来源：环球网 威尔士表示，他只是"略微"看过Grokipedia。当被问及对此有何看法时，威尔士提到了马斯克基于人工 智能的百科全书所引发的一些强烈反对意见。"我认为它所受到的很多批评对我来说并不意外。从信任 的角度来看，我不确定是否有人会信任一部带有偏见的百科全书。"他补充道。 威尔士试图将自己与马斯克区分开来。他说，如果他对维基百科上的某些内容不满意，他会发起讨论。 而马斯克则不同，威尔士暗示，马斯克很可能会自己去修改他不认同的内容。 外媒称，马斯克一贯喜欢插手公司细节，并自上而下地做出领导决策。 外媒还表示，维基百科无疑希望阻止用户转向像Grokipedia这样的竞争对手，因此允许人工智能机器人 抓取其内容。用户发现， Grokipedia上的一些页面几乎与维基百科的条目完全相同。（思瀚） 威尔士指的是埃隆·马斯克的 Grokipedia，这位特斯拉首席执行官在多年来指责维基百科存在偏见之后推 出了 Grokipedia。 【环球网科技综合报道】12月20日消息，据《商业内幕》报道，维基百科联合创始人吉米·威尔士表 示，人们可能不会信任"带有偏见"的百科全书。 ...

说句实在话，几年前咱们聊AI，还带着点科幻感，说什么"奇点临近""智能革命"。 可到了2025年，新鲜劲儿早没了。 AI不再犯低级错误，却开始批量生产"正确但平庸"的内容——语法没错，逻辑通顺，就是空洞得让人 反胃。 咱们刷手机的时候，是不是越来越觉得"看啥都像AI写的"？ 这不是你敏感，而是互联网真的在变味儿！ 2025年，连韦氏词典都看不下去了，直接把年度词汇定为"Slop"（泔水）。 今天周叔就带大家扒一扒，这口"数字泔水"到底是谁喂给我们的？ "泔水"上桌：AI内容泛滥成灾 韦氏词典对"Slop"的定义很扎心："由人工智能大量生产的低质量数字内容"。 更可怕的是，这些内容根本不是给人看的，它们存在的唯一目的，就是骗过算法、塞满广告位、榨干你 那几秒注意力。 真正的信息反而被埋在底下，得像淘金一样扒拉半天。 迪士尼也端上了"泔水套餐" 你以为只有小平台在搞这套？错了。 就连迪士尼——那个靠米老鼠和冰雪女王讲故事的"造梦工厂"，也开始向AI低头了。 2025年11月，迪士尼正式宣布与OpenAI达成战略合作。 不仅计划将Sora生成的视频引入Disney+流媒体平台，还豪掷10亿美元入股OpenAI，并获 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the transformation of knowledge in the internet age, highlighting both its unprecedented proliferation and potential crises [1][11] - It emphasizes the democratization of knowledge, where access and dissemination have become easier for the general public, moving away from elite control [4][12] - The article also addresses the challenges of information overload and the shifting authority of knowledge, necessitating new filtering mechanisms [5][6][10] Group 1: Characteristics of Networked Knowledge - Networked knowledge is characterized by richness, with vast amounts of information available online, such as over 40 billion indexed web pages and 7 million Wikipedia entries [2][3] - The internet has enabled a significant increase in the quantity of accessible knowledge, with projections of around 1.2 billion websites by January 2025 [2] - Knowledge is no longer confined to traditional institutions but is now a dynamic entity that evolves with real-time contributions from users [4][18] Group 2: Knowledge Democratization - The article outlines the historical context of knowledge democratization, tracing back to the invention of the printing press and the role of public libraries [4] - Digital technology has further propelled this democratization, allowing knowledge to transcend geographical and social barriers [4][12] - Wikipedia serves as a prime example of this phenomenon, providing an open platform for knowledge sharing and real-time updates [4][2] Group 3: Knowledge Filtering Mechanisms - The overwhelming abundance of information has led to a need for effective filtering systems to manage knowledge [5][6] - Traditional filtering methods have lost some authority, and new mechanisms, including algorithmic and social filtering, are being explored [7][10] - The article warns of potential issues with these new filtering systems, such as echo chambers and confirmation bias, which can distort knowledge acquisition [10][9] Group 4: Future Directions for Knowledge - The article advocates for open access initiatives to remove barriers to knowledge, allowing free and unrestricted access to academic research [12][13] - It emphasizes the importance of linking knowledge across platforms and fostering a culture of sharing and collaboration [15][16] - Education on critical thinking and effective internet use is deemed essential for navigating the complexities of networked knowledge [19][20]

Core Insights - PolitiFact's evaluation of xAI's Grokipedia reveals serious issues including content plagiarism and lack of factual accuracy, damaging its credibility as a reliable information source [2][3][4] - Grokipedia, launched in October 2023, aimed to compete with Wikipedia but has faced widespread criticism for its AI-generated content that often replicates Wikipedia without proper attribution [2][3] Content Plagiarism - PolitiFact analyzed 885,279 articles on Grokipedia, finding that many directly copied text from Wikipedia, with a similarity rate as high as 96% in some cases [2][4] - An example includes the "Monday" entry, which omitted 22 reference sources from Wikipedia while claiming to adapt content under a Creative Commons license [4] Lack of Factual Accuracy - Grokipedia's AI-generated content has been found to introduce errors, such as a misleading statement regarding the Nobel Prize, which lacked citation and was factually incorrect [4][6] - The platform often simplifies narratives by removing context from Wikipedia, sacrificing accuracy in the process [4][5] Transparency Issues - Grokipedia's editing mechanism lacks transparency, with no visible edit history or clear error correction processes, making its "fact-checking" label difficult to trust [6] - In contrast, Wikipedia maintains a transparent editing process, allowing anyone to edit and providing a complete history of article changes [5][6] Industry Context - The launch of Grokipedia coincides with xAI's legal disputes with Apple and OpenAI, which have accused these companies of suppressing AI competition [6] - The Wikimedia Foundation has raised concerns about Grokipedia's plagiarism and the implications for educational ecosystems, emphasizing the need for responsible use of open-source content [6]

Core Points - Elon Musk has criticized Wikipedia multiple times and has launched his own AI-driven online encyclopedia called GrokiPedia, which aims to surpass Wikipedia [1][4] - Wikipedia has responded to Musk's criticisms by emphasizing its human-operated nature and non-profit status, contrasting it with Musk's wealth and the commercial nature of large tech companies [1][4] Group 1 - Wikipedia has been operational for nearly 25 years and is committed to being a human-created platform rather than a machine-generated one [4] - Wikipedia's content is maintained by volunteers, while GrokiPedia is developed by xAI and utilizes the Grok large language model for generating and editing entries [4] - GrokiPedia 0.1 was officially launched recently, claiming to have access to 885,279 articles, with Musk stating that it is a necessary step for achieving xAI's goal of understanding the universe [4]

Core Points - Elon Musk's xAI company launched Grokipedia, an AI-generated competitor to Wikipedia, with a promise that the upcoming version 1.0 will be "ten times better" than the current version [1] - Grokipedia has over 885,000 articles as of October 29, 2023, but its content is primarily AI-generated, contrasting with Wikipedia's nearly 8 million articles created by human contributors [1] - Musk has criticized Wikipedia for perceived biases and has called for a cessation of funding to the platform [1] Group 1 - Grokipedia's interface is simple and similar to search engines like Google [1] - The platform is positioned as a source for "truth," with Musk acknowledging the challenge of achieving perfection [1] - Critics argue that Grokipedia's content often mirrors Wikipedia's and is heavily reliant on unverified AI-generated material, suggesting it reflects Musk's viewpoints rather than objective facts [2] Group 2 - The Wikimedia Foundation emphasized that Wikipedia will continue to be human-operated and highlighted that human-created knowledge is foundational for AI-generated content [2] - Scholars suggest that Musk's launch of Grokipedia is a strategic move to gain control over narrative and discourse [2]

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk's AI company xAI has launched an AI-driven encyclopedia website to compete with Wikipedia, featuring over 885,000 articles compared to Wikipedia's over 7 million articles [1][3]. Group 1: Product Features - The homepage of Musk's encyclopedia is very simple, displaying only the title and a search box for user queries [3]. - The website is currently in version 0.1, with plans for an upgrade to version 1.0 that will enhance its functionality [3]. Group 2: Market Context - Musk has criticized Wikipedia for containing biased information, although some entries on his encyclopedia cite Wikipedia as a source [3]. - The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, has stated that previous alternatives to Wikipedia have not disrupted its operations [3].

Core Insights - Elon Musk's Grokipedia, a new encyclopedia website, has officially launched and is currently in a free public testing phase, experiencing high traffic that led to initial server crashes [2][4] - Grokipedia aims to surpass Wikipedia in quality and user experience, with Musk claiming that even its current "0.1" version is significantly better than Wikipedia [2][4] - The platform currently hosts approximately 885,000 entries, compared to Wikipedia's 8 million, indicating a substantial gap in content volume [4] Content Quality and Originality - There are significant concerns regarding the originality of Grokipedia's content, with many entries showing similarities to Wikipedia, including direct acknowledgments of content adaptation [4][6] - Critics, including a spokesperson from Wikipedia, have pointed out that Grokipedia relies on Wikipedia for its existence, raising questions about its content integrity [4][6] - Grokipedia's content presentation is noted to be more detailed and visually engaging than Wikipedia, although it has been criticized for potential bias in how it presents certain figures, such as Elon Musk [6][10] User Interaction and Editing Model - Unlike Wikipedia's open editing model, Grokipedia does not allow users to edit content directly; instead, users can request modifications, which Musk believes will enhance information neutrality [10][11] - This approach aims to mitigate the issues of bias and misinformation that Musk associates with Wikipedia's collaborative editing process [11][12] Strategic Vision and Future Development - Musk's motivation for creating Grokipedia stems from his dissatisfaction with Wikipedia's perceived biases and inaccuracies, which he believes do not serve humanity's knowledge needs [11][12] - Grokipedia is designed to work in conjunction with the Grok AI model, which will facilitate dynamic content generation and updates, aiming to create a more reliable and structured knowledge base [12][13] - The long-term vision for Grokipedia includes integrating personalized interaction features to enhance user engagement and knowledge exploration, aligning with Musk's goal of advancing human understanding [13]

Core Insights - Elon Musk officially launched Grokipedia V0.1 on October 28, claiming it could outperform Wikipedia, with a promise that version 1.0 will be ten times stronger [1][5]. Group 1: Grokipedia Overview - Grokipedia features a simple design centered around an input box, with a dark background and over 880,000 articles, primarily fact-checked by Grok [2][25]. - The platform allows for online interaction and error reporting, aiming to ensure content accuracy and reliability [25]. - Despite its ambitious claims, Grokipedia has faced criticism for allegedly copying content and layout from Wikipedia [2][38]. Group 2: Comparison with Wikipedia - As of now, Grokipedia has 885,279 articles, while English Wikipedia boasts 7,081,800 articles, making Wikipedia's content nearly eight times larger [29]. - Users have noted that Grokipedia provides more detailed information on certain topics compared to Wikipedia, with some articles being significantly longer [41][48]. - The platform has received mixed reviews, with some praising its depth and others criticizing its reliance on Wikipedia's content [30][33]. Group 3: Industry Context - The launch of Grokipedia comes at a time when Wikipedia is experiencing a decline in page views, reportedly down 8% year-over-year, attributed to the rise of AI-driven search engines [57]. - Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, has expressed confidence that AI cannot replace the accuracy of Wikipedia, and is leading efforts to enhance its content neutrality and objectivity [62][65]. - The emergence of AI search tools like Google's Overviews and OpenAI's Atlas poses a significant threat to traditional information sources like Wikipedia [57][60].

Core Points - Grokipedia, an open-source encyclopedia platform developed by xAI, aims to challenge Wikipedia by providing a more neutral and accurate source of information [3][5] - The platform is driven by AI, which generates content and conducts fact-checking, bias detection, and logical consistency assessments [7][12] - Grokipedia currently has 885,279 articles, significantly fewer than Wikipedia's millions, and allows users to report inaccuracies and suggest edits [12][25] Group 1: Grokipedia's Purpose and Features - Grokipedia was created to address perceived biases in Wikipedia, particularly left-leaning systemic bias in its articles [4][25] - The platform emphasizes an "open access" philosophy, allowing both AI and human users to freely utilize its content [5][22] - Grokipedia's initial version (0.1) is expected to be significantly improved in its 1.0 version, which Musk claims will be ten times stronger [5][22] Group 2: Comparison with Wikipedia - Wikipedia's operational team has responded to Grokipedia's launch, asserting that Wikipedia's knowledge is a human achievement built through collaboration and consensus [25][27] - There are ongoing discussions comparing the portrayal of sensitive topics, such as George Floyd, between Grokipedia and Wikipedia, highlighting differences in narrative framing [28][39] - Users have noted that Grokipedia's interface is simpler and provides a more fluid reading experience compared to Wikipedia, although it currently lacks advanced features like synonym recognition [48][50] Group 3: Criticisms and Challenges - The effectiveness of Grokipedia's AI-driven fact-checking is questioned, as it may inherit biases from its data sources, similar to Wikipedia [7][9] - Some users have pointed out that Grokipedia has entries that directly copy from Wikipedia, raising concerns about originality [46][44] - The platform's support for non-English content, particularly Chinese, is noted to be inadequate, limiting its accessibility [56][57]