深圳光峰科技股份有限公司 对外投资管理办法 （2025 年 8 月修订） 第二条 本办法所称投资是运用公司资金对所涉及的主业范围投资和非主业 投资的统称，其中主业范围投资是指与公司主营业务相关，与公司业务有直接 协同效应的投资，非主业范围投资指公司以获取投资收益为主要目的，所投资 标的与公司业务无直接关联。 第一章 总则 第一条 为进一步完善深圳光峰科技股份有限公司（下称"公司"）的法人 治理结构，规范公司投资决策程序，提高决策效率，明确决策责任，确保决策 科学，保障公司的合法权益及各项资产的安全完整和有效运营，根据《中华人 民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中华人民共和国证券法》《上海 证券交易所科创板股票上市规则》和其他有关法律、法规和规范性文件的规定 （以下简称"法律法规"）及《公司章程》，制定本办法。 第三条 根据国家对投资行为管理的有关要求，投资项目需要报政府部门审 批的，应履行必要的报批手续，保证公司各项投资行为的合规合法性，符合国 家宏观经济政策。 第二章 投资决策权限 第四条 投资项目立项由公司股东会、董事会、董事长、总经理按照各自的 权限，分级审批。 （二）交易的成交金额占公司市 ...

公司研究讨论重大经营管理事项时，董事会秘书应当列席。 第四条 董事会秘书由董事长提名，经董事会聘任或解聘。董事会秘书每届 任期 3 年，可以连续聘任。 第五条 董事会秘书是公司与上海证券交易所（以下简称"上交所"）之间的 指定联络人。公司设立由董事会秘书分管的工作部门，由董事会秘书负责管理。 深圳光峰科技股份有限公司 董事会秘书工作制度 （2025 年 8 月修订） 第一章 总则 第一条 为进一步促进深圳光峰科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）规 范运作，明确董事会秘书的职责权限，充分发挥董事会秘书的作用，根据《中华 人民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中华人民共和国证券法》（以 下简称"《证券法》"）、《上市公司信息披露管理办法》《上海证券交易所上市 公司科创板股票上市规则》《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 1 号—— 规范运作》和其他有关法律、法规和规范性文件的规定（以下简称"法律法规"） 及《公司章程》，制定本制度。 第二章 董事会秘书任职资格和任免 第二条 董事会设董事会秘书 1 名。董事会秘书应当遵守法律、行政法规、 部门规章和《公司章程》的规定，勤勉尽责地履行职责，对公司和董事会 ...

Market Overview - On August 26, the consumer electronics sector experienced a slight decline of 0.05% compared to the previous trading day, with Xinhua Data leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3868.38, down 0.39%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12473.17, up 0.26% [1] Stock Performance - Notable gainers in the consumer electronics sector included: - Mengsheng Electronics (Code: 838701) with a closing price of 23.49, up 12.12% [1] - Lingyi Technology (Code: 002600) with a closing price of 14.92, up 10.03% [1] - Fenda Technology (Code: 002681) with a closing price of 7.90, up 10.03% [1] - Other significant gainers included GoerTek (Code: 002241) and Dongni Electronics (Code: 603595) with increases of 10.01% and 9.98% respectively [1] - Conversely, the following stocks faced declines: - Xinhua Data (Code: 300857) closed at 100.98, down 5.98% [2] - Longyang Electronics (Code: 301389) closed at 50.40, down 5.62% [2] - Industrial Fulian (Code: 601138) closed at 45.48, down 5.25% [2] Capital Flow - The consumer electronics sector saw a net inflow of 388 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 919 million yuan [2][3] - However, there was a net outflow of 1.307 billion yuan from speculative funds [2][3] Individual Stock Capital Flow - GoerTek (Code: 002241) had a net inflow from institutional investors of 12.74 million yuan, while speculative funds saw a net outflow of 5.37 million yuan [3] - Fenda Technology (Code: 002681) experienced a net inflow of 6.92 million yuan from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 2.85 million yuan from speculative funds [3] - Victory Precision (Code: 002426) had a significant net inflow of 358 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net outflow of 201 million yuan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling has significantly reduced the financial liability of the company, allowing it to focus on core business development and technological innovation [1] Group 1: Arbitration Outcome - The company and its Hong Kong subsidiary are required to pay a total of $12.6904 million to GDC, while GDC must pay $1.98 million plus accrued interest to the company [1] - The net payment amount is substantially lower than GDC's initial claim of $38 million, indicating a favorable outcome for the company [1] Group 2: Historical Context - The arbitration stemmed from a dispute regarding the execution of a settlement agreement initiated by GDC in 2022, which initially sought $38 million in damages and later increased its claim [1] - The company actively responded to the claims and filed a counterclaim during the arbitration process [1] Group 3: Future Outlook - With the resolution of the arbitration, the company can now focus on its core technology and business development without the burden of historical legal disputes [1] - The company is actively expanding into AR and robotics applications and will showcase its advancements at the 26th China International Optoelectronic Expo from September 10 to 12 [1] - The upcoming exhibition is expected to highlight the company's technological capabilities and convey a positive message about its commitment to innovation and steady progress [1]

Economic Information - According to the China Index Academy, as of August 2025, the debt restructuring and reorganization of 20 distressed real estate companies will exceed 12,000 billion RMB, significantly impacting the real estate sector [2] - As of August 13, the national pig price was 14.25 RMB/kg, down 1.32% from August 6, with the pig-to-grain price ratio at 5.94, a decrease of 1.33% [2] Company Alerts - Jishi Media reported a net loss of 232 million RMB in the first half of the year [5] - Dameng Data had two directors investigated within three days [5] - Kanglong Chemical's net profit for the first half of the year was 701 million RMB, a decrease of 37% year-on-year [5] - Yunmei Energy reported a net loss of 163 million RMB in the first half of the year [5] - Zhuosheng Microelectronics experienced a net loss of 147 million RMB in the first half, marking a transition from profit to loss [5] - Penghui Energy reported a net loss of 88.23 million RMB in the first half, also transitioning from profit to loss [5] - Aoxin Security reported a net loss of 356 million RMB in the first half [5] - Anyuan Coal Industry reported a net loss of 290 million RMB in the first half [5] - Guangsheng Tang reported a net loss of 66.6881 million RMB in the first half [5] - Yiyuan Lithium Energy's net profit decreased by 24.9% year-on-year in the first half [5] - Zhongtian Rocket's net profit decreased by 80.74% year-on-year in the first half [5] - Jianjie Industrial reported a net profit of 48.8658 million RMB in the first half, down 44.90% year-on-year [5] - Nanjing Chemical Fiber reported a net loss of 88.9317 million RMB in the first half [5] - Sanwei Xinan reported a net loss of 29.3858 million RMB in the first half [5] - Taiping Bird reported a net profit of 77.7116 million RMB in the first half, down 54.61% year-on-year [5] - Aerospace Power reported a net loss of 73.1243 million RMB in the first half [5] - Renhe Pharmaceutical's subsidiary product ULook brain-machine interaction smart glasses has not generated sales revenue [5] - Rhein Biotech experienced a safety incident resulting in one death and three serious injuries [5] - Guangfeng Technology's arbitration ruling is expected to reduce the consolidated profit for 2025 by approximately 91 million RMB [5] Overseas Alerts - The three major U.S. stock indices experienced slight declines, with the S&P 500 down 0.4%, marking its fifth consecutive day of decline [4] - The U.S. Department of Justice plans to investigate Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook and has urged Fed Chairman Powell to dismiss her [4] - According to the International Copper Study Group, a surplus of 36,000 tons in the global refined copper market is expected by June 2025 [4]

Group 1 - The stock price of Guangfeng Technology is reported at 19.20 yuan, down 0.38 yuan or 1.94% from the previous trading day [1] - The opening price was 19.50 yuan, with an intraday high of 20.18 yuan and a low of 19.05 yuan, with a trading volume of 198,700 hands and a transaction amount of 388 million yuan [1] - Guangfeng Technology operates in sectors such as consumer electronics, AI glasses, and robotics, focusing on the research and application of core laser display technologies, with products covering cinema, engineering, education, and home use [1] Group 2 - The American Arbitration Association made a final ruling regarding a dispute with GDC, resulting in a net payment amount significantly lower than GDC's initial claim after offsetting amounts [1] - This matter is expected to reduce the company's consolidated profit for the year 2025 by approximately 91 million yuan [1] - Guangfeng Technology plans to release several cutting-edge technological achievements at the China International Optoelectronic Expo in September [1] Group 3 - On August 21, the net outflow of main funds was 1.5382 million yuan, while the cumulative net inflow of main funds over the past five days was 127 million yuan [1]

Core Points - Shenzhen Guangfeng Technology Co., Ltd. disclosed the final arbitration result, requiring the company to pay a total of $12.6904 million to GDC, while GDC must pay $1.98 million plus accrued interest to Guangfeng [1][2] - The arbitration stemmed from a dispute regarding the execution of a settlement agreement, with GDC initially claiming $38 million in damages, which was significantly reduced in the final ruling [1][2] - The final arbitration decision alleviates uncertainty for investors, allowing Guangfeng Technology to focus on its core business and technological advancements [2] Summary by Sections - **Arbitration Outcome** - The final arbitration ruling requires Hong Kong Guangfeng and the company to pay GDC a total of $12.6904 million, while GDC is to pay $1.98 million plus accrued interest to Guangfeng [1][2] - The initial claim from GDC was $38 million, which was later increased during the arbitration process [1] - **Settlement Agreement Background** - The dispute originated from a 2021 settlement agreement regarding GDC's compensation plan, which included the transfer of 8% equity in GDC BVI to Hong Kong Guangfeng and a cash compensation of $1.2 million [2] - The final arbitration amount includes the performance compensation and related interest, as well as some legal fees designated by the arbitration tribunal [2] - **Market Implications** - The resolution of this long-standing litigation allows Guangfeng Technology to shed historical burdens and concentrate on its core technological innovations and business development [2] - The company is actively expanding into AR and robotics applications and plans to showcase its technological advancements at the upcoming 26th China International Optoelectronic Expo [2]

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling has resolved a long-standing dispute for the company, allowing it to focus on its core business and technological advancements [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Arbitration Outcome - The company and its Hong Kong subsidiary are required to pay a total of $12.69 million to GDC, while GDC must pay $1.98 million plus accrued interest to the company [1]. - The net payment amount is significantly lower than GDC's initial claim of $38 million [1]. - The arbitration stemmed from a dispute regarding the execution of a settlement agreement related to a compensation plan from 2021 [1]. Financial Implications - The final arbitration amount includes performance compensation and related interest, as well as some legal fees designated by the arbitration tribunal [1]. - The company successfully supported its claim regarding GDC's violation of the shareholder agreement, resulting in GDC being ordered to pay $1.98 million plus interest [1]. Market Impact - The resolution of the arbitration brings clarity to investors, alleviating uncertainties that have affected the company for three years [2]. - The company is now positioned to concentrate on its core technology and business development [2]. Future Developments - The company is actively expanding into AR and robotics applications [2]. - It plans to showcase its technological advancements at the 26th China International Optoelectronic Exposition from September 10 to 12 [2].

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling has resolved a long-standing dispute between the company and GDC, allowing the company to focus on its core business and technological advancements [1][2]. Group 1: Arbitration Outcome - The company and its Hong Kong subsidiary are required to pay a total of $12.69 million to GDC, while GDC must pay the company $1.98 million plus accrued interest, resulting in a net payment significantly lower than GDC's initial claim of $38 million [1]. - The arbitration stemmed from a dispute regarding the execution of a settlement agreement related to a compensation plan from 2021, which involved the transfer of an 8% equity stake and a cash compensation of $1.2 million [1]. - The final arbitration amount includes performance compensation, corresponding interest, and a portion of legal fees as determined by the arbitration tribunal [1]. Group 2: Market Implications - The resolution of the arbitration dispute eliminates uncertainty for investors, allowing the company to move forward without the burden of historical legal issues [2]. - The company is actively expanding into AR and robotics applications, indicating a strategic focus on innovation and core business development [2]. - The company plans to showcase its technological advancements at the 26th China International Optoelectronic Expo from September 10 to 12, signaling its commitment to technology innovation [2].

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling has resolved a long-standing dispute for the company, allowing it to focus on its core business and technological advancements [1][2] Group 1: Arbitration Outcome - The company and its Hong Kong subsidiary are required to pay a total of $12.69 million to GDC, while GDC must pay $1.98 million plus accrued interest to the company [1] - The initial claim from GDC was $38 million, which was significantly reduced after the arbitration process [1] - The arbitration stemmed from a dispute regarding the execution of a settlement agreement related to a compensation plan from 2021 [1] Group 2: Business Focus and Future Plans - With the arbitration conclusion, the company can now concentrate on its core technology and business development [2] - The company is actively expanding into AR and robotics applications [2] - The company will participate in the 26th China International Optoelectronic Exposition from September 10 to 12, showcasing its technological capabilities and innovations [2]