IT之家 10 月 30 日消息，埃隆・马斯克多次批评维基百科，并建立了自己的 AI 驱动在线百科全书 GrokiPedia，但维基百科并未示弱。 据《商业内幕》今日报道，维基百科在向美国用户募捐的公告中更是直接点明：本站由人类运营，不受任何意识形态影响，不属于亿万富 翁，以此来"暗讽"针对净资产约 5000 亿美元（IT之家注：现汇率约合 3.55 万亿元人民币）的马斯克。 维基百科指出："经过近 25 年，维基百科依然是人们承诺的互联网 —— 由人类创造，而非机器。这里虽不完美，但从不试图推动某种观 点。它属于非营利组织，而非大型科技公司或亿万富翁。" 维基百科的海量内容依靠志愿者撰写和维护，而马斯克的 GrokiPedia 由 xAI 开发，通过 Grok 大语言模型生成和编辑条目。 GrokiPedia 0.1 在本周一正式上线，宣称可访问 885279 篇文章。马斯克上个月在 X 平台上预告 GrokiPedia，称这部 AI 驱动百科全书"将远超 维基百科"。"坦率地说，这是实现 xAI 理解宇宙目标的必要步骤。" ...

不过，Grokipedia的生成、运营方式遭到多方质疑。英国科技新闻网站The Register称，Grokipedia的很 多内容几乎是"逐字照搬维基百科"，且过度依赖未经审查过的AI创作，"简言之它就是一台由AI生成杂 乱内容的机器"，它所代表的并非客观中立的事实，而是更倾向于"马斯克认可的观点"。 维基百科的运营方——维基媒体基金会方面也表示，维基百科将一如既往地由人工运营，还揶揄称"这 些由人类创作出的知识才是AI生成内容的根基"，"即便是Grokipedia也需要依附维基百科才能存在"。 有学者认为，马斯克此时推出AI百科网站归根结底还是为了争夺话语权。马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校 研究员麦格雷迪称："控制书面内容是获得或维系权力的一种手段。"（高文宇） 【环球时报综合报道】据美国《纽约时报》28日报道，27日，美国富豪马斯克名下的xAI公司推出维基 百科竞品网站——基于人工智能（AI）模型"Grok"生成的"Grokipedia"。该平台未进行公开宣传便上 线，仅标注"Grokipedia v0.1"版本标识。马斯克公开承诺，即将推出的1.0正式版将比当前版本"好十 倍"，品质更是"远超维基百科"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk's AI company xAI has launched an AI-driven encyclopedia website to compete with Wikipedia, featuring over 885,000 articles compared to Wikipedia's over 7 million articles [1][3]. Group 1: Product Features - The homepage of Musk's encyclopedia is very simple, displaying only the title and a search box for user queries [3]. - The website is currently in version 0.1, with plans for an upgrade to version 1.0 that will enhance its functionality [3]. Group 2: Market Context - Musk has criticized Wikipedia for containing biased information, although some entries on his encyclopedia cite Wikipedia as a source [3]. - The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, has stated that previous alternatives to Wikipedia have not disrupted its operations [3].

出品｜搜狐科技 作者｜郑松毅 编辑｜杨锦 马斯克要搭建的"人类知识库"，真的成了？ 数小时前，马斯克预热已久的百科全书网站Grokipedia正式上线，目前免费向公众开放测试。意外的是，Grokipedia上线第一天就遭遇服务器崩盘，但很快恢 复运行，火爆程度可想而知。 或许还处于测试阶段，Grokipedia暂被谦虚地命名为"0.1"版本。但马斯克的自信毫不掩饰，"1.0版本会比现在再好十倍，但即便是0.1版本，也比维基百科好 太多了。" 力压维基百科？Grokipedia被疑"抄袭"且"夹带私货" 势要力压维基百科的Grokipedia，实用效果究竟如何？ 搜狐科技测试发现，进入网站页面，相较于维基百科，Grokipedia的设计更给人一种"简明扼要"的风格感受。 但从回答篇幅和内容细节来看，二者存在明显差别。Grokipedia的回答更为详尽，篇幅较维基百科长不少，在关键数据处还会加以图表解释说明，整体阅读 舒适感更强。当然，如果再多些配图用户体验感可能会更好。 | 里程碑 | 大约日期 | | --- | --- | | 亿万富翁 | 2012 | | 千亿富翁 | 2020年8月 | | 2000亿 ...

维基百科，终于开源了！ 10月28日，马斯克正式发布Grokipedia V0.1版本，并预告1.0版本要比现在强十倍。 他自信满满地表示，就现在这个版本，就足以秒杀维基百科了！ 它目前收录了超88万篇文章，主要通过Grok去核查事实。而且，还支持在线交互、申报错误。 传送门：https://grokipedia.com/ 上线不过几小时，这项扬言要取代维基百科的项目，就引爆了争议。 有网友辣评，Grokipedia就是对着维基百科玩了一把「复制粘贴」，从内容到排版，全都照搬过来了。 如下，在解释半导体中的「米勒效应」（Miller Effect），前者直接一字不差地「抄袭」。 进入Grokipedia主页，设计非常简洁，核心就是一个输入框。 背景是那种深邃的黑，上面闪烁着星辰点点，将知识的星辰大海的感觉瞬间拉满。 马斯克立即打脸，「我们永远无法做到完美，但将依然为之努力」。 Grok和Grokipedia的终极目标是真理，全部的真理，别无其他。 维基百科的时代，真的成为过去了吗？ 开源版「维基百科」 十月初，xAI团队在内部秘密打造Grokipedia消息，才被正式爆出。 当时，马斯克称，这是一款由AI驱动 ...

机器之心报道 机器之心编辑部 刚刚，马斯克预热了几个月的 Grokipedia 终于上线了。 简单来说，Grokipedia 是 xAI 于 2025 年 9 月提出的开源百科平台，它的诞生就是为了挑战维基百科。因为在马斯克看来，维基百科不够中立，充满了偏 见，而他要做的 Grokipedia 在准确性和中立性方面都要超越前者。 | Grokipedia von | Q Search 搜索 жк | | --- | --- | | sourcing | 同光与以后影响 | | 主题和来源中的系统性覆盖偏差 | | | Reliability and Accuracy | Evidence of left-leaning systemic bias in articles | | 切靠性与准确应 | 文章中存在左倾系统性偏见证据 | | Empirical studies on factual correctness | | | 关于事实正确性的实证研究 | A 2024 computational analysis of over 1,000 Wikipedia biographies of politica ...

Core Points - Elon Musk launched Grokipedia, an AI-generated online encyclopedia, claiming it to be a "better alternative" to Wikipedia [1][3] - Grokipedia currently contains 885,000 entries, while English Wikipedia has over 7 million entries [1] - The website experienced downtime shortly after its launch but was restored later that evening [1] Summary by Sections Product Overview - Grokipedia is designed to challenge Wikipedia, which Musk has criticized for "political bias" [3] - The site features a simple interface with a search box and is powered by the AI chatbot Grok developed by Musk's xAI [1][3] Content and Accuracy - Some entries on Grokipedia appear to directly copy content from Wikipedia, raising concerns about originality [3] - There are instances of incorrect information within Grokipedia, such as inaccuracies in the entry about Elon Musk [4] Industry Reactions - Musk expressed that the goal of Grokipedia is to create an open-source, comprehensive knowledge database [5] - Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales expressed skepticism about the capabilities of AI in creating a reliable encyclopedia, predicting many errors [5]

Core Insights - Elon Musk's xAI has launched Grokipedia, an encyclopedia website that claims to provide fact-checked entries, positioning itself as a potential alternative to Wikipedia [2][4] - Grokipedia is described as open-source and free to use, although there is no clear information on its open-source status [4] - The website features approximately 885,000 entries, significantly fewer than Wikipedia's 8 million English entries [4] Group 1: Grokipedia's Features and Content - Grokipedia's design is minimalistic, consisting of a logo, a search box, and a version number [4] - Initial user experiences reported that Grokipedia crashed shortly after launch but was quickly restored [6] - Some content on Grokipedia appears to be rewritten from Wikipedia entries, indicating a reliance on existing sources [8] Group 2: Content Comparison with Wikipedia - Grokipedia's entries are noted for being more direct and sometimes biased compared to Wikipedia, with significant differences in the presentation of sensitive topics [11][14] - For example, Grokipedia defines gender in a binary manner, contrasting with Wikipedia's broader definition that includes various gender identities [11] - The page about Elon Musk on Grokipedia offers a highly favorable portrayal, including personal details about his habits, which differs from the more neutral tone typically found on Wikipedia [11][14] Group 3: Potential Bias and Criticism - Some entries on Grokipedia contain factual inaccuracies, such as misrepresenting the role of political figures in relation to Musk [14] - The content reflects Musk's viewpoints, particularly on controversial topics like gender transition surgeries, which are presented with a critical stance [14] - Concerns have been raised about Grokipedia's potential biases, with Wikipedia's co-founder expressing skepticism about AI's ability to replace the accuracy of human-edited content [15] Group 4: Future Outlook - The ambition to "rewrite the human knowledge base" remains in an experimental phase, with Grokipedia showcasing AI's potential in information integration but also revealing significant reliance on Wikipedia [16] - The challenge for Grokipedia will be to balance openness and objectivity while establishing a transparent verification and update mechanism [16]

在埃隆·马斯克的宏大叙事中，他总是在扮演挑战旧秩序、改写规则的"先知"角色。继收购Twitter改造为X、创立xAI叫板OpenAI之后， 他又将矛头指向了互联网认知最权威的知识宝库——维基百科。 美国当地时间10月27日，一场知识界的"AI政变"悄然发动。由马斯克旗下Grok AI驱动的在线百科全书Grokipedia v0.1以极简风格亮相。 马斯克为其赋予了"崇高的使命"：希望打造一个"更少偏见"、致力于"净化宣传"的维基百科替代品。 然而，这场被寄予厚望的豪赌，在上线首日就演变成了一场技术故障与信任危机的连环爆雷。 一、技术滑铁卢：上线即宕机，基础架构堪忧 10月27日上午，Grokipedia在毫无预警的情况下悄然上线。这个仅有一个搜索框的极简网站，在上线约一小时后便陷入瘫痪。尽管官方将 原因归咎于"流量远超预期"，但技术上的仓促可见一斑。 更令人质疑的是其发布节奏比马斯克原定计划推迟了一周，理由是"需要更多时间净化宣传内容"。这种临阵磨枪的姿态，为后续的连环 问题埋下了伏笔。 Grokipedia宣称拥有88.5万篇文章，这个数字虽不及英文维基百科800万条的规模，但仍显可观。然而，用户很快发现， ...

Core Viewpoint - Grokipedia, an AI-generated encyclopedia, aims to surpass Wikipedia by eliminating perceived biases from human editors, as stated by Elon Musk [1][3][6] Group 1: Product Overview - Grokipedia is officially launched as version 0.1, claiming to be superior to Wikipedia [3] - The platform features over 885,000 entries generated entirely by the AI model Grok, contrasting with Wikipedia's crowdsourced model [6] - Users cannot edit content directly but can request modifications from the AI [6] Group 2: Content Generation and Issues - Many entries on Grokipedia are found to be nearly identical to those on Wikipedia, raising questions about originality [6][14] - A notable example includes the entry on George Floyd, which presents a different narrative compared to Wikipedia, focusing on his criminal record and downplaying the social justice implications [14][15] - The AI's approach to controversial topics, such as climate change, reflects a tendency to present skepticism towards established scientific consensus [17] Group 3: Implications of AI Control - The centralization of content editing power within an AI algorithm raises concerns about the objectivity and transparency of information [18][19] - Musk's vision for Grokipedia suggests a potential shift in the definition of "facts," making it a battleground for ideological narratives [19]