新乡胖东来称确有此事，会依法应诉，积极配合相关工作，后续也会根据国家相关规定以及法院的最终判决来处理。 整理 ｜安雅 菁菁 顾客起诉胖东来免费筷子无生产日期，胖东来：会依法应诉，积极配合相关工作 8月28日，有消费者质疑胖东来免费发放的一次性筷子没有标注生产日期，称已起诉胖东来，并在社交平台上发布了受理案件 通知书。8月29日，新乡胖东来回复大象新闻称确有此事，会依法应诉，积极配合相关工作，后续也会根据国家相关规定以及 法院的最终判决来处理。 胖东来在接受大象新闻采访时表示，筷子外包装箱已清晰标注相关标签信息，并具备厂家出具的质检报告，后续市场监管部门 也介入调查，并未发现产品存在质量问题。（大象新闻） 厦门航空通报"充电宝起火致航班延误" 小米主动召回PB2030MI型号部分充电宝，总计146891台 万达集团19.7亿股权被冻结，48座万达广场出售初步落地 拼多多下场自制短剧，招聘策划、创造及拍摄人员 辛巴妻子初瑞雪首播爆火，辛巴连麦闪现 迷你版Labubu实物被吐槽"做工丑"、"品控差" 8月28日，有网友发视频称，厦门航空MF8086航班在起飞前客舱有充电宝着火，烟雾特别刺鼻。 迷你版Labubu实物 ...

Group 1 - A recent advertisement by the company for its "Four Grains of Red Peanuts" product has drawn criticism for depicting peanuts growing on branches, which contradicts agricultural facts as peanuts grow underground [1][3] - The company acknowledged the error, attributing it to the use of AI-generated images and has issued an apology while updating the product page to correct the misinformation [7] - The company is implementing a comprehensive review of all promotional materials to ensure scientific accuracy and is enhancing its internal content review processes [7] Group 2 - The company is currently facing a control dispute involving its major shareholder, with the amount in litigation increasing from 996 million to 1.023 billion yuan [12] - The ongoing lawsuit is not expected to significantly impact the company's operations or current profits, but it introduces uncertainty regarding control transfer matters [12] - Financially, the company reported a revenue of 2.829 billion yuan for the first half of the year, a year-on-year decline of 27.21%, and a net loss of 93.55 million yuan, marking a shift from profit to loss [12]

Core Viewpoint - The company faced consumer backlash due to the incorrect use of AI-generated images in product promotion, specifically depicting peanuts growing on trees, which contradicts the biological characteristics of peanuts [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The promotional image for a peanut-flavored compressed biscuit incorrectly showed peanuts hanging from branches, leading to consumer confusion and criticism [1]. - The company acknowledged the mistake was due to a work oversight and has issued an apology for the misunderstanding [3]. Group 2: Company Response - Following the incident, the company updated the relevant product pages and initiated a comprehensive review of all promotional materials for scientific accuracy [4]. - The company is also enhancing its content review mechanisms and optimizing internal management processes to ensure future content is more rigorous and reliable [4]. Group 3: Current Status - As of the latest update, the promotional materials for the affected product on the company's official JD.com flagship store have been replaced [5].