Core Points - A conflict has arisen within the automotive service industry involving Tianmao Yangche, centered around the legitimacy of executive dismissals and authority over company representation [2][5][8] - The dispute highlights the importance of legal representation and authority in corporate governance, particularly regarding the use of company seals and management rights [9] Group 1: Incident Overview - On May 19, a statement was circulated claiming the dismissal of three executives, citing unauthorized positions and management over Tianmao Yangche [2][5] - The following day, a counter-statement was issued, declaring the previous dismissal announcement invalid and alleging illegal actions by the individuals who made the announcement [5][6] Group 2: Company Structure and Governance - The focus of the conflict is not merely about job positions but rather about who has the legal authority to represent Tianmao Yangche and exercise management rights [9] - The governance structure of the company is complex, with overlapping control and ownership, making the delineation of authority unclear [9] - Jiangsu Kangzhong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. is a key operational entity behind the Tianmao Yangche platform, with significant investments from various financial institutions [9][11] Group 3: Key Individuals - Luo Fangye, Huang Jianliang, and Wu Wangyang are identified as directors of Jiangsu Kangzhong Auto Parts Co., Ltd., while Cai Yongzhi serves as the legal representative of Hangzhou Tianmao Chezhang Technology Co., Ltd. [11]