures established since 1998 [3][4]. - The focus on performance benchmarks is expected to lead to a reduction in the pursuit of star fund managers and short-term products, promoting a more stable investment environment [7]. Group 4: Impact on Fund Management - Fund managers will face increased pressure to align with performance benchmarks, necessitating adjustments in investment methodologies and enhanced risk control [8]. - The industry may see a shift towards more passive investment strategies, with ETFs and stable active management funds becoming more prevalent as performance benchmarks are strictly adhered to [8].