This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain Meta has announced it will abandon its fact-checking program, starting in the United States. It was aimed at preventing the spread of online lies among more than 3 billion people who use Meta's social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram and Threads. In a video, the company's chief, ...

Investors often face two extreme narratives in AI discourse-it's either a repeat of the dot-com bubble or a near-future superintelligence poised to transform everything overnight. In reality, AI is too complex for such simplistic views, and understanding its deeper mechanics"AWS Certified AI Practitioner Early Adopter"DevOps Engineer in charge of building, deploying, and maintaining internal AI infrastructure on the AWS Cloud. For instance, I have built, deployed, and maintained an internal chatbot for our ...

Meta's Content Moderation Policy Changes - Meta plans to replace third-party fact-checkers with a community-based fact-checking program, addressing criticism of partisanship and overcorrection in the previous system [3] - Meta will loosen content moderation restrictions on topics considered "part of mainstream discourse" and reintroduce political content to users' feeds [3] - The company emphasized preventing censorship of speech in its announcement, with no direct mention of brand safety concerns [3] Advertiser Reactions and Concerns - Some advertisers worry about Meta's commitment to brand safety, particularly around hate speech and adult nudity [4][7] - Advertisers are cautious about publicly criticizing platforms or threatening to pull spending due to political sensitivities [9] - Advertisers have outstanding questions about Meta's new thresholds for removing posts and the roadmap for monitoring misinformation trends [11] Industry Perspectives on Meta's Strategy - Industry analysts believe many marketers will continue spending on Meta as long as it delivers expected audiences and ad performance [9] - Meta commands about 21% of the US digital ad market, second only to Google [9] - Some advertising executives support Meta's announcement, viewing it as a step toward boosting engagement and free speech [15][16] Comparison with X's Community Notes - Advertisers are closely watching how Meta's Community Notes-like feature will perform, given mixed results with X's implementation [12][14] - Studies show X's Community Notes may be too slow to counter misinformation during its most viral stages but have been effective in specific cases like Covid vaccine misinformation [14] - Meta's approach is seen as an evolution of brand-safety standards rather than a retreat from protecting users and marketers [16][17]

Meta's Policy Shift - Meta announced it will stop using third-party fact-checkers and instead adopt a user-generated community notes feature, similar to Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) [2][4] - The decision was influenced by the incoming Trump administration and a perceived shift in American attitudes toward censorship, free speech, and content moderation [1][3][4] - Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated the move aims to address concerns about biased employees overly censoring content [3] Content Moderation and Political Climate - Meta is relocating some content moderation teams from California to Texas, citing political alignment differences between the states [3] - The company acknowledged past complaints of bias, particularly from Republicans, regarding content moderation and the banning of former President Donald Trump [5][6] - Meta's CMO Alex Schultz noted that community notes on X have been more successful in engaging contributors across the political spectrum [6] Advertiser Relations and Brand Safety - Meta plans to maintain brand safety tools for advertisers, focusing on hate speech and adult nudity rather than fact-checked content [8] - The company emphasized a commitment to precision in content moderation, avoiding unnecessary removals [8] - Meta's approach to advertiser relations will differ from X, with no plans to denigrate or sue advertisers [7] Leadership and Strategic Direction - Zuckerberg is described as returning to his core values, taking advantage of the current moment to align Meta's policies with his vision [4][5] - Schultz highlighted that the changes reflect a response to broader societal shifts and the company's adaptability to different administrations [2][3][4]

Meta announced Tuesday it's doing away with third-party fact-checking in favor of community notes.Several lawmakers told BI the move is an indication Mark Zuckerberg is catering to Trump.Some business leaders praised Meta for the change while others expressed concern.Meta is carrying out the biggest overhaul to its content moderation system in years.AD The company announced on Tuesday that it's replacing third-party fact-checking program with user-generated community notes, like those on Elon Musk's X, for ...

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Meta faces criticism over its decision to 'get rid' of US fact-checkers. Tech giant Meta's shock announcement to end its US fact-checking program triggered scathing criticism Tuesday from disinformation researchers who warned it risked opening the floodgates for proliferating false narratives. Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerb ...

The first indication of Mark Zuckerberg's capitulation to the MAGA movement came when he went to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort for Thanksgiving in December.Following which Meta, worth $1.5tn, made a decidedly modest $1m contribution to president-elect Trump's inaugural fund. But it seems geeks bearing gifts wouldn't be enough to placate a president-elect who once threatened to jail the man he called "Zuckerschmuck," whom he accused of conspiring against him in the 2020 election.Trump news conference - as ...

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Meta's announcement repeated many of the complaints made by Republicans and X-owner Elon Musk. Social media giant Meta on Tuesday slashed its content moderation policies, including ending its US fact-checking program on Facebook and Instagram, in a major shift that conforms with the priorities of incoming president Donald Trump. ...

About this content About Oliver Haill Oliver has been writing about companies and markets since the early 2000s, cutting his teeth as a financial journalist at Growth Company Investor with a focusing on AIM companies and small caps, before a few years later becoming a section editor and then head of research. He joined Proactive after a couple of years freelancing, where he worked for the Financial Times Group, ITV, Press Association, Reuters sports desk, the London Olympic News Service, Rugby World Cup ...

Meta's Content Moderation Policy Overhaul - Meta announced a significant overhaul of its content moderation policies, admitting that its previous approach to limiting political content was "pretty blunt" and would now be addressed [1] - The company plans to reintroduce political content into Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, allowing users who want such content to see more of it [1] Historical Context of Political Content Reduction - Meta reduced the amount of political content on its apps since 2021 based on user feedback indicating a desire to see less of this content [2] - Changes to limit proactive recommendations of political content on Instagram were implemented just last year [2] Backlash from Users and Creators - Meta's decision in early 2024 to stop proactively recommending political content on Instagram and Threads faced backlash from both users and creators, especially during a critical U S presidential election year [3] - Hundreds of creators signed an open letter in April arguing that the decision to limit political content should be opt-in rather than default [3] - Creators expressed concerns about how Meta would define political content, fearing it would limit discussions on topics like climate change, gun control, and reproductive rights [4] - Creators were also worried about the impact on their reach, audience growth, personal brand, and income [5] - Users felt that Meta's changes suppressed their voices on social media, exacerbated by a "bug" that reverted settings to default, limiting political content from non-followed accounts [6] Demand for Political Content - Despite the changes, there was a clear demand for political content in users' feeds, particularly on Threads, where political content often dominated the trends section [7] New Personalized Approach - Meta announced a "more personalized approach" to handling political content, treating "civic content" from followed accounts like any other content in feeds, ranking it based on user engagement signals such as likes and views [8] - The company will recommend more political content based on personalized signals and expand user controls to manage the amount of political content they see [9] - Specific controls will be implemented in user settings, though it is unclear how Meta will inform users about the availability of these controls [9]