综合自：央视新闻、新华社 根据新规，新加坡中学生不仅在上课期间不得使用智能手机和智能手表，包括课间休息、课外活动等其他在校 时间，都需要将设备存放于指定区域内，实现校园"无手机化"。只有在特殊情况下，经校方批准才可使用。 除了物理隔绝手机干扰，从2026年1月起，新加坡中学生个人学习设备中的管理应用程序设置将统一调整，系 统自动关闭时间从目前的晚上11时提前至10时30分，确保学生有足够时间在睡前远离屏幕，获得更高质量的睡 眠。 效仿澳大利亚？法国酝酿禁止15岁以下群体使用社交媒体 为应对社交媒体对儿童的不良影响，法国打算从2026年9月起禁止15岁以下群体使用社交媒体。法国《世界 报》等媒体报道，法国政府将在1月初提交草案供立法机构审议。 法国总统马克龙多次说，社交媒体是导致青少年群体暴力行为增多的原因之一，并暗示法国将效仿澳大利亚， 出台社交媒体禁令。 马克龙没有在新年讲话中提及这一立法动向，但承诺将"保护儿童和青少年远离社交媒体和屏幕"。 澳大利亚针对16岁以下人群的社交媒体禁令2025年12月10日正式生效，10个主要社交媒体平台需阻止这一年龄 段用户在其平台拥有账户，未配合的平台将面临至多4950万 ...

澳大利亚针对16岁以下人群的社交媒体禁令已于12月10日正式生效。这是全球首例通过立法实施社交媒体最低年龄限制的举措。需要执行禁令 的平台目前共有10家，包括脸书、优兔、X等。未予配合的企业将面临最高4950万澳元（约合2.3亿元人民币）罚款。 11月5日，在澳大利亚悉尼，人们从市政厅门口走过。新华社记者马平摄 尽管社交媒体平台公司抵触该禁令，但民意却持续推高了议题的热度，推动政府和议会加速审议法案。民调机构YouGov 当年8月实施的民调 显示，澳大利亚61%的受访者支持限制16岁以下青少年使用社交媒体。4个月后这一比例增加至77%。两个月后YouGov/ABC News民调再度确 认：超60%的跨党派民众支持限制17岁以下人群使用社交媒体。压力之下，执政党迅速将"禁止未成年人使用社交媒体"从竞选口号转化为立法 行动。 围绕禁令本身存在争议 回溯其立法过程，各方围绕禁令的可行性和有效性存在诸多争议。比如，关于年龄验证问题，禁令实施后，未成年人如果通过借用家长身份信 息、购买虚假账号等方式绕过验证，禁令的效力必定大打折扣。 澳大利亚的做法在国际上引发广泛关注，丹麦、马来西亚、巴西、印度尼西亚和新西兰等国也在考 ...

修正案规定，相关部门主要根据三个标准来评估哪些平台需要采取上述措施：该服务的唯一目的或重要 目的是使两个或更多终端用户进行在线社交互动；该服务允许终端用户链接到部分或全部其他终端用户 或与之进行交互活动；该服务允许终端用户在其平台发布内容。 自修正案通过以来，澳大利亚政府一直根据具体情况动态调整需要执行禁令的平台名单。目前该名单包 括脸书（Facebook）、优兔(Youtube)、TikTok、X（原推特）、照片墙（Instagram）和红迪等10个在线 平台。 澳大利亚政府电子安全机构的研究发现，有96%的10岁至15岁青少年使用社交媒体，其中70%的人接触 过有害内容。澳政府强调，最低年龄限制措施可以减少社交媒体带来的负面影响。 （文章来源：新华社） 总部位于美国的在线平台红迪12日就澳大利亚针对16岁以下人群的社交媒体禁令向澳高等法院提起诉 讼，要求法院宣布相关法律无效，或者宣布该禁令不适用于该平台。 红迪在法律文书中说，红迪是公共论坛，并非主要供用户在线社交互动的平台。红迪还表示，如果16岁 以下用户拥有其账号，平台的设置限制就会阻止其访问可能有害的特定类型内容。 据澳大利亚广播公司报道，澳政府发言 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Australian Parliament's passage of the "2024 Cybersecurity (Minimum Age for Social Media) Amendment" has sparked global attention, prohibiting minors under 16 from using mainstream social media platforms, effective December 10. This ban raises concerns about its implications and effectiveness, revealing several issues with a one-size-fits-all approach [1][9]. Group 1: Children's Rights and Participation - The ban overlooks children's media rights and fails to respect their voices, as the execution of the social media ban lacks a solid foundation. In the digital age, access and participation rights for children are essential [1][2][3]. - The Australian government's approach deviates from fundamental principles by not involving minors in the policy-making process, raising questions about potential violations of children's basic rights [3]. Group 2: Political Motivations and Governance - The legislation appears driven by short-term electoral motives, reflecting a political struggle to secure parental votes, with 77% of parents supporting the ban. The rapid progression from proposal to approval indicates a lack of long-term governance strategy [4]. - The law's swift passage, with minimal public feedback opportunities, has led to skepticism from social media platforms regarding the underlying motives and the adequacy of scientific justification [4][5]. Group 3: Implementation Challenges - The ban simplifies complex issues of digital literacy and content governance into a physical isolation policy, revealing governmental inertia and a lack of nuanced strategies [5][6]. - The practical implementation of the ban faces significant challenges, including age verification difficulties and potential conflicts between parents and children, which may exacerbate existing issues rather than resolve them [6][7]. Group 4: Digital Market Context - Australia's digital market is underdeveloped, with the country ranking low in global internet quality and digital competitiveness. This context raises concerns about the feasibility and relevance of the social media ban [8][9]. - The government has allocated AUD 6.5 million to test age verification technologies, but the effectiveness of these systems remains uncertain, complicating the ban's implementation [8]. Group 5: Global Perspectives and Future Directions - The global trend in social media governance is shifting from rigid restrictions to more flexible guidance, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that protects minors while allowing for their development [10]. - A more forward-looking strategy would focus on enhancing digital literacy and critical thinking among minors, rather than isolating them from digital environments, fostering a generation of informed digital citizens [10].

上述禁令涉及的10个社交媒体平台包括脸书、优兔、照片墙和澳大利亚本土流媒体平台Kick等。澳 政府表示，将根据实际情况动态调整需执行禁令的平台名单。 社交媒体X平台10日承诺遵守禁令，是10家平台中最后一个宣布将切断未成年用户访问的企业。X 在官网上发文称，"这并非我们的选择，而是澳大利亚法律的要求"，并强调X会自动下线不符合年龄要 求的用户。 据路透社报道，相关平台企业已告知澳政府，将通过多种方式核验用户年龄，包括基于用户行为、 依托自拍照进行年龄估算，以及通过上传身份证件、绑定银行账户信息等方式进行身份核验。 澳大利亚总理阿尔巴尼斯10日说，对许多家庭而言这是"值得骄傲的一天"，印证了政策制定者有能 力遏制那些已超越传统防护措施范畴的网络危害。 他9日在视频讲话中鼓励学生们充分利用即将到来的假期，不要沉迷手机。"开始一项新运动，学习 一种新乐器，或者读完书架上搁置已久的书。重要的是，多和你的朋友及家人面对面地度过一段好时 光。" 9月7日，在澳大利亚首都堪培拉，孩子们参加明月节活动。新华社发（储晨摄） 新华社北京12月10日电 澳大利亚10日起正式实施针对16岁以下人群的社交媒体禁令，是全球首例 通过立法 ...

Group 1: Core Perspective - Australia has implemented a social media ban for individuals under 16 years old, effective December 10, 2023, to protect youth from harmful content and excessive screen time [1][2] Group 2: Reasons for Implementation - The Australian Parliament passed the "2024 Cyber Security (Social Media Minimum Age) Amendment" in November 2022, mandating social media platforms to take reasonable measures to prevent under-16s from having accounts, with non-compliance penalties up to AUD 49.5 million (approximately CNY 232 million) [1] - Research indicates that 96% of 10 to 15-year-olds use social media, with 70% having encountered harmful content, prompting the government to act [1] Group 3: Execution of the Ban - Multiple social media platforms have committed to comply with the new regulations, offering options for under-16 users to deactivate or delete their accounts [3] - Platforms like Meta have begun closing youth accounts, while TikTok plans to use a combination of technology and manual review to identify non-compliant accounts [4] Group 4: Public Opinion - A recent poll shows high overall support for the ban among Australians at 73%, with 84% of teachers and 75% of parents in favor [5] - Experts believe the ban could alleviate peer pressure and online stress, thus protecting youth mental health [5] Group 5: Concerns and Criticism - Some experts worry that the ban may push youth to unregulated online spaces, suggesting that digital literacy education and parental guidance could be more effective than age restrictions [6] - Concerns have been raised regarding the large-scale data collection required for age verification, especially in light of past data breaches in Australia [6]

Group 1 - The Australian government will implement a ban on social media usage for individuals under the age of 16 starting December 10 [1] - This legislation aims to protect children from harmful content on social media platforms [1] - Social media companies that fail to prevent underage users from accessing their platforms could face fines of up to 50 million AUD (approximately 232 million CNY) [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Malaysian government plans to implement age restrictions on social media usage, prohibiting individuals under 16 from creating accounts starting next year to protect youth from online bullying and scams [1][3]. Group 1: Government Actions - The Malaysian Minister of Communications, Fahmi Fadzil, announced that the government is studying practices from countries like Australia to enforce these restrictions [1]. - The government aims to ensure a safe internet environment by encouraging responsibility from the government, regulatory bodies, and families [1]. Group 2: Public Support - A survey by Ipsos Group indicated that over 70% of respondents in Malaysia support restrictions on children's use of social media [2]. Group 3: International Context - Malaysia has been increasing its regulation of social media platforms in response to rising online crime [3]. - Australia has enacted a law prohibiting minors under 16 from using most social media platforms, with penalties for non-compliance reaching up to AUD 50 million (approximately CNY 229 million) [3]. - Other countries, including Germany, France, the Netherlands, and New Zealand, have also implemented measures to limit youth access to social media [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Malaysian government plans to implement age restrictions on social media users, prohibiting individuals under 16 from using these platforms starting next year to protect youth from online bullying and fraud [1][3]. Group 1: Government Actions - The Malaysian Minister of Communications, Fahmi Fadzil, announced that the government is studying practices from countries like Australia to implement these restrictions [1][3]. - The new regulations will prevent individuals under 16 from creating accounts on social media platforms [1]. Group 2: Public Support and Trends - A survey by Ipsos Group indicated that over 70% of respondents in Malaysia support restrictions on children's use of social media [3]. - Malaysia has been increasing its regulation of social media platforms in response to the rising incidence of cybercrime [3]. Group 3: International Context - Australia passed a law in November last year that prohibits minors under 16 from using most social media platforms, with penalties for non-compliance reaching up to AUD 50 million (approximately 229 million RMB) [3]. - Other countries such as Germany, France, the Netherlands, and New Zealand have also taken measures to limit youth access to social media [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of utilizing modern information technology to enhance the active use of red culture resources in higher education ideological and political education [1] - Virtual Reality (VR) technology is highlighted as a transformative tool that can create immersive learning experiences, allowing students to engage with historical events and figures in a three-dimensional environment [1] - The combination of VR and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies expands educational scenarios, enabling students to experience historical events on campus, thus deepening their understanding of red culture [1] Group 2 - Online courses are identified as a flexible and efficient platform for the active use of red culture resources, allowing for the development of a diverse online ideological and political education curriculum [2] - The integration of high-quality online course resources from across the country can create a comprehensive educational material library, addressing the challenges faced by institutions in resource-scarce areas [2] - Digital platforms facilitate the breaking of traditional classroom limitations, providing students with a variety of learning paths and resources related to red culture [2] Group 3 - Social media platforms are recognized as significant channels for disseminating red culture resources, offering a broad space for engagement in ideological and political education [3] - Educators can create diverse and engaging content on platforms like Weibo, WeChat, Douyin, and Xiaohongshu to attract the attention of university students [3] - Encouraging student participation in content creation fosters peer engagement and enhances students' understanding and appreciation of red culture [3]