登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 为满足广大投资者的投资需求，中信建投基金管理有限公司（以下简称"本公司"）决定在销售机构北京 银行股份有限公司开通本公司旗下部分基金的基金转换业务。 一、适用基金范围 本次开通基金转换业务的基金有： 前述适用基金的转换业务仅限于通过销售机构北京银行股份有限公司办理的投资者。 三、开通时间 2025年9月29日起（含），投资者可申请办理前述适用基金的转换业务，具体办理时间与基金申购、赎 回业务办理时间相同。基金暂停转换时，以基金管理人发布的公告为准。 四、基金转换业务规则 （一）基金转换是指本公司旗下的基金份额持有人将其持有的某只基金的部分或全部份额转换为本公司 管理的其他基金基金份额的行为。 （二）基金转换只能在同一销售机构进行。转换的两只基金必须都是该销售机构销售的同一基金管理人 管理的、在同一注册登记机构注册登记的基金。 （三）基金转换以份额为单位进行申请。投资者可以发起多次基金转换业务，基金转换费用按每笔申请 单独计算。 ■ 二、适用投资者范围及办理场所 （四）基金转换业务的定价原则视转入和转出时的基金类型不同而定，并以申请受理当日各转出、转入 基金的基 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a recommendation for the banking industry [3] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the asset-liability structure and interest margin changes of 42 A-share listed banks during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, highlighting a shift towards corporate loans on the asset side and a stronger retail focus on the liability side [12][14] - The asset-liability structure indicates a significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, rising from 57.02% to 63.22% from the end of 2020 to mid-2025, while the proportion of demand deposits decreased from 41.94% to 30% [12][14] - The report notes a decline in both asset yield and interest margin, with the yield on interest-earning assets dropping from 4.43% to 3.32% and the net interest margin decreasing from 2.23% to 1.53% during the same period [14][15] Summary by Sections Overall Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin Changes - The asset-liability structure shows an increase in loan-to-earning asset ratio from 54.19% to 56.49%, with corporate loans making up a larger share of total loans [14][15] - The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased significantly, with the loan yield falling from 5.34% to 3.82% [15] - The net interest margin for listed banks remains higher than that of commercial banks, despite a decline [14][15] Changes in Each Banking Sector's Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin - City commercial banks experienced a more significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, with their interest margin narrowing less compared to other banks [18] - The report highlights that the proportion of deposits in interest-bearing liabilities for state-owned banks decreased, while it increased for rural commercial banks [18] - The decline in interest-bearing liabilities' cost rate was most pronounced in city commercial banks, leading to a smaller reduction in their interest margin [18]

一、核准张婧超北京银行股份有限公司城市副中心分行行长助理的任职资格。 二、北京银行应要求上述核准任职资格人员严格遵守金融监管总局有关监管规定，自北京银行政许可决 定作出之日起3个月内到任，并按要求及时报告到任情况。未在上述规定期限内到任的，本批复文件失 效，由决定机关办理行政许可注销手续。 2025年9月24日，北京金融监管局发布批复称，《北京银行股份有限公司关于张婧超城市副中心分行行 长助理任职资格核准的请示》（京银人发〔2025〕781号）收悉。经审核，现批复如下： 三、北京银行应督促上述核准任职资格人员持续学习和掌握经济金融相关法律法规，牢固树立风险合规 意识，熟悉任职岗位职责，忠实勤勉履职。 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - External environment factors such as interest rate fluctuations, bond supply - demand, and policy orientation jointly impact bond investment returns. In H1 2025, the bond investment of 42 listed banks showed certain characteristics in scale, structure, and profit and loss, but there are still challenges in maintaining stable returns in the future [1]. - The overall bond investment scale of 42 listed banks expanded steadily in H1 2025. There were differences in the investment structure among different types of banks, with state - owned banks and city commercial banks having stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, while joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio. The bond investment portfolio generally presented a pattern of "stable foundation and flexible gain" [1]. - The coupon income of 42 listed banks was generally stable in H1 2025 but showed a slight year - on - year decline. The fair value change loss was significant, and the investment income increased. However, the bond investment of the banking industry still faces pressure to maintain stable returns [1]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Volume - **Overall Bond Investment Scale: Steady Expansion**: In H1 2025, the total scale of the three types of bond - type financial assets of 42 listed banks showed a steady expansion trend. The growth of debt investment - type financial assets measured at amortized cost was relatively slow, while the growth of trading financial assets measured at fair value and included in current profits and losses was relatively large, indicating that banks increased the proportion of trading positions [9]. - **Differentiated Bond Investment Distribution Structures among Different Bank Types**: In H1 2025, state - owned banks and city commercial banks showed stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, which may be related to their participation in the primary - market issuance of important national and regional bond varieties. Joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks slightly weakened their bond allocation power but significantly increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio, showing a differentiated feature of "stable allocation by large banks and prominent trading flexibility by small and medium - sized banks" [13]. - **Bond Investment Allocation Tilted towards Government - Related Bonds**: In H1 2025, commercial banks increased their allocation of government - related bonds, with an average month - on - month increase of about 10% for state - owned banks, joint - stock banks, and city commercial banks, and a slightly smaller increase for rural commercial banks. The allocation of financial bonds and other bonds was differentiated. All banks held a relatively large scale of government - related bonds, followed by financial bonds and credit - related bonds [18]. - **Correlation between Financial Asset Types and Bond Variety Structures**: The banking industry maintained a stable growth of interest - rate bonds in the bond allocation portfolio and increased the allocation of credit bonds, while the allocation of financial bonds was relatively weak. In the bond trading portfolio, interest - rate bonds and financial bonds were the core varieties, with a more significant increase than credit bonds, showing a "stable foundation and flexible gain" pattern [22]. 3.2 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Profit and Loss - **Coupon Income: Generally Stable and Still the Main Source of Income**: In H1 2025, the total coupon income of 42 listed banks decreased slightly year - on - year. Although the scale of held - to - maturity bonds increased, the decline in the coupon rate of newly issued bonds led to a decrease in coupon income. In the future, coupon income is still expected to be the main source of bond investment income for commercial banks [26]. - **Fair Value Change Loss: Losses in the Trading Level**: In H1 2025, the total fair value change loss of 42 listed banks decreased significantly year - on - year, indicating that it was difficult to obtain capital gains through short - term trading in the volatile bond market, and there were floating losses in bond trading [28]. - **Investment Income: Growth in All Bank Types**: In H1 2025, the actual investment income of 42 listed banks in the bond field increased significantly year - on - year. Although the book value appreciation of bond - type trading financial assets and other debt investment - type financial assets was not as good as that of the previous year, banks could still increase their investment income by selling floating - profit old bonds and waiting for the maturity of high - coupon bonds [31]. 3.3 Attribution and Summary - **External Environment Driving Factors: Interest Rate Fluctuations, Bond Supply - Demand, and Policy Orientation Jointly Impact Bond Investment Returns**: In H1 2025, the "more adjustments and fewer opportunities" bond market environment led to a general decline in the prices of existing bonds, resulting in a significant year - on - year decline in the fair value change loss of listed banks' bond investment. The supply of national bonds, local government bonds, and policy - based financial bonds increased, but the coupon rate of newly issued bonds decreased, leading to a decline in coupon income. Regulatory policies indirectly affected bond investment performance [35]. - **Banking Industry's Bond Investment Pressure and Future Outlook** - Overall Income Shows a Positive Trend but There Are Still Hidden Concerns: In H1 2025, the actual bond investment income of 42 listed banks increased slightly year - on - year, but the coupon income faced downward pressure in the interest - rate downward cycle, and it was more difficult to obtain spread income through band trading. Since H2 2025, the "stock - strong and bond - weak" pattern has emerged, and the loss caused by fair value change will be more obvious [3]. - Different Bank Types Show Differentiated Performance, and State - owned Banks' Pressure Is Relatively Controllable: State - owned banks can maintain a certain profit - making ability in the low - interest - rate volatile bond market due to their advantages in bond allocation and trading portfolios. Joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks are more vulnerable, and they may increase their capital allocation in the equity market, commodity market, and related structured fixed - income products in the future [3].

在"五大战略定位"中，"构建新发展格局的战略支点"是金融支持的重要一环。 中经记者 张漫游 北京报道 1955年10月1日，新疆维吾尔自治区成立，开创了新疆发展的新纪元。金融业作为现代经济的核心，始 终与新疆发展同频共振。 近年来，新疆金融业锚定新疆在国家全局中的"五大战略定位"，实现了从机构稀少到体系健全、从服务 薄弱到功能完善、从规模微小到实力壮大的历史性飞跃，形成了"政策引导+市场运作"的多元金融服务 体系，为实体经济发展注入了源源不断的金融活水，成为推动新疆高质量发展的核心引擎。 精准对接国家战略 新疆作为我国西北边陲的重要门户，在国家发展全局中肩负着"打造亚欧黄金通道和向西开放桥头堡、 构建新发展格局的战略支点、全国能源资源战略保障基地、全国优质农牧产品重要供给基地、维护国家 地缘安全的战略屏障"的"五大战略定位"重任。这一定位清晰指明了新疆发展的方向，也为金融资源的 配置划定了重点领域。 近年来，新疆地区金融机构立足新疆"五大战略定位"，做好金融"五篇大文章"，实现金融机构从少到 多、服务从弱到强、规模从小到大的历史性飞跃。截至2024年年末，新疆银行保险机构数量、从业人员 规模均较党的十八大前增 ...

Core Viewpoint - Since September, local small and medium-sized banks have been continuously lowering deposit interest rates to alleviate net interest margin pressure and follow the lead of larger banks [1][3]. Group 1: Deposit Rate Adjustments - On September 25, several banks in Henan, including Luoyang Rural Commercial Bank, announced reductions in RMB deposit rates, with the highest cut reaching 35 basis points [2][3]. - The new rates for fixed-term deposits at Luoyang Rural Commercial Bank are now 0.75% for three months, 1.00% for six months, 1.30% for one year, and 1.35% for two years, reflecting a reduction of 15 basis points [3]. - Other banks, such as Jieyang Rural Commercial Bank and Shanghai Huarui Bank, have also lowered rates across various deposit products, indicating a broader trend among local banks to adjust rates following national banks [3]. Group 2: Retail Deposit Trends - There is a noticeable outflow of retail deposits as customers shift to investment products with higher returns, such as cash management and fixed-income bank wealth management products, which offer annual yields of 2% to 3% [2][5]. - Retail deposit growth has significantly slowed, with banks facing challenges in attracting new customers and retaining existing deposits [5][6]. - Data shows that major banks like China Merchants Bank and Ping An Bank experienced a decline in retail deposit growth rates in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, with decreases of 3.43 and 3.73 percentage points, respectively [8]. Group 3: Wealth Management Strategies - In response to declining retail deposits, banks are focusing on expanding their wealth management services, leveraging the recent bullish trends in capital markets [9][10]. - Wealth management products, particularly those linked to equity funds, are becoming key revenue drivers for banks as they seek to retain customer assets [9]. - The "fixed income plus" product category is seen as a new pathway for banks to attract deposits in a low-interest-rate environment, highlighting the need for diversified investment options [10].

Core Insights - The mobile banking app has become a core platform for commercial banks to serve users, optimize experiences, and enhance competitiveness in the context of national digital transformation and financial technology innovation [1] - The market for mobile banking apps is entering a stage of stock competition, with user flow stabilizing between 650 million to 700 million from 2023 to 2025, indicating saturation [2] - User engagement with mobile banking apps is declining, necessitating refined operational strategies for banks to retain customers [4][6] User Flow and Behavior - The overall user flow of mobile banking apps in China is projected to fluctuate between 650 million and 700 million, with a change rate of -1.2% to 4.6% from 2023 to 2025, indicating market saturation [2] - User stickiness has significantly decreased, with average daily effective usage time dropping from 4.93 minutes to 2.70 minutes and daily usage frequency from 4.54 times to 2.86 times [4] Operational Strategies - Refined operations are essential for banks to break through in a saturated market, focusing on precise user insights and intelligent technology applications [6][7] - The strategy involves three layers: foundational user insights, scenario-based and differentiated operations, and establishing emotional connections with users [7] AI Integration - AI technology is recognized for its potential value across industries, aiding banks in refining operations by enhancing interactive experiences, risk management, and data efficiency [9] Rankings and Performance - The top 50 rankings show that state-owned banks dominate, with Agricultural Bank of China leading with an average MAU of 24.8 million, followed by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and China Construction Bank [11][12] - Among joint-stock commercial banks, China Merchants Bank leads with over 7 million MAU, while many others face declining user engagement [16][17] - City commercial banks have shown strong performance, with Jiangsu Bank leading at 3.5 million MAU, and several banks achieving significant growth rates [19][20] Case Studies of Successful Apps - Agricultural Bank of China continues to lead the industry with a 4.8% increase in MAU, focusing on integrating financial services with daily life scenarios [28][29] - China Merchants Bank is recognized for its innovative digital services, maintaining its position as a leader among joint-stock banks [31] - Jiangsu Bank emphasizes the integration of digital capabilities with wealth management, enhancing its app to meet customer needs [33] - Beijing Bank's app showcases a digital transformation strategy that combines technology, scenarios, and services to create value [35]

由新公司法驱动的银行治理变革正加速落地。近日，齐鲁银行、兴业银行等上市银行纷纷宣布不再设立 监事会。 业内人士认为，以审计委员会取代监事会可以提升公司治理效率、降低运营成本，但需解决监督的独立 性与专业性问题。此外，如何将原则性规定转化为可行的具体方案，也是银行需要面对的挑战。 纷纷取消监事会 9月23日，齐鲁银行召开股东大会，表决通过了《关于不再设立监事会的议案》。议案表示，根据相关 法律法规、监管制度的规定，结合实际情况，该行拟不再设立监事会及其下设专门委员会，由董事会审 计委员会行使公司法和监管制度规定的监事会职权。 齐鲁银行并非是取消监事会的唯一一家银行。4月29日，工商银行、农业银行、建设银行、中国银行、 交通银行五家国有大行集体宣布撤销监事会，招商银行、兴业银行、北京银行等股份行和城商行也陆续 跟进。 银行取消监事会需要从去年7月1日起施行的新公司法说起。根据法律规定，公司可以在董事会中设置由 董事组成的审计委员会，行使监事会的职权，不设监事会或者监事。此后，国家金融监督管理总局发布 相关通知称，金融机构可以按照公司章程规定，在董事会中设置由董事组成的审计委员会，行使公司法 和监管制度规定的监事会 ...

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the banking industry is "Positive" (maintained) [1] Core Insights - The banking sector is experiencing a shift in fund investment behavior, with banks redeeming low-yield money market funds and increasing their holdings in credit bond funds to enhance returns [5][57] - The total fund holdings of listed banks reached approximately 6.37 trillion yuan, accounting for 2.03% of total assets as of the end of the first half of 2025 [15][18] - The proportion of fund investments in the fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) category is 48.5%, with city commercial banks showing even higher ratios [15][22] Summary by Sections 1. Fund Investment Participation and Scale - The self-managed fund holdings of listed banks as of June 2025 were approximately 6.37 trillion yuan, with shareholding banks and city commercial banks having significant investment scales of 2.84 trillion yuan and 1.72 trillion yuan, respectively [15][18] - The investment in money market funds decreased to 9.10%, while the proportion of passive index bond funds increased to 7.90% [23][25] 2. Changes in Fund Investment Behavior - Banks are redeeming money market funds and low-yield rate bond funds while increasing their investment in credit bond funds [5][57] - The redemption pressure for money market funds was primarily concentrated in the first quarter of 2025, driven by liquidity management needs and yield enhancement [49][55] 3. Future Expansion and Impact of Redemption Fee Reform - Smaller banks have greater expansion potential in fund investments, driven by the need for redundant fund screening and tax-exempt income [3][3] - The implementation of redemption fee reforms may catalyze preventive redemptions by banks, leading to a preference for customized bond funds and bond ETFs [3][3]

经济观察网9月25日，北京银行（601169）党委书记、董事长霍学文在"2025中国普惠金融国际论坛"上 表示，北京银行深刻认识到普惠金融的战略价值，将普惠金融作为重点业务、特色服务，强化三个驱 动，来做好普惠金融这篇大文章。 一是技术驱动，探索普惠金融的新范式。北京银行依托数字技术，创新工具、新产品、创新方法、创新 服务，普惠型小微企业贷款余额超过2600亿元。二是特色驱动，激发普惠客群新潜能。坚定科技金 融"第一战略"，打造专精特新"一号工程"。积极培育文化新质生产力，实现"数字风控+场景融合"双轮 驱动。三是生态驱动创造金融健康的新价值。金融健康是普惠金融的高级形式，是服务从"有没 有"向"好不好"进阶和价值跃迁的有效形式。北京银行将跟中国普惠金融研究院成立一个金融健康实验 室，就是要推动金融健康为普惠金融做好服务。 ...