Core Viewpoint - Australia has implemented the world's first ban on social media usage for individuals under 16 years old, requiring platforms to take reasonable measures to prevent registration and usage by this age group [3][7]. Regulatory Measures - The new law mandates that platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and others must block or remove accounts held by users aged 13 to 15, with an estimated 440,000 Snapchat accounts, 150,000 Facebook accounts, and 350,000 Photo Wall accounts needing to be banned [5][6]. - Platforms are not given a specific method for age verification but must use multiple techniques, including identity verification, facial recognition, and user behavior analysis [6]. Implementation Challenges - Experts suggest that while the law is significant, it may face challenges in execution, particularly regarding identity verification and privacy concerns [3][6]. - There are reports of children circumventing the ban using makeup or other methods, indicating potential flaws in the age verification system [7]. International Reactions - Australia's move has garnered international attention, with countries like Denmark, Norway, France, Spain, Malaysia, and New Zealand considering similar measures [9][10]. - The European Parliament has also proposed a non-binding resolution advocating for a minimum age of 16 for social media access, with parental consent required for younger users [10].

Core Viewpoint - Australia has implemented the world's first social media usage ban for users under 16 years old, requiring platforms to take reasonable measures to prevent registration and remove existing accounts of underage users [1][3] Group 1: Regulatory Measures - The new law mandates that platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and others must prevent users under 16 from creating new accounts and must remove existing accounts, with fines up to AUD 49.5 million (approximately USD 32 million) for non-compliance [1] - Approximately 440,000 Snapchat accounts, 150,000 Facebook accounts, and 350,000 Photo Wall accounts held by users aged 13 to 15 are targeted for removal [3] - The government has not specified the age verification methods, allowing for various techniques such as facial recognition and user behavior analysis [3] Group 2: Implementation Challenges - Experts suggest that the implementation of the law may face significant challenges, including identity verification, privacy protection, and operational costs for platforms [1] - Some children have reportedly found ways to bypass the age restrictions, indicating potential flaws in the age verification system [4] - The Prime Minister acknowledged that the system may not operate perfectly from the start, comparing it to underage drinking laws [4] Group 3: International Implications - Australia's actions have garnered international attention, with countries like Denmark, Norway, and Malaysia considering similar measures [5] - The Malaysian government has announced plans to follow Australia's lead, while New Zealand is also monitoring the situation for potential policy development [5] - The European Parliament has proposed a non-binding resolution advocating for a minimum age of 16 for social media access, with parental consent required for younger users [5]

Core Viewpoint - Australia has officially implemented a ban on social media accounts for individuals under the age of 16, becoming the first country to enforce such a regulation, which requires platforms to identify and disable accounts of users below this age [1][3]. Summary by Sections Implementation of the Ban - The ban mandates that technology companies behind social media platforms must identify and remove accounts of users under 16, with penalties of up to 49.5 million AUD (approximately 2.32 billion RMB) for non-compliance [1]. - Major platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have indicated their intention to comply with the law, while some have already begun suspending accounts prior to the law's enactment [1][2]. Reporting Requirements - Companies are required to report the number of underage accounts on their platforms, both before and after the ban, with monthly updates for the following six months [1]. Age Verification Concerns - The government has stated that platforms have the discretion to determine age verification methods, but presenting an ID cannot be the sole method [3]. - Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has not disclosed its age verification plans, while TikTok plans to use a combination of technology and manual review for age verification [3]. Global Implications - The ban has attracted international attention, with countries like Denmark, New Zealand, and Malaysia considering similar measures, positioning Australia as a test case for age restrictions on social media [3]. Public Reaction - The ban has received support from parents and child advocacy groups but has faced criticism from tech companies and free speech advocates [4]. - Following the announcement, X (formerly Twitter) became the last major platform to comply with the ban, stating it is a legal requirement [4]. Impact on Users - Some young users have expressed feelings of isolation due to the ban, particularly those from marginalized communities who rely on social media for connection and support [5]. - Critics argue that the ban may push children towards less regulated areas of the internet, potentially increasing risks [5].

Group 1: Core Perspective - Australia has implemented a social media ban for individuals under 16 years old, effective December 10, 2023, to protect youth from harmful content and excessive screen time [1][2] Group 2: Reasons for Implementation - The Australian Parliament passed the "2024 Cyber Security (Social Media Minimum Age) Amendment" in November 2022, mandating social media platforms to take reasonable measures to prevent under-16s from having accounts, with non-compliance penalties up to AUD 49.5 million (approximately CNY 232 million) [1] - Research indicates that 96% of 10 to 15-year-olds use social media, with 70% having encountered harmful content, prompting the government to act [1] Group 3: Execution of the Ban - Multiple social media platforms have committed to comply with the new regulations, offering options for under-16 users to deactivate or delete their accounts [3] - Platforms like Meta have begun closing youth accounts, while TikTok plans to use a combination of technology and manual review to identify non-compliant accounts [4] Group 4: Public Opinion - A recent poll shows high overall support for the ban among Australians at 73%, with 84% of teachers and 75% of parents in favor [5] - Experts believe the ban could alleviate peer pressure and online stress, thus protecting youth mental health [5] Group 5: Concerns and Criticism - Some experts worry that the ban may push youth to unregulated online spaces, suggesting that digital literacy education and parental guidance could be more effective than age restrictions [6] - Concerns have been raised regarding the large-scale data collection required for age verification, especially in light of past data breaches in Australia [6]

特别声明：以上文章内容仅代表作者本人观点，不代表新浪网观点或立场。如有关于作品内容、版权或其它问 题请于作品发表后的30日内与新浪网联系。 新华社悉尼12月10日电（记者梁有昶 齐紫剑）澳大利亚针对16岁以下人群的社交媒体禁令10日正式生 效，目前共有10个主要社交媒体平台需要阻止该年龄段用户在其平台拥有账户。这是世界上第一例通过 立法实施此类社交媒体年龄限制的举措。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Australia is set to implement a social media ban for users under 16 years old starting December 10, with non-compliant companies facing fines up to 50 million AUD (approximately 232 million RMB) [1] Group 1: Legislative Background - The ban is described as the world's first of its kind aimed at protecting children from harmful content on social media [1] - The legislation was passed by the Australian Federal Parliament in November of the previous year [1] - Mia Bannister, a single mother who lost her son to suicide, was a key advocate for this legislation, citing social media bullying as a contributing factor to her son's condition [2] Group 2: Implementation and Compliance - The law allows a one-year period for platforms to develop measures to enforce the age restriction [3] - Parents of underage users will not face penalties; the responsibility lies with social media companies to prevent access by users under 16 [3] - Companies must implement "reasonable measures" for age verification, which may include biometric data and online behavior analysis, rather than relying solely on government-issued IDs [3] Group 3: Challenges and Concerns - Experts highlight challenges in accurately verifying ages, particularly for users aged 15 to 17, which may lead to misclassification and service disruptions [4][5] - Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has already begun to enforce the ban by halting new account registrations for users under 16 and revoking access for existing accounts [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Malaysian government plans to implement age restrictions on social media usage, prohibiting individuals under 16 from creating accounts starting next year to protect youth from online bullying and scams [4][8]. Group 1: Government Actions - The Malaysian Minister of Communications, Fahmi Fadzil, announced the government's intention to study practices from countries like Australia to ensure a safer internet environment [3][4]. - A survey by Ipsos Malaysia revealed that over 70% of respondents support restrictions on children's social media use, and more than 50% favor banning smartphones in schools [7]. Group 2: International Context - Australia has already enacted similar measures, passing the Cyber Security Amendment in 2024, which prohibits minors under 16 from using most social media platforms, with fines up to AUD 50 million for non-compliance [8]. - Meta has announced it will ban users under 16 from accessing its platforms in Australia by December 10, marking a significant step in global social media regulation [10]. - New Zealand is also considering similar legislation, proposing fines for social media companies that fail to verify users' ages [12]. Group 3: Domestic Calls for Action - There are calls within China to adopt similar measures to protect minors from harmful online content and gaming addiction, suggesting a ban on social media for those under 16 [13][16]. - Current measures in China, such as requiring platforms to establish minor modes, have been deemed insufficient due to the lack of mandatory age verification [16].

Group 1 - The Australian government has added the live streaming platform Twitch to the list of social media platforms banned for users under 16 years old, effective December 10 [1][2] - The eSafety Commissioner stated that Twitch is classified as a "social media platform with age restrictions" due to its primary purpose of encouraging user interaction through live streaming and social engagement [1] - A spokesperson for Twitch confirmed that accounts for users under 16 will be prohibited starting January 9, 2024 [1] Group 2 - The eSafety Commissioner indicated that the list of banned social media platforms for users under 16 may change with technological advancements [2] - The Social Media Minimum Age legislation, passed by the Australian Parliament in November 2024, is the first of its kind globally and will officially take effect on December 10, 2023 [2] - Other platforms like Facebook, X, and YouTube have also been included in the ban, with YouTube initially receiving an exemption [2]

Group 1 - The proposed legislation in New Zealand aims to ban social media use for individuals under 16 years old, requiring digital platforms to verify user age before account creation, with fines up to 2 million NZD (approximately 864,000 RMB) for non-compliance [1] - The initiative is modeled after a similar law passed in Australia, which is considered one of the strictest measures against popular social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram [2] - There is significant public support for the legislation, with over two-thirds of New Zealanders favoring restrictions on social media access for those under 16 [4] Group 2 - The proposal has faced strong opposition from tech giants, who describe the laws as "hasty," "vague," and "problematic" [3] - The bill is being drafted by the National Party, which is the largest member of the ruling coalition, and requires support from its coalition partners to pass [4] - The opposition Labour Party leader has expressed an open attitude towards the proposal, indicating a need for national dialogue on the issue [4]

本期内容转载自公众号「十分之一信箱」 Hi 亲爱的朋友！ 「声动活泼」和「十分之一」联合为青少年制作的音频节目「Knock Knock 世界」已经更新到第 13 期啦。昨 天上线的新一期，是听众 aiden 投稿的选题：「为什么小学生不能有手机？」我们不敢说节目里给出了唯一的 答案，但确实和大家一起认真讨论了「为什么大人们会对小孩用手机感到担忧」这个话题。 一起来看看，本周敲开的三扇大门分别通向哪里吧。 03 在缅甸,不仅有自然灾害,还有人为的苦难 ——缅甸为何成为亚太地区最贫困的国 家?又为何在地震当天,部分受灾地区依然 遭受轰炸? 04 2021 年缅甸发生军事政变以来,媒体、互 联网设施、社交媒体全部被政府严格控制。 国际媒体也被拒绝进入缅甸。 05 与缅甸地震几乎无人问津形成对比,我们 该如何获取地震相关信息?这些信息又能 带来哪些帮助? 2008 年,汶川大地震发生后,仅《南方都 06 市报》就持续报道了整整一个月,总共推出 了 1027 个版面。一个地震，真的需要这么 多内容去记录和讲述吗? 07 缅甸军政府以「没有精力照顾」为由,拒绝国 际媒体入境报道。这样的理由真的合理吗? 全球最大的飞机制造 ...