具体来看，行业主题产品在这波行情中的表现一骑绝尘。基金定期报告数据显示，截至 9 月 30 日，国投瑞银锐意改革 A 近一年回报 72.58% ，跑赢业绩比较基准 62.81% ；国投瑞银产业升级两年持有 A 近一年回报 69.17% ，跑赢业绩比较基准 50.62% ；国投瑞银先 进制造近一年回报 50.64% ，跑赢业绩比较基准 35.18% ；还有国投瑞银新能源 A 、国投瑞银产业趋势 A 、国投瑞银创新医疗 A 等，也 在近一年时间里收获了超过 40% 的业绩回报。 全市场选股的产品同样表现不俗。其中，国投瑞银进宝近一年净值增长 49.65% 、跑赢业绩比较基准 39.88% ；国投瑞银策略智选近一年 回报 39.17% 、跑赢业绩比较基准 20.62% 。 另外，主动量化产品则以系统化投资追求持续的超额收益。基金定期报告数据显示，截至 9 月 30 日，国投瑞银专精特新量化选股 A 近一 年实现回报 69.46% ，跑赢业绩比较基准 41.31% 。 注：数据来源于基金定期报告，截至 2025 年 9 月 30 日；各产品业绩比较基准同期增长率参考下表，各产品业绩基准计算公式见文末。 基金过往业绩并 ...

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: Maximized Factor Exposure (MFE) Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The MFE portfolio aims to maximize the exposure of a single factor while controlling for constraints such as industry exposure, style exposure, stock weight deviation, and turnover rate. This approach evaluates the effectiveness of factors under realistic constraints in enhanced index portfolios [56][57][59] **Model Construction Process**: The optimization model is formulated as follows: $ \begin{array}{ll} max & f^{T}w \\ s.t. & s_{l}\leq X(w-w_{b})\leq s_{h} \\ & h_{l}\leq H(w-w_{b})\leq h_{h} \\ & w_{l}\leq w-w_{b}\leq w_{h} \\ & b_{l}\leq B_{b}w\leq b_{h} \\ & 0\leq w\leq l \\ & 1^{T}w=1 \\ & \Sigma|w-w_{0}|\leq to_{h} \end{array} $ - **Objective Function**: Maximize single-factor exposure, where \( f \) represents factor values, and \( w \) is the stock weight vector - **Constraints**: 1. Style exposure deviation (\( X \)): \( s_{l} \) and \( s_{h} \) are the lower and upper bounds for style factor deviation 2. Industry exposure deviation (\( H \)): \( h_{l} \) and \( h_{h} \) are the lower and upper bounds for industry deviation 3. Stock weight deviation (\( w_{l} \) and \( w_{h} \)): Limits on individual stock weight deviation relative to the benchmark 4. Component weight limits (\( b_{l} \) and \( b_{h} \)): Constraints on the weight of benchmark components 5. No short selling and upper limits on stock weights 6. Full investment constraint: \( 1^{T}w=1 \) 7. Turnover constraint: \( \Sigma|w-w_{0}|\leq to_{h} \), where \( w_{0} \) is the previous period's weight [56][57][59] **Model Evaluation**: The model effectively balances factor exposure and practical constraints, ensuring stable returns and avoiding excessive concentration in specific stocks [60] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: Six-Month UMR **Factor Construction Idea**: The six-month UMR factor measures risk-adjusted momentum over a six-month window, capturing medium-term momentum trends [19][8][44] **Factor Construction Process**: - The UMR (Up-Minus-Down Ratio) is calculated as the ratio of upward movements to downward movements in stock prices over a specified period - The six-month UMR specifically uses a six-month window to compute this ratio, adjusted for risk [19][8][44] **Factor Evaluation**: This factor demonstrates strong performance in various index spaces, particularly in the CSI 500 and CSI All Share indices, indicating its effectiveness in capturing medium-term momentum [8][44] - **Factor Name**: Three-Month UMR **Factor Construction Idea**: Similar to the six-month UMR, this factor focuses on shorter-term momentum trends over a three-month window [19][8][44] **Factor Construction Process**: - The three-month UMR is calculated using the same methodology as the six-month UMR but with a three-month window for data aggregation [19][8][44] **Factor Evaluation**: This factor shows consistent performance across multiple indices, including the CSI 500 and CSI All Share indices, making it a reliable short-term momentum indicator [8][44] - **Factor Name**: Pre-Tax Earnings to Total Market Value (EPTTM) **Factor Construction Idea**: This valuation factor evaluates the earnings yield of a stock, providing insights into its relative valuation [19][8][44] **Factor Construction Process**: - EPTTM is calculated as the ratio of pre-tax earnings to the total market value of a stock, with adjustments for rolling time windows (e.g., one year) [19][8][44] **Factor Evaluation**: EPTTM consistently ranks among the top-performing valuation factors, particularly in the CSI 300 and CSI 800 indices, reflecting its robustness in identifying undervalued stocks [8][44] --- Backtesting Results of Models - **MFE Portfolio**: - The MFE portfolio demonstrates strong performance under various constraints, with backtesting results showing significant alpha generation relative to benchmarks like CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 [60][61] --- Backtesting Results of Factors - **Six-Month UMR**: - CSI 500: Weekly return of 0.99%, monthly return of 1.65%, annualized return of -4.07% [26] - CSI All Share: Weekly return of 1.23%, monthly return of 1.59%, annualized return of 7.43% [44] - **Three-Month UMR**: - CSI 500: Weekly return of 0.94%, monthly return of 1.31%, annualized return of 0.68% [26] - CSI All Share: Weekly return of 1.02%, monthly return of 1.63%, annualized return of 5.64% [44] - **EPTTM**: - CSI 300: Weekly return of 0.74%, monthly return of 1.42%, annualized return of 3.89% [22] - CSI 800: Weekly return of 1.00%, monthly return of 1.91%, annualized return of 2.87% [30]