新华社华盛顿1月7日电 美国欧洲司令部7日宣布，美方已在北大西洋扣押"贝拉1"号油轮。 ...

美国试图在大西洋扣押与俄罗斯有关联的油轮。 ...

市场消息：美国在北大西洋靠近与俄罗斯有关联的油轮附近进行侦察飞行。 ...

证券日报网讯1月5日，大西洋在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，截至2025年12月31日公司股东总数为 47202户。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The EU's enforcement of the Digital Services Act has escalated tensions between the US and EU, with the US imposing travel restrictions on European officials in response to a significant fine levied against Musk's platform X [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Context - The EU's Digital Services Act, enacted in 2022, mandates large internet platforms to prevent the spread of illegal content and hate speech, impacting major US tech companies like Apple, Google, and X [3][5]. - The first fine under this act was imposed on X, amounting to €120 million, which has drawn strong discontent from the US [3][5]. Group 2: Political Implications - The US sanctions against European officials are seen as a challenge to the EU's digital governance authority, indicating a shift from policy disagreements to a more profound political conflict [3][6]. - The ongoing digital regulatory dispute is expected to evolve into a direct conflict over rule-making authority and governance boundaries by 2026 [3][10]. Group 3: Internal Pressures - Both the US and EU face internal pressures to adopt more aggressive stances in their digital regulatory approaches, with US lawmakers advocating for harsher measures against EU officials [6][7]. - The EU is experiencing internal divisions regarding its response to US sanctions, with some leaders calling for a stronger stance against US tech companies [8][9]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The digital governance conflict reflects deeper ideological divides between the US and EU, with the US viewing the Digital Services Act as a tool for censorship, while the EU sees it as essential for curbing hate speech [10][11]. - The situation is indicative of a broader cultural and political clash between the Trump administration and Europe, suggesting that the transatlantic relationship has fundamentally changed [11].

Core Viewpoint - The EU's enforcement of the Digital Services Act has escalated tensions between the US and Europe, with the US imposing travel restrictions on EU officials in response to a significant fine levied against Musk's platform X [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Context - The EU's Digital Services Act, passed in 2022, mandates large internet platforms to prevent the spread of illegal content and hate speech, impacting major US tech companies like Apple, Google, and X [3][5]. - The first fine under this act was imposed on X, amounting to €120 million (approximately $130 million), which has drawn strong discontent from the US [3][5]. Group 2: Political Implications - The US sanctions against EU officials are seen as a challenge to the EU's digital governance authority, indicating a shift from mere policy disagreements to a deeper political conflict [3][6]. - The US government has previously threatened retaliation against the EU's digital regulations, using them as leverage in trade negotiations [6][7]. Group 3: Internal Pressures - Both the US and EU face internal pressures to adopt more aggressive stances in their digital regulatory disputes, with US lawmakers advocating for harsher measures against EU officials [7][10]. - The EU Commission's cautious response to US sanctions has sparked debate within Europe, with some leaders calling for a stronger stance against US actions [10][12]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The ongoing digital dispute reflects fundamental differences in governance philosophies between the US and EU, with potential for further escalation as both sides prepare for future regulatory actions [15][16]. - The EU's ability to assert its digital sovereignty and respond effectively to US pressures will be critical in shaping the future of transatlantic relations [16].

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission issued its first "non-compliance decision" under the Digital Services Act, imposing a fine of €120 million on the social media platform X, owned by billionaire Elon Musk. This action has led to the U.S. imposing travel restrictions on five European individuals, including former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, who was instrumental in drafting the Digital Services Act. Analysts suggest that the U.S. sanctions are aimed at challenging the EU's digital governance authority and exerting long-term pressure on its regulatory enforcement. The digital regulatory dispute between the U.S. and EU is expected to evolve into a direct conflict over rule dominance and governance boundaries by 2026, becoming a new focal point of transatlantic tensions [1]. Group 1 - The European Commission fined the social media platform X €120 million for non-compliance with the Digital Services Act [1] - The U.S. imposed travel restrictions on five European individuals, including Thierry Breton, in response to the fine [1] - Analysts believe the U.S. sanctions challenge the EU's digital governance authority and aim to create long-term pressure on its regulatory framework [1] Group 2 - The digital regulatory dispute between the U.S. and EU is expected to escalate beyond policy differences [1] - There is a possibility of direct conflicts over rule dominance and governance boundaries by 2026 [1] - This situation may become a new focal point of transatlantic tensions [1]

用东海的水养出了大西洋鲑。 浙江省宁波市象山县出产黄鱼和梭子蟹等海鲜，在长三角地区早已颇有盛名。不过从2024年开始，从象 山县还"游"出了新品种——大西洋鲑。 用东海之水在陆地上养殖三文鱼，已经成为现实。 大西洋鲑俗称三文鱼，中国市场上的冰鲜三文鱼，主要是来自挪威等中高纬度国家的养殖产品。而如今 在象山县高塘岛乡临海边的高大厂房内，依靠着现代技术在封闭的环境中，也养成了血统纯正的陆基大 西洋鲑。陆基养殖是指在陆地上建设养殖池设施的养殖模式。 养殖企业诺帝克水产（宁波）有限公司（以下简称"诺蒂克"）总经理童安睿（Andreas Thorud）告诉第 一财经记者，中国对三文鱼的需求每年剧增，让企业看到了机遇，相比进口三文鱼，在宁波象山出产的 三文鱼更加贴近市场，更能保持新鲜度，同时在封闭环境下养殖，无需担心寄生虫问题，食品更加安 全。 养殖不易 三文鱼在中国市场上越卖越火，从原先的一二线城市，如今已经下沉到三四线城市。这一趋势在数据上 也有所反映，据统计，2025年1月至9日，挪威向中国出口三文鱼6.94万吨，同比大幅增长112.1%，中国 已成为挪威三文鱼全球第六大出口市场，也是前十大市场中增长最快的市场。 ...

特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克周二在社交平台X上回应了《大西洋月刊》的一篇文章，该文章称他是"科学种 族主义者"，并将矛头指向资助该刊物的已故苹果联合创始人史蒂夫·乔布斯的遗孀劳伦·乔布斯，顺便再 次批评了亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝索斯前妻麦肯齐·斯科特的慈善捐赠。 一位X用户分享了《大西洋月刊》11月份的文章《为什么埃隆·马斯克需要龙与地下城来成为种族主义者 ——"科学种族主义"的虚幻根源》。 马斯克回应称："《大西洋月刊》是一份假刊物，靠着劳伦·乔布斯用她亡夫的钱做一些他会鄙视的事情 才得以存活。" 他补充称："这再次强调了一点，即'觉醒'白人女性是西方文明的厄运。" 一位网友评论称："亿万富翁的左翼妻子是西方文明最大的威胁之一。她们精神不稳定，拥有世界上所 有的钱来制造混乱。" 马斯克回应称："是的！麦肯齐·贝索斯（或者不管她现在姓什么）是另一个例子。她鄙视她的前任，并 希望任何像他这样的人去死。" 马斯克的这条帖子还附带了2024年一篇文章的链接，该文章讲述了贝索斯的前妻如何将大部分慈善捐赠 给了"帮助移民罪犯和变性运动员的极左组织。" 一位网友评论称："亿万富翁的左翼妻子是西方文明最大的威胁之一。她们精神不稳定 ...

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) has issued its first non-compliance decision under the Digital Services Act, fining Elon Musk's social media platform X €120 million for transparency violations [1] - The EU's investigation into X, initiated on December 18, 2023, focuses on the effectiveness of measures taken to combat illegal content and misinformation [1] - X's violations include misleading design regarding "blue check" certification, non-compliance in advertising database transparency, and failure to provide public data access to qualified researchers, resulting in fines of €45 million, €35 million, and €40 million respectively [1] Group 2 - Following the announcement, Musk criticized the EU's fine, and the U.S. government condemned the EU's regulatory actions as unfair to American tech companies [2] - EU officials assert that the penalties are proportionate to X's user scale and are not targeted specifically at U.S. companies, emphasizing that all firms operating in the EU must adhere to the same standards [2] - The EU has been actively enforcing digital regulations, including significant fines against Google and investigations into other tech companies like Meta and Amazon [2] Group 3 - The EU is assessing Amazon and Microsoft to determine if they qualify as "gatekeepers" in cloud computing, which could lead to market investigations and penalties for non-compliance [3] - Tensions between the U.S. and EU over digital regulation have extended to traditional trade areas, with U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum linked to EU's regulatory approach [3] - The EU has rejected U.S. claims of "extortion" regarding digital regulations, asserting that these laws are essential for sovereignty and should not be used as bargaining chips [3] Group 4 - Observers note that the increasing fines reflect a broader struggle for digital sovereignty between the U.S. and EU, with the EU seeking to enhance its digital autonomy in response to the expansion of U.S. tech giants [4] - The U.S. has criticized EU regulations as unfair, with recent national security reports highlighting challenges to the "America First" strategy posed by European digital policies [4] - The divergence in worldviews between Europe and the U.S. is seen as a growing trend, with calls for Europe to achieve greater sovereignty and independence [4]