从更宏观的角度来看，特朗普曾计划通过断绝俄罗斯的能源出口，来卡住普京政府的收入，但他的算盘彻底落空了。中俄的合作越走越深，俄罗斯的资金 来源变得更加稳定；欧洲虽然嘴上说要抵制俄气，但实际上又通过各种渠道给俄罗斯开辟了销路。曾经特朗普威胁说，要对与俄罗斯做生意的国家加征 500%的关税，现在看着中俄铁定的合作关系，这些话已经不再有人信了。实际上，俄罗斯将能源以降价的方式卖给中国，正是全球能源格局变化的缩 影。试图通过单边制裁扭曲市场规则的做法，根本行不通！反而是中俄这种互利共赢的合作，正在为全球能源市场带来新的贸易规则。中俄能源合作的深 化，不仅保障了双方的核心利益，还为全球能源市场的稳定与多元化注入了强大的动力。 中国外交部早就明确表示：中俄能源合作是正常的商业行为，互利共赢，谁搞单边制裁和长臂管辖我们都坚决反对！这番话背后，是中国日益强大的国力 和国际话语权的支撑。事实上，中俄的能源合作早已成为老搭档关系，从原油管道到天然气供应，双方的合作早已非常成熟，根本不怕外部制裁破坏。更 有意思的是，美国和欧洲对俄罗斯实施的能源制裁，已经开始面临瓶颈。有数据显示，今年上半年，法国从俄罗斯进口的天然气居然翻了一倍！欧盟 ...

毛宁表示，中方一贯反对没有国际法依据、未经联合国安理会授权的单边制裁。 经济观察网 据央视新闻客户端消息，11月17日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问：美国 总统特朗普曾表示，他可以接受拟议中的参议院法案中对与俄罗斯开展业务的国家实施制裁这一措施。 外交部对此有何评论？ ...

中方：从来没有、也不会要求企业违法采集或存储数据 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：徐世明 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新网北京11月17日电 (记者 黄钰钦)中国外交部发言人毛宁17日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：第一个问题，美国白宫国家安全备忘录以及相关声明称，阿里巴巴集团向中国军方提供了 针对美国目标的技术支持。外交部对此有何评论？第二个问题是，美国总统特朗普曾表示，他可以接受 拟议中的参议院法案中对与俄罗斯开展业务国家实施制裁这一措施。外交部对此有何评论？ 毛宁：关于第一个问题，有关企业已经作出了回应。中国政府高度重视并依法保护数据隐私和安全，从 来没有、也不会要求企业以违法形式采集或者存储数据。 关于第二个问题，中方一贯反对没有国际法依据、未经联合国安理会授权的单边制裁。(完) ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing sanctions against Russia due to the Ukraine conflict have now extended to steel, with Germany's Vice Chancellor calling for a complete ban on Russian steel, placing the EU in a precarious position between geopolitical pressures and economic realities [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Internal Conflicts - The call for a ban on Russian steel has caused significant discord within the EU, revealing that while there is a collective stance, individual member states have differing interests [3][5]. - Eastern European countries are particularly vulnerable, as many small and medium enterprises rely heavily on Russian steel, risking production halts and potential unemployment [3][5]. - Western European nations may face increased costs if they seek alternative suppliers from countries like India and Brazil, potentially raising prices by at least 30%, which could further exacerbate inflation [5][10]. Group 2: Germany's Strategic Moves - Germany's push for a ban appears to be a strategy to solidify its leadership role within the EU while also pressuring its domestic steel industry to reduce reliance on Russian imports [8][10]. - A special summit is scheduled for November 6, where German officials will discuss measures to mitigate the impact of the ban on the domestic steel sector, highlighting the importance of steel to Germany's manufacturing base [8][10]. - The contradiction in Germany's approach—calling for a ban while simultaneously seeking ways to cushion its domestic industry—illustrates the complex balancing act between political posturing and economic stability [10][12]. Group 3: Russia's Response and Market Dynamics - Russia has responded defiantly to the sanctions, asserting that it can overcome the challenges posed by Western restrictions and suggesting that the sanctions may ultimately harm the global economy [12][14]. - As a major steel exporter, Russia's products are difficult to replace in the short term, and a complete ban could lead to Russia redirecting its exports to emerging markets in Asia and Africa [14][15]. - The EU's search for alternative suppliers is likely to be a lengthy process, and a sudden ban could lead to further disruptions in supply chains, complicating the situation for European businesses [15][17]. Group 4: Broader Implications of Sanctions - The current situation highlights the challenges of using sanctions as a tool to undermine a significant global player, suggesting that such measures may not yield the intended results and could destabilize the global economy [17]. - The internal divisions within the EU regarding the sanctions may lead to some member states circumventing the ban, making it difficult for Germany's call for a complete embargo to be fully realized [17].

Core Points - The European Union (EU) has included Chinese companies and major oil refineries in its latest round of sanctions against Russia, which has drawn strong criticism from China [1][3] - China asserts that these sanctions violate previous agreements between China and the EU and threaten global energy security [3][10] Group 1: Impact on Trade and Economy - The trade relationship between China and the EU is expected to reach €840 billion in 2024, indicating a strong economic interdependence [5] - Sanctions against Chinese companies could disrupt their operations and lead to lost collaboration opportunities for European firms [5] - European consumers reliant on Chinese imports may face higher prices and fewer choices, particularly in the solar energy sector where 80% of photovoltaic components are sourced from China [6] Group 2: Political and Diplomatic Consequences - The EU's actions undermine political trust between China and the EU, jeopardizing previous cooperation on global governance and climate change [8] - This behavior may lead to perceptions of the EU as biased in international affairs, diminishing its global influence [8] Group 3: Global Energy Market Effects - The sanctions on Chinese refineries have caused immediate fluctuations in international oil prices, with Brent crude rising by 1.6% and Shanghai crude by 2.3% [10] - The EU's sanctions against Russian oil have previously led to an energy crisis in Europe, highlighting the potential for self-harm through such measures [12] Group 4: Broader Implications of Sanctions - The EU's sanctions are perceived as being influenced by the United States, which has profited from the situation by selling liquefied natural gas at inflated prices to Europe [14] - China maintains a neutral stance in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and has called for the EU to reconsider its actions to avoid becoming a scapegoat [14]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1][1][1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has expressed strong disapproval of the UK's sanctions, stating that they are unjustified and detrimental to the normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises [1] - It is highlighted that China adheres to strict regulations regarding the export of dual-use items and that normal business interactions should not be hindered by external pressures [1][1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated that China has consistently controlled the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [1] - The UK’s actions are described as unilateral sanctions without international legal justification or United Nations authorization [1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions to maintain the overall cooperation between China and the UK [1] Group 2: Impact on Economic Relations - The imposition of sanctions by the UK is expected to have a negative impact on the positive momentum of Sino-British economic and trade relations [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, asserting that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government emphasizes that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese side urges the UK to correct its erroneous actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has stated that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The UK’s actions are viewed as a disregard for China's diplomatic efforts and the positive momentum in Sino-British economic relations, prompting a call for the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1 - The UK announced a new round of sanctions on October 15, targeting 11 Chinese companies [2]. - China maintains that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to preserve the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2].