Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who acquired Lockheed Martin Corporation securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its business prospects [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint states that Lockheed Martin failed to disclose several critical issues, including: - Inefficient internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [2] - Lack of effective procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements and risks [2] - Overstatement of its ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule [2] - Likelihood of reporting significant losses as a result of these issues [2] Financial Impact - On July 22, 2025, Lockheed Martin disclosed an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses on classified programs, which included: - $950 million in losses from the Aeronautics Classified program - $570 million in losses from the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program - $95 million charge related to the Turkish Utility Helicopter Program - Following this announcement, the company's share price dropped by $49.79, or over 10%, closing at $410.74 [3]. Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs must submit their papers by September 26, 2025, but participation is not required to be eligible for recovery [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 26, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by September 26, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [5]. - Specific claims include the lack of effective internal controls over risk-adjusted contracts, inaccurate program reviews, and overstated capabilities in meeting contract commitments [5]. - As a result of these alleged misrepresentations, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages when the true information became public [5].

Core Insights - Rising global demand for satellite-based communications, Earth observation, and cybersecurity systems is driving the space technology market, benefiting Lockheed Martin's Space segment through major contracts [1][9] - Lockheed's space business unit is involved in designing and testing lunar and deep space exploration capabilities, securing contracts for various space capabilities including Mars exploration and weather satellites [2][9] - The space business segment registered a 4% revenue growth in Q2 2025 after previous declines, driven by satellite, missile-defense, and space exploration contracts [3][9] Revenue Trends - Prior to Q2 2025, Lockheed's Space segment experienced declining revenues in 2024 and early 2025, with a 2% year-over-year sales drop in Q1 2025 and a 13% decline in Q4 2024 due to slower production and program delays [4][9] - The near-term challenges include delays in the Artemis mission, affecting Orion's revenue cadence, but long-term prospects remain solid with over $3 billion annual demand for Next Gen OPIR satellites and substantial Artemis program funding [5][9] Competitive Landscape - Other defense stocks like Boeing and L3Harris Technologies are also involved in space programs, with Boeing being the prime contractor for the U.S. Space Launch System and L3Harris supporting the Artemis II mission [6][7] Market Performance - Lockheed Martin's shares have lost 12.3% year-to-date, contrasting with the industry's 27.3% growth [8] - The company's shares are trading at a relative discount, with a forward 12-month Price/Earnings ratio of 15.67X compared to the industry's average of 27.55X [10]

NEW YORK, Aug. 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin Corporation" or the "Company") (NYSE: LMT) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Lockheed Martin Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: CONTACT: ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Lockheed Martin (LMT) and presents a perspective that it is currently a hold position for investors [1]. Group 1 - The author has previously analyzed Lockheed Martin and expressed a cautious stance on its investment potential [1]. - The article indicates a focus on the tech sector and highlights the author's educational background in finance [1]. - The author emphasizes core values such as excellence, integrity, transparency, and respect as essential for long-term success [1]. Group 2 - There is an invitation for readers to provide constructive criticism and feedback to improve the quality of the analysis [1].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls regarding its risk-adjusted contracts and the reporting of its profit booking rate [2]. - It is alleged that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [2]. - The complaint states that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to fulfill contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule, leading to a likelihood of significant losses [2]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects were materially misleading [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until September 26, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls during the specified class period from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false statements regarding its internal controls and risk management related to contracts, leading to overstated capabilities in delivering on contract commitments [3]. - Significant financial losses were reported by Lockheed Martin, including an $80 million loss on a classified program announced on October 22, 2024, which caused a stock price drop of over 6% [4]. - On January 28, 2025, Lockheed Martin disclosed pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion related to classified programs, resulting in a stock price decline of more than 9% [5]. - An additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses was reported on July 22, 2025, including $950 million related to the Aeronautics Classified program, leading to a nearly 11% drop in stock price [6]. Group 2: Legal Process and Representation - Investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [7]. - The lead plaintiff has the authority to select a law firm for litigation, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any potential recovery [7]. Group 3: Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit alleging misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls during a specified class period [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [1]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [1]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule [1]. - As a result of these issues, the company was likely to report significant losses [1]. - The positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects were allegedly misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [1]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by September 26, 2025, to potentially be appointed as lead plaintiffs [2]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the case lifecycle [2]. Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [3].

NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP announces that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors (the "Class") who purchased or acquired the securities of Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin" or the "Company") (NYSE: LMT) between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025, inclusive. Should You Join This Class Action Lawsuit? If you purchased or acquired Lockheed Martin securities, and/or would like to discuss your legal rights and options ...

Core Insights - The U.S. has imported 3,834 tons of antimony oxide through Thailand and Mexico in just five months, nearly matching the total amount imported over the past three years, coinciding with China's planned export control policy for minerals by the end of 2024 [1][3] - The surge in imports raises questions about the effectiveness of China's export bans and whether Thailand and Mexico are acting as "bridges" for the U.S. to circumvent these restrictions [1][3] Group 1: Import Dynamics - Thailand and Mexico are not major producers of antimony, yet there has been an unusual increase in antimony product exports from China to these countries, indicating a strategy of "washing" the origin of products [3][4] - The increase in imports from Thailand and Mexico aligns with China's announcement of export controls on critical minerals, suggesting that the U.S. is using these countries as transit points to bypass direct purchases from China [4][6] Group 2: Supply Chain Complexity - The global supply chain is intricate and interconnected, making it challenging to enforce export bans effectively, especially when products are exported to third countries for minimal processing before reaching the U.S. [4][6] - The presence of Chinese capital in many of the new mineral transshipment companies in Mexico raises concerns about the effectiveness of the export controls [4][6] Group 3: Strategic Materials Concerns - Gallium procurement is also problematic, with U.S. companies managing to acquire it from China through undisclosed channels, highlighting the secretive nature of these transactions [6] - The situation underscores the need for China to enhance its regulatory mechanisms to close supply chain loopholes and strengthen its strategic deterrence against attempts to circumvent export bans [6]