中央纪委国家监委网站讯 据海南省纪委监委消息：经海南省委批准，海南省纪委监委对海南省交通投 资控股有限公司原党委书记、董事长黄兴海严重违纪违法问题进行了立案审查调查。 （海南省纪委监委） 黄兴海严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉洁纪律和工作纪律，构成严重职务违法并涉嫌受贿犯罪， 且在党的十八大后不收敛、不收手，性质严重，影响恶劣，应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产党纪律处分 条例》《中华人民共和国监察法》《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》等有关规定，经海南省纪委 常委会会议研究并报海南省委批准，决定给予黄兴海开除党籍处分；由海南省监委给予其开除公职处 分；收缴其违纪违法所得；终止其中共海南省第八次党代会代表资格；将其涉嫌犯罪问题移送检察机关 依法审查起诉，所涉财物一并移送。 经查，黄兴海丧失理想信念，背弃初心使命，履行全面从严治党主体责任不力，对党不忠诚不老实，对 抗组织审查；无视中央八项规定精神，接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请，违规配备专车和司机；违反 组织原则，不按规定报告个人有关事项，违规选拔任用干部；廉洁底线失守，违规收受礼品、礼金；不 正确履行职责，违规插手干预市场经济活动；违反国家法律法规，违规骗领、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the efforts of the Mingguang City Discipline Inspection Commission to address and manage repeated complaints effectively, enhancing public trust and satisfaction through systematic measures and community engagement [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Strategies for Managing Repeated Complaints - The commission has developed a "toolbox" for managing repeated complaints, focusing on both prevention and treatment, which has led to resolving complex issues and addressing urgent public concerns [1] - A systematic approach is adopted for unresolved repeated complaints, utilizing tailored governance plans and collaborative methods to improve processing efficiency [2] - The commission employs a feedback mechanism for complaints that have been resolved but still receive negative feedback, analyzing the reasons for repeated complaints and implementing actionable solutions [3] Group 2: Enhancing Public Awareness and Trust - The commission enhances public awareness of complaint procedures through education and communication, encouraging lawful and rational expressions of grievances [1] - By ensuring timely communication regarding the status of complaints, the commission aims to reduce anxiety among the public and prevent repeated submissions [2] - The commission's efforts to build trust include direct engagement with complainants, providing updates on the progress of their issues, and ensuring satisfaction with the outcomes [3] Group 3: Institutionalizing Governance Mechanisms - The commission is focused on institutionalizing the governance of repeated complaints by summarizing successful practices and establishing a regular management mechanism [4] - New operational guidelines and review mechanisms are being developed to further enhance the effectiveness of complaint resolution processes [4]

聚焦监督重点，全方位推进正风反腐。基层监督工作点多面广，必须坚持精准高效，注重从本地区实际 出发，向重点处聚焦、向关键处发力。海门区纪委监委紧盯"一把手"和领导班子，统筹运用因人因岗谈 话监督、"巡纪"联动"画像"、专题通报"一把手"违纪违法问题、家风访查等举措，督促"关键少数"廉洁 履职用权。对反映"关键少数"的问题线索优先处置，去年以来查处区管干部59人，留置9人。聚焦优化 营商环境开展专项监督，形成问题清单、原因清单、责任清单，推动解决堵点难点112个。聚焦群众反 映强烈问题，分领域分行业构建监督体系，搭建农村集体"三资"等"大数据"监督模型，进行问题大起 底、责任大排查、作风大整治，以靶向查促精准改、精准治。在对社区巡察中，针对群众普遍关心的养 老服务、物业管理、消防安全等民生事项进行专项巡察，发现的问题向街道、社区"双反馈"，整改成效 接受社区居民评议。 健全监督机制，全领域深化基层治理。以常态促长效，是衡量政治监督质效的重要标尺。海门区纪委监 委健全政治监督协作机制，将10个纪检监察室、21个派驻纪检监察组和各乡镇（街道）纪（工）委划分 为3个协同办案区，与审计、财政、信访等职能部门加强整体联动， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal implications of high-interest lending by state officials to borrowers with genuine financial needs, emphasizing the need to distinguish between legitimate private lending and potential bribery or disciplinary violations [1][6][9]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - The case involves a state official, referred to as A, who provided financial assistance to a company director, referred to as B, from 2008 to 2023, receiving significant interest payments in return [2]. Divergent Opinions - Four differing opinions exist regarding the classification of A's high-interest lending behavior: 1. A's actions are seen as normal private lending due to B's genuine financial need [3]. 2. A's lending violates party discipline as it could affect the impartial execution of duties [3]. 3. The relationship between A and B is viewed as a facade for bribery, with all interest payments considered as bribes [3]. 4. A's actions are partially classified as bribery and partially as a disciplinary violation, with specific calculations for the amounts involved [3][4]. Opinion Analysis - The article supports the fourth opinion, advocating for a nuanced approach to determine the nature of the lending and its implications [5]. Legal Framework - The essence of bribery is highlighted as a transaction involving power and money, necessitating a thorough examination of the lending circumstances to determine if they constitute bribery [6][9]. Objective and Subjective Aspects - Objective analysis requires assessing whether the interest rates charged were reasonable and if there was a genuine need for the loan [7][8]. - Subjectively, the intent behind A's lending actions is crucial in determining if they were aimed at helping B or merely for personal gain [8][9]. Judicial Practice - The article references judicial interpretations regarding the calculation of interest rates in private lending cases, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal standards [13][15]. Financial Implications - The case illustrates the importance of correctly identifying and processing illicit gains from high-interest lending, ensuring that no one benefits from illegal activities [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the commitment of Yibin City in Sichuan Province to combat corruption through a comprehensive approach, focusing on systematic rectification and continuous improvement in governance and accountability. Group 1: Anti-Corruption Strategy - The strategy involves a thorough analysis of existing corruption cases and trends, aiming to understand the underlying issues and promote a dual approach of clearing existing problems while preventing new ones [1][2] - Responsibilities are being tightened, with regular reports to the municipal party committee on key sectors, ensuring that all levels of government are engaged in the anti-corruption efforts [1][2] - The long-term nature of the anti-corruption struggle is acknowledged, with a focus on key areas such as state-owned enterprises, pharmaceuticals, and construction sectors [1] Group 2: Problem Identification and Response - The approach includes strict adherence to directives from higher authorities, ensuring that specific issues are targeted effectively [2] - A comprehensive review of problem indicators, including public complaints and oversight findings, is conducted to identify the most pressing issues [2] - The integration of resources across the municipal and county levels is emphasized to ensure a coordinated response to corruption cases [2] Group 3: Deep Analysis and System Improvement - There is a focus on in-depth analysis of cases to identify root causes and improve the ability to recognize similar cases in the future [3] - The examination of institutional weaknesses is prioritized, particularly in decision-making and execution processes [3] - Key areas of concern include procurement practices in the pharmaceutical sector and the management of state-owned enterprises [3] Group 4: Systematic Treatment and Reform - The establishment of a robust institutional framework is highlighted, focusing on preventive measures and clear regulations to combat corruption [4] - The dual approach of addressing both negative practices and promoting positive behaviors is emphasized, aiming to create a healthy political environment [5] - The effectiveness of reforms is to be evaluated based on public feedback and measurable outcomes, ensuring that the reforms meet the needs of the community [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a collaborative approach in enhancing the effectiveness of grassroots supervision within the supervisory authority [1][2] - The organization structure is designed to integrate various supervisory units into six collaborative areas, transitioning from isolated operations to a system-integrated approach [1][2] - The implementation of a "responsible area leader" system allows for comprehensive coordination and guidance of supervisory tasks within each area [1][2] Group 2 - The establishment of a collaborative work mechanism aims to streamline cooperation and address operational bottlenecks, ensuring orderly progress of tasks [2] - The role of stationed supervisory teams is crucial in identifying issues and providing leads, thereby supporting the effective functioning of the collaborative mechanism [2] - The collaborative approach is tailored based on the complexity of cases and the resources available, allowing for targeted responses to challenging situations [2] Group 3 - A dual-mentor training model is introduced for new supervisory staff, focusing on both ideological guidance and practical business mentorship [3] - The practical training model encourages hands-on experience through case involvement, enhancing the capabilities of new staff while fostering inter-area collaboration [3] - A regular training system is established to ensure continuous development of supervisory personnel, thereby strengthening the talent pool for collaborative efforts [3]

二十届中央纪委四次全会指出，针对错误思想观念影响，加大以文化人、以文育人力度，制定新时代廉 洁文化建设三年行动计划（2025—2027年），推动廉洁文化走进各行各业、千家万户。山东省青岛市纪 委监委坚持把加强新时代廉洁文化建设作为推进全面从严治党向纵深发展的基础性工程和引领性举措抓 紧抓实抓好，持续推动廉洁文化建设向全社会延伸拓展，着力营造崇廉拒腐的良好风尚，打造"清廉之 岛"城市名片。 完善统筹推进体系，全方位凝聚合力 青岛市纪委监委秉持厚植廉洁奉公文化基础、弘扬崇廉拒腐社会风尚是全党全社会共同责任的理念，推 动健全完善机制，努力从纪检监察机关"单兵作战"、系统内外"各自为战"向党委统筹、全域联动转变。 健全齐抓共管的领导体制。青岛市委高度重视廉洁文化建设，多次召开市委常委会会议研究部署相关工 作，并将"纵深推进廉洁文化建设，打造'清廉之岛'城市名片"写入青岛市第十三次党代会报告，作为五 年规划部署推进。2024年，立足全市5年多来廉洁文化建设实践，研究出台《关于高质量纵深推进清廉 建设的意见》，相关工作要求写入青岛市全面深化改革工作要点，在新起点上部署推动全市新时代廉洁 文化建设向纵深推进。 健全全域统筹 ...

中央纪委国家监委网站 程威 特邀嘉宾 张皓宇 重庆市荣昌区纪委常委 杨一龙 中国农业银行重庆开州支行党委委员、纪委书记 龙琎琎 重庆市铜梁区人民检察院四级高级检察官 杨 建 重庆市铜梁区人民法院四级高级法官 编者按 本案中，甲多次以民间借贷名义收取"利息"，为何有的认定为违纪，有的认定构成受贿犯罪？有观点认 为，甲审核同意发放贷款3670万元仅仅是发放贷款的一个环节，因此不构成违法发放贷款罪，如何看待 该观点？对甲收受贿赂并违法发放贷款的行为，是应择一重罪处罚，还是按受贿罪和违法发放贷款罪数 罪并罚？我们特邀相关单位工作人员予以解析。 基本案情： 甲，曾任某国有商业银行A市B区支行党委委员、副行长，A市C区支行党委委员、副行长，A市D区支 行党委委员等职务。 违反廉洁纪律。2017年11月至2019年1月，甲在担任A市C区支行党委委员、副行长期间，筹集100万元 出借给A市某林业发展公司（该公司为A市C区支行信贷客户，在此期间，该公司存在资金需求，同期 向其他民事主体有多笔借款，且多笔借款所支付的月利率大于或等于3%），并按3%的月利率收取利 息。2019年1月，甲收回本金100万元，累计收取利息45万余元。 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the interpretation of "receiving property from others" in the context of bribery, where a public official can be deemed to have received benefits even if they do not directly possess the property [1] - The case involves Chen, a public official, who facilitated the purchase of commercial properties at significantly lower prices than market value, which raises questions about the legality of his actions [2][5] - Chen's actions are classified as a form of bribery under the law, particularly due to the substantial discounts he and his relative received, which were below market prices by 1.03 million and 1.5 million respectively [5][6] Group 2 - There are differing opinions on whether Chen's assistance to his relative in obtaining a low-priced property constitutes bribery or merely a violation of disciplinary regulations [2][3] - The prevailing view is that Chen's actions should be classified as bribery since the benefits received by his relative were a direct result of Chen's abuse of power [3][4] - The legal framework indicates that public officials who use their authority to benefit others, even indirectly, can be prosecuted for bribery, emphasizing the importance of maintaining integrity in public service [4][5]

中央纪委国家监委网站 刘一霖 重庆市铜梁区纪委监委聚焦违规吃喝隐形变异问题，联合市场监管、税务等部门深入酒店、饭店、单位 食堂等重点场所开展专项监督检查，坚决防止违规吃喝歪风反弹回潮。图为该区纪委监委和区市场监管 局工作人员在辖区某饭店了解情况。马冬晓 摄 特邀嘉宾 余伟国 重庆市沙坪坝区委常委，区纪委书记、监委主任 王符学 海南省纪委监委党风政风监督室副主任 杨 华 湖南省宁乡市委常委，市纪委书记、监委主任 一是干部纪律意识更强了。各级纪检监察机关紧盯违规吃喝问题，坚持发现一起查处一起，同时，用身 边案、典型案加强警示教育，不断释放越往后越严的强烈信号。广大党员干部普遍认识到，违规吃喝绝 非个人行为上的小毛病，而是关系党的作风形象的大问题，是与党的性质宗旨相悖的突出表现，是群众 深恶痛绝的"舌尖上的腐败"，是党纪国法明令禁止、决不能触犯的"红线""高压线"。 二是干事创业包袱没有了。"饭局"文化、"酒桌"文化得到有效遏制，"工作汇报不如酒杯一倒"的潜规则 从根本上被破除。调查研究深入一线而不是"走马观花"，部门协同靠机制而不是靠"勾兑"，考核评价看 实绩而不是看亲疏。干部从"推杯换盏"的负担中解脱出来，全身 ...