证券代码：300555 证券简称：ST路通 公告编号：2025-071 关于特定股东未来减持计划的预披露公告 公司特定股东萍乡汇德企业管理中心（有限合伙）保证向本公司提供的信息 内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容与信息披露义务人提供的信息一致。 无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 | 股东名称 | 减持数量 | 占公司总股本的比例 | | --- | --- | --- | | | （股） | （%） | | 萍乡汇德 | 集中竞价交易不超过： | 1.00 | | | 2,000,000 股 | | | 萍乡汇德 | 大宗交易不超过： | 2.00 | | | 4,000,000 股 | | | 股东名称 | 减持期间 | | | --- | --- | --- | | | 自本公告披露之日起十五个交易日后的三个月内（即从 | 2025 年 8 | | 萍乡汇德 | 月 日起至 年 月 日止）。具体减持时间将遵守特定 18 2025 11 17 | | | | 股东买卖股票的相关要求及内幕信息管理等相关规定。 | | 6、减持价格：根据实施减持交易期间的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The control dispute over ST Lutong has escalated from covert conflicts to legal proceedings, with the company filing a lawsuit against its largest shareholder, Wu Shichun, for allegedly violating shareholding regulations [1][2] Group 1: Legal Actions - ST Lutong has initiated a lawsuit to protect its rights and those of minority shareholders, claiming that Wu Shichun failed to disclose information regarding a share transfer agreement and subsequently increased his stake by 2.54% without proper disclosure [1][2] - The company asserts that there is sufficient evidence to support its legal claims against Wu Shichun, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal protocols in shareholding matters [1] Group 2: Corporate Governance - The company has raised concerns about the compliance of its supervisory board, noting that two supervisors, who are not actively involved in the company's operations, disclosed board resolutions to the media without proper authorization [2] - This situation highlights potential governance issues within ST Lutong, as the actions of the supervisory board may not align with the company's operational realities [2]

Core Viewpoint - ST Luton (300555) is embroiled in a legal battle with major shareholder Wu Shichun over control rights, involving disputes over voting rights and corporate governance [1][3] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - ST Luton has filed two lawsuits: one to restrict Wu Shichun and related parties from exercising voting rights on illegally acquired shares, and another seeking compensation of 2.5 million yuan for "illegal proposals to re-elect the board" and "improper information disclosure" [1][6] - The first lawsuit focuses on the compliance of shareholder equity changes with disclosure regulations, particularly regarding Wu Shichun's acquisition of 7.44% of shares through judicial auction and subsequent market purchases without proper disclosure [4][8] - The second lawsuit addresses corporate governance issues, highlighting failed attempts by Wu Shichun to convene a temporary shareholders' meeting to remove three non-independent directors [5][6] Group 2: Shareholder Actions - Wu Shichun has been increasing his stake in ST Luton through various means, including judicial auctions and secondary market purchases, aiming to reorganize the board with the support of other shareholders [3][4] - The company claims that Wu Shichun's actions, including undisclosed share acquisitions and attempts to influence board decisions, violate securities laws and regulations [5][8] - ST Luton has requested the court to rule that Wu Shichun and six defendants cannot exercise voting rights on 3.87% of shares for 36 months due to illegal acquisitions [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - ST Luton has filed lawsuits against several individuals due to securities disputes and damage to company interests, with a total amount involved of approximately RMB 2.5 million [1][2]. Group 1: Securities Dispute - The plaintiff is Wuxi Luton Vision Network Co., Ltd., and the defendants include Wu Shichun, Gu Jiming, Yin Guanmin, Zhuang Xiaozheng, Jiang Xiujun, and Pingxiang Huide Enterprise Management Center (Limited Partnership) [1]. - The main allegation is that Wu Shichun acquired shares and voting rights of Luton Vision without complying with the reporting and announcement requirements stipulated in the Securities Law, thus violating regulations during the increase of his voting rights [1]. Group 2: Damage to Company Interests - The plaintiff is also Wuxi Luton Vision Network Co., Ltd., with defendants including Wu Shichun, Zeng Qingchuan, and Fu Yuxia [2]. - The allegations state that since March 2025, Wu Shichun has sought control of the listed company through various means without fulfilling disclosure obligations and has attempted to unlawfully convene a shareholders' meeting to re-elect the board of directors [2]. - The defendants are accused of damaging the company's reputation and investor interests by disclosing company information to the media and undermining the stability of the company's management [2]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - As of the announcement date, the company and its subsidiaries do not have any undisclosed significant litigation or arbitration matters [3]. - The lawsuits have not yet gone to trial, and the final outcomes remain uncertain, making it difficult to assess the impact on the company's current or future profits [3].

证券代码：300555 证券简称：ST路通 公告编号：2025-070 无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 关于公司提起诉讼事项的公告 1、诉讼当事人 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 重要内容提示: 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：两案均已由法院立案受理； 2、上市公司所处的当事人地位：两案均为原告； 3、涉案的金额：两案合计人民币 2,500,000 元（暂计）和所涉案件的诉讼费； 4、对上市公司损益产生的影响：鉴于上述两起诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，最 终诉讼结果存在不确定性，目前暂无法判断对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响。 一、本次诉讼事项的基本情况 无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"、"路通视信"、"原 告"）因与吴世春等证券纠纷一案、与吴世春等损害公司利益责任纠纷一案，分 别向北京市昌平区人民法院递交了《民事起诉状》。近日，北京市昌平区人民法 院已受理相关诉讼，案号为（2025）京 0114 民初 27753 号及（2025）京 0114 民 初 27752 号，相关诉讼具体情况如下： 二、诉讼案件的基本情况 （一）案件一 原告：无锡路通视信网 ...

证券代码：300555 证券简称：ST路通 公告编号：2025-069 无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 关于深圳证券交易所关注函的回复公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"路通视信"）于 2025 年 7 月 13 日收到深圳证券交易所创业板公司管理部下发的《关于对无锡路通视信 网络股份有限公司的关注函》（创业板关注函〔2025〕第 7 号）（以下简称"《关 注函》"）。公司高度重视，对《关注函》中所涉及的事项进行了认真的核查，并 函询相关股东，现就相关事项回复说明如下： 一、回函显示，2025 年 5 月 7 日，吴世春与顾纪明、萍乡汇德企业管理中 心（有限合伙）（以下简称"汇德合伙"）、蒋秀军、尹冠民、庄小正（以下合称 "股份转让方"）分别签订《股份转让协议》和《表决权委托协议》，约定股份转 让方向吴世春转让合计 6.4%的公司股份，股份的实际受让主体是未来设立的以 吴世春为普通合伙人暨执行事务合伙人的有限合伙企业"梅岭合伙"。股份转让 方将其转让股份所对应的表决权不可撤销地全权委托给吴世春行 ...

北京卓纬律师事务所 关于 《关于对无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司的关注函》 之 法律意见书 地址：北京市东城区东长安街 1 号东方广场 E2 座 2107-2112 邮政编码：100738 座机：86-010-85870068 传真：86-010-85870079 《关于对无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司的关注函》 之法律意见书 北京卓纬律师事务所（以下简称"本所"）接受吴世春先生委托，就深圳证 券交易所（以下简称"深交所"）下发的"创业板关注函[2025]第 7 号"《关于 对无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司的关注函》（以下简称"《关注函》"）中涉 及的法律问题出具本法律意见书。 本所律师依据本法律意见书出具之日以前已发生或存在的事实和对中国（仅 为本法律意见书之目的，不包括香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区及台湾地区） 有关法律、法规和规范性文件的理解发表法律意见。本法律意见书依据本法律意 见书出具日现行有效的中国法律、行政法规、规章和相关规定出具，并声明如下： Add.2107-2112, Office Tower E2 Oriental Plaza, No. 1 East Chang An Avenue, Beij ...

广东普罗米修（茂名）律师事务所 关于无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 回复深圳证券交易所关注函所涉相关事项的 法律意见书 广东普罗米修（茂名）律师事务所 1 广东普罗米修（茂名）律师事务所 关于无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 回复深圳证券交易所关注函所涉相关事项的 法律意见书 普（茂）法意字[2025]第 0011 号 致：无锡路通视信网络股份有限公司 广东普罗米修（茂名）律师事务所（以下简称"本所"）接受无 锡路通视信网络股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）之委托，根据《中 华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称《公司法》）、《中华人民共和国 证券法》（以下简称《证券法》）、《上市公司股东会规则》（以下 简称《股东会规则》）、《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 2 号——创业板上市公司规范运作》、《律师事务所从事证券法律业 务管理办法》（以下简称《证券法律业务管理办法》）、《律师事务 所证券法律业务执业规则（试行）》（以下简称《证券法律业务执业 规则》）等相关法律、行政法规、规章、规范性文件及《无锡路通视 信网络股份有限公司章程》（以下简称《公司章程》）的规定，就公 司董事会回复深圳证券交易所关注函（创业板关注函[202 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing power struggle for control of ST Luton has intensified following the termination of share transfer agreements and the uncertainty surrounding the validity of voting rights entrusted to Wu Shichun, the largest shareholder [1][4][9]. Group 1: Shareholding and Agreements - Wu Shichun became the largest shareholder of ST Luton in March by acquiring 7.44% of shares for 150 million yuan, followed by a planned acquisition of an additional 6.4% through a partnership agreement [1][2]. - The share transfer agreement was set at a total price of 160 million yuan, with Wu Shichun only needing to pay 16 million yuan upfront to secure voting rights for 13.84% of the company [2]. - On May 26, Wu Shichun claimed to have orally terminated the agreements due to regulatory non-compliance, leading to a series of confirmations regarding the termination of both the share transfer and voting rights agreements [3][4]. Group 2: Board and Regulatory Responses - The ST Luton board expressed skepticism regarding the termination, citing a lack of objective evidence and the requirement for written confirmation for any modifications or terminations of the agreements [5][6]. - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a notice on July 13, requesting clarification on the basis for the oral termination and the implications for the ongoing control dispute [7]. Group 3: Governance and Market Impact - The uncertainty surrounding the voting rights has directly affected the board's ability to proceed with member elections, as Wu Shichun and allies have sought to convene extraordinary shareholder meetings to remove current board members [7][8]. - The board has consistently rejected proposals for board member removal, citing legal grounds and concerns over operational stability amid shareholder changes [8][9]. - The internal conflict has led to increased volatility in ST Luton's stock price, creating dilemmas for minority shareholders regarding trust in management versus capital interests [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of major shareholders occupying funds from listed companies, which harms the interests of the companies and minority shareholders, and highlights the efforts of regulatory bodies and the China Securities Investor Service Center in addressing this problem through legal actions and shareholder rights protection [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and stock exchanges have taken strict measures to combat the malicious occupation of funds, emphasizing that occupied funds must be repaid, with deadlines for rectification and no exemption from delisting [1][2]. - The CSRC has been enhancing policies to address fund occupation, including clear deadlines for rectification and increased penalties for major offenders [2][3]. Group 2: Shareholder Rights Protection - Shareholders are encouraged to actively exercise their rights and pursue legal actions against major shareholders who occupy company funds, with the China Securities Investor Service Center playing a crucial role in this process [3][4]. - The legal framework provided by company law and securities law allows affected shareholders to initiate derivative lawsuits to recover occupied funds [3][4]. Group 3: Successful Cases - The China Securities Investor Service Center has successfully initiated derivative lawsuits, leading to significant recoveries from responsible parties, including the notable *ST Modern case, which set a precedent for shareholder rights protection [4][5]. - In the *ST Modern case, the court ruled that the controlling shareholder must repay approximately 240 million yuan, with responsible executives also bearing joint liability [5]. Group 4: Ongoing Efforts and Challenges - The China Securities Investor Service Center continues to expand its efforts in shareholder rights protection, collaborating with regulatory bodies to ensure the recovery of occupied funds [6][7]. - Despite progress, challenges remain, such as high litigation costs that hinder the ability of investor protection agencies to pursue derivative lawsuits effectively [8][9]. - There is a call for improved institutional support, including the possibility of waiving litigation fees for investor protection agencies when filing derivative lawsuits [8][9]. Group 5: Future Directions - The China Securities Investor Service Center aims to enhance its role in protecting shareholder rights and promoting corporate governance through legal actions against fund occupation [10]. - There is a suggestion for centralized jurisdiction for derivative lawsuits to improve judicial consistency and efficiency in handling complex cases related to fund occupation [9][10].