费、茶位费等附 加费用，需在消 费者点餐前明确 告知并公示收费 标准。 广东拟出新规： 茶位费需提前告 知并明码标价_ 南方+_南方plus 日前，《广东省 餐饮行业"诚信 价格"行为指引 （征求意见 稿）》向社会公 开征求意见，指 出若收取服务 锅店、快餐店、 大排档等各类餐 饮场所，演变为 不论是否饮用茶 水、均按人头收 取的普遍性费 用。 茶位费源于广东 早茶文化，最初 是茶楼为覆盖场 地、茶具、服务 等成本而收取的 费用，与"一盅 两件"的传统饮 茶习惯相伴相 生。然而，随着 餐饮业态多样 化，茶位费逐渐 从茶楼扩展至火 近年来，消费者 对茶位费的不满 主要集中在几个 方面：一是收费 不透明，结账时 才知晓被收取费 用；二是强制收 取，不论是否喝 茶、是否实际使 用餐具，都被统 一收取茶位费， 涉嫌"霸王条 款"；三是收费 标准不一，从几 元到几十元不 等，缺乏统一规 范。 针对茶位费的争 议，广州市市场 监督管理局有关 负责人此前在接 受媒体采访时指 出，茶位费不属 于政府定价、政 府指导价，而是 属于市场调节 价，由餐饮业经 营者根据市场情 况自行确定，餐 饮业经营者须尽 到明码标价和提 前告知两 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the cultural significance and ongoing debate surrounding the tea service charge (tea fee) in Guangdong, highlighting its historical roots and the mixed reactions from both locals and tourists [3][5][9]. Group 1: Historical Context - The tea fee originated from Guangdong's early tea culture, dating back to the Qing Dynasty, where establishments charged a small fee for tea service, evolving into a customary practice in tea houses [9][10]. - The concept of tea fee has transformed over time, with tea houses becoming social gathering places, necessitating a fee for occupying space [10][11]. Group 2: Current Practices and Reactions - Recent data from the Guangdong Provincial Culture and Tourism Department indicates a significant increase in tourist visits, with 65.176 million visitors during the recent holiday, which may amplify discussions around local customs like the tea fee [3]. - A survey by the Guangzhou Consumer Council revealed that 99% of respondents have been charged a tea fee, with 77% considering it unreasonable, prompting calls for standardization or elimination of such fees [17]. Group 3: Cultural Significance - The tea fee is viewed by many locals as a traditional practice that is intertwined with the social fabric of Guangdong, where drinking tea is a daily necessity for many [11][19]. - The article emphasizes that the tea fee reflects a broader cultural identity, with the practice of "dim sum" and tea drinking being deeply embedded in the lifestyle of Guangdong residents [19][25]. Group 4: Future Considerations - There are differing opinions on whether the tea fee should be maintained or abolished, with some suggesting that market forces should dictate its relevance, while others advocate for a return to its original purpose as a tea service charge [15][18]. - The evolving preferences of younger generations, who may not adhere to traditional tea drinking habits, suggest a potential shift in how tea culture and associated fees are perceived in the future [21][22].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving a seafood restaurant in Guangdong highlights the issue of hidden charges in the dining industry, particularly the controversial "tea fee" that has sparked public concern over consumer rights and transparency in pricing [1][2]. Group 1: Consumer Rights and Transparency - The core of the tea fee controversy revolves around the respect for consumer rights, particularly the right to be informed and to choose, which is fundamental to consumer protection laws in China [1][2]. - The restaurant's failure to disclose the tea fee and its application to children, including infants who do not consume any services, represents an abuse of industry practices for profit, infringing on consumers' rights to fair trading [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Challenges - Regulatory bodies have previously issued warnings and guidelines to ensure that restaurants clearly display prices and allow voluntary selection of services, yet many establishments continue to ignore these regulations [2][3]. - The persistence of these issues is attributed to businesses taking advantage of small charges that consumers often overlook, coupled with consumers' reluctance to pursue complaints due to perceived difficulties in the process [2][3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - There is a call for regulatory authorities to implement stricter enforcement measures, including increased inspections and penalties for non-compliance, to deter businesses from imposing hidden charges [3]. - Consumers are encouraged to actively question charges, retain receipts, and report violations to enhance accountability and ensure that businesses recognize the consequences of non-compliance [2][3].

Group 1 - The Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress has included the "Guangzhou Early Tea Inheritance and Protection Regulations" in its 2025 legislative work plan, which has sparked widespread discussion [1] - A survey titled "Guangzhou Early Tea Inheritance Protection Questionnaire" has been released to gather public opinions on various topics related to early tea, including "tea seat fees," "pre-made dishes," and "designated smoking areas" [1] - The survey aims to collect data for legislative analysis and is designed by the Legal Work Committee of the Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress [1] Group 2 - Attitudes towards the tea seat fee vary, with many tea houses in Guangzhou charging fees based on tea type and seating location, ranging from a few yuan to over ten yuan per person [2] - The tea seat fee is viewed as a "basic service fee" or "entrance fee," which compensates for the cost of tea, utensils, and seating, particularly in the context of the low average spending in early tea culture [2] - Older consumers are generally more accepting of the tea seat fee, while younger consumers are more sensitive to its pricing and may choose other dining options if the cost is perceived as high [2] Group 3 - The questionnaire includes a question on whether respondents agree with the practice of charging tea seat fees, aiming to gauge public sentiment on this pricing model [3] - Some tourists express willingness to pay the tea seat fee but find it expensive when combined with the cost of tea and snacks, which can range from tens to hundreds of yuan [3] - Properly setting the tea seat fee can be a legitimate pricing strategy as long as it is transparently communicated and does not replace minimum consumption requirements [3] Group 4 - Traditional tea houses in Guangzhou often maintain a model of handwritten orders and freshly made dishes, while chain brands may innovate with pre-made or semi-finished products to improve efficiency [4] - Customers generally prefer freshly made dim sum for better taste, although some tea houses manage the timing of pre-made dishes to ensure quality [4] - The early tea industry is rapidly evolving towards standardization and chain operations, with many businesses adopting central kitchen systems to address rising labor costs and improve service efficiency [8] Group 5 - Some tea houses impose dining time limits to manage customer flow, with discounts offered during different time slots to balance traffic [9] - Consumers are generally accepting of time limits as long as they are communicated upfront, reflecting a balance between customer experience and operational efficiency [9] - From a legal perspective, restaurants can set reasonable dining time limits as long as they are clearly communicated before customers are seated, which is common in high-turnover dining environments [12]