【环球网报道】2月5日上午，国台办举行例行新闻发布会，发言人陈斌华就近期两岸热点问题回答记者 提问。 记者：近日，赖清德称，"台湾身处捍卫民主自由的第一线，面对国际局势快速变化与灰色地带威胁， 台军须持续精进实战训练，结合科技与人工智能，打造有效、可恃、现代化的防卫力量，确保国家安 全"。对此有何评论？ 陈斌华：民进党当局一再编造"民主对抗威权"虚假叙事，煽动两岸对立对抗，大肆挥霍台湾民众血汗钱 购武备战，背后有多少不可告人的利益勾当，台湾人民都看得很清楚。蚍蜉撼树，不自量力。我们有充 分的信心、强大的能力粉碎一切"台独"分裂图谋，坚决捍卫国家主权和领土完整。民进党当局妄图"以 武谋独"，只会自寻绝路、自取灭亡。 ...

国台办发言人陈斌华答问表示，民进党当局一再编造"民主对抗威权"虚假叙事，煽动两岸对立对抗，大 肆挥霍台湾民众血汗钱购武备战，背后有多少不可告人的利益勾当，台湾人民都看得很清楚。蚍蜉撼 树，不自量力。我们有充分的信心、强大的能力粉碎一切"台独"分裂图谋，坚决捍卫国家主权和领土完 整。民进党当局妄图"以武谋独"，只会自寻绝路、自取灭亡。 2月5日，国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。有记者问，近日，赖清德称，"台湾身处捍卫民主自由的第 一线，面对国际局势快速变化与灰色地带威胁，台军须持续精进实战训练，结合科技与人工智能，打造 有效、可恃、现代化的防卫力量，确保国家安全"。对此有何评论？ ...

1月21日上午，国台办在新闻发布厅举行例行新闻发布会，发言人彭庆恩就近期两岸热点问题回答记者 提问。 会上有记者提问：台防务部门近期多起采购案引发舆论争议，继装修公司、鞋厂被爆中标军火标案，茶 叶公司取得服务器标案后，近日又爆出台军备部门一项4550万元新台币军购案，中标企业原从事烟酒、 食品及五金零售批发行业。对此有何评论？ 国台办发言人彭庆恩表示，民进党当局为了"以武谋独"大肆挥霍台湾老百姓的血汗钱购买外国武器，同 时借机敛财，贪污腐败。希望广大台湾同胞看清民进党当局的险恶用心、丑恶嘴脸，用实际行动看紧自 己的荷包，不要再上当受骗。 智通财经记者 李文姬 ...

发言人朱凤莲表示，我们看到民调显示，90%的受访者认为民进党当局加速武装台湾的行径已将台湾民 众推向兵凶战危的险境。岛内也有民调显示，超过六成的民众并不愿意自己或家人上战场。这些情况折 射出台湾社会对买武器买不来"安全"、只会加速把台湾推入险境的高度共识，也反映了台湾民众对民进 党当局浪费民脂民膏讨好外部势力、养肥外国军火商的强烈不满。民进党当局为谋求政党私利，不断增 加防务预算，大搞"全民皆兵"、鼓噪"战争恐慌"，把台湾民众绑上"台独"战车，妄图"倚外谋独"、"以武 谋独"，是对台湾民众安全与利益最大的现实威胁。（总台央视记者 赵超逸 黄惠馨） 责编：陈菲扬、张振 1月14日，国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 "更何况，M1A2T其实根本算不上什么先进的坦克，不过是美国为赚取台湾军火利润、敲诈台湾的'水 货'罢了。"袁周分析，其120毫米主炮宣称的最大穿甲深度（850毫米）依赖美军自用的贫铀穿甲弹，而 美国仅向台湾地区提供出口版本的穿甲弹，其实际穿甲能力大幅降低至约560毫米，在现代坦克中已不 占优势。坦克最核心的贫铀复合装甲并未能随车出售，导致其防护能力显著低于美军自用版本。美军坦 克战力的核心在于其数字化战场管理系统（如旅和旅以下作战指挥系统FBCB2），但这套系统也没有 随车出口。不仅性能被阉割，其战场定位也并不适合台湾岛内的战场环境。M1A2T重约63吨，远超台 湾地区多数公路和桥梁的承重标准，严重限制了其机动范围和速度。更为严重的是，在现代战争中，坦 克面临无人机、反坦克导弹等多维打击，战场生存能力面临严重挑战的背景下，没有配备主动防御系统 的M1A2T在现代战场上充其量也就是一个移动的靶标。 △M1A2T 袁周指出，综合来看，台湾地区组建第2个M1A2T坦克营，其政治象征意义远大于实际军事价值。这些 价格昂贵的坦克存在性能缺陷、环境不适、生存力弱和体系脱节等根本性问题，难以发挥其预 ...

国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。对于赖清德日前发表的错误言论，发言人张晗表示，民进党当局为一 党之私，不惜将台湾民众绑上"台独"战车，完全不顾台湾老百姓的民生福祉，必遭唾弃。民进党当局妄 图"以武谋独"只会加速灭亡。 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the implications of U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, emphasizing that it violates the One China principle and undermines China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [6][7] - It highlights the Taiwanese authorities' efforts to portray themselves as victims to gain military support from other countries, which is seen as a tactic to disrupt the stability of the Taiwan Strait [7][8] - The article warns that military cooperation with Taiwan will lead to severe consequences and that any country underestimating China's resolve to defend its sovereignty will face repercussions [6][7] Group 2 - The article mentions that the U.S. public opinion is largely against military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, with over half opposing such actions and more than 60% prioritizing conflict avoidance in U.S.-China relations [8] - It calls for the U.S. government to adhere to the One China principle and the three joint communiqués, urging an immediate halt to arms sales to Taiwan to prevent further damage to U.S.-China relations [8] - The historical context of Israel's recognition of China and its stance on Taiwan is presented, emphasizing the importance of understanding the historical narrative and China's determination to maintain national unity [9]

Core Viewpoint - The recent military exercises conducted by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) around Taiwan, named "Mission of Justice-2025," are seen as a strong warning against the provocative actions of Taiwan's government under Lai Ching-te, which is perceived to be pushing Taiwan towards conflict and instability [1][2]. Group 1: Military Exercises and Responses - The PLA's military exercises demonstrate a more assertive attitude, showcasing enhanced capabilities and rapid response, aimed at deterring "Taiwan independence" forces from misjudging the situation [2]. - The exercises serve as a warning to both the Lai administration and external forces not to escalate tensions or interfere in China's internal affairs [1][2]. Group 2: Political Climate in Taiwan - There is a growing sentiment among Taiwanese citizens that the current administration's reliance on external support and military purchases from the U.S. is leading to increased political division and societal unrest [2]. - Public opinion is shifting towards a desire for peace and stability, with many young people recognizing that the path of relying on foreign powers is fraught with danger [2][3]. Group 3: Calls for Peace and Dialogue - Analysts emphasize the importance of dialogue and reconciliation between the two sides, arguing that true stability in Taiwan can only be achieved through peaceful means and mutual understanding [3]. - The narrative surrounding the military exercises is framed as a collective responsibility of all Chinese people to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent military exercises conducted by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) around Taiwan, named "Mission of Justice-2025," are seen as a strong warning to the Taiwanese authorities led by Lai Ching-te, who are accused of provoking tensions and seeking independence through external support [1][2]. Group 1: Military Exercises and Responses - The PLA's military exercises demonstrate a stronger attitude, more skilled maneuvers, and quicker response capabilities, aimed at deterring pro-independence forces in Taiwan [2]. - The exercises serve as a warning to both the Lai administration and external forces not to escalate tensions or misjudge the situation [2][3]. Group 2: Political Reactions in Taiwan - The Kuomintang (KMT) party leader criticized Lai Ching-te for provoking conflict and failing to create peace across the Taiwan Strait, arguing that his policies are leading Taiwan towards danger [1]. - Public sentiment in Taiwan is increasingly against the Lai administration's reliance on external powers and military spending, with calls for peace and stability being voiced by various societal groups [2][3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around China's strong opposition to the recent U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, which total over $11 billion, marking a historical high. This action is seen as a violation of the One China principle and a serious interference in China's internal affairs [1][2][3] - The Chinese government has announced countermeasures against 20 U.S. defense companies and 10 executives, emphasizing its determination to protect national sovereignty and security [1] - The arms sales are perceived as a strategy by the U.S. to gain political leverage, arm Taiwan to contain China, and benefit American arms manufacturers, rather than serving the interests of the Taiwanese people [2][3] Group 2 - The articles highlight the negative implications of the arms sales on Taiwan's economy and social welfare, questioning how much better Taiwan could be if the funds were allocated to public services instead of military spending [3] - There is a growing sentiment among Taiwanese citizens against the current administration's reliance on the U.S. for military support, with over 8 million signatures collected for a motion to impeach the Taiwanese leader, indicating a significant public backlash [4] - The narrative suggests that the current approach of the Taiwanese government, which relies on external forces for independence, is ultimately detrimental and could lead to severe consequences for Taiwan [3][4]