拔尖创新人才的培养成长，与平台和环境密切相关。记者注意到，与长期以来以竞赛选拔为主导的"关 门培养"模式不同，近年来越来越多的中学、高校开始设立新型实验班。这些实验班面向更多学子敞开 大门，以综合素质培养为落脚点实施个性化育人，为拔尖创新人才成长发展开辟了新空间。 这些实验班，不少以学术大师的名字命名，先贤们的为学为人，给学生带来了潜移默化的滋养。此类实 验班在培养方式、育人举措上有何特色，为拔尖创新人才的塑造积累了哪些经验？记者进行了采访。 叶企孙实验班 现场聆听院士专家为学生们"量身打造"的讲座；在风洞实验室里感受呼啸的气流；拧紧一颗颗螺丝，调 试代码、操控车辆行动……实验班学生蔡佳润仍然记得参加"北航科学营"时亲手尝试组装火星车的情 景，"当它成功识别障碍并灵活转身的那一刻，那种从理论到实践的成就感，让我热血沸腾。还有无人 机课程，让我体验了创造的快乐，从组装机身到调试飞控，直到看着它稳稳升空，似乎心也随着它一起 翱翔。" "立足校内，拓展校外，联合大学，深入社会"是实验班的另一大亮点。记者了解到，叶企孙实验班聘请 学科专家、特级教师对学生进行学科引领，高一高二重在夯实基础拓宽视野，高三突出综合运用提升 ...

Core Viewpoint - NASA is set to reduce its workforce by approximately 3,870 employees, nearly 20% of its total staff of 18,000, as part of a voluntary resignation program initiated under the Trump administration's plan to cut federal government employment [1][9]. Historical Context - NASA was established in 1958 with around 8,000 employees, reflecting the U.S. government's core research capabilities in aviation [4]. - The peak employment of NASA reached 34,000 during the Apollo program era in the 1960s and 70s, driven by the U.S.-Soviet space competition [4][12]. - Following the Apollo program's conclusion in 1972, NASA's workforce began to decline, dropping to 22,000 by 1982 due to budget constraints [4][5]. Budget Cuts and Workforce Reduction - The Clinton administration in the 1990s initiated significant budget cuts, leading to a reduction in NASA's workforce to about 17,500 by 2000 [7][8]. - The Trump administration's proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 includes a drastic cut to NASA's budget from $24.8 billion in 2025 to $18.8 billion, marking a 24% reduction, the largest in NASA's history [9][13]. - This budget cut has resulted in the cancellation or adjustment of several key projects, including the Mars Sample Return mission and the Gateway lunar project [9][10]. Future Outlook - NASA's current budget proposal focuses on two main objectives: returning to the Moon and achieving the first crewed landing on Mars, although progress has been significantly delayed [10]. - The historical fluctuations in NASA's employee numbers highlight the impact of international competition, societal interest, and government budget adjustments on its operations [11][12]. - The current fiscal pressures on the U.S. government make it unlikely for NASA to see a restoration of its budget in the near future, potentially leading to the lowest staffing levels since 1961 [15].