当地时间10月5日，俄罗斯国防部发布报告说，4日深夜至5日凌晨，俄武装力量用攻击型无人机和包 括"匕首"高超音速导弹在内的武器集中攻击并摧毁了一批乌克兰军工企业和保障这些企业运行的燃气能 源设施。 北京青年报2025-10-05 23:33:52 报告显示，俄航空兵、导弹兵和炮兵5日还击毁了位于137个地区的乌军部队和外国雇佣兵临时部署站 点、乌方远程无人机及美制"海马斯"火箭炮的几处储存和发射场所、用于向顿巴斯战区运输武器和其他 军事装备的乌方铁路列车和为乌军服务的一处燃料供应中心。 依据这份报告，截至5日，俄南部集团军部队在顿涅茨克地区占据了库兹米诺夫卡村，西部集团军部队 占据了更为有利的阵地和防线，中央集团军部队的前沿阵地态势好转，东部集团军部队继续向乌军防御 纵深推进。 报告说，与此同时，俄各集团军部队在众多村镇与乌军交战，造成乌军伤亡、武器装备损失，以及乌方 多座弹药物资仓库被毁。 ...

俄罗斯国防部5日发布报告说，4日深夜至5日凌晨，俄武装力量用攻击型无人机和包括"匕首"高超音速 导弹在内的武器集中攻击并摧毁了一批乌克兰军工企业和保障这些企业运行的燃气能源设施。报告显 示，俄航空兵、导弹兵和炮兵5日还击毁了位于137个地区的乌军部队和外国雇佣兵临时部署站点、乌方 远程无人机及美制"海马斯"火箭炮的几处储存和发射场所、用于向顿巴斯战区运输武器和其他军事装备 的乌方铁路列车和为乌军服务的一处燃料供应中心。 （文章来源：新华社） ...

有消息称，在未来1个半月的时间里，美国将会为乌克兰提供3350枚新型远程巡航导弹，极限射程可以达到450公里。这批武器弹药将会通过空中运输的方式 抵达波兰，然后再由波兰中转进入乌克兰境内。与此同时，乌克兰国内的导弹工厂也正在加班加点的生产一款名为"火烈鸟"的远程巡航导弹，该导弹的最大 射程有3000公里，理论上能够对俄罗斯西部地区完成全面覆盖。目前，乌克兰每个月大概可以生产100枚巡航导弹，这就意味着在今年年底乌军部队将可以 列装至少4000枚远程巡航导弹，有能力对俄罗斯本土发起多场饱和式空袭打击，对俄军展开对等反制。而根据军事专家的评估分析，乌军导弹的主要攻击目 标并不是俄军指挥所，也不是空军基地和弹药库，而是俄罗斯西部平原上分布的200座炼油厂。 随着俄乌军事冲突的持续升级，乌克兰也开始对俄罗斯本土展开新的攻势行动。前不久，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体上主动喊话泽连斯基，表示如果一场战 斗，乌克兰只是一味的防守而不是主动发起进攻，那么乌克兰就无法获得最终的胜利。这一表态的出现立刻引发了外界的热议，虽然特朗普并没有公开表态 支持乌克兰对俄罗斯本土进行攻击，但潜台词却是在提醒泽连斯基，需要通过进攻俄罗斯本土来为自 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. will provide more defensive weapons to Ukraine to support its self-defense efforts amid ongoing attacks [2][3] - President Trump emphasized the need for Ukraine to be able to defend itself, stating that many lives are being lost in the chaos [2] - The Pentagon announced that the U.S. Department of Defense will ensure the delivery of additional defensive weapons as part of U.S. priorities and defense initiatives [2] Group 2 - Specific weapons mentioned for delivery include dozens of Patriot air defense missiles, over 250 precision-guided rockets for HIMARS, thousands of 155mm high-explosive artillery shells, and over 100 Hellfire missiles [2] - Prior to this announcement, the U.S. had paused the shipment of certain critical munitions to Ukraine due to concerns over inventory depletion [3] - The analysis indicated that the aid plan for Ukraine would not jeopardize the U.S. military's own ammunition supplies [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. has paused the delivery of certain weapons to Ukraine, which the White House claims aligns with U.S. interests, while Russia welcomes this decision as a means to expedite the end of the conflict, and Ukraine finds it "painful" [1] - The Trump administration has withheld hundreds of PAC-3 missiles, Stinger missiles, Sparrow missiles, Hellfire missiles, precision-guided rockets, and thousands of 155mm artillery shells, citing concerns that U.S. military weapon stocks could drop to dangerous levels [1] - Analysts suggest that the halt in ammunition supply could render a significant amount of U.S.-made weaponry in Ukraine obsolete, impacting the overall military capability of the Ukrainian forces [1] Group 2 - Since 2021, Russian defense industry production capacity has increased tenfold, capable of supporting battlefield consumption for 500,000 troops, while the U.S. military faces challenges in maintaining its weapon stock due to commitments in Ukraine, Israel, and other regions [2] - Ukrainian officials emphasize their heavy reliance on U.S. weapon supplies, stating that without U.S. ammunition, they would face significant difficulties despite European efforts [2] - Estimates suggest that the Western weapons available to Ukrainian forces may only last until the end of summer 2023, prompting Ukraine to ramp up the production of small drones, with an expected annual output exceeding 4 million units [2] Group 3 - The Ukrainian Defense Minister acknowledged that a recent large-scale airstrike by Russia aimed to deplete Ukraine's air defense capabilities [3] Group 4 - The ongoing conflict has displaced approximately 10.6 million people, representing about a quarter of Ukraine's population, with many others suffering from frequent airstrikes and shortages [4] - A recent poll indicates that 56% of Ukrainians support ending the war through negotiations, reflecting a growing sentiment that military victory may not be achievable [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, particularly focusing on the largest airstrike by Russia against Ukraine to date, involving a significant number of drones and missiles, and the ongoing military actions on both sides [1][2][4]. Summary by Sections Airstrike Details - On July 4, Ukrainian President Zelensky reported that Russia launched one of its largest airstrikes, utilizing nearly 550 aerial weapons, including over 330 attack drones, marking the highest number of drones used in a single attack [2][8]. - The air raid caused significant damage, with reports of 23 injuries in Kyiv and multiple fire points across the city [10][11]. Ukrainian Response - Ukraine's air defense forces successfully intercepted 270 aerial targets, emphasizing the importance of advanced defense systems like the "Patriot" missile for protecting lives [6][12]. - Ukrainian military forces reported that they managed to repel Russian advances in several directions, destroying Russian tanks, armored vehicles, and artillery systems [21]. Russian Military Actions - The Russian military has reportedly gained control over Melovoye and Donetsk's Krazino, while also targeting Ukrainian military facilities and drone assembly sites [20][21]. - Russia's defense ministry claimed to have intercepted and destroyed multiple aerial threats, including drones and missiles, during the ongoing conflict [19][20]. Broader Implications - The article indicates that the conflict remains intense, with both sides engaging in significant military operations, and highlights the need for continued support from international partners for Ukraine [16][21].

Core Points - The article discusses the shift in U.S. foreign policy under President Trump, indicating a long-term move away from Atlanticism and European alliances towards a focus on the Asia-Pacific region [1][2] - It highlights the challenges Europe faces in re-establishing its own defense capabilities amid a perceived abandonment by the U.S. and the need for increased military spending [4][7] - The article emphasizes the fragmentation of European military capabilities and the reliance on U.S. military technology, which complicates Europe's efforts to independently rearm [12][13] Group 1: U.S. Policy Shift - The U.S. is moving away from Europe, prioritizing the Asia-Pacific region and sacrificing Atlanticism as a result of strategic contraction [1][2] - This shift is not merely a temporary phenomenon tied to Trump's presidency but reflects a long-term trend that will persist regardless of which party is in power [1] Group 2: European Defense Challenges - Europe is attempting to bolster its own defense capabilities, with NATO countries aiming to increase defense spending from 2% to 3% of GDP and enhance military equipment by 30% over the next 5-10 years [7][10] - The European Union has proposed an €800 billion "rearmament plan," with €650 billion coming from member states and €150 billion from a new EU fund [10] Group 3: Military Capability Fragmentation - European NATO countries have a total military strength of around 1.5 million personnel, but much of this is non-combat support, leading to concerns about actual combat readiness [4][6] - The reliance on U.S. military equipment is increasing, with European NATO countries' arms imports rising by 105% from five years ago, 64% of which come from the U.S. [6][12] - European military industries are struggling to meet the demand for advanced military technology, particularly in areas like combat aircraft and naval systems, which are heavily reliant on U.S. technology [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Army is forming new mobile units to address potential conflicts with China, emphasizing the need for flexible ground forces, new missile systems, and innovative combat strategies [1]. Group 1: New Units - The U.S. has established two multi-domain task forces in the Asia-Pacific region, with a third one currently being formed, ultimately aiming to create five such units [3]. - The multi-domain task forces are designed to operate across various domains including land, sea, air, space, cyber, and electromagnetic [3]. - Each multi-domain task force includes units such as long-range artillery battalions, air defense battalions, support battalions, and multi-domain effectiveness battalions [3]. Group 2: New Warfare Strategies - The new mobile units are intended to be deployed in the so-called "first island chain" during wartime, utilizing their equipped medium to long-range missiles to strike ground and maritime targets [5]. - The "HIMARS" rocket artillery can fire guided rockets with a range of approximately 90 kilometers, while its tactical missiles can reach up to 300 kilometers, and precision strike missiles can extend to 500 kilometers, with improved versions potentially reaching 1,000 kilometers [6]. - The "THAAD" system can launch "Standard"-6 missiles with a range of 400-500 kilometers for ground attack, and "Tomahawk" cruise missiles exceeding 1,600 kilometers, while the "Dark Eagle" system can reach up to 2,700 kilometers [6]. Group 3: New Capabilities - The multi-domain task forces can create multiple firepower zones, capable of striking deep land targets in Asia, and improved missiles can also target mobile objectives, including key maritime routes in the "first island chain" [6]. - However, the deployment of these forces may face significant challenges in real combat scenarios, particularly regarding air superiority and the effectiveness of their defense systems against high-intensity aerial attacks [8]. - The formation of multi-domain task forces is seen as a way to expand the Army's roles and prevent marginalization, although the actual participation of these forces in potential conflicts remains uncertain [8].

打造后勤支点 美空军近期宣布，有望在5月前完成天宁岛北部机场的清理工作，为恢复二战时期的跑道做准备。 据悉，过去一年，始终有15至30名美军人员在位于关岛以北约190公里的天宁岛上工作。该机场是继天 宁岛民用机场转军用、帕劳机场跑道大幅修缮后，美军在太平洋地区恢复启用的又一离岛式机场。 美海军和海军陆战队发布未来5年"远征前进基地"计划，正式启动前沿弹药油料补给点组建工作， 以租赁或协议共用方式，将日本、菲律宾、新加坡等国的军用和民用机场港口，打造为战场补给点。美 海军陆战队还在菲律宾、泰国和马来西亚筹建12个战备物资预置点，可保障其在印太地区45天以上的战 斗部署。 美陆军在"太平洋通道"任务框架下，开始在东南亚方向组建陆战装备预置点，用于储备"海马斯"火 箭炮、"斯特赖克"装甲车等。这些预置点可能设置在菲律宾、泰国、新加坡等国。 此外，美国还根据双边协议，为越南援建双方共用的船舶维修中心，帮助澳大利亚升级4处机场和 训练设施，在巴布亚新几内亚等太平洋岛国建设简易机场和港口。评论称，"特朗普2.0时代"，美军在 整体战略回缩态势下，仍加大印太地区军力部署，各军种同步进行后勤布局，意在通过"对抗性后勤"建 设 ...