Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls during a specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [3]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [3]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule, leading to potential significant losses [3]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by the deadline of September 26, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. - Participants will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring system to receive updates on the case's progress [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors affected by misleading statements [5].

Core Insights - The US military is experiencing significant delays in the delivery of F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters, with 2024 deliveries averaging a delay of 238 days [1][2] - The delays are primarily attributed to the Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) upgrades, which are part of a modernization effort that has seen costs increase by approximately $6 billion and timelines extend by at least five years [2] - Despite the delays and rising costs, the Pentagon plans to procure around 2,500 F-35 aircraft, and international allies continue to place orders for the fighter jet [5][6] Delivery Delays - In 2023, most F-35s delivered were late, averaging a delay of 61 days, while in 2024, every delivered aircraft was late [1] - The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the structure of on-time delivery incentives allowed contractors to deliver aircraft up to 60 days late and still receive some incentive fees [3] Cost and Budget Implications - The estimated lifetime cost of the F-35 program has risen to over $2 trillion, covering procurement, operations, and sustainment [6] - The modernization effort, originally budgeted at $2 billion, is now expected to cost significantly more due to the delays and additional requirements [2] Operational Readiness - The F-35 fleet's mission-capable rate is just over 50%, indicating ongoing challenges with readiness and reliability [6] - Lockheed Martin aims to deliver between 170 to 190 F-35s in the current year while continuing to implement Block 4 capabilities [4]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging that the company misled investors about its financial health by failing to disclose inadequate internal controls to assess program risks [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Misrepresentations - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to deliver on contracts in its Aeronautics and Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS) segments, presenting a false view of its operations [2]. - It is alleged that the company lacked effective internal controls and procedures to accurately review program requirements and risks, leading to undisclosed significant losses [2]. Group 2: Financial Disclosures and Impact - On July 22, 2025, Lockheed Martin disclosed an additional $950 million in pre-tax losses for its Aeronautics segment and $570 million for its RMS segment, primarily due to issues with the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program [3]. - Following these disclosures, Lockheed Martin's stock price experienced a significant drop, with shares falling almost 11% on the final disclosure [4]. Group 3: Investigation and Systemic Issues - Hagens Berman is investigating whether the substantial losses were a foreseeable consequence of poor internal controls and a failure to communicate risks accurately to investors [5]. - The investigation suggests that the scale and recurrence of losses indicate a systemic issue rather than isolated problems, raising questions about management's awareness of internal control deficiencies [6]. Group 4: Additional Financial Losses - On January 28, 2025, Lockheed Martin reported $1.8 billion in pre-tax losses in its Aeronautics segment [7]. - On April 17, 2025, the company announced the departure of its CFO, which may indicate internal challenges [7].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls and contract commitments, which may lead to significant losses for the company [1]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to its risk-adjusted contracts, including the reporting of its risk-adjusted profit booking rate [1]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for conducting comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [1]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to fulfill contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule [1]. - As a result of these issues, the company is likely to report significant losses, and the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially misleading [1]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Shareholders who purchased shares during this period are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline set for September 26, 2025 [2]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [2]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure that companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls, resulting in significant financial losses during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled Khan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation and covers purchasers or acquirers of Lockheed Martin securities from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until September 26, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [3]. - Specific allegations include: - Lack of effective internal controls over risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [3]. - Inadequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements and risks [3]. - Overstating the company's ability to meet contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule [3]. - Likelihood of reporting significant losses as a result of these issues [3]. Financial Impact and Stock Performance - On October 22, 2024, Lockheed Martin announced an $80 million loss on a classified program, leading to a stock price drop of over 6% [4]. - On January 28, 2025, the company reported pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion related to classified programs, causing a stock price decline of more than 9% [5]. - On July 22, 2025, an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses was disclosed, including $950 million related to the Aeronautics Classified program, resulting in a nearly 11% drop in stock price [6]. Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [7]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [7]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases [8].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin has shown strong stock performance recently, with a return of +7.5% over the past month, outperforming the S&P 500 composite's +3.8% and the Zacks Aerospace - Defense industry's +2.3% [1] Earnings Estimate Revisions - The current quarter's earnings estimate for Lockheed is $6.36 per share, reflecting a -7% change year-over-year, with a slight adjustment of -0.2% in the last 30 days [4] - The consensus earnings estimate for the current fiscal year is $22.4, indicating a -21.3% year-over-year change, with a recent change of +0.2% [4] - For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate is $29.5, showing a +31.7% change from the previous year, with a minor adjustment of -0.1% [5] - Lockheed holds a Zacks Rank 3 (Hold), influenced by recent changes in earnings estimates and other related factors [6] Projected Revenue Growth - The consensus sales estimate for the current quarter is $18.54 billion, indicating an +8.4% year-over-year change [8] - Revenue estimates for the current and next fiscal years are $74.3 billion and $77.23 billion, reflecting changes of +4.6% and +3.9%, respectively [8] Last Reported Results and Surprise History - In the last reported quarter, Lockheed generated revenues of $18.16 billion, a +0.2% year-over-year change, with an EPS of $7.29 compared to $7.11 a year ago [9] - The reported revenues were -2.21% below the Zacks Consensus Estimate, while the EPS exceeded estimates by +12.33% [9] - Lockheed has consistently beaten consensus EPS estimates over the last four quarters, but has only surpassed revenue estimates once during this period [10] Valuation - Lockheed is graded B in the Zacks Value Style Score, indicating it is trading at a discount compared to its peers [14]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls regarding its risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rate [2]. - It is alleged that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [2]. - The complaint states that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to fulfill contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule, leading to a likelihood of significant losses [2]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects were materially misleading [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until September 26, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Insights - Nations are enhancing defense capabilities with hypersonic weapons seen as a potential game-changer due to their speed and maneuverability, posing a threat to existing defense systems [1] - Lockheed Martin Corp. has been a leader in hypersonic technology development for 60 years, with programs like ARRW, CPS, and LRHW [2][9] Company Developments - Lockheed's Mako missile is designed for the U.S. Air Force's SiAW program and is being refined for speed and cost-effectiveness to attract customers [3] - The successful deployment of Lockheed's LRHW system by the U.S. Army during Talisman Sabre 25 highlights the demand for hypersonic weapons among U.S. allies and potential future contracts [4][9] Industry Context - The U.S. is heavily investing in hypersonic technology to compete with China and Russia, benefiting defense contractors like RTX Corp. and Northrop Grumman [5] - RTX is involved in the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept program and is transitioning the LTAMDS radar to production [6] - Northrop Grumman develops both hypersonic weapons and counter-hypersonic systems, utilizing scramjet technology and Glide Phase Interceptor capabilities [7] Market Performance - Lockheed's shares have increased by 7.4% in the past month, outperforming the industry growth of 1.4% [8] - Lockheed is trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 16.77, which is lower than the industry average of 28.04 [10]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, about the September 26, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by September 26, 2025 [3] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4] - Rosen Law Firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013 [4] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls and ability to meet contract commitments, which misled investors [5] - Specific claims include a lack of effective internal controls, inaccurate reviews of program requirements, and an overstatement of the company's delivery capabilities [5] - The lawsuit asserts that these misrepresentations likely led to significant losses for investors when the true details became public [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights China's comprehensive control over 17 types of rare earth elements, which significantly impacts the U.S. military's sixth-generation aircraft project, demonstrating that financial investments alone cannot overcome technological barriers [1][13]. Group 1: Rare Earth Control - China accounts for over 60% of global rare earth production and 90% of refined supply, making it a critical supplier for U.S. military equipment [3]. - The introduction of China's Rare Earth Management Regulations has led to export controls on seven medium and heavy rare earth elements, requiring U.S. companies to apply for permits [3][5]. - 87% of the supply chain for 153 types of U.S. military equipment relies on Chinese rare earth processing [3][5]. Group 2: U.S. Military Response - The U.S. Department of Defense has been urgently meeting to address the impact of China's rare earth controls on military production lines, with companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing expressing significant concerns [5][6]. - The NGAD sixth-generation aircraft project has been halted for review due to material supply issues, highlighting the dependency on rare earth elements for advanced military technology [5][11]. Group 3: Technological Disparity - The U.S. is approximately 20 years behind China in rare earth separation and purification technology, which poses a significant challenge for rebuilding its supply chain [8][13]. - China has established a complete rare earth industrial chain, from mining to refining, while the U.S. struggles to restart its own operations [8][9]. Group 4: Strategic Investment and Challenges - The Biden administration's $100 billion investment aims to rebuild the rare earth supply chain by 2027, but this timeline is seen as unrealistic compared to China's immediate control measures [13]. - The U.S. faces challenges in attracting private capital to the rare earth sector, which is heavily reliant on government subsidies [13]. Group 5: Historical Context and Future Outlook - The U.S. relinquished its rare earth industry in the 1990s due to environmental and cost concerns, leading to a significant technological and industrial gap with China [13]. - China's ongoing innovation in rare earth materials and applications continues to widen the gap, making it difficult for the U.S. to regain its former position [13].