从视频画面可见，导弹确实发生了撞击，但该不明飞行物并未受到影响，仍保持原有轨迹继续飞行。 长期报道军方UFO事件的调查记者乔治·纳普在听证会上表示："这些画面本该让公众看到，至于为什么 不允许，我也不知道。"他在现场说道："那就是'地狱火'导弹击中那个不明飞行物的瞬间，但导弹就这 样被弹开了，而且该不明飞行物还在继续飞行。这到底是什么东西？" 据悉，视频拍摄时间为也门近海处于胡塞武装活跃时期。美国海军舰艇和飞机当时正在保护商业航道， 防御也门胡塞武装向商船发射的导弹和无人机。美军舰艇经常拦截并击落这些武器，以防其威胁美军或 商船。 据新京报报道，9月9日，一名美国议员在听证会上公布一段视频称，UFO（不明飞行物）被地狱火导弹 击中后仍继续飞行。该议员称，此视频由MQ-9死神无人机于2024年10月30日在也门近海拍摄。 视频中一个UFO被一枚美军地狱火导弹击中后仍继续飞行，疑似被导弹击中后脱落的碎片也在跟着继续 飞行。 据海客新闻报道，当地时间9月9日，美国国会就"不明异常现象"举行听证会，期间首次公开一段摄于 2024年10月的视频。视频内容显示，美军一架MQ-9无人机在也门海岸附近发射"地狱火"导弹，击中 ...

Group 1 - A U.S. congressman presented a video during a hearing on September 9, showing a UFO being struck by a Hellfire missile but continuing to fly [1][2] - The video was captured by an MQ-9 Reaper drone on October 30, 2024, near the coast of Yemen, during a period of active Houthi operations [2] - The footage indicates that the missile impacted the UFO, yet the object remained unaffected and continued on its original trajectory [2][3] Group 2 - A journalist specializing in military UFO incidents expressed that the footage should have been made public, questioning the reasons for its prior concealment [2] - The U.S. Department of Defense officials stated they could not provide any information to confirm the video's authenticity or the timing of its capture [3] - The Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office will continue to investigate UFO reports submitted by military personnel [3]

"现在是拉远镜头的画面，大家仍能看到它在移动。"伯利森表示，但他并未透露自己是如何拿到视频 的。 【文/观察者网 柳白】在当地时间9月9日的美国国会听证会上，美国众议员公开了一段摄于去年10月的 视频。画面中，美军MQ-9"死神"无人机发射的一枚"地狱火"导弹击中了也门海岸附近的发光不明飞行 物（UFO），但导弹未能摧毁目标，而是疑似"反弹"开来，UFO继续向前飞行。 听证会上的另一名证人更是爆料，20世纪80年代，前苏联发生的一起UFO事件一度激活了苏军洲际导弹 发射状态，险些引爆第三次世界大战。 这段视频是在众议院监督委员会下属小组委员会关于"不明异常现象"（UAP）的听证会上公布的。 共和党籍联邦众议员埃里克·伯利森播放了这段视频。他表示，这是别人交给他的视频，由一架MQ- 9"死神"无人机拍摄。 画面显示在也门近海上空，一个高速移动的物体沿直线掠过海浪，同时另一架"死神"无人机发射的"地 狱火"导弹似乎击中该物体。 "我不打算过多解释，大家看视频就能清楚发生了什么。"伯里森在播放时说道。 视频显示导弹似乎击中了目标，但该物体仍沿原有轨迹继续飞行。 画面显示，导弹击中目标，但飞行物此后仍按原轨迹继续飞行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent confusion regarding U.S. military aid to Ukraine stems from Defense Secretary Mark Esper's unilateral decision to pause certain arms shipments without notifying the White House, leading to a chaotic internal decision-making process within the Trump administration [1][3][5]. Group 1: Decision-Making Process - Secretary Esper authorized the pause in arms shipments following President Trump's request for an evaluation of military stockpiles, but did not receive explicit instructions to halt aid to Ukraine [3][4]. - The decision to pause aid was reportedly influenced by Deputy Defense Secretary Elbridge Colby, who has been skeptical of large-scale military assistance to Ukraine [3][4]. - The Pentagon's announcement of the pause caught not only the White House off guard but also other key officials, including the U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine and the Secretary of State [3][4]. Group 2: Military Aid Details - The halted shipment included dozens of Patriot missiles, thousands of 155mm artillery shells, and over 100 Hellfire missiles, which were already prepared for transport to Ukraine [4][5]. - Colby stated that the Pentagon was reviewing and adjusting the military aid to align with the goal of ending the conflict in Ukraine while maintaining U.S. military readiness [4][5]. Group 3: Internal Conflicts and Reactions - The decision to pause aid has been criticized internally, with military officials indicating that while some high-precision munitions are at low levels, they are not below the minimum required for military readiness [5][6]. - This incident marks the third time Esper has unilaterally halted aid to Ukraine without prior coordination with the White House or Congress, raising concerns about his decision-making approach [5][6]. - Colby has faced backlash for his unilateral actions, which have reportedly caused friction with both U.S. allies and within the government [6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. will provide more defensive weapons to Ukraine to support its self-defense efforts amid ongoing attacks [2][3] - President Trump emphasized the need for Ukraine to be able to defend itself, stating that many lives are being lost in the chaos [2] - The Pentagon announced that the U.S. Department of Defense will ensure the delivery of additional defensive weapons as part of U.S. priorities and defense initiatives [2] Group 2 - Specific weapons mentioned for delivery include dozens of Patriot air defense missiles, over 250 precision-guided rockets for HIMARS, thousands of 155mm high-explosive artillery shells, and over 100 Hellfire missiles [2] - Prior to this announcement, the U.S. had paused the shipment of certain critical munitions to Ukraine due to concerns over inventory depletion [3] - The analysis indicated that the aid plan for Ukraine would not jeopardize the U.S. military's own ammunition supplies [2]

Core Points - The U.S. Department of Defense halted a shipment of weapons to Ukraine due to concerns over its own ammunition supply levels, although an analysis indicated that the aid plan would not jeopardize U.S. military supplies [2][3] - The decision surprised various stakeholders, including the State Department, Congress members, and European allies, leading to bipartisan criticism [2][3] - The halt in military aid was reportedly a unilateral action by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, marking the third time he has paused shipments to Ukraine [2][3][6] Summary by Sections Decision and Reactions - The decision to stop the shipment caught many off guard, including U.S. lawmakers and European allies, with bipartisan criticism emerging from both Republican and Democratic members [2][3] - Congressman Adam Smith criticized the Pentagon's justification for the halt, suggesting it was not honest and aimed at cutting aid to Ukraine [2][3] Military Aid and Inventory Concerns - The Pentagon's assessment indicated that while some high-precision munitions were at low levels, they had not fallen below critical thresholds necessary for military readiness [3][4] - The halted shipment included critical weaponry such as Patriot missiles, artillery shells, and precision-guided munitions, which Ukraine urgently requested amid increased Russian attacks [4][5] Legislative and Political Implications - Lawmakers are reviewing whether the delay in military aid violates legislation mandating security assistance to Ukraine, with some expressing frustration over not being informed in advance [3][6] - The ongoing scrutiny of U.S. ammunition supplies has raised concerns about the defense industrial base's ability to replenish stocks, particularly for artillery shells [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Defense has halted the shipment of certain weapons to Ukraine due to concerns over domestic ammunition supplies, but an analysis suggests this decision will not jeopardize U.S. military readiness [1][3]. Group 1: Decision Background - The decision to pause military aid to Ukraine was unexpected for U.S. officials, Congress members, and European allies, with bipartisan criticism emerging from those who support aiding Ukraine against Russia [1][3]. - Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's unilateral decision to stop aid marks the third such instance this year, with previous decisions being reversed shortly after [3]. - A review of ammunition stocks indicated that while some high-precision munitions are at low levels, they have not fallen below critical thresholds necessary for U.S. military readiness [3][4]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Congressional aides expressed disappointment over the lack of prior notification regarding the aid suspension, and investigations are underway to determine if this action violates legislation mandating security assistance to Ukraine [3][6]. - Ukrainian officials reacted strongly to the news, with a parliament member stating that the U.S. is no longer seen as an ally, despite the absence of a formal alliance [5][6]. Group 3: Specifics of the Aid Suspension - The halted shipments included dozens of Patriot missiles, thousands of 155mm artillery shells, over 100 Hellfire missiles, and various other precision-guided munitions [5][6]. - Reports indicated that some U.S. weapons were already prepared for transport to Ukraine but were suddenly stopped, raising concerns about the implications for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression [5][6]. Group 4: Broader Context - The White House defended the decision as part of a broader review of U.S. military aid to allies, emphasizing the need to assess ammunition availability [4][5]. - Former President Trump commented on the situation, stating that while the U.S. continues to provide weapons, there is a need to prioritize American interests and ensure sufficient domestic supplies [6][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that President Trump criticized the Biden administration for excessively providing military aid to Ukraine, emphasizing the need to prioritize U.S. domestic needs before foreign assistance [1][3][4] - On July 3, Trump stated that the Biden administration's military support to Ukraine has depleted U.S. weapon stockpiles, necessitating a reassessment of U.S. military inventory [3][4] - The White House and Pentagon confirmed the suspension of certain military aid to Ukraine, including "Patriot" missiles and "Hellfire" missiles, citing concerns over the depletion of U.S. military resources [4] Group 2 - Trump clarified that the U.S. would not completely cut off aid to Ukraine, stating that significant military support has already been provided and cooperation will continue [4] - Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed intentions to discuss the suspension of aid with Trump in the coming days [4] - The Kremlin welcomed the U.S. decision to suspend some military deliveries to Ukraine, suggesting that fewer weapons would expedite the end of the conflict [4]

Core Points - The U.S. has halted the delivery of several high-value weapons to Ukraine, raising concerns about Kyiv's defense capabilities amid recent Russian advances [1][2] - Ukrainian officials have expressed disappointment and concern over the impact of this decision on their military strategy and civilian infrastructure [2][3] - The Pentagon stated that the review of military aid is aimed at aligning with U.S. defense priorities, emphasizing the need to maintain military readiness [1][2] Group 1: U.S. Decision and Its Implications - The decision to suspend military aid was made in early June but only took effect recently, with some shipments already en route to Ukraine at the time of the halt [3] - The weapons affected include PAC-3 interceptors for the Patriot air defense system, Stinger missiles, precision-guided munitions, and Hellfire missiles [1][2] - The Kremlin welcomed the U.S. decision, suggesting that fewer weapons supplied to Ukraine could lead to a quicker end to the conflict [3][4] Group 2: Impact on Ukraine's Defense - The lack of Patriot missiles is expected to increase the success rate of Russian missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, potentially leading to higher civilian casualties [3][4] - Ukrainian military officials indicated that the suspension of promised systems would significantly affect their planning and expose civilian infrastructure to attacks [2][3] - Analysts suggest that while European and Asian sources may partially compensate for the reduced U.S. aid, the immediate situation for Ukrainian forces will become more challenging [4]

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Defense has halted the delivery of certain air defense missiles and precision-guided weapons to Ukraine, confirming the suspension of military aid on July 1 [1][4][5] - The decision to pause military aid is attributed to concerns over the depletion of U.S. arms stockpiles, as the Pentagon reviews military assistance to other countries [4][5] - The U.S. has provided over $66 billion in weapons and military aid to Ukraine since the escalation of the crisis in February 2022 [7] Group 2 - The Kremlin welcomed the U.S. decision to reduce arms supplies to Ukraine, stating that fewer weapons would lead to a quicker end to the conflict [2][8] - Ukraine is actively seeking clarification from Washington regarding the specifics of the paused military aid, emphasizing the importance of U.S. support in the ongoing conflict [8][10][11] - Ukrainian officials have confirmed that they have not received any official notification regarding changes to the agreed military aid delivery schedule [10][11] Group 3 - Russian media reported that Russian forces have fully controlled the Luhansk region, although the Russian Defense Ministry has not confirmed this [3][15] - A new investment mechanism for foreign investors in Russia has been established, allowing investments from "unfriendly countries" despite Western sanctions [3] - Reports indicate that Russian forces attempted to break through administrative borders in the Dnipropetrovsk region but faced resistance from Ukrainian troops [12][19]