携程App
Search documents
2026年,多少人期待携程“低调”一些?
3 6 Ke· 2026-01-28 10:01
36氪计算统计,A股旅游链各子板块在2025年前三季度的净利润分别是,酒店15亿、景区26亿、航空运输149亿,合计约190亿。也就是说,携程一家压过 了整个旅游产业链。 过去一年,靠着持续火热的文旅市场,赚得盆满钵满的携程,经历有些曲折。 2025年第三季度,携程净营业收入达到183亿元人民币。其中住宿预订贡献了80亿元收入,同比增长18%,交通票务收入则达到了63亿元;2025年前三季 度累计净利润已达290亿元,毛利率高达80%。 这些数据意味着什么? 争议随之而来。 进入1月,有关携程因涉垄断被调查的消息传得沸沸扬扬。在此之前,与柬埔寨旅游局合作一事(已暂停),让"卸载携程"相关话题阅读量累计超50亿 次。这并非携程首次牵动舆论,回溯2025年,公司就曾先后被郑州、贵州市监约谈。 截至目前,垄断调查尚未有明确结果,但各类预测已纷纷出炉:罚款、整改、更合规……不管结果如何,对于这家赚钱能力一流的行业巨头,不少人都期 待其在2026年能收敛锋芒,更为低调。 2026年,携程"困"不住酒店了 携程被立案调查,云南民宿协会会长在朋友圈里写了一句话:"我们倍感欣慰。" 一时间,不少酒店人也纷纷转载发文。资深酒店 ...
携程踩了哪些“红线”?
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2026-01-14 17:49
Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has initiated an investigation into Ctrip Group for suspected monopolistic behavior, particularly regarding its market dominance and practices such as "choose one" and automatic price adjustments [2][3]. Group 1: Investigation and Complaints - The investigation was prompted by complaints from local regulatory bodies and businesses regarding Ctrip's alleged monopolistic practices [2]. - The Yunnan Province Tourism Homestay Industry Association publicly announced its decision to investigate Ctrip and other online travel agencies (OTAs) for unfair competition practices, including "choose one" clauses and unilateral commission increases [2][3]. - The association has received multiple complaints from its members about Ctrip's practices, which they believe violate market rules and antitrust requirements [3]. Group 2: Evidence and Industry Impact - The Yunnan Province Tourism Homestay Industry Association has been collecting evidence of Ctrip's alleged monopolistic behavior, with nearly 7,000 member hotels and homestays as of January 2026 [4]. - Complaints from businesses indicate that Ctrip's practices may hinder smaller platforms and innovative services from gaining market access, as Ctrip controls over 60% of online traffic for certain hospitality businesses [5]. - Ctrip has made adjustments to its display rules in response to regulatory scrutiny, removing visual distinctions between "gold" and "special" merchant listings [5]. Group 3: Pricing Practices - Ctrip's business managers reportedly inform "gold" and "special" merchants that they must not sell on other platforms, with a pricing strategy that requires Ctrip to offer the lowest price compared to competitors [6]. - The company employs a dynamic pricing algorithm that automatically adjusts merchant prices based on competitor pricing, a practice referred to as "price locking" [6]. Group 4: Market Share and Dominance - According to estimates, Ctrip holds a 56% market share in the core travel market as of the end of 2024, and when including its strategic investment in Tongcheng Travel, the "Ctrip system" commands nearly 70% of the domestic OTA market [7]. - This market dominance significantly exceeds that of competitors such as Meituan (approximately 13%), Fliggy (about 8%), and Douyin (around 3%) [7].
携程踩了哪些“红线”?
经济观察报· 2026-01-14 15:17
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation into Ctrip Group for alleged monopolistic practices, including requiring merchants to choose between platforms and automatic price adjustments, as reported by the National Market Supervision Administration [3][4]. Group 1: Investigation and Complaints - The National Market Supervision Administration has initiated an investigation into Ctrip for suspected abuse of market dominance under the Anti-Monopoly Law [3]. - Complaints from local regulatory bodies and businesses have highlighted Ctrip's alleged practices of requiring merchants to choose one platform ("二选一") and automatic price adjustments [2][4]. - The Yunnan Province Tourism Homestay Industry Association has documented complaints from its members regarding Ctrip's monopolistic behavior, including unfair trading conditions and price manipulation [4][5]. Group 2: Market Position and Impact - Ctrip's market share in the core travel market reached 56% by the end of 2024, and when including its strategic investment in Tongcheng Travel, the "Ctrip system" holds nearly 70% of the domestic OTA market [8]. - The association has noted that Ctrip's practices may hinder smaller and innovative platforms from gaining market access, as over 60% of online traffic for certain merchants is captured by Ctrip [6][7]. - Ctrip has made adjustments to its display rules in response to regulatory scrutiny, removing visual distinctions between different merchant categories on its platform [6].
天下苦携程久矣
虎嗅APP· 2026-01-14 14:02
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant antitrust investigation against Ctrip Group, highlighting the company's monopolistic practices and the resulting consumer dissatisfaction, which has led to a notable decline in its stock price [4][6]. Group 1: Antitrust Investigation - On January 14, 2026, the State Administration for Market Regulation initiated an antitrust investigation against Ctrip for allegedly abusing its market dominance [4]. - The announcement triggered a 6.49% drop in Ctrip's stock price, reflecting widespread consumer support for the investigation due to long-standing grievances against the company [4][6]. - Industry insiders indicate that businesses in the travel sector have been struggling with Ctrip's monopolistic practices, often feeling compelled to pay a "traffic tax" to maintain their customer base [6][7]. Group 2: Market Position and Financial Performance - Ctrip has emerged as one of the top internet companies in China, ranking seventh in market value by 2025, up from fifteenth in 2021 [10]. - The company reported a net profit of 199 billion yuan in Q3 2025, with a net profit margin of 32%, significantly higher than many of its peers [10][11]. - Ctrip controls over 56% of the domestic online travel market, solidifying its position alongside its subsidiary, Qunar, and creating a strong market presence [11][12]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Challenges - Despite Ctrip's dominance, there is a growing resistance from airlines and other businesses attempting to reduce their reliance on OTA platforms, with several airlines launching their own platforms to regain pricing power [13]. - The ongoing antitrust investigation signifies a critical shift in regulatory scrutiny, potentially impacting Ctrip's relationships with its numerous partners in the travel industry [13].
携程被反垄断调查,互联网没有漏网之鱼
Feng Huang Wang· 2026-01-14 11:02
Core Viewpoint - Ctrip has risen from the 15th position in 2021 to the 7th position in 2025 among internet companies, becoming one of the most profitable internet companies in China [1][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Investigation - On January 14, 2026, the State Administration for Market Regulation initiated an antitrust investigation against Ctrip for suspected abuse of market dominance, which has sparked significant reactions from consumers and industry insiders [1][2]. - The investigation has drawn parallels to previous cases involving Alibaba and Meituan, which faced substantial fines of 18.228 billion yuan and 3.442 billion yuan respectively, suggesting that Ctrip may also face similar penalties [1]. - Ctrip's stock price fell by 6.49% on the day of the announcement, reflecting market concerns over the potential impact of the investigation [1]. Group 2: Market Position and Financial Performance - Ctrip has established itself as a dominant player in the online travel market, holding over 56% of the transaction volume in China by the end of 2025, alongside its subsidiary Qunar [6]. - The company reported a net profit of 19.9 billion yuan in the third quarter of 2025, translating to a daily profit of approximately 216 million yuan, with a net profit margin of 32% [5]. - Ctrip's cumulative net profit for the first three quarters of 2025 reached 29 billion yuan, significantly surpassing the combined net profits of various segments in the A-share tourism sector [5]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics and Challenges - Many merchants in the travel industry have expressed frustration with Ctrip's market dominance, often feeling compelled to pay "traffic taxes" to maintain visibility on the platform [2][3]. - Ctrip's commission rates for merchants range from 12% to 15%, with additional promotional costs potentially raising the total to 20%-30%, which has led to significant profit pressure on these businesses [2]. - Despite attempts by new entrants like JD.com to disrupt the market, industry experts believe that Ctrip's established position makes it difficult for competitors to gain significant market share [6][7].
携程与柬埔寨营销合作引担忧,回应称暂停投放!协议内容曝光
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-25 07:31
Core Viewpoint - Ctrip Group signed a marketing cooperation agreement with the Cambodian National Tourism Board, which raised public concerns about travel safety and personal data security, leading some users to uninstall the Ctrip app [1][2] Group 1: Agreement Details - The marketing cooperation agreement was signed on September 1, 2023, and is set to run from September 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026 [1] - The agreement involves Ctrip providing advertising services for the Cambodian National Tourism Board, but it does not include any data cooperation [2] Group 2: Response to Concerns - In response to public concerns regarding user data security, Ctrip emphasized that the cooperation has not yet started and has been paused due to safety alerts issued by the Chinese Embassy in Cambodia [2] - Ctrip has submitted the cooperation agreement and its actual situation for verification by relevant authorities, assuring that there is no risk of user privacy information leakage [2] Group 3: Safety Alerts - The Chinese Embassy in Cambodia has issued multiple safety warnings to Chinese citizens, particularly regarding the border area with Thailand, advising them to enhance safety precautions [2] - A recent incident involved a Chinese citizen being slightly injured due to border conflict, prompting further safety reminders from the embassy [2]