Core Insights - The concept of "smart driving" has gained significant attention since 2025, with companies like BYD pushing the narrative of "equal rights in smart driving" [1] - The initial purpose of smart driving was to enhance safety and reduce driver fatigue, but it has been misrepresented by some companies, leading to user misconceptions about its capabilities [1] - A recent test conducted by an automotive platform revealed a low pass rate for smart driving systems, raising concerns about the reliability of such technologies [3] Group 1: Testing and Results - A total of 36 vehicles underwent 183 tests, with only 44 passing, resulting in an overall pass rate of 24% [3] - In urban scenarios, 26 vehicles were tested 233 times, achieving a pass rate of approximately 44.2% [3] - The release of the test results has sparked public debate, with some experts criticizing the methodology and suggesting it was a marketing stunt [3][4] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has emphasized the need for standardized marketing practices to avoid misleading consumers, including banning terms like "automatic" and "high-level smart driving" [8] - The police have stated that current smart driving systems do not possess true autonomous driving capabilities, reinforcing that human drivers remain responsible [10] - Regulatory scrutiny is increasing, with a focus on clarifying responsibilities and enhancing safety measures in the smart driving sector [10][14] Group 3: Safety and Limitations - All Level 2 smart driving systems are still fundamentally reliant on human drivers, and cannot guarantee absolute safety [11] - There is a significant difference between Level 2 and Level 3 systems in terms of design and safety protocols, with Level 2 systems lacking comprehensive redundancy [13] - The recent tests highlight the limitations of smart driving technologies in real-world conditions, urging consumers to remain aware of their responsibilities while driving [14]