Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of intelligent driving technology in the automotive industry, highlighting the cautious approach of companies in promoting their capabilities, particularly in the context of L4-level automated parking systems. It emphasizes the need for clear definitions and responsibilities regarding the technology's safety and insurance coverage [2][5][27]. Group 1: Industry Developments - Following the government's crackdown on exaggerated claims in intelligent driving, many companies have shifted their marketing from "intelligent driving" to "assisted driving" [2][4]. - A domestic car manufacturer claims to be the first globally to achieve L4-level-like intelligent parking, but it has been careful to use the term "comparable" and limits the functionality to parking scenarios [5][6]. - The article notes that while L4-level parking is being discussed, true L4 capabilities require no driver involvement, which is not the case with the current offerings [12][17]. Group 2: Technology and Safety - The SAE International defines the levels of automated parking from L0 to L5, with L4 requiring no driver participation and functioning in designated areas [15][16]. - Real-world examples of L4-level parking include the automated valet parking system tested at Shenzhen Airport, showcasing the potential for fully autonomous parking solutions [18][20]. - The success rate of intelligent parking is higher than that of urban intelligent assisted driving, with data showing over 1.02 billion automated parking instances in 2024 [23]. Group 3: Insurance and Liability - The emergence of "intelligent driving insurance" aims to boost consumer confidence in using intelligent driving features, with various companies offering coverage for smart parking and assisted driving scenarios [28][30][31]. - There is a distinction between genuine insurance products and those that are more like risk commitments or value-added services, raising questions about the true nature of "intelligent driving insurance" [33][34]. - Concerns are raised about the potential for companies to use their dual role as both sellers and adjudicators of insurance to avoid liability in case of accidents [35].