广发证券(01776)公布，广发证券股份有限公司2025年面向专业投资者公开发行短期公司债券(第一期) (债券简称："25广发D2"，债券代码：524124，以下简称"本期债券")将于2025年8月13日支付2025年2月 13日至2025年8月12日期间的利息及本期债券的本金并摘牌。 本期债券发行期限为181天，发行规模为25亿元，票面利率为1.79%，本次兑付兑息每手(面值1000 元)"25广发D2"兑付本息合计人民币1008.876438元(含税)。 ...

债券代码：524124 债券简称：25 广发 D2 广发证券股份有限公司 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、 误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 特别提示： 广发证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行短期公司债券（第 一期）（债券简称："25 广发 D2"，债券代码：524124，以下简称"本期债券"） 将于 2025 年 8 月 13 日支付 2025 年 2 月 13 日至 2025 年 8 月 12 日期间的利息 及本期债券的本金。为确保本次兑付兑息工作的顺利进行，现将有关事宜公告如 下： 一、本期债券基本情况 公司债券（第一期） 记日收市时所持有的债券面值*实际计息天数*票面利率/365 天。 的《广发证券股份有限公司 2025 年度公开发行公司债券跟踪评级报告》，公司 主体信用等级为 AAA，评级展望为稳定；本期债券的信用等级为 A-1。 下简称"深交所"）上市交易。 分公司（以下简称"中国结算深圳分公司"）。 二、本期债券兑付兑息方案 本期债券"25 广发 D2"的票面利率为 1.79%，本次兑付兑息每手（面值 1,000 元）"25 广发 D2"兑付本息合计 ...

炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 广发证券(01776)公布，广发证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行短期公司债券(第一期) (债券简称："25 广发 D2"，债券代码：524124，以下简称"本期债券")将于 2025 年 8 月 13 日支付 2025 年 2 月 13 日至 2025 年 8 月 12 日期间的利息及本期债券的本金并摘牌。 本期债券发行期限为 181 天，发行规模为 25 亿元，票面利率为 1.79%，本次兑付兑息每手(面值 1000 元)"25 广发 D2"兑付本息合计人民币 1008.876438 元(含税)。 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 GF SECURITIES CO., LTD. 廣發証券股份有限公司 （於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司） （股份代號：1776） 海外監管公告 本公告乃根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則第13.10B條刊發。 根據中華人民共和國的有關法例規定，廣發証券股份有限公司（「本公司」）在深圳 證券交易所網站( http://www.szse.cn )刊發的《廣發証券股份有限公司2025年面向專 業投資者公開發行短期公司債券（第一期）2025年兌付兌息及摘牌公告》。茲載列 如下，僅供參閱。 承董事會命 廣發証券股份有限公司 林傳輝 董事長 中國，廣州 2025年8月11日 於本公告日期，本公司董事會成員包括執行董事林傳輝先生、秦力先生、孫曉燕 女士及肖雪生先生；非執行董事李秀林先生、尚書志先生及郭敬誼先生；獨立非 執行董事梁碩玲女士、黎文靖先生、張闖先生及王大樹先生。 债券代码：524124 债券简称 ...

债券代码：524124 债券简称：25 广发 D2 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行短期公司债券（第一期） 2025 年兑付兑息及摘牌公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、 误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 特别提示： 广发证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行短期公司债券（第 一期）（债券简称："25 广发 D2"，债券代码：524124，以下简称"本期债券"） 将于 2025 年 8 月 13 日支付 2025 年 2 月 13 日至 2025 年 8 月 12 日期间的利息 及本期债券的本金。为确保本次兑付兑息工作的顺利进行，现将有关事宜公告如 下： 一、本期债券基本情况 1、债券名称：广发证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行短期 公司债券（第一期） 2、债券简称及代码：本期债券简称为"25 广发 D2"，债券代码为"524124"。 3、债券发行批准机关及文号：中国证券监督管理委员会证监许可〔2023〕 2404 号文。 4、发行期限、规模和利率：本期债券发行期限为 181 天，发行规模为 25 亿 元，票面利率为 1.79%。 广发证券股份 ...

Core Viewpoint - The trend of fund companies shutting down their mobile apps is accelerating, driven by high operational costs and declining user engagement, leading to a shift towards simplified operational strategies in the industry [1][6]. Group 1: Industry Trends - Since 2019, several mid-sized public fund companies have closed their independent app operations, including Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund and Guoshou Anbao Fund [1]. - The overall pressure on fund apps includes shrinking net values, declining monthly active users (MAU), and low operational scales [1]. - The initial goal of fund companies developing their own apps was to reduce reliance on third-party distribution channels, but this has changed due to high maintenance costs and limited direct sales revenue [1][5]. Group 2: User Engagement Data - In the first half of 2025, only five fund apps saw positive growth in monthly active users: E Fund e-Wallet (+26,300 to 138,600), Huaxia Fund Manager (+23,800 to 102,600), and others [2]. - Conversely, many fund apps are experiencing significant user losses, with Tianhong Fund's app dropping to 40,800 MAU, about one-third of its user base three years ago [2]. - Other fund apps, such as Bosera and Xingsheng Global, also reported declines of over 10,000 MAU [2]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - The competitive landscape shows that brokerage apps maintain higher user engagement, with monthly active users in the hundreds of thousands, contrasting sharply with fund apps [2][5]. - The top-performing brokerage app, "Zhang Le Cai Fu Tong," had 10.97 million MAU, while the second, Ping An Securities, had 8.14 million [5]. - The decline in user numbers for fund apps is attributed to the siphoning effect of third-party distribution platforms, which have rapidly grown due to their traffic and product offerings [5][6]. Group 4: Regulatory Impact - The China Securities Regulatory Commission's 2025 action plan encourages fund companies to optimize resource allocation and reduce inefficient investments, further accelerating the trend of app closures [6]. - The industry is transitioning from "heavy asset direct sales" to "lightweight operations," with a focus on cost-effective models [6]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The future of direct sales channels in public funds is expected to diversify, with smaller institutions likely abandoning independent apps in favor of lighter platforms like WeChat services and official websites [6]. - The industry is predicted to deepen investment advisory services, enhancing competitiveness through professional services and brand building rather than high-frequency trading [6].

Core Viewpoint - Multiple securities firms have become significant shareholders in the top ten circulating shareholders of listed companies, indicating a strong interest in sectors such as non-ferrous metals and power equipment [2][3]. Group 1: Securities Firms as Major Shareholders - As of August 11, several listed companies, including Western Mining and Xiangdian Co., have securities firms among their top ten circulating shareholders [4]. - The top shareholders include Guotou Securities, Shenwan Hongyuan Securities, and others, with notable holdings in companies like Western Mining (21.98 million shares) and Xiangdian Co. (18.26 million shares) [5][6]. - Shenwan Hongyuan and China Merchants Securities increased their holdings in Cangge Mining by 2.96 million shares and 72,000 shares, respectively, by the end of Q2 [5][6]. Group 2: Changes in Holdings - Guotou Securities has newly become the sixth largest shareholder in Huate Dain and the tenth in Western Mining, holding 3.80 million shares [6]. - Shanghai Securities has entered as the sixth largest shareholder in Taijia Co. with 1.80 million shares, while Huatai Securities is now the tenth largest shareholder in Kaimete Gas with 2.72 million shares [6]. - Some firms, like Shenwan Hongyuan, have reduced their holdings, selling approximately 522,800 shares of Xiangdian Co. in Q2 [7]. Group 3: Securities Firms' Proprietary Business Performance - In 2024, the total proprietary business income of securities firms exceeded 174 billion yuan, marking a year-on-year growth of over 40% [8]. - Six firms, including CITIC Securities and Huatai Securities, reported proprietary business net income exceeding 10 billion yuan [8]. - The first quarter of 2024 saw significant growth in proprietary income for several firms, with Changjiang Securities increasing by over 23 times to 872 million yuan [8]. Group 4: Market Outlook and Analyst Insights - Analysts suggest that the securities sector is poised for a stable recovery in valuation, supported by favorable liquidity, strong mid-year performance, and potential for mergers and acquisitions [10].

两融余额维持高位，投资者关注融资利率变化 两融市场活跃成为近期市场关注焦点。截至8月5日，A股融资融券余额为20002.59亿元，距离上一次 （2015年7月1日）站上2万亿元大关已时隔逾10年。截至8月6日，A股融资融券余额为20094.14亿元，连 续两日突破2万亿元，再创近10年新高。 "需要融资、开户的朋友欢迎联系我"。近日A股两融余额重回2万亿元的消息"刷屏"后，就有券商营业部 相关人士在朋友圈"吆喝"起来了。沪上一营业部投顾人士告诉记者，近期行情不错，有不少客户主动来 咨询怎么开两融账户，也比较关心融资利率有多少。 每当市场对两融预期向好之时，就有券商下调两融利率的传言。近期，网络平台涌现了一批通过低融资 利率招揽客户的帖子，以"3.58%超低利率，零门槛畅享""头部券商，两融利率最低可到3%""两融利率 断崖式下跌"等宣传语吸引眼球。 真实的情况究竟如何？记者就此多方调查，确实有个别券商为了揽客，对融资利率进行了下调。"我们 最低可以降到4%以下，无资金门槛。如果资金体量非常大，3%以下也可以突破。"华东地区一券商营 业部经理说。 还有一家头部券商营业部客户经理说："最低无门槛是3.98%，10 ...

Core Viewpoint - The stability of information systems in the securities industry is essential for ensuring the safe operation of financial markets, prompting the China Securities Association to seek industry feedback on the "Stability Assurance System Standard for the Securities Industry" [1][2]. Group 1: Background and Purpose - The initiative aims to integrate best practices from securities firms to create a practical stability assurance framework, promoting the digital and standardized development of technical capabilities across the industry [1]. - The project for drafting the standard began in November 2023, with participation from 14 securities firms, including major players like GF Securities and CITIC Securities [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - There are four main challenges identified: 1. Lack of resilience design in system development, leading to high operational risk prevention costs due to insufficient monitoring and automation capabilities [2]. 2. Predominantly reactive risk perception during operations, lacking proactive data-driven risk identification capabilities [2]. 3. Emergency response relies heavily on individual expert experience, lacking data-driven human-machine collaborative capabilities [2]. 4. Insufficient depth of intelligent technology application, resulting in a gap between abnormal response efficiency and real-time business requirements [2]. Group 3: Proposed Framework - The "Stability Assurance System Standard" proposes a "three-in-one" framework for stability assurance, focusing on organizational, institutional, and process guarantees [3]. - Organizational guarantees include defining the structure, personnel competency requirements, and management objectives [3]. - Institutional guarantees encompass regulations, technical support, operational procedures, and timelines to ensure management requirements are actionable and traceable [3]. - Process guarantees focus on ten core processes related to stability management, including monitoring, alerting, and fault management, with mechanisms for evaluation and key activities [3]. - The standard emphasizes a shift towards proactive operations management to meet non-functional requirements like resilience and maintainability, utilizing digital methods to enhance defense capabilities [3].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the significant increase in the margin trading balance in the A-share market, which has surpassed 20 trillion yuan for the first time in nearly a decade, indicating heightened investor interest and market activity [2][10]. - As of August 6, the A-share margin trading balance reached 20,094.14 billion yuan, marking a new high in nearly 10 years [2]. - The rise in margin trading has led to increased inquiries from investors about opening margin accounts and the associated financing rates [2]. Group 2 - Some brokerage firms have lowered their margin financing rates to attract new clients, with reports of rates as low as 3% for large fund amounts, although this is not a widespread trend across the industry [4][5]. - The financing rates offered by brokerages vary significantly, with new clients often receiving lower rates compared to existing clients [5][6]. - The average coupon rate for securities company bonds issued by brokerages has decreased to 1.97% in 2023, down from 2.52% in the previous year, indicating a reduction in financing costs for brokerages [6]. Group 3 - The competitive landscape in the margin trading business has led to a "volume increase but price decrease" phenomenon, particularly affecting major brokerages [7][8]. - Major brokerages like CITIC Securities and Huatai Securities have reported declines in interest income from margin trading, with CITIC Securities experiencing a 14.41% year-on-year drop [7]. - The intense competition has prompted brokerages to lower rates to retain clients, but this strategy may compress profit margins [8]. Group 4 - The current margin trading balance, while high, represents a smaller proportion of the A-share market's total trading volume compared to 2015, suggesting a more stable market environment [10]. - The ratio of margin trading balance to the free float market value is currently at 2.23%, significantly lower than the 4.73% peak in 2015, indicating a more cautious use of leverage [10]. - Factors such as policy support and expectations of interest rate cuts have contributed to the increased use of leverage in the market, enhancing trading activity [10]. Group 5 - Individual investors remain a significant driving force in the market, with their buying consensus nearing the high points of Q4 2024 [11]. - The behavior of individual investors in margin trading and other trading strategies will be crucial for future market trends [11].