中国的拒绝绝非偶然，而是基于对局势的清醒判断。就在欧洲酝酿"求援计划"的同时，英国国防部宣布向乌克兰提供6亿英镑的"星streak"防空导弹系统， 法国则继续向敖德萨港运送"凯撒"自行火炮。这种"一边拱火一边求和"的虚伪做派，彻底暴露了欧洲的真实意图：他们不是要停火，而是想让中国替他 们"火中取栗"。中国当然不会忘记，2023年欧洲议会曾以"人权问题"为由冻结《中欧投资协定》，如今却想空手套白狼？这种将地缘政治当儿戏的投机心 态，注定只会收获闭门羹。 事实上，欧洲的破局之道从来不在北京，而在布鲁塞尔和莫斯科。当德国企业偷偷绕过制裁通过土耳其购买俄罗斯天然气，当匈牙利总理欧尔班公开呼 吁"承认新现实"，这些暗流涌动都证明：对抗没有出路，对话才有生机。中国提出的《全球安全倡议》早已指明方向——停火止战、领土谈判、战后重 建，这三个步骤环环相扣，缺一不可。但只要欧洲还沉迷于"代理人战争"的幻梦，还在充当美国霸权的马前卒，和平就永远只是镜花水月。 此刻的欧洲就像站在悬崖边的困兽，前有美俄夹击的深渊，后有内部崩溃的绝境。他们向中国伸出的不是合作之手，而是救命稻草。但中国早已用行动证 明：我们既不是谁的救世主，更不是可以 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the shift in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump, indicating a long-term move away from Atlanticism and European alliances towards a focus on the Asia-Pacific region [1][2] - It highlights the challenges Europe faces in re-establishing its own defense capabilities amid a perceived abandonment by the U.S. and the need for increased military spending [4][7] - The article emphasizes the fragmentation of European military capabilities and the reliance on U.S. military technology, which complicates Europe's efforts to independently rearm [12][13] Group 1: U.S. Policy Shift - The U.S. is moving away from Europe, prioritizing the Asia-Pacific region and sacrificing Atlanticism as a result of strategic contraction [1][2] - This shift is not merely a temporary phenomenon tied to Trump's presidency but reflects a long-term trend that will persist regardless of which party is in power [1] Group 2: European Defense Challenges - Europe is attempting to bolster its own defense capabilities, with NATO countries aiming to increase defense spending from 2% to 3% of GDP and enhance military equipment by 30% over the next 5-10 years [7][10] - The European Union has proposed an €800 billion "rearmament plan," with €650 billion coming from member states and €150 billion from a new EU fund [10] Group 3: Military Capability Fragmentation - European NATO countries have a total military strength of around 1.5 million personnel, but much of this is non-combat support, leading to concerns about actual combat readiness [4][6] - The reliance on U.S. military equipment is increasing, with European NATO countries' arms imports rising by 105% from five years ago, 64% of which come from the U.S. [6][12] - European military industries are struggling to meet the demand for advanced military technology, particularly in areas like combat aircraft and naval systems, which are heavily reliant on U.S. technology [12][13]