停业决定的背后，是多位消费者的集体投诉。有消费者反映，在店内用餐后出现了恶心头晕、上吐下泻等症状。一位家长向媒体透露，她与孩子在11月1日 食用番茄面、酸辣粉与炸鸡后，孩子出现腹痛，她本人也随后发生恶心、头晕、呕吐和腹泻。另一位同一天用餐的顾客也表示次日出现了腹泻。由于相似状 况的投诉接连出现，最终引发了卫生部门的介入检查。 公开资料显示，麻六记酸辣粉洛杉矶店于10月28日正式开业，是麻六记品牌线下门店的首次出海尝试。此前，其线上电商产品已销往海外。 值得注意的是，这并非麻六记近期首次遭遇食品安全争议。今年7月，麻六记酸辣粉曾被曝出产品发霉问题。 业内分析认为，国内餐饮品牌即使国内做得不错，进入国外市场，管理体系、供应链体系也不能直接照搬，有些甚至可能需要重新搭建。麻六记的海外首秀 如何收场，其全球扩张计划是否会因此调整，市场正拭目以待。 由汪小菲创立的餐饮品牌麻六记，其位于美国洛杉矶的海外线下首店，在开业仅约半个月后，因食品安全问题被当地卫生部门勒令停业。 据报道，根据美国洛杉矶公共卫生局的公告，该局在11月5日对麻六记酸辣粉餐厅进行调查后，发现其存在多项违反卫生与安全法规的行为。其中，关键问 题之一是一个 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly opened restaurant "Ma Liu Ji Spicy Noodles" in Los Angeles, founded by Wang Xiaofei, has faced multiple consumer complaints regarding food safety issues, leading to reports of food poisoning symptoms among patrons [1][2][4]. Group 1: Consumer Complaints - Multiple consumers reported experiencing symptoms of vomiting and diarrhea after dining at the restaurant shortly after its opening on October 28 [2][4]. - One consumer, Ms. Chen, and her son experienced severe gastrointestinal issues after dining on November 1, leading her to seek emergency medical attention [4]. - Another consumer, Ms. Li, also reported similar symptoms after dining on the same day, prompting her to file a complaint with the Los Angeles Public Safety Bureau [4]. Group 2: Restaurant Response - The restaurant's official account acknowledged the complaints and expressed regret, offering refunds to customers who dined between November 1 and November 3 [5]. - The restaurant stated that inspections revealed temperature fluctuations in their refrigeration equipment, which have since been addressed to ensure compliance with health standards [5]. - The establishment is reportedly working on improving food storage and service processes to enhance dining quality [5]. Group 3: Health Department Involvement - The Los Angeles Public Health Department is actively investigating the complaints but has not disclosed specific details regarding the situation [6]. - As of November 11, some consumers reported receiving refunds, while others indicated they had not yet communicated with the restaurant regarding their complaints [7].