NEW YORK, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group PLC (“Klarna” or the “Company”) (NYSE: KLAR). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at newaction@pomlaw.com or 646-581-9980, (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased. The class action concerns whether Klarna and certain of its officer ...

智通财经APP注意到，距离美国中期选举还有九个月，华尔街已开始预演 11 月投票前的各种交易情 景。目前最受关注的是美国消费者，至少从最新的情绪调查来看，他们的情况并不乐观。 投资者正在紧盯那些能从特朗普政府降低生活成本的努力中获益的交易。这包括：随着某些税制改革和 其他生活成本政策的实施，需求可能增加的新型金融公司；以及如果抵押贷款利率下降，景气度将回升 的住房建筑商。 美国总统特朗普已经通过下令购买抵押贷款支持证券(MBS)，试图压低住房借贷成本。共和党目前在众 议院仅维持微弱多数优势，投资者预计他们将倾向于支持解决通胀威胁的立法。 特朗普新交易表现优异 这就是为什么花旗推出了被佩蒂特称为"战术性"的交易一篮子股票，重点关注活跃于中低收入消费者金 融领域的金融科技公司，如 Klarna(KLAR.US)、Block(XYZ.US)和 Intuit (INTU.US)。例如，该群体可能 会受到使消费者更容易获得信贷的政策的提振。 花旗瞄准金融科技领域之际，世界大企业联合会的数据显示，消费者信心降至 2014 年以来的最低水 平。这在华尔街的部分角落引发了警报，担忧支出可能开始萎靡，尽管几个月来情绪调查一直疲 ...

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Klarna Group plc (NASDAQ: KLAR) securities pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus issued in connection with Klarna's September 10, 2025, initial public offering ("IPO"). Klarna purports to be a “technology-driven payments company, with operations spanning multiple countries.” For more information, su ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc on behalf of investors who acquired Klarna securities during the specified Class Period, alleging omissions in the IPO Registration Statement regarding potential increases in loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit targets investors who purchased Klarna securities from September 7, 2025, to December 22, 2025, including shares from the September 2025 IPO [1]. - The complaint claims that Klarna's IPO Registration Statement failed to disclose critical information about the potential increase in loss reserves, which the defendants should have been aware of due to the risk profiles of their customers [3]. - Reports starting November 18, 2025, indicated that Klarna was raising its provisions for credit losses due to defaults, which is central to the allegations in the lawsuit [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - As of the lawsuit filing, Klarna shares were trading at $31.31, significantly lower than the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Company Overview - Klarna is a financial technology company based in Stockholm, Sweden, that facilitates loans for small purchases, including food delivery services [2].

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Klarna, the global digital bank and flexible payments provider, is joining Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP), an open standard designed to help AI agents and commerce systems work together across the full shopping lifecycle, from discovery and purchase through post-purchase support. UCP enables consumers to shop seamlessly in AI conversations while giving agents, merchant systems, and payment providers a standardized way to interact across multiple AI platfor. ...

ATLANTA, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Holzer & Holzer, LLC reminds investors of the deadline to seek to be appointed lead plaintiff in the following class action lawsuits: Gauzy Ltd. (GAUZ) The shareholder class action filed against Gauzy Ltd. (“Gauzy” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: GAUZ) alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material facts regarding the ability of Gauzy’s French subsidiaries to meet their debts between March 11, 2025 and Novem ...

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 10, 2025 IPO, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 due to misleading offering documents and understated risk regarding loss reserves [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit, titled Nayak v. Klarna Group plc, allows purchasers of Klarna securities from the IPO to seek lead plaintiff status by February 20, 2026 [1][2]. - Klarna's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [2]. Allegations Against Klarna - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's offering documents were materially false or misleading, particularly regarding the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [3]. - A Bloomberg News article reported that Klarna posted a net loss of $95 million and increased provisions for loan losses to $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates [4]. Stock Performance - Following the IPO, Klarna's stock price fell to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the initial offering price of $40 per share [4]. Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows investors who acquired Klarna securities to seek lead plaintiff status, representing the interests of the class [5]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 10, 2025 IPO, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 due to misleading offering documents and understated risks associated with its loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Nayak v. Klarna Group plc, allows purchasers of Klarna securities from the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff by February 20, 2026 [1][2]. - Klarna's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [2]. - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's offering documents were materially false and omitted critical information regarding the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - Following the IPO, Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million on November 18, 2025, and increased provisions for loan losses to $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [4]. - Provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, up from 0.44% the previous year [4]. - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, Klarna's stock price had dropped to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation and Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Klarna securities in connection with the IPO to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can choose a law firm to litigate the case [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm handling the case, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

转自：InfoQ ，编译 | Tina 过去几十年，软件工程有一个稳定不变的前提：系统的行为写在代码里。工程师读代码，就能推断系 统在大多数场景下会怎么运行；测试、调试、上线，也都围绕"确定性"展开。但 Agent 的出现正在动 摇这个前提：在 Agent 应用里，决定行为的不再只是代码，还有模型本身——一个在代码之外运 行、带着非确定性的黑箱。你无法只靠读代码理解它，只能让它跑起来、看它在真实输入下做了什 么，才知道系统"到底在干什么"。 在播客中，LangChain 创始人 Harrison Chase 还把最近一波"能连续跑起来"的编程 Agent、Deep Research 等现象视为拐点，并判断这类"长任务 Agent"的落地会在 2025 年末到 2026 年进一步加 速。 这也把问题推到了台前：2026 被很多人视为"长任务 Agent 元年"，现有的软件公司还能不能熬过 去？就像当年从 on-prem 走向云，并不是所有软件公司都成功转型一样，工程范式一旦变化，就会 重新筛选参与者。长任务 Agent 更像"数字员工"——它不是多回合聊天那么简单，而是能在更长时间 里持续执行、反复试错、不断自 ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc, alleging that the company and its executives failed to disclose material information in the registration statement related to its September 2025 IPO, which has adversely affected investors [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna materially understated the risk of an increase in loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which was known or should have been known given the risk profile of individuals taking out buy now, pay later loans [2]. - The public statements made by Klarna were alleged to be materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [2]. Group 2: Legal Process - Investors in Klarna who suffered losses during the relevant time frame have until February 20, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although serving as lead plaintiff is not a requirement for recovery [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC, the law firm handling the case, is recognized as one of the top boutique securities litigation firms in the U.S., having been ranked among the top 10 firms nationally based on total settlement value [3].