据美国消费者新闻与商业频道(CNBC)报道，当地时间27日，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体平台发布了一 张卡通图片，画面显示，他正在解雇美联储主席杰罗姆鲍威尔。 图片来源：特朗普社交媒体账号 据报道，这张图片被认为由AI生成(或数字绘制)。在图片中，特朗普手指鲍威尔，大喊"你被解雇 了！"，后者抱着装有个人物品的纸箱站立。两人身后是美联储的徽章图案。 报道提到，特朗普曾多次批评鲍威尔在降息问题上采取谨慎态度，并给其起了 "慢半拍鲍威尔" 的绰 号。 报道还称，尽管美联储9月早些时候已实施2025年首次降息，特朗普仍发出了这一最新 "解雇威胁"。鲍 威尔的主席任期将于2026年5月结束。 目前，白宫尚未立即回应置评请求。 （文章来源：中国新闻网） ...

Group 1 - A recent advertisement by the company for its "Four Grains of Red Peanuts" product has drawn criticism for depicting peanuts growing on branches, which contradicts agricultural facts as peanuts grow underground [1][3] - The company acknowledged the error, attributing it to the use of AI-generated images and has issued an apology while updating the product page to correct the misinformation [7] - The company is implementing a comprehensive review of all promotional materials to ensure scientific accuracy and is enhancing its internal content review processes [7] Group 2 - The company is currently facing a control dispute involving its major shareholder, with the amount in litigation increasing from 996 million to 1.023 billion yuan [12] - The ongoing lawsuit is not expected to significantly impact the company's operations or current profits, but it introduces uncertainty regarding control transfer matters [12] - Financially, the company reported a revenue of 2.829 billion yuan for the first half of the year, a year-on-year decline of 27.21%, and a net loss of 93.55 million yuan, marking a shift from profit to loss [12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the newly released draft regulations by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for online food trading platforms, amidst a competitive landscape marked by significant subsidy wars among major players like JD.com, Ele.me, and Meituan [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The draft regulations cover various online food trading platforms, including delivery services, live streaming, social media, short video platforms, community group buying, and self-built websites [1]. - The regulations consist of 23 articles focusing on five main areas: overall requirements, responsibility allocation, personnel requirements, violations, and penalties [3]. Group 2: Responsibilities and Compliance - Platforms are required to ensure that their branches, agents, and partners comply with food safety management responsibilities [3]. - If platforms engage in self-operated food sales, they must fulfill the responsibilities of food sales enterprises [4]. Group 3: Personnel and Monitoring - The regulations mandate platforms to establish a "daily control, weekly inspection, monthly scheduling" system and appoint food safety directors and personnel commensurate with transaction volumes [4]. - Food safety personnel are encouraged to utilize AI and big data for compliance monitoring and risk assessment of food producers and sellers on the platform [4]. Group 4: Addressing Food Safety Risks - The article highlights that previous regulations lacked clarity in management responsibilities, necessitating more detailed guidelines for platforms to implement food safety management effectively [5]. - Instances of food safety risks have been noted, with platforms being urged to adhere strictly to food safety laws and regulations following multiple discussions with regulatory authorities [6]. Group 5: AI and Marketing Practices - The article points out concerns regarding the use of AI-generated images by merchants, which can mislead consumers about the actual conditions of food establishments [6][9]. - Platforms like Meituan and JD.com have responded by tightening their review processes for merchant images to prevent misleading marketing practices [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has released a draft regulation aimed at enhancing food safety responsibilities for online food trading platforms, including delivery, live streaming, social media, short video platforms, community group buying, and self-built websites [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The draft regulation consists of 23 articles covering five main areas: overall requirements, responsibility allocation, personnel requirements, roles and responsibilities, and penalties for violations [2]. - Platforms are required to ensure that their branches, agents, and partners comply with unified food safety management responsibilities [3]. Group 2: Food Safety Management - Platforms engaging in self-operated food sales must assume the responsibilities of food sales enterprises [4]. - The regulation mandates platforms to establish a "daily control, weekly inspection, monthly scheduling" system and appoint food safety directors and personnel commensurate with transaction volume [4]. Group 3: Risk Management and Compliance - Upon identifying food safety risks, platforms must take actions such as blocking, removing, or deleting food information or links, and halting related sales activities [5]. - Previous regulations have highlighted the platforms' obligations to audit and manage merchants, but practical implementation has revealed ambiguities in responsibility allocation [5]. Group 4: AI and Marketing Practices - The regulation addresses the use of AI-generated images by merchants, which has raised concerns about misleading marketing practices [6]. - Platforms like Meituan and JD have implemented stricter review requirements for images used by merchants, particularly those generated by AI, to prevent misleading consumers [8].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of AI-generated images for restaurant storefronts on food delivery platforms raises concerns about misleading advertising and consumer rights [1][20]. Group 1: AI-Generated Images in Food Delivery - Many restaurants are using AI-generated images that appear to show bustling dining environments, which may not reflect the actual conditions of the establishments [1][19]. - A random investigation of four restaurants in Shanghai revealed discrepancies between their online images and real-life appearances, with some establishments not even offering dine-in options [1][3][19]. Group 2: Platform Regulations and Responses - Meituan has established a special task force to address the use of misleading AI-generated images, emphasizing that such images can mislead consumers [2][20]. - Ele.me has also formed a task force to tackle the issue, focusing on improving rules and technology to identify and rectify misleading storefront images [2][20]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives on Misleading Advertising - Legal experts suggest that the key issue is whether consumers can reasonably identify AI-generated images as not representing the actual business premises [20][21]. - If storefront images are found to be misleading or fraudulent, the restaurants could face civil and administrative liabilities, and the platforms may also bear responsibility for not adequately vetting their merchants [22][24]. Group 4: Consumer Perception and Acceptance - Consumers generally accept some level of exaggeration in food advertising, but storefront images are expected to accurately represent the business, as they directly influence purchasing decisions [23][24]. - The introduction of regulations regarding AI-generated content will require businesses to disclose the use of such images, effective from September 1 [24].

自互联网普及之后，素人走进大众视线成为网红的难度直线下降，有时甚至不需要你有些什么过人的创意天赋来产生有趣的内容，只要长得够好看，就能 够让天南海北的陌生人给你送流量恰大米。 再给点运气赶上平台推流，你就能正式开始恰流量的米了。 你所需要的，只有一个漂亮或帅气的脸蛋（符合主流审美的身材也行）、一面镜子、一个有摄像功能的手机、一点构图小巧思和微妙的网感。 OK，你现在已经学会起号当颜值博主了。 不管是不是在擦边，这种对镜随手一拍的慵懒氛围总能给大伙一种"美得真实"的错觉，总让人不经意多看几眼。 但眼尖的朋友应该已经发现了，上面这些对镜拍都弥漫着一种说不清道不明的怪异感。 先不说那些莫名其妙的模糊是怎么来的，在教室中间放一堵落地全身镜是何意味？再仔细一看，这小圆的cos服怎么长得这么奇怪？ 事实上，以上所有"照片"都被刻意截掉了四个字。 （先别喷我怎么不给人家脸打码） 这样简简单单的自媒体内容对于硬件过关的人来说几乎是有手就行，硬件稍显劣势也没问题，只是P图软件多划几下手指的事情。 不仅喜欢分享生活的普通人喜欢对镜自拍，对时尚有点造诣的穿搭博主、比古早二次元更热心拥抱社交媒体的新生代coser们也对这招十分受用。 ...