Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on the major fall accident at China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining Co., Ltd. reveals significant safety management failures and recommends accountability for 42 individuals involved in the incident [1][2]. Group 1: Accident Details - The accident occurred on July 23, 2025, resulting in 6 fatalities and 1 injury, classified as a major production safety responsibility accident [1]. - The incident involved 55 students and teachers from Northeast University, where a grid board above a flotation tank collapsed, leading to 7 individuals falling into the tank [1]. - The direct cause was identified as the grid board being smaller than the design specifications and improper welding of supporting steel, which had corroded due to prolonged exposure to moisture [1]. Group 2: Management and Regulatory Issues - The report highlights chaotic on-site safety management, gaps in safety production management systems, and superficial hazard identification and remediation processes [2]. - It points out that the supervising teacher lacked risk awareness and that the safety plan for the internship was not adequately targeted [2]. - Regulatory bodies failed to effectively enforce safety responsibilities and did not adequately supervise or manage safety in the mining sector [2]. Group 3: Accountability and Recommendations - The report recommends accountability for 42 individuals, including criminal charges for 4 employees of China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining, who have been transferred to judicial authorities [2]. - Administrative penalties, including fines, have been imposed on China Gold Group, and various organizations are required to submit written checks to their higher authorities [2]. - The report emphasizes the need for stricter safety regulations and improved safety management practices in mining operations and educational institutions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on the major fall accident at China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining Co., Ltd. identifies the incident as a significant production safety responsibility accident, resulting in 6 fatalities and 1 injury [1]. Group 1: Accident Overview and Causes - The accident occurred on July 23, 2025, during a field study involving 55 students and teachers from Northeast University at the flotation workshop of the mining plant, where a grid platform above the flotation tank collapsed, causing 7 individuals to fall into the tank [2]. - The direct cause of the accident was identified as the grid platform being smaller than the design specifications, improper welding of supporting steel, and significant corrosion due to prolonged exposure to moisture, leading to structural failure [2]. Group 2: Emergency Response - Upon discovering the fall, the workshop staff immediately activated emergency protocols, including stopping the flotation machine and organizing the evacuation of personnel, successfully rescuing one individual [2]. Group 3: Issues Exposed - The investigation revealed multiple issues, including poor safety management at the accident site, lack of effective safety protocols, and inadequate oversight by regulatory bodies and local government [3]. - The report highlighted deficiencies in risk awareness among supervising teachers and the absence of targeted safety plans for the internship program [3]. Group 4: Accountability and Consequences - The report recommended criminal charges against four individuals from China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining, with the police already implementing coercive measures [4]. - Various disciplinary actions were taken against 27 individuals from China Gold Group and its affiliates, as well as 6 personnel from Northeast University, including warnings and administrative penalties [4]. Group 5: Rectification and Preventive Measures - The report emphasized the need for regulatory bodies to enforce safety regulations rigorously and for companies to strengthen their safety management practices [5]. - It called for improvements in construction and operational standards for metal and non-metal mining projects, as well as enhanced safety management for internship programs [5].

Core Viewpoint - The visit of the Vice President of Guanglian Da Technology Co., Ltd. to China National Gold Group Co., Ltd. focused on the in-depth application and future planning of the electronic bidding platform version 9.0 [1] Group 1 - Guanglian Da's Vice President, Bi Pengfei, led a delegation to discuss the electronic bidding platform [1] - The discussions emphasized the deepening application of the platform and its future development plans [1]

12月27日，中国黄金集团内蒙古矿业有限公司较大坠落事故调查报告向社会公布，通过现场勘查、调查 取证、查阅资料、问询谈话、检测鉴定和分析论证，认定该事故为一起较大生产安全责任事故。 三、暴露出的问题。调查报告指出了企业、监管部门、地方政府及高校存在的问题。事故发生单位现场 安全管理粗放混乱、安全生产管理制度存在漏洞、隐患排查治理流于形式、选矿厂建设期间管理不规 范；实习带队教师风险意识不强、实习安全预案缺乏针对性；事故相关单位存在违规承揽工程、违法分 包工程、督导检查和监管不力、对安全生产工作重视程度不够等问题；相关监管部门存在未有效督促企 业落实安全生产主体责任、统筹安全和发展不够、监督管理失察、发挥非煤矿山行业主管部门作用不力 等问题。 四、追责问责情况。报告建议对事故中涉嫌犯罪的中金内蒙古矿业4人移送司法机关追究刑事责任，目 前公安机关已对其采取刑事强制措施；对中金集团及其所属企业27人分别给予撤销党内职务、党内严重 警告、政务撤职、降级、记大过、行政处罚、诫勉处理；对东北大学资源与土木工程学院6名人员分别 给予警告处分、诫勉处理、批评教育并作出书面检查；对新巴尔虎右旗应急管理局原局长给予开除党 籍、开 ...

Group 1 - The accident at China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining Co., Ltd. resulted in 6 fatalities and 1 injury, classified as a major production safety responsibility accident [1][2] - The direct cause of the accident was the failure of a grid plate above the flotation tank, which was undersized and improperly welded, leading to a collapse that caused individuals to fall into the tank [1][2] - The report identified multiple issues including poor on-site safety management, lack of effective safety protocols, and inadequate oversight by regulatory bodies [2][3] Group 2 - A total of 42 individuals are recommended for accountability, with 4 individuals from China Gold Group Inner Mongolia Mining being referred for criminal prosecution [2] - The report emphasizes the need for stricter safety regulations and management practices in the mining industry, urging companies to learn from the incident and improve safety measures [3] - It calls for enhanced safety management in internship programs and the establishment of comprehensive emergency response plans to ensure the safety of students and staff [3]

Group 1 - The jewelry sector experienced a slight decline of 0.01% on December 26, with Feiya leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3963.68, up 0.1%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13603.89, up 0.54% [1] - Key stocks in the jewelry sector showed varied performance, with Cuihua Jewelry rising by 3.76% to a closing price of 13.53 [1] Group 2 - The main funds in the jewelry sector saw a net outflow of 35.5 million yuan, while retail investors had a net inflow of 20.95 million yuan [2] - The stock Feiya had a closing price of 15.22, down 1.36%, with a trading volume of 40,200 shares [2] - The stock data indicates that major funds had a net inflow in stocks like Shenchuan A and Cuihua Jewelry, while others like Laofengxiang and Mingpai Jewelry experienced net outflows [3]

中新网北京12月25日电 (陶思阅)国际金价连日来持续走高，多家黄金首饰品牌缩小线下门店规模，但也 有黄金品牌加快开店步伐。据了解，老铺黄金25日开设了在香港的第四家门店，其今年新开门店数量为 去年的两倍。 国际金融机构罗斯柴尔德近期的报告指出，老铺黄金将在2025年首次实现营收超越历峰集团中国珠宝业 务。作为全球三大奢侈品巨头之一的瑞士历峰集团，旗下包括卡地亚、梵克雅宝、布契拉提、江诗丹 顿、积家等一线奢侈品牌。 巴克莱银行的报告显示，越来越多的中国消费者认为，中国产品的质量已经赶上西方，因此国际奢侈品 牌的高进入壁垒可能比市场预期要弱。 与此同时，国际金价与金饰消费的红利之下，黄金珠宝的抗周期性与中国本土消费粘性成国际巨头们青 睐的特征。已有中国本土高端珠宝品牌于本月宣布完成亿元A轮融资，全球三大奢侈品集团之一的开云 集团联合跟投。(完) 第一财经商学院院长黄磊认为，中国本土黄金品牌在核心城市的扩张，使其进入了与全球一线奢侈品牌 竞争的腹地，双方抢占核心的高净值消费人群。"随着全球高端消费'东移'和本土文化消费的激活，属 于中国本土黄金品牌的战略窗口期已经出现"。 老铺黄金方面表示，希望凭借香港的"窗口效 ...

Market Overview - The jewelry sector increased by 0.19% on December 25, with ST Xinhua Jin leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3959.62, up 0.47%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13531.41, up 0.33% [1] Individual Stock Performance - ST Xinhua Jin (600735) closed at 5.04, up 5.00% with a trading volume of 75,700 shares and a turnover of 37.74 million yuan [1] - Jin Yi Culture (002721) closed at 3.13, up 1.95% with a trading volume of 610,100 shares and a turnover of 190 million yuan [1] - Feiya (000026) closed at 15.43, up 1.85% with a trading volume of 61,600 shares and a turnover of 94.93 million yuan [1] - Other notable performances include: - Cai Zi Co. (6655509) up 0.93% to 16.27 [1] - Mingpai Jewelry (002574) up 0.71% to 5.68 [1] - Diya Co. (301177) up 0.69% to 29.11 [1] - China Gold (600916) down 0.37% to 8.07 [1] - Lao Feng Xiang (600612) down 0.49% to 44.72 [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The jewelry sector experienced a net outflow of 51.72 million yuan from institutional investors and 19.44 million yuan from retail investors, while individual investors saw a net inflow of 71.17 million yuan [2] - Notable capital flows include: - Feiya (000026) had a net inflow of 10.98 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - ST Xinhua Jin (600735) saw a net inflow of 9.01 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - China Gold (600916) had a net inflow of 2.11 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Lao Feng Xiang (600612) experienced a net outflow of 2.64 million yuan from institutional investors [3]

来源：环球网 【环球网消费报道 记者 刘晓旭】南海之滨，椰风轻拂。2025年12月12日，一场关乎黄金产业未来的思想盛宴在三亚拉开帷幕。由世界黄金协会与中国黄金 协会联合主办的"2025黄金行业可持续发展大会"在此隆重举行。在全球ESG浪潮奔涌与"双碳"目标深入推进的时代背景下，本次大会汇聚国内外行业领袖、 顶尖学者与资深媒体，共同探讨黄金行业可持续增长的新路径，共建负责任的黄金产业生态，推动整个产业链向善而行。 大会伊始，主持人世界黄金协会中国区CEO王立新便点明了会议的深远意义。他提到，2025年是挑战与机遇并存的关键之年，可持续发展已从行业共识上升 为全球行动，这一议题正深刻重塑着全球黄金产业的格局。 在随后的主旨演讲环节，中国黄金、山东黄金、紫金矿业、山东招金四大黄金巨头的领军人物联袂登场，奉献了一场关于战略、实践与未来的深度对话，为 中国黄金产业的可持续发展之路提供了清晰的路线图和生动的实践样本。 作为行业的压舱石和领航者，四大黄金集团从各自企业的实践出发，系统阐述了对可持续发展的深刻理解与战略布局，展现了新时代中国黄金企业的责任与 担当。 0:00 战略引领，合规筑基：中金黄金的"新篇章"之道 中 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news highlights the recent performance of China Gold, noting a slight decline in stock price and trading volume on December 24, with a total transaction amount of 106 million yuan [1] - On December 24, China Gold experienced a financing buy-in amount of 6.18 million yuan, with a net financing buy of -0.89 million yuan, indicating a negative sentiment among investors [1] - The total financing and securities lending balance for China Gold reached 339 million yuan, with the financing balance accounting for 2.48% of the circulating market value, which is below the 20% percentile level over the past year, indicating a low financing level [1] Group 2 - China Gold Group Gold Jewelry Co., Ltd. was established on December 16, 2010, and listed on February 5, 2021, focusing on the research, design, production, and sales of gold jewelry products under the "China Gold" brand [2] - The company's main business revenue composition includes 98.83% from gold products, with minor contributions from brand usage fees (0.67%), management service fees (0.22%), and other business activities [2] - For the period from January to September 2025, China Gold reported an operating income of 45.76 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 1.74%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 335 million yuan, down 55.08% year-on-year [2] Group 3 - Since its A-share listing, China Gold has distributed a total of 2.52 billion yuan in dividends, with 1.84 billion yuan distributed over the past three years [3] - As of September 30, 2025, the top ten circulating shareholders of China Gold include Hong Kong Central Clearing Limited, which holds 17.59 million shares, a decrease of 6.13 million shares from the previous period [3] - The Gold Stock ETF (517520) is noted as the ninth largest circulating shareholder, having newly entered with a holding of 9.67 million shares [3]