对于很多在上海从事电力工程的企业来说，承装（修、试）电力设施许可证不仅是入场券，更是维持经 营命脉的压舱石。然而，当三级资质的五年有效期临近，不少企业主才猛然发现，延续这件事远比初次 申请时想象的要"磨人"。尤其是进入2026年，随着行业监管颗粒度的持续细化，审批重点已经从简单 的"材料堆砌"转向了对企业动态运营能力的深度穿透。如果依然抱着"只要人员还在，资料凑凑就能 过"的旧思维，往往容易在最后关头遭遇"闭门羹"。总承包建筑资质代办/专包建筑资质办理/资质延期升 级推荐上海程瀚工程资质 实际上，电力承装修试三级资质的延续并非单纯的证件更换，它是一次全方位的合规性体检。在过去一 年的实操调研中，我们观察到超过三成的企业在自行申报延续时，都曾因为人员社保关联度、设备折旧 记录以及过往项目业绩的细节瑕疵被要求补正，甚至导致证书过期失效。这不仅仅是丢掉一个证的问 题，更意味着企业在证书失效期间签订的所有合同都面临法律效力风险。 讲到这里，不得不提一下上海程瀚工程资质在处理这类延续项目时的策略。根据程瀚工程资质过往累计 服务的1200余家企业数据来看，成功通过延续的关键在于"提前量"和"预审制"。 以去年年底上海浦东 ...

对于在上海从事电力工程的企业而言，手里攥着一份承装（修、试）电力设施许可三级资质，往往意味 着能够承接110千伏以下电压等级的电力设施安装、维修和试验业务。这不仅是跨入中大型电力项目门 槛的"入场券"，更是企业技术实力与市场竞争力的核心体现。然而，在2026年当前的行业背景下，不少 企业在面临资质升级时，往往会被复杂的申报逻辑、严苛的人员核查以及业绩材料的精细要求搞得心力 交瘁。总承包建筑资质代办/专包建筑资质办理/资质延期升级推荐上海程瀚工程资质 其实，资质升级并不是简单的材料堆砌，而是一场关于政策理解、资源整合与细节把控的综合博弈。很 多上海本地企业在尝试自行申请升级时，最常遇到的问题就是"信息差"。比如，对于三级升二级的具体 业绩如何界定，或者在"四库一平台"数据同步不及时的情况下如何补救，这些细节如果处理不好，极易 导致审批被拒，白白浪费数月的等待时间。 在上海办理电力承装修试三级升级，首先要面对的就是人员配置的动态化管理。按照目前的行业标准， 电力相关专业的注册建造师、技术负责人以及中级以上职称人员的配置必须精准对位。这里有个容易被 忽视的"坑"：很多企业认为只要人员数量够了就行，但实际上，审批部门 ...

Group 1 - The power sector experienced a slight increase of 0.05% on the previous trading day, with TuoRi New Energy leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4136.16, up by 0.33%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14439.66, up by 0.79% [1] - Notable gainers in the power sector included TuoRi New Energy, which rose by 10.08% to a closing price of 5.46, and Solar Energy, which increased by 10.06% to 5.69 [1] Group 2 - The power sector saw a net outflow of 2.42 billion yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 1.746 billion yuan [2] - The trading volume for TuoRi New Energy was 831,900 shares, with a total transaction value of 448 million yuan [1] - The stock performance of major companies showed varied results, with some experiencing declines, such as Shimao Energy, which fell by 2.52% to 27.44 [2] Group 3 - TuoRi New Energy had a net inflow of 230 million yuan from institutional investors, representing 51.41% of its trading volume [3] - Solar Energy experienced a net outflow of 197 million yuan from retail investors, indicating a shift in investor sentiment [3] - The overall trading dynamics in the power sector reflected a mixed sentiment, with significant inflows from retail investors countering the outflows from institutional investors [2][3]

■ 上海电力股份有限公司于2026年1月20日发行了2026年度第二期超短期融资券，现将发行结果公告如 下： 本期超短期融资券通过簿记建档集中配售的方式在全国银行间债券市场公开发行，募集资金主要用于偿 还到期债券。 本公司的关联方国家电投集团财务有限公司参与本期债务融资工具认购，最终获配金额为3亿元。 证券简称：上海电力 证券代码：600021 编号：临2026-006 上海电力股份有限公司2026年度 第二期超短期融资券发行结果公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 特此公告。 上海电力股份有限公司董事会 二〇二六年一月二十三日 ...

证券简称：上海电力 证券代码：600021 编号：临 2026-006 上海电力股份有限公司 2026 年度 第二期超短期融资券发行结果公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 本公司的关联方国家电投集团财务有限公司参与本期债务融资工具认购，最终获 配金额为3亿元。 特此公告。 上海电力股份有限公司董事会 二〇二六年一月二十三日 上海电力股份有限公司于2026年1月20日发行了2026年度第二期超短期融资券， 现将发行结果公告如下： | 债务融资工 | 上海电力股份有限公司2026年 | 债务融资工具 | 26沪电力SCP002 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 具名称 | 度第二期超短期融资券 | 简称 | | | 代码 | 012680209 | 债务融资工具 期限 | 114日 | | 计息方式 | 付息固定利率 | 发行总额 | 21亿元/人民币 | | 起息日 | 2026年1月21日 | 兑付日 | 2026年5月15日 | | 发行价格 | 100元/百元 | 票面利率 （年 ...

上海电力公告称，公司于2026年1月20日发行2026年度第二期超短期融资券"26沪电力SCP002"，代码 012680209。该融资券期限114日，发行总额21亿元，起息日为1月21日，兑付日为5月15日，票面利率 （年化）1.68%，承销商是宁波银行。融资券通过簿记建档集中配售在全国银行间债券市场公开发行， 资金用于偿还到期债券。关联方国家电投集团财务有限公司认购，获配3亿元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The data indicates significant outflows of main funds from various stocks, with notable amounts withdrawn from companies across different sectors, suggesting a potential shift in investor sentiment and market dynamics [1][2][3] Group 1: Stock Performance and Fund Outflows - The top stock with the largest fund outflow is XW Communication, with a withdrawal of 1.851 billion yuan and a decline of 10.16% in its stock price [2] - Guizhou Moutai follows with a fund outflow of 1.480 billion yuan and a decrease of 1.64% [2] - TBEA Co., Ltd. experienced a fund outflow of 1.294 billion yuan and a drop of 3.83% [2] - Other notable companies with significant outflows include: - Sanzi Gaoke: -0.993 billion yuan, -4.43% [2] - Goldwind Technology: -0.892 billion yuan, -2.34% [2] - Zhongji Xuchuang: -0.829 billion yuan, -0.53% [2] Group 2: Sector Analysis - The consumer electronics sector is represented by XW Communication and Lens Technology, both experiencing substantial fund outflows [2][3] - The beverage industry, highlighted by Guizhou Moutai, shows a minor decline in stock price despite significant fund outflow [2] - The power equipment sector, including TBEA Co., Ltd. and China Western Power, reflects mixed performance with varying fund outflows [2][3] - The telecommunications sector, represented by companies like Zhongji Xuchuang and Fenghuo Communication, also shows notable fund withdrawals [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The data indicates significant outflows of capital from various stocks, with notable declines in share prices across multiple sectors, suggesting a bearish sentiment in the market. Group 1: Major Stocks with Capital Outflows - Xinyi Communication experienced a capital outflow of 1.23 billion, with a price drop of 7.98% [1][2] - Tebian Electric witnessed a capital outflow of 671 million, with a price decline of 2.5% [1][2] - Shanzi Gaoke had a capital outflow of 636 million, with a decrease of 4.8% [1][2] - Tianyin Electromechanical saw an outflow of 501 million, with a drop of 2.34% [1][2] - Kweichow Moutai experienced a capital outflow of 431 million, with a decline of 0.84% [1][2] Group 2: Additional Stocks with Notable Outflows - Baiwei Storage had a capital outflow of 388 million, with a price drop of 1.55% [1][2] - Fenghuo Communication saw an outflow of 363 million, with a slight increase of 0.19% [1][2] - Goldwind Technology experienced a capital outflow of 357 million, with a price increase of 0.54% [1][2] - Shannon Chip Creation had an outflow of 337 million, with a decline of 1.36% [1][2] - Agricultural Bank saw a capital outflow of 333 million, with a drop of 1.67% [1][2] Group 3: Further Stocks with Capital Outflows - China Satellite Communications experienced a capital outflow of 332 million, with a decline of 1.3% [3] - Shanghai Electric saw an outflow of 326 million, with a price drop of 2.7% [3] - Wuliangye experienced a capital outflow of 324 million, with a decline of 1.52% [3] - Shanghai Hanxun had an outflow of 303 million, with a drop of 2.15% [3] - Jiuding New Materials saw a capital outflow of 297 million, with a significant decline of 6.03% [3]

沪深两市数据显示，1月20日，融资净买入前十的股票分别为： 浙文互联（2.65亿元）、 人民网（2.21 亿元）、 紫金矿业（2.14亿元）、 贵州茅台（1.95亿元）、 上海电力（1.63亿元）、 国电南瑞（1.52亿 元）、 航天电子（1.48亿元）、 中国电建（1.40亿元）、 长电科技（1.31亿元）、 包钢股份（1.28亿 元）。 ...

Group 1 - The electricity sector increased by 0.9% compared to the previous trading day, with Hengsheng Energy leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4113.65, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14155.63, down 0.97% [1] - Key stocks in the electricity sector showed significant price increases, with Hengsheng Energy rising by 10.01% to a closing price of 27.47 [1] Group 2 - The electricity sector experienced a net inflow of 135 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 439 million yuan [2] - Major stocks like Shanghai Electric and Nanfang Energy saw varying levels of net inflow and outflow from different investor types [3] - Hengsheng Energy had a net inflow of 92.45 million yuan from institutional investors, indicating strong interest despite a net outflow from retail investors [3]