银河德睿资本产品总监张丝莹发表题为《场外期权在上市公司市值管理过程中应用场景分享》的主题分 享。张丝莹重点介绍了多种金融工具和策略，如雪球期权和香草期权，这些工具被广泛应用于服务上市 公司股东和私募基金。 中国证券报创新中心产品总监李淼发表题为《如何借助媒体做好上市公司市值管理》的主题分享。李淼 表示，舆情管理对企业的生存与发展至关重要，尤其是对上市公司而言。舆情问题还可能涉及金融资 产、市值管理、产品运营和法律诉讼等多个方面，这些因素共同作用于上市公司的市值和舆论形象。因 此，企业应主动管理和应对舆情，特别是在海外发展时，需关注宏观政治倾向和政策变化。 2025年，"中国银河证券·星耀企业家办公室"将持续整合公司企业服务资源，通过企业家办公室活动平 台，助力拓展企业家及家庭核心圈层，不断扩大企业服务边际效应。银河证券将始终秉持"金融报国 客 户至上"的服务理念，深刻把握金融工作"功能性"，积极投身并融入区域产业和经济发展。未来，中国 银河证券将继续同各方紧密携手，服务于国家战略，实现高质量发展。 银万资本总经理赵峰深入解读《上市公司股东资产管理和PIPE业务》。赵峰重点介绍上市公司股东的 资产管理与PIPE ...

Group 1: Common Option Structures - The three common option structures—Snowball, Phoenix, and Fixed Coupon Notes (FCN)—are essentially barrier options, with specific characteristics regarding cash flow and risk exposure [2][3]. - The classic Snowball structure allows for cash flow only at maturity or upon knock-out, while the Phoenix structure enables monthly cash flow as long as the price is above the knock-in line [2]. - FCN provides fixed coupon payments regardless of price movements during the holding period, making it attractive for conservative investors due to a significantly lower probability of knock-in [2]. Group 2: Profit and Loss Scenarios - In scenarios without knock-in, all three structures yield similar returns, with higher coupon structures being more favorable [3]. - In cases where knock-in occurs but knock-out does not, Snowball and FCN can still yield returns, while Phoenix's cash flow is affected by the knock-in event [3]. - If knock-in occurs and the asset price is below the exercise price at maturity, losses may occur, with Snowball being the most adversely affected due to no cash flow during the holding period [3]. Group 3: Risk and Return Dynamics - The risk-return relationship indicates that Phoenix typically offers lower coupons than Snowball, while FCN generally has the lowest coupon rates [4]. Group 4: Market Timing Considerations - Proper market timing is essential, as no option structure guarantees profit in all market conditions [5]. Group 5: Delta and Volatility Analysis - All three structures maintain a positive Delta, indicating a bullish stance on the underlying asset, and are more suitable for moderate upward or sideways markets [7]. - The expected volatility is positively correlated with coupon rates, as higher volatility increases the likelihood of reaching knock-in conditions [8]. - The structures tend to be short volatility in most scenarios, making high volatility periods favorable for entry [10]. Group 6: Selection of Underlying Assets - The choice of underlying assets significantly impacts the performance of the structured products, with the China Securities 500 Index being identified as a suitable candidate due to its risk-return profile [14][16]. - The analysis of daily return distributions shows that the Hang Seng Tech Index has the lowest probability of extreme negative returns, making it a favorable option [14][15]. Group 7: Historical Backtesting and Timing Strategies - Historical backtesting indicates that FCN can effectively mitigate knock-in losses, making it a lower-risk option compared to Snowball [16]. - Rational timing strategies suggest that selecting more aggressive structures during low-risk periods and conservative structures during higher-risk periods can optimize returns [16]. Group 8: Structural Variations and Adjustments - The flexibility in setting barriers allows for various structural adjustments to balance risk and return, such as eliminating knock-in features or adjusting the knock-out thresholds [19].