北京商报讯（记者 宋亦桐）9月17日，北京金融监管局发文表示，在加强"校园贷"监管，明令禁止小额 贷款公司向大学生发放互联网消费贷款的背景下，仍有不法网贷机构暗中将"黑手"伸向校园，北京金融 监管局提醒广大学生及家长：警惕非法"校园贷"，辨别非法外衣，共同保护学生群体茁壮成长。 非法"校园贷"主要有四大类套路，具体来看，套路一：巧立名目勿轻信。不法网贷机构通过电商平台、 社交平台甚至本地生活服务平台引流，给非法"校园贷"披上"培训贷""美容贷""回租贷""刷单贷""求职 贷"等形式多样的外衣，极具迷惑性。 套路二：阴阳合同擦亮眼。不法网贷机构利用部分学生社会经验不足等弱点，有的签订合同的书面金额 远高于学生实际到手金额，有的诱骗学生在空白合同上签字，之后随意填写不利于学生的条款。 套路三：花样引诱莫贪心。不法网贷机构宣称仅凭身份证、学生证即可办理贷款，以"无抵押、高额 度、低利率"为噱头，故意降低门槛、夸大好处，甚至宣称"三分钟到账"，通过诱导性营销，诱导学生 过度消费、超前消费、盲目借贷。部分学生因无力偿还债务而遭受非法催收，引发严重后果。 套路四：以贷养贷要止步。大学生群体一旦出现贷款逾期，不法分子往往采 ...

Core Viewpoint - Qudian (NYSE: QD) reported a significant decline in revenue for Q2 2025, with operating income dropping to 3.49 million yuan, a 93.5% year-over-year decrease, while net profit attributable to shareholders surged to 311.8 million yuan, a 213% increase year-over-year [2] Revenue Performance - The revenue of 3.49 million yuan in Q2 2025 represents a drastic decline from 53.3 million yuan in the same period last year [2] - The company attributed the revenue drop to intensified industry competition, leading to a substantial decrease in sales from its last-mile delivery business, which the company has decided to gradually shut down [2] Business Transformation - Qudian has transitioned from a company originally focused on campus loans to a "cash shell" with no core business, following multiple rounds of transformation including ventures into car financing, prepared food, and cross-border e-commerce [2] - The company currently holds over 5.6 billion yuan in cash reserves, including 4.8 billion yuan in cash and cash equivalents and approximately 800 million yuan in restricted cash [2] Profitability Sources - Despite the near-zero revenue from its main business, Qudian achieved significant profit growth due to strong cash flow, with net interest and investment income reaching several hundred million yuan, becoming the primary source of net profit [2] Investment Strategy - Qudian appears to be attempting to replicate Warren Buffett's early "cigar butt" investment strategy by leveraging its substantial cash reserves for investments and buybacks to return value to shareholders [2] - The sustainability of this profit model remains uncertain in the absence of a core business to support it [2]

Core Viewpoint - The resurgence of campus loans has led to significant financial distress among university students, with many falling into debt traps due to high-interest loans and aggressive collection practices [1][4][9]. Group 1: Loan Practices and Impact - Many students are lured into taking loans through targeted marketing on e-commerce and social platforms, often resulting in annual interest rates exceeding 24% [4][9]. - A significant number of students report being overwhelmed by relentless collection calls, which severely disrupts their academic and personal lives [3][4]. - The phenomenon of students signing non-student declarations to obtain loans highlights the challenges in accurately identifying borrowers [7][8]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment - Despite regulations prohibiting loans to students, some lending institutions continue to target this demographic, often using loopholes to bypass restrictions [6][9]. - Regulatory bodies have issued multiple notifications to prevent lending to students, emphasizing the need for financial institutions to adhere to risk management protocols [4][10]. Group 3: Risk and Compliance Issues - The lending practices of some institutions pose both compliance and ethical risks, particularly for students without stable income sources, leading to potential over-borrowing [5][9]. - Many lending platforms lack effective identity verification processes, making it difficult to prevent loans to students [10][11]. - The drive for profit in the student loan market has led to some institutions engaging in questionable practices, including hidden fees and high-interest rates [9][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Financial institutions are encouraged to enhance identity verification technologies and implement stricter controls on lending practices to mitigate risks associated with student loans [10][11]. - There is a call for better management of partnerships with third-party platforms to ensure compliance with regulations and protect vulnerable student borrowers [10][11].