广州早茶

Search documents
城市24小时 | “工业第一城” 继续“拥抱”传统产业
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-30 15:59
9月29日,深圳市政府新闻办召开"推动传统产业向'新'向'智'加快建设现代化产业体系"新闻发布会。会 上介绍,深圳将充分发挥创新资源丰富、产业门类齐全、应用场景广阔等优势,通过深化技术赋能、生 态共建、模式创新,积极探索传统产业优化升级新路径,推出12条政策措施,力争经过3年左右的时 间,推动全市传统产业总规模突破7000亿元,实现发展能级的大幅提升。 其中提到,将强化基金赋能打好多元投资组合拳。充分发挥智能终端、智能传感器、超高清显示等战略 性新兴产业引导基金作用,支持国企与传统产业龙头企业设立并购基金,鼓励国有资本联合行业协会设 立智能眼镜等产业专项基金,打造"政府引导基金+上市公司产业资本+专业投资机构"的多元投资支撑 模式,孵化、培育一批技术优势突出、发展前景广阔的优质企业。 解读:作为我国"工业第一城",深圳全年规上工业总产值突破5万亿元、全部工业增加值突破1.2万亿 元,先进制造业增加值、高技术制造业增加值占规上工业增加值比重分别为68.2%、58.2%。 尽管以电子信息等产业为代表的新兴产业,已经成为外界认知深圳的第一印象,但在那之前,深圳也曾 凭借"三来一补"和"贴牌加工",构建起包括服装、珠 ...
广州拟为早茶设立专项规定:预制点心差别定价,茶位费不能只收钱
第一财经· 2025-09-30 08:59
2025.09. 30 本文字数:1858,阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 宋婕 回应消费者关切,广州早茶相关规定正在征求意见。 9月29日,在国庆中秋假期到来的前夕,广州市人大常委会法制工作委员会发布公告,公开征求广大 市民和社会各界对《广州早茶传承保护规定(草案修改稿·征求意见稿)》(下称"意见稿")的意见 和建议。 当谈到为早茶设立专项规定有何深远意义时,广东省食品安全保障促进会副会长朱丹蓬告诉第一财经 记者,从2017年到现在,中国餐饮业规模从3.7万亿元增长到2024年约5.5万亿元,餐饮赛道依然非 常火爆。各地政府也在打造各自的城市名片,围绕文旅做创新升级,拉动旅游市场内需。为广州早茶 这种非遗设立专项规定,是非常不错的举措。 茶位费不能只收钱 第一财经在今年5月就广州早茶消费进行现场走访和报道时,曾有好几位消费者表达了对茶位收费与 服务不匹配、预制茶点等现存争议的关注,其中以外地游客最为突出。 当时有几位在广州某茶楼外取号排队的外地游客称,他们提前做了功课,了解到收取茶位费这一模 式,确实有支付意愿,但考虑茶点的消费人均几十元甚至上百元,还是觉得茶位费的收取有些贵。 有本地消费者告诉第一 ...
广州早茶“听劝”:预制点心差别定价,茶位费不能只收钱
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-30 05:24
回应消费者关切,广州早茶相关规定正在征求意见。 9月29日,在国庆中秋假期到来的前夕,广州市人大常委会法制工作委员会发布公告,公开征求广大市 民和社会各界对《广州早茶传承保护规定(草案修改稿·征求意见稿)》(下称"意见稿")的意见和建 议。 当谈到为早茶设立专项规定有何深远意义时,广东省食品安全保障促进会副会长朱丹蓬告诉第一财经记 者,从2017年到现在,中国餐饮业规模从3.7万亿元增长到2024年约5.5万亿元,餐饮赛道依然非常火 爆。各地政府也在打造各自的城市名片,围绕文旅做创新升级,拉动旅游市场内需。为广州早茶这种非 遗设立专项规定,是非常不错的举措。 茶位费不能只收钱 第一财经在今年5月就广州早茶消费进行现场走访和报道时,曾有好几位消费者表达了对茶位收费与服 务不匹配、预制茶点等现存争议的关注,其中以外地游客最为突出。 当时有几位在广州某茶楼外取号排队的外地游客称,他们提前做了功课,了解到收取茶位费这一模式, 确实有支付意愿,但考虑茶点的消费人均几十元甚至上百元,还是觉得茶位费的收取有些贵。 第一财经记者留意到,意见稿除了回应消费者关切,还提到了要进行"广州早茶经典店"的评定。被评上 广州早茶经典店的 ...
广州拟立法保护早茶文化 约定俗成的“茶位费”该不该收?
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-05-24 17:07
Group 1 - Guangzhou is planning to establish regulations for the preservation and inheritance of its unique morning tea culture, which is a significant aspect of Cantonese culture [1] - A survey is being conducted to gather public opinions on various issues related to morning tea, including the controversial "tea seat fee" [1] - Acceptance of the "tea seat fee" varies between local and non-local customers, with a notable difference in practices between Guangzhou and Beijing locations of the same tea brand [1] Group 2 - The core issue surrounding the "tea seat fee" is the consumers' right to know and choose, emphasizing the need for transparency in pricing and service options [2] - Recommendations include clear pricing, detailed menus for tea services, and a variety of options for consumers to enhance their experience [2] - The legislative focus is not solely on whether to charge the "tea seat fee," but rather on improving service quality and consumer experience within the cultural context of morning tea [2]
广州拟为早茶立法,茶位费、预制菜等存争议
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-22 10:47
Group 1 - The Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress has included the "Guangzhou Early Tea Inheritance and Protection Regulations" in its 2025 legislative work plan, which has sparked widespread discussion [1] - A survey titled "Guangzhou Early Tea Inheritance Protection Questionnaire" has been released to gather public opinions on various topics related to early tea, including "tea seat fees," "pre-made dishes," and "designated smoking areas" [1] - The survey aims to collect data for legislative analysis and is designed by the Legal Work Committee of the Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress [1] Group 2 - Attitudes towards the tea seat fee vary, with many tea houses in Guangzhou charging fees based on tea type and seating location, ranging from a few yuan to over ten yuan per person [2] - The tea seat fee is viewed as a "basic service fee" or "entrance fee," which compensates for the cost of tea, utensils, and seating, particularly in the context of the low average spending in early tea culture [2] - Older consumers are generally more accepting of the tea seat fee, while younger consumers are more sensitive to its pricing and may choose other dining options if the cost is perceived as high [2] Group 3 - The questionnaire includes a question on whether respondents agree with the practice of charging tea seat fees, aiming to gauge public sentiment on this pricing model [3] - Some tourists express willingness to pay the tea seat fee but find it expensive when combined with the cost of tea and snacks, which can range from tens to hundreds of yuan [3] - Properly setting the tea seat fee can be a legitimate pricing strategy as long as it is transparently communicated and does not replace minimum consumption requirements [3] Group 4 - Traditional tea houses in Guangzhou often maintain a model of handwritten orders and freshly made dishes, while chain brands may innovate with pre-made or semi-finished products to improve efficiency [4] - Customers generally prefer freshly made dim sum for better taste, although some tea houses manage the timing of pre-made dishes to ensure quality [4] - The early tea industry is rapidly evolving towards standardization and chain operations, with many businesses adopting central kitchen systems to address rising labor costs and improve service efficiency [8] Group 5 - Some tea houses impose dining time limits to manage customer flow, with discounts offered during different time slots to balance traffic [9] - Consumers are generally accepting of time limits as long as they are communicated upfront, reflecting a balance between customer experience and operational efficiency [9] - From a legal perspective, restaurants can set reasonable dining time limits as long as they are clearly communicated before customers are seated, which is common in high-turnover dining environments [12]