| 离任高级管理人员职务 | 副总经理级高级管理人员 | | --- | --- | | 离任高级管理人员姓名 | 张清华 | | 离任原因 | 工作调整 | | 离任日期 | 2025年9月29日 | | 转任本公司其他工作岗位的说明 | 专注于投资管理工作 | 张清华以擅长做大类资产配置为外界熟知。据wind数据，张清华于2013年12月开始管理第一只基金—— 易方达安心回报A，属于混合债券型二级基金，至今管理时间已近12年，任职回报达266.8%，年化回报 11.7%，在151只同类型基金中排名第一。 前些年，"投而优则仕"成为公募基金行业激励优秀投研人才的一种方式。在2019-2021年那轮上涨行情 中，易方达基金内部提拔了多位明星基金经理为副总经理，其中包括张清华，还有张坤、萧楠、陈皓、 冯波、胡剑等。据wind统计，截至2021年末，上述6人管理规模合计5014.17亿元，占易方达非货币市场 基金规模42.16%。 近年来，市场出现了一股反向潮流，不少投研出身的高管选择主动"减负"，不再兼任管理职务，将更多 时间和精力集中投入到基金管理中。 9月29日，易方达基金公告称，因工作调整，张清华不再担任 ...

Core Viewpoint - The departure of renowned fund manager Zhang Yifei from Anxin Fund has raised concerns among investors, as he managed over 300 billion yuan in assets, accounting for more than one-third of the company's total fund size, and was known for his emphasis on long-term stable returns and strict risk control [2][5]. Group 1: Zhang Yifei's Background and Performance - Zhang Yifei joined Anxin Fund in September 2012 and became a public fund manager in March 2014, later promoted to Deputy General Manager in May 2023, but resigned from this position within a year [2]. - His public equity products achieved a total return of 75.9% and an annualized return of 5.72%, significantly outperforming the CSI 300 index's annualized return of 2.35% during the same period [3]. - Zhang managed 18 funds, all of which maintained positive returns, with Anxin Stable Growth being the longest-held fund, achieving ten consecutive years of positive returns [3][5]. Group 2: Impact of Departure on Investors - Investors are uncertain about whether to hold or redeem their investments following Zhang's departure, with some expressing a desire to increase their investments while others are hesitant [6][7]. - The change in fund management has led to discussions among investors, with some indicating they would leave if the new management does not perform well [8][7]. Group 3: Industry Trends - The fund industry is shifting towards a platform-based investment research model, reducing reliance on individual star managers, as highlighted by recent regulatory guidance [10]. - Numerous funds have announced the addition of multiple fund managers to their teams, indicating a trend towards collaborative management structures [10].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is experiencing a significant wave of fund manager changes, driven by various factors including market conditions, industry competition, incentive mechanisms, the trend of "de-starring," and personal career planning [2][12]. Group 1: Fund Manager Changes - As of June 24, nearly 200 public fund products have announced fund manager changes this month, indicating a trend of frequent adjustments within the industry [2][5]. - The changes in fund managers can be categorized into three main types: new appointments, simultaneous appointments and dismissals, and departures [6][10]. - The increase in fund manager dismissals is attributed to work needs and performance evaluations, with companies adjusting their fund manager assignments based on product style and performance benchmarks [9][11]. Group 2: Industry Changes - The public fund industry is gradually moving away from reliance on "star fund managers" and is transitioning towards a team-based and institutionalized approach [14]. - Talent mobility within the industry is accelerating, with competition shifting from mere salary comparisons to diverse dimensions such as equity incentives and differentiated assessments [14]. - The industry is evolving from extensive growth to high-quality development, emphasizing long-term performance, risk management, and effective communication with investors [14]. Group 3: Team Management Model - The implementation of a team management model for fund managers is expected to increase, as highlighted in the new regulations aimed at enhancing core investment research capabilities [15]. - The team management model allows for resource integration and improved investment quality, while also posing challenges such as decision-making conflicts and coordination costs [16][17]. - This model reduces dependency on individual fund managers and enhances the stability of performance, but it requires careful management to avoid potential pitfalls [17].