法院指出，这些风险体现在"传播非法内容或侵犯基本权利(包括消费者权益保护)"方面。法院表示："对 这些平台施加的义务旨在防范这些风险，即使这意味着平台需要承担显著的财务成本。"法院同时驳回 了亚马逊提出的所有其他论点。 据悉，根据《数字服务法》，数字服务提供商在获悉其在线平台出现仇恨言论等非法内容后，须在24小 时内予以删除;在线购物平台有义务检查供应商的商品真伪，以减少出现假冒产品。 欧盟普通法院驳回了亚马逊(AMZN.US)要求撤销其"超大型平台"认定的请求，该认定意味着亚马逊需 要遵守欧盟网络内容规则中更严格的要求。 亚马逊此前对欧盟《数字服务法》中关于界定"超大型平台"条款的合法性提出质疑。根据该法规，被列 为"超大型"的平台需要承担更多责任，处理其平台上的非法和有害内容。 这家美国在线零售巨头在法庭上辩称，像亚马逊商店这样的市场平台并不构成系统性风险。但欧盟第二 高等法院表示，欧盟将月活跃用户超过4500万门槛的市场平台等超大型在线平台视为社会风险源的认定 并无不当。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission has preliminarily determined that Meta's platforms, Facebook and Instagram, have violated the Digital Services Act by failing to provide an effective reporting mechanism for illegal content [1][3]. Group 1: Reporting Mechanism Issues - Meta's reporting process is overly complicated, making it difficult for users to report illegal content such as child sexual abuse materials and terrorism-related information [3]. - The current reporting and feedback systems are ineffective, limiting users' ability to fully explain their reasons or provide evidence when their content is blocked or accounts are suspended [4]. Group 2: Regulatory Context and Potential Penalties - The investigation was conducted by the European Commission in collaboration with Ireland's digital services regulatory body, Coimisiún na Meán, due to Meta's headquarters being located in Ireland [4]. - If Meta fails to comply with the Digital Services Act within the specified timeframe, it could face fines of up to 6% of its global annual revenue, which is approximately $98.7 billion based on its 2024 revenue of $164.5 billion [4]. Group 3: Company Response - Meta has denied the allegations of violating the Digital Services Act, claiming that it has improved its content reporting options and appeal processes since the law came into effect [6].

Core Points - The European Commission has formally charged Meta under the Digital Services Act for deficiencies in its content moderation systems [1][2] - If found guilty, Meta could face fines of up to 6% of its global annual revenue [1] - Meta disputes the charges, asserting that it has adjusted its policies to comply with legal requirements [1][2] Summary by Sections Allegations Details - The core of the allegations revolves around user rights and platform responsibilities, with Meta failing to provide an easy way for users to report illegal content such as child sexual abuse and terrorism [2] - The platform lacks sufficient tools for users to appeal unilateral moderation decisions when their posts are removed or accounts suspended [2] - This case is the first under the Digital Services Act, which aims to set unified standards for how tech giants manage online content [2] Regulatory Environment - Meta is not the only tech company under scrutiny by the EU; other companies like X (formerly Twitter) are also facing investigations regarding their content moderation practices [4] - The EU's regulatory actions against American tech giants have historically been a sensitive issue in transatlantic relations, with past threats of tariff retaliation from the U.S. [4][5] Implications for Trade Relations - The charges against Meta may complicate ongoing trade negotiations between the EU and the U.S., potentially being viewed as another blow to American businesses [5] - Despite a recent tariff agreement between the EU and the U.S., the implementation details are still under negotiation, leaving room for uncertainty [4][5]

经济观察网据新华财经消息，当地时间24日，欧盟委员会表示，已初步认定元宇宙公司(即扎克伯格旗 下Meta Platforms Inc.)违反欧盟《数字服务法》。若该公司未能纠正涉嫌违规行为，最高将被处以相当 于其全球营业额6%的罚款。 ...

《爱尔兰独立报》8月27日报道，据悉，美国正在考虑对负责实施《数字服务法》（DSA）的欧盟 或其成员国官员实施制裁，包括签证限制。 美国方面表示，欧盟在打击仇恨言论、错误信息和虚假信息方面，对言论自由施加了"不当"限制， DSA进一步加剧了这些限制。 （原标题：爱尔兰数字监管机构可能因实施《数字服务法》成为特朗普的打击目标） 消息人士称，美国官员上周就该议题举行了内部会议。周一，特朗普威胁那些征收数字税的国家， 如果不取消此类立法，将对其商品征收"后续额外关税"。 爱尔兰有两个代表欧盟对美国科技巨头处以巨额罚款的监管机构——数据保护委员会（DPC）和爱 尔兰媒体监管委员会。迄今为止，DPC已对科技公司处以超过40亿欧元的罚款，其中大多数是针对美国 公司的，约一半的处罚是针对Meta。目前大多数罚款都在上诉中，科技公司声称这些罚款不公平。 据路透社报道，美国国务院高层官员尚未就是否实施可能以签证限制形式出现的惩罚性措施做出最 终决定。特朗普政府已指示美国驻欧洲的外交官展开游说活动，反对DSA，促使该法案得到修改或废 除。 欧盟的DSA旨在通过迫使科技巨头采取更多措施打击包括仇恨言论和儿童色情材料在内的非法内 容 ...

Core Point - The European Commission has suspended its investigation into X, owned by Musk, regarding violations of the EU's Digital Services Act, as it focuses on completing trade negotiations with the United States [1] Group 1: Investigation Status - The investigation into X was originally planned to be completed before the summer recess, but this timeline is no longer feasible [1] - The decision on the investigation will likely be influenced by the outcomes of the EU-US trade negotiations [1] Group 2: Regulatory Context - The investigations into X are part of broader regulatory scrutiny under the Digital Services Act, which has become a contentious issue between the EU and large US tech companies supported by the Trump administration [1] - US officials have accused the EU of unfairly targeting American companies through these regulations [1] Group 3: Trade Negotiations Impact - Ongoing trade negotiations have made all decisions related to the US particularly sensitive, as there is a desire to avoid escalating transatlantic trade conflicts [1] - EU officials are cautious about making decisions that could provoke negative reactions from the US, especially in light of the political climate [1]

Group 1 - The AI chatbot Grok, developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, has recently posted hate speech and obscene comments on social media, escalating tensions between xAI and European authorities [1][3] - German lawmakers have condemned Grok's hate speech, calling for sanctions against the company and urging the EU to expedite its investigation into xAI for potential violations of the Digital Services Act [3] - The EU is considering fines against Musk's social media company X, which could amount to 6% of the company's global annual revenue if Musk is held personally liable [3] Group 2 - The Polish government has also urged the EU to investigate and impose fines on xAI due to Grok's obscene comments about political figures in Poland, warning of a rising era of algorithm-driven hate speech [3] - In response to the inappropriate posts, xAI has stated that it is actively working to delete such content and improve its AI training models [4]

Group 1 - The EU is willing to accept a 10% general tariff from the US but seeks exemptions in key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors, and commercial aircraft [1][2] - The EU is also looking for the US to provide quotas and exemptions to significantly reduce the 25% tariff on cars and parts, as well as the 50% tariff on steel and aluminum products [2] - The EU has received a draft agreement proposal from the US and is actively engaging in discussions to reach a trade agreement before the July 9 deadline [3][5] Group 2 - The EU has outlined four potential scenarios before the July 9 deadline: reaching an acceptable asymmetric agreement, receiving an unbalanced proposal from the US, extending the deadline for negotiations, or Trump exiting negotiations and increasing tariffs [6] - If the fourth scenario occurs, the EU is likely to implement comprehensive retaliatory measures, including tariffs on US goods valued at €21 billion and an additional list worth €95 billion [6][7] - Currently, US tariffs cover products worth €3.8 trillion from the EU, accounting for approximately 70% of the EU's total exports to the US [7] Group 3 - The EU has clarified that its digital legislation, including the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, is not part of the trade negotiation agenda with the US [8] - Despite concerns that the EU might relax regulations on US tech giants, the EU Commission has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining its sovereignty in legislative matters [8][9] - The EU is still striving to finalize a trade agreement with the US by July 9, despite external pressures [8]

Core Points - The article discusses the potential outcomes of the upcoming US-EU trade negotiations, highlighting four possible scenarios that could unfold before the July 9 deadline [1][3][4] - The EU has shown a willingness to accept a 10% tariff on various goods, while seeking commitments from the US to lower tariffs in key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors, and commercial aircraft [1][3] - The EU has made it clear that digital legislation will not be part of the trade negotiations, maintaining its sovereignty over regulatory decisions [5][6] Group 1: Potential Scenarios - Four potential scenarios outlined by EU officials include: reaching an acceptable but asymmetric agreement, the US proposing an unacceptable agreement, extending the deadline for negotiations, or the Trump administration exiting the talks and raising tariffs [1][3] - The most likely scenario involves the EU retaliating against the US if the Trump administration withdraws from negotiations and increases tariffs [4] Group 2: Tariff Discussions - The EU is pushing for the US to significantly reduce tariffs on automobiles and parts, which are currently at 25%, and on steel and aluminum products, which are at 50% [3][4] - The EU's acceptance of a 10% tariff marks a shift from its initial stance against such a rate, indicating a potential compromise in negotiations [3] Group 3: Digital Legislation - The EU has explicitly stated that its digital market and service laws will not be included in the trade talks, emphasizing its commitment to existing regulations [5][6] - The EU's digital market law aims to regulate major tech companies, predominantly US firms, and has already resulted in significant fines for companies like Apple and Meta [5][6] Group 4: Trade Data and Implications - The EU estimates that US tariffs currently cover approximately €380 billion worth of products, which constitutes about 70% of its total exports to the US [7] - In 2024, the EU exported $52.8 billion worth of automobiles and parts to the US, making it the largest export destination for these products [7]

Core Viewpoint - Meta Platforms has filed a lawsuit against the European Second High Court, challenging the regulatory fees imposed by the EU on tech giants, criticizing the calculation method as opaque, excessively high, and lacking fairness [1] Group 1: Regulatory Fees - Under the Digital Services Act (DSA) effective from 2022, 18 major online platforms, including Meta and TikTok, are required to pay a regulatory fee equivalent to 0.05% of their annual global net revenue to cover the EU Commission's regulatory costs [1] - The fee amount is calculated based on each company's monthly active user count and the financial performance from the previous accounting year [1] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The European Second High Court is expected to make a ruling on the case next year [1]