证券代码：300125 证券简称：*ST 聆达 公告编号：2025-095 聆达集团股份有限公司 关于持股 5%以上股东部分股份被变卖的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记 载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 董事会 2025 年 10 月 10 日 二、本次股东部分股份被变卖的进展情况 近日，公司通过中国证券登记结算有限责任公司查询，光恒昱所持公司无限售 条件流通股 153,000 股于 2025 年 10 月 9 日卖出。截止本公告披露日，光恒昱持有公 司股份 23,230,260 股，占公司总股本的 8.68%。 三、相关说明及风险提示 光恒昱不是公司的控股股东，亦不是公司第一大股东，其所持公司股份被变卖 不会影响公司的正常生产经营。 公司将持续关注上述事项的进展情况，严格按照有关法律法规及规范性文件的 要求及时履行信息披露义务。公司指定信息披露媒体为《中国证券报》《上海证券 报》《证券时报》及巨潮资讯网（http://www.cninfo.com.cn），公司发布的信息均以 在上述指定媒体披露的信息为准，敬请广大投资者理性投资，并注意投资风险。 特此公告。 聆达集团股 ...

证券代码：300125 证券简称：*ST 聆达 公告编号：2025-096 聆达集团股份有限公司 关于大连证监局《监管关注函》的整改报告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 聆达集团股份有限公司（以下简称：公司）于 2025 年 9 月 16 日收到中国 证券监督管理委员会大连监管局（以下简称：大连监管局）出具的监管关注函 （大证监函〔2025〕390 号，以下简称：《关注函》），要求公司对《关注函》 中指出的事项进行整改。具体内容详见公司在巨潮资讯网（www.cninfo.com.cn） 披露的《关于收到大连证监局<监管关注函>的公告》（公告编号：2025-091）。 收到《关注函》后，公司对此高度重视，及时向全体董事、高级管理人员 进行传达，本着严格自律、规范运作的态度，结合公司实际情况，积极落实整 改工作，针对《关注函》中所提及的问题进行了全面的梳理分析，严格按照相 关法律法规和规范性文件以及《公司章程》的要求，结合公司现场检查情况， 深入分析问题原因，明确责任部门，制定整改措施，并形成整改情况报告如下： 一、存在的问题及整改措施 问题一：对 ...

证券代码：300125 证券简称：*ST 聆达 公告编号：2025-097 聆达集团股份有限公司 关于对大连证监局《行政监管措施决定书》的整改报告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 聆达集团股份有限公司（以下简称：公司、聆达股份）于 2025 年 9 月 11 日收到中国证券监督管理委员会大连监管局出具的行政监管措施决定书（行政监 管措施〔2025〕21 号，以下简称：决定书）《关于对聆达集团股份有限公司采 取责令改正监管措施的决定》，具体内容详见公司于 2025 年 9 月 11 日披露的《关 于公司及相关当事人收到<行政监管措施决定书>的公告》（公告编号：2025-090）， 现根据《决定书》的要求对涉及的相关事项说明如下： 一、未及时披露全资子公司金寨嘉悦新能源科技有限公司（以下简称：金 寨嘉悦）停工停产情况，违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法（2021 年修订）》 （证监会令第 182 号）第二十二条第一款规定。 整改情况及说明： 1、问题复盘与责任认定：公司已组织董监高及相关部门重新学习《上市公 司信息披露管理办法》等法规，明确信息披露的 ...

重要内容提示： 公司 2024 年度经审计的扣除非经常性损益后的净利润为-85,579 万元且 扣除后营业收入为 5,785 万元，期末净资产为-53,841 万元。根据《深圳证券交易 所创业板股票上市规则》（2025 年修订）（以下简称：《上市规则》）第 10.3.1 条第一款第（一）（二）项规定，公司股票交易于 2025 年 4 月 25 日起被实施退 市风险警示。 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记 载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 证券代码：300125 证券简称：*ST 聆达 公告编号：2025-093 聆达集团股份有限公司 关于公司股票被实施退市风险警示 并继续叠加其他风险警示相关事项的进展公告 公司 2022 至 2024 年扣非前后净利润孰低值为负且 2024 年财务报告被致 同会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）出具了带有持续经营重大不确定性段落的无保 留意见审计报告；《2024 年度内部控制审计报告》被出具了否定意见；公司子 公司金寨嘉悦新能源科技有限公司（以下简称：金寨嘉悦）高效太阳能电池片生 产线于 2024 年 3 月 14 日实施临时停产，并预计无法在三个月内恢 ...

证券代码：300125 证券简称：*ST 聆达 公告编号：2025-094 聆达集团股份有限公司 关于公司预重整事项进展暨风险提示性公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 特别风险提示： 1、公司是否进入重整程序尚存在不确定性 截至本公告披露日，公司尚未收到法院关于进入重整程序的相关法律文书， 公司是否进入重整程序尚存在重大不确定性。 2、公司股票交易被实施退市风险警示的风险 1、2024 年 7 月 31 日，聆达集团股份有限公司（以下简称：聆达股份、公 司）披露了《关于公司被债权人申请重整暨法院启动公司预重整及指定临时管理 人的公告》（公告编号：2024-080），公司收到六安中院送达的《决定书》（（2024） 皖 15 破申 127 号），公司债权人金寨汇金投资有限公司以不能清偿到期债务， 明显缺乏清偿能力但具备重整价值为由，向法院申请对公司进行重整，并申请启 动预重整程序。为有效识别重整价值和重整可行性，降低重整成本，提高重整成 功率，六安中院决定对公司启动预重整，同时指定由金寨县人民政府组建成立的 聆达集团股份有限公司清算组担任公司预重 ...

New Stock Issuance - New stock issuance for Daoshengtianhe (Code: 780026) priced at 5.98 RMB on September 29, 2025[1] - Offer period for the acquisition of Shangwei New Materials (Code: 688585) is from September 29, 2025, to October 28, 2025[1] Delisting and Trading Alerts - Zitian Tui (Code: 300280) is in the delisting preparation period with 4 trading days remaining until the last trading day[1] - Significant abnormal fluctuations reported for Kaipu Cloud (Code: 688228) on September 25, 2025[1] Recent Announcements - Multiple companies including Zhonghuan Hailu (Code: 301040) and Shenhuafa A (Code: 000020) have recent announcements regarding their stock activities[1] - A total of 30 companies have made announcements regarding stock fluctuations and trading activities in the past week[1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent actions by 14 A-share companies to improve the management of fund occupation reflect a growing consensus among listed companies to strengthen the financial safety "firewall" through institutional measures [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Company Responses - 27 A-share listed companies have faced regulatory measures due to fund occupation issues this year, indicating a strong regulatory stance against such behaviors [1][2] - Companies are increasingly adopting measures to prevent fund occupation, with a focus on revising their internal management systems [1][4] Group 2: Characteristics of Fund Occupation - Fund occupation behaviors are becoming more covert, with a decline in traditional methods like direct borrowing and an increase in non-operational transactions and hidden guarantees [2][3] - The manufacturing and construction sectors are particularly affected, with 51.85% of the 27 companies involved in fund occupation being from the manufacturing industry [3] Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Future Directions - New regulations have been introduced, including stricter delisting rules for companies with significant fund occupation issues, with amounts exceeding 200 million or 30% of the latest audited net assets triggering potential delisting [5] - Experts suggest enhancing transparency in information disclosure, increasing penalties for violations, and strengthening the responsibilities of intermediary institutions as key measures to combat fund occupation [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the administrative penalties imposed on two companies, 聆达股份 (Lingda Co., 300125) and 新宁物流 (Xinning Logistics, 300013), for failing to disclose significant financial information, leading to potential investor claims for compensation [1][3]. Group 1: Lingda Co. (300125) - Lingda Co. received an administrative penalty from the Dalian Securities Regulatory Bureau for failing to disclose external guarantee matters, including two guarantees totaling 80 million yuan, which represented 19.42% of the audited net assets for the period [1]. - The company also failed to disclose related party fund occupation, with a total of 65.6 million yuan occupied over 12 months, accounting for 9.95% of the latest audited net assets [2]. - Investors who purchased Lingda Co. shares between June 12, 2023, and April 27, 2024, may initiate claims for compensation due to these violations [2]. Group 2: Xinning Logistics (300013) - Xinning Logistics was penalized for inflating revenue through fraudulent contracts from 2015 to 2021, with a total inflated revenue of approximately 105.12 million yuan, which constituted 10.06% of the reported revenue for 2018 [3][4]. - Investors who bought Xinning Logistics shares between April 25, 2019, and December 31, 2022, can still file claims, but the time for legal action is limited [4].

Core Viewpoint - Recent penalties imposed on *ST Lingda and Yangmei Chemical highlight the regulatory authorities' zero-tolerance stance towards the misuse of listed companies' funds and information disclosure violations [2][9] Group 1: Penalties and Violations - *ST Lingda was fined 1 million yuan for failing to disclose related party fund occupation of 65.6 million yuan and for unauthorized external guarantees totaling 126 million yuan [2][5] - Yangmei Chemical faced a fine of 1.5 million yuan due to its controlling shareholder, Huayang Group, non-operationally occupying 1.126 billion yuan without disclosure [9][10] - The penalties reflect a significant increase in regulatory enforcement efficiency, with Yangmei Chemical's case being resolved in just over two months [2][12] Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Impacts - The new delisting rules, effective from April 2024, have intensified scrutiny on fund occupation cases, with non-repayment of occupied funds leading to potential delisting [10][12] - Regulatory actions have resulted in the recovery of misappropriated funds, with *ST Lingda recovering all occupied funds and eliminating unauthorized guarantees [7][10] - The overall regulatory process has become faster, with cases like *ST Lingda's taking less than 10 months from investigation to final penalty [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - Recent penalties imposed on listed companies for fund occupation issues highlight the regulatory authorities' "zero tolerance" stance towards actions that infringe on the interests of listed companies and minority investors [1][7]. Group 1: *ST Lingda's Violations - *ST Lingda was fined 1 million yuan for failing to disclose related party fund occupation of 65.6 million yuan and for unauthorized guarantees totaling 126 million yuan, with responsible individuals fined 4 million yuan [1][3]. - The company had a total of 65.6 million yuan occupied by related parties, accounting for 9.95% of its latest audited net assets, and 126 million yuan in unauthorized guarantees, representing 19.10% of its net assets [4][5]. - The penalties reflect a significant regulatory crackdown, with the company facing multiple disclosure violations, including failure to report production stoppages and risks related to equipment prepayments [4][5]. Group 2: Yangmei Chemical's Violations - Yangmei Chemical was fined 1.5 million yuan for the non-operational occupation of 1.126 billion yuan by its controlling shareholder, which was not disclosed in financial reports [1][7]. - The funds occupied by the controlling shareholder represented 17.74% of Yangmei Chemical's latest audited net assets, and the penalties included fines for both the company and responsible individuals totaling 690,000 yuan [8][9]. - The regulatory response to Yangmei Chemical's violations was swift, with the entire process from investigation to penalty completion taking just over two months [12]. Group 3: Regulatory Efficiency - The regulatory authorities have significantly improved their efficiency in handling fund occupation cases, with the time from investigation to penalty issuance being notably reduced [11][12]. - For instance, *ST Lingda's case took less than 10 months from being filed to receiving the final penalty decision, while Yangmei Chemical's case was resolved in just over two months [11][12]. - This increase in regulatory speed indicates a more proactive approach to enforcing compliance and protecting the interests of investors [10][11].