1月5日，爱尔兰总理马丁出席媒体见面会表示，"我们反对关税，我们认为关税最终将损害世界经济。" 爱尔兰总理米哈尔·马丁于1月4日下午乘机抵达北京首都国际机场，开启为期5天的访华行程。此访是爱 尔兰总理时隔14年再次访华。 ...

美国总统特朗普2025年12月31日签署文件，宣布推迟按照原计划继续提高对进口软体家具、厨房橱柜和 浴室柜等产品的关税税率。美国政府当前对部分软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征收25%的关税。 美国相关行业协会和媒体此前表示，对软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜等产品加征关税会给美国消费者、 购房者和建筑商带来新的压力，而这些群体正处于政府意在提振增长的经济领域。（央视新闻） 分析人士认为，物价持续上涨迫使美国政府暂停对相关产品继续加征关税。2025年10月，美国政府开始 对进口自多数贸易伙伴的软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征收25%关税，并计划于2026年1月1日起把厨房 橱柜、浴室柜及相关产品税率再次上调至50%，把软体家具税率提高至30%。目前，再次加征关税的时 间被推迟至2027年1月1日。 ...

美国总统特朗普2025年12月31日签署文件，宣布推迟按照原计划继续提高对进口软体家具、厨房橱柜和 浴室柜等产品的关税税率。美国政府当前对部分软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征收25%的关税。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 美国相关行业协会和媒体此前表示，对软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜等产品加征关税会给美国消费者、 购房者和建筑商带来新的压力，而这些群体正处于政府意在提振增长的经济领域。 分析人士认为，物价持续上涨迫使美国政府暂停对相关产品继续加征关税。2025年10月，美国政府开始 对进口自多数贸易伙伴的软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征收25%关税，并计划于2026年1月1日起把厨房 橱柜、浴室柜及相关产品税率再次上调至50%，把软体家具税率提高至30%。目前，再次加征关税的时 间被推迟至2027年1月1日。 ...

来源：新华社 作者: 刘亚南 美国相关行业协会和媒体此前表示，对软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜等产品加征关税会给美国消费者、 购房者和建筑商带来新的压力，而这些群体正处于政府意在提振增长的经济领域。 多家美国媒体在报道中提到，这并不是美国政府第一次因物价压力调整加征关税安排，此前就曾取消部 分农产品的"对等关税"。美国有线电视新闻网表示，美国政府对多种商品征收关税导致物价不稳，受到 越来越多的批评。彭博社报道说，目前美国选民对物价水平的不满情绪将持续发酵。 转自：北京日报客户端 新华社纽约1月1日电 美国总统特朗普2025年12月31日签署文件，宣布推迟按照原计划继续提高对进口 软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜等产品的关税税率。美国政府当前对部分软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征 收25%的关税。 分析人士认为，物价持续上涨迫使美国政府暂停对相关产品继续加征关税。2025年10月，美国政府开始 对进口自多数贸易伙伴的软体家具、厨房橱柜和浴室柜征收25%关税，并计划于2026年1月1日起把厨房 橱柜、浴室柜及相关产品税率再次上调至50%，把软体家具税率提高至30%。目前，再次加征关税的时 间被推迟至2027年1月1日。 ...

根据《保障措施条例》第二十条规定，商务部向国务院关税税则委员会提出对规定数量之外的进口牛肉 加征关税的建议，国务院关税税则委员会根据商务部的建议作出决定，对规定数量之外的进口牛肉在现 行适用关税税率的基础上加征关税，加征关税税率为55%。 每经AI快讯，12月31日，商务部公告，根据调查结果，决定以"国别配额及配额外加征关税"的形式对进 口牛肉采取保障措施。保障措施实施期限为3年，自2026年1月1日至2028年12月31日。保障措施在实施 期间内按固定时间间隔逐步放宽。 ...

中国大陆出发减少16%、印度出发减少19%、韩国出发减少5%、台湾出发减少24%、日本 出发减少19%。有观点指出，2024年11月存在加征关税之前的抢搭末班车运输，2025年出 现报复性减少…… 美国调查公司笛卡尔数据（Descartes Datamyne）的统计数据显示，11月从亚洲发往美国 的海上集装箱运输量同比减少6.7%，降至160万4016个（换算成20英尺集装箱）。运输量 连续3个月低于上年。除中国大陆出发的运输量放缓拉低整体之外，印度出发也持续减少。 中国大陆出发的运输量同比减少16%，连续3个月减少2位数，中美对立导致货物运输停滞不 前。美国在8月底对印度启动追加关税，11月印度出发的运输量减少19%，连续2个月减少2 位数。 韩国出发（减少5%）和新加坡出发（减少3%）等的运输也表现低迷。台湾出发（减少 24%）和日本出发（减少19%）也出现负增长。有观点指出，2024年11月因美国当选总统 特朗普提出高关税政策，存在加征关税之前的抢搭末班车运输，2025年出现了报复性减少。 受美国转向从中国以外采购的动向影响，越南等国的对美集装箱运输势头强劲。越南出发同比大幅增长 31%。泰国（增长28 ...

作者 | 第一财经 程程 对于美国总统特朗普发出的不还"水债"就加征关税的威胁，墨西哥总统辛鲍姆9日表示，墨西哥计划 增加对美供水量。 据新华社报道，美国总统特朗普8日在社交媒体发帖称，如果墨西哥不立即向美国供水，美国将对墨 西哥产品额外征收5%的关税。他声称墨西哥违反了两国的水资源共享条约。 特朗普称，墨西哥在过去5年未能遵守协议，现在欠美国超过约9.8亿立方米供水量，美国要求墨西 哥在12月31日前释放约2.47亿立方米供水，其余部分尽快交付。 辛鲍姆对此表示，干旱和输水管道的规模限制了墨西哥向美国输送"更多水"的能力，"这并非墨西哥 方面的恶意"。她将找到一个"不会危及墨西哥人口和农业生产，但也能帮助美国的解决方案"。 2025.12. 11 本文字数：1554，阅读时长大约2.5分钟 美国采取多重举措考量农民利益 里奥格兰德河同样流经了美国农业第一大州得克萨斯州，该州近年同样饱受干旱困扰。得州农民代表 去年就向媒体表示，由于降水不足和墨西哥供水减少，当地蔗糖产业基本消失殆尽，棉花、玉米、高 粱、大豆、柑橘等农作物的生产则正面临着严重挑战。 世界自然基金会的最新研究发现，水资源短缺已经导致科罗拉多河流域 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government is proposing a one-time "tariff dividend" of $2,000 per person for the American public, excluding high-income individuals, funded by revenue from tariffs, which Trump claims generates trillions for the federal government [2][3] Group 1: Financial Implications - The U.S. Census Bureau indicates a population of 340 million, meaning a total payout of $680 billion if every individual receives $2,000 [2] - Approximately 18% of American adults earn over $100,000 annually, suggesting that even after excluding high-income earners, the total cost of the "tariff dividend" would exceed $500 billion [2] - Tariff revenue for the fiscal year 2025 is projected to reach $195 billion, a significant increase of $118 billion from the previous fiscal year, but still far from the required funds for the proposed dividend [3] Group 2: Legal and Political Context - The legality of the proposed "tariff dividend" is under scrutiny, as the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to levy taxes, while the President's role is limited to execution and management of tax policies [4] - The Supreme Court is questioning whether the President has the authority to impose large-scale tariffs, emphasizing that taxation is a core power of Congress [5] - Officials are attempting to frame tariffs as diplomatic tools rather than revenue-generating measures, complicating the narrative surrounding the proposed dividend [6] Group 3: Economic Impact and Public Perception - Economic experts argue that the burden of tariffs will ultimately fall on American consumers and importers, potentially leading to price increases that outweigh the benefits of the proposed $2,000 payment [8] - Research indicates that during Trump's first term, tariffs led to price hikes on consumer goods, with American consumers bearing over 90% of the tariff costs [8] - The proposal for a "tariff dividend" may serve as a political strategy to counteract criticism of inflation caused by tariffs, creating a perception that protectionism equates to welfare [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's proposal to distribute a one-time $2,000 "tariff dividend" to citizens raises questions about its feasibility and legality, especially in light of the significant costs involved and the ongoing Supreme Court review of tariff policies [1][3][5]. Financial Implications - The total cost of distributing $2,000 to the entire U.S. population of approximately 340 million would amount to $680 billion, and even after excluding high-income earners, the cost would still exceed $500 billion [1]. - The projected tariff revenue for the fiscal year 2025 is $195 billion, which is a significant increase of $118 billion from the previous fiscal year, but still insufficient to cover the proposed dividend [1][2]. Legal Considerations - The legality of the proposed "tariff dividend" is under scrutiny, as the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to levy taxes, while the President's authority to impose tariffs is being challenged in the Supreme Court [3]. - Officials are attempting to frame tariffs as diplomatic tools rather than revenue-generating measures, complicating the legal landscape surrounding the proposed dividend [3]. Public Sentiment and Economic Impact - Surveys indicate that the American public does not support the current economic and trade policies, suggesting that the proposed dividend may not garner the intended support for the government's tariff strategy [4]. - The burden of tariffs is likely to be passed on to American consumers through increased prices, potentially negating the benefits of the proposed $2,000 payment [5]. Political Strategy - The proposal for a "tariff dividend" may be a strategic move to counteract criticism of the negative economic impacts of tariffs, creating a perception that protectionist policies can provide benefits to the public [5][6]. - The approach of taxing citizens and then offering rebates or cash payments is described as a common political tactic in the U.S. [6].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government is proposing a one-time "tariff dividend" of $2,000 per person for citizens outside the high-income group, funded by tariffs collected from trade, raising questions about the legality and feasibility of such a policy [1][3]. Financial Implications - The total cost of distributing $2,000 to the entire U.S. population of approximately 340 million would amount to $680 billion, and even after excluding high-income earners, the cost would still exceed $500 billion [1]. - The projected tariff revenue for the fiscal year 2025 is $195 billion, which is a significant increase of $118 billion from the previous fiscal year, but still insufficient to cover the proposed dividend [1]. Legal Considerations - The legality of the proposed "tariff dividend" is under scrutiny, as the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to levy taxes, while the President's authority to impose tariffs is being challenged in the Supreme Court [3]. - Officials are attempting to frame tariffs as diplomatic tools rather than revenue-generating measures, complicating the legal landscape surrounding the proposed dividend [3]. Economic Impact - Scholars argue that the burden of tariffs will not disappear but will instead be passed on to consumers through higher prices, potentially negating the benefits of the proposed cash payments [5]. - Research indicates that during Trump's first term, tariffs led to increased prices for consumer goods, with U.S. importers and consumers bearing over 90% of the tariff costs [5]. Political Strategy - The proposal for a "tariff dividend" may be a strategic move to regain public support for the administration's trade policies, especially among lower-income groups, by creating the illusion that protectionism equates to welfare [5][6]. - The Wall Street Journal critiques the approach of using cash payments to placate public discontent over high taxes, labeling it a common political tactic [6].