Group 1 - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi have raised concerns and criticisms from the international community, signaling a potential revival of Japanese militarism [1][3][6] - Multiple international figures emphasize that Takaichi's statements could undermine Japan's acceptance of the outcomes of World War II, questioning Japan's historical stance [1][6] - The implications of Takaichi's comments are viewed as a threat to regional stability in East Asia, with potential global repercussions [3][5] Group 2 - Scholars and experts from various regions express that Takaichi's statements are provocative and could exacerbate tensions between Japan and China, leading to a deterioration in bilateral relations [5][6] - The discourse surrounding Taiwan as a sensitive issue in Sino-Japanese relations is highlighted, with calls for vigilance against any resurgence of militaristic ideologies in Japan [1][3]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is accelerating its militarization efforts, as indicated by Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's goal to revise the "security three documents" within the year, which raises concerns about regional peace and stability [1][2] Group 1: Japan's Security Policy Changes - The revision of the "security three documents" will focus on increasing defense spending, modifying the "three non-nuclear principles," lifting restrictions on arms exports, and significantly developing offensive military capabilities [1] - This shift is seen as a dangerous trend towards militarization that could undermine regional peace [1] Group 2: Historical Context and International Response - Historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation stipulate that Japan should be completely disarmed and not maintain industries that could lead to rearmament [1] - The current push by Japan's right-wing forces to expand military capabilities challenges post-war international norms and order [1][2] - There is a strong stance from China and other peace-loving nations against the resurgence of militarism in Japan, emphasizing the need to prevent a historical regression [2]

转自：北京日报客户端 日本军国主义滋长是对战后国际秩序的严重威胁 ——访中国社会科学院学部委员张海鹏 记者： 日本首相高市早苗在国会宣称"台湾有事"或构成日本可行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，公然干涉中 国内政，进行武力威胁。日本所谓"存亡危机"的真相究竟是什么？ 张海鹏： 回顾历史，打出所谓"生存权""自卫"或者"存亡危机"这样的旗号，是日本发动对外侵略的惯用伎俩。 1931年，日本蓄意发动九一八事变，自此开启了长达14年的侵华战争。1937年发动卢沟桥事变，陆续占 领我国华北、华东、华中、华南交通要道以及大中城市，包括北平、天津、保定、济南、青岛、上海、 南京、武汉、长沙、南昌、广州等地。日军势力侵略了大半个中国，并在中国境内制造了伪满洲国、南 京汪伪和北平伪组织等几个傀儡政权，在那里实行日本式殖民统治。侵华战争造成中国军民伤亡3500万 人以上，直接经济损失1000多亿美元，无数和平居民在战火中奔走流徙、辗转沟壑。南京大屠杀，造成 30万和平居民和放下武器的士兵惨死；分布在各地的数以百计的万人坑，至今白骨嶙嶙。"三光"政策， 烧杀奸淫，给中国人民留下了永远难以抚平的痛苦记忆。强征"慰安妇"、731细菌 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of Japanese right-wing forces attempting to revise historical narratives surrounding militarism and war crimes, particularly focusing on the attack on Pearl Harbor and its implications for international justice [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Japanese right-wing figures, such as former Air Self-Defense Force Chief Toshio Tamogami, publicly claim that the U.S. falsely accused Japan of the Pearl Harbor attack, reflecting a long-standing effort to alter the narrative of Japan's wartime actions [1][2]. - The narrative constructed by Japanese right-wing groups suggests that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a defensive act provoked by economic and military threats from the U.S. and its allies, a claim that has persisted since Japan's defeat in World War II [2][3]. Group 2: Justification of Actions - During the war, Japanese militarists framed their aggression as a liberation struggle against Western colonial powers, asserting that their actions were justified as self-defense [3][4]. - The glorification of military leaders and the perpetuation of a "glorious" narrative surrounding Japan's wartime actions continue to be prominent in right-wing discourse, with artifacts from the war being venerated in places like Yasukuni Shrine [3]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The right-wing's call for "reconciliation" while simultaneously attempting to distance themselves from the historical context of their militaristic past poses a significant threat to post-war international order [4]. - The push for collective self-defense and military rearmament under the guise of being a loyal ally to the U.S. indicates a dangerous strategic shift, as these factions remain unrepentant about their wartime actions [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing attempts by Japanese right-wing factions to revise historical narratives surrounding Japan's actions during World War II, particularly the attack on Pearl Harbor, reflecting a broader trend of historical denialism and militaristic resurgence in Japan [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Japanese right-wing figures, such as former Air Self-Defense Force Chief Toshio Tamogami, publicly claim that the U.S. framed Japan for the Pearl Harbor attack, indicating a long-standing effort to alter the narrative of Japan's wartime actions [1] - The narrative constructed by Japanese nationalists suggests that the attack was a defensive measure against perceived threats from the U.S. and its allies, a claim that has persisted even after Japan's defeat in the war [2] Group 2: Justification of Actions - During the war, Japanese militarists framed their aggression as a liberation struggle against Western colonial powers, asserting that their actions were justified as self-defense [3] - The glorification of military leaders and the perpetuation of a "glorious" narrative surrounding Japan's wartime actions continue to be promoted by right-wing groups, with artifacts from the war being venerated in places like Yasukuni Shrine [3] Group 3: Strategic Manipulation - Japanese right-wing factions attempt to separate the narrative of wartime aggression from contemporary peace efforts, advocating for a reinterpretation of history that downplays Japan's militaristic past [4] - The push for collective self-defense and military rearmament is framed under the guise of loyalty to allies, while simultaneously undermining the post-war peace framework established after World War II [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry has released a list of 20 Japanese war criminals and plans to continue exposing the crimes of Japanese militarism, indicating ongoing legal actions against these individuals [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Historical Context - The Russian government will revoke "rehabilitation" decisions made in the 1980s to 2000s for certain Japanese citizens involved in espionage and sabotage against the Soviet Union during and after World War II [1] - The Russian Prosecutor General's Office has confirmed that these individuals do not meet the criteria for rehabilitation, as their crimes have been fully substantiated [1] - The actions of these individuals included attempts to gather intelligence on Soviet military forces and training saboteurs near the Soviet border, as well as participation in notorious human experimentation by Unit 731 [1] Group 2: Future Plans and Statements - The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, stated that there is no statute of limitations on the crimes of Japanese militarism, and legal proceedings against relevant individuals are ongoing [1] - In 2026, Russia plans to continue revealing the crimes of Japanese militarism to the public [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry has released a list of 20 Japanese war criminals and plans to continue exposing the crimes of Japanese militarism, indicating ongoing legal actions against these individuals [1]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Historical Context - The Russian Prosecutor General's Office will annul "rehabilitation" decisions made for certain Japanese citizens from the 1980s to 2000s between April and November 2025 [1]. - These individuals participated in sabotage and espionage activities against the Soviet Union during World War II and after Japan's surrender in 1945 [1]. - The review by Russian authorities concluded that these individuals do not meet the criteria for rehabilitation, as their crimes have been fully substantiated [1]. Group 2: Specific Crimes and Activities - Some individuals attempted to organize intelligence-gathering activities to obtain information on the size and deployment of Soviet troops after surrendering to the Soviet Red Army [1]. - Others were involved in training saboteurs in border areas adjacent to the Soviet Union [1]. - Notably, some were part of the infamous Unit 731, which conducted human experimentation [1]. Group 3: Future Plans and Statements - The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Zakharova, emphasized that there is no statute of limitations on the crimes of Japanese militarism, and legal proceedings against relevant individuals are ongoing [1]. - In 2026, Russia plans to continue revealing the crimes of Japanese militarism to the public [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry has released a list of 20 Japanese war criminals and plans to continue exposing the crimes of Japanese militarism, indicating a renewed focus on historical accountability [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Historical Accountability - The Russian Prosecutor General's Office will revoke the "rehabilitation" decisions made for certain Japanese citizens from the 1980s to the 2000s, effective from April to November 2025 [1] - The individuals on the list participated in sabotage and espionage activities against the Soviet Union during World War II and after Japan's surrender in 1945 [1] - The Russian authorities have confirmed that these individuals do not meet the criteria for rehabilitation, as their crimes have been fully substantiated [1] Group 2: Specific Crimes and Activities - Some individuals attempted to organize intelligence-gathering activities after surrendering to the Soviet Red Army, aiming to obtain information on troop numbers and deployments [1] - Others were involved in training saboteurs in border areas adjacent to the Soviet Union [1] - Notably, some were part of the infamous Unit 731, which conducted human experimentation [1] Group 3: Ongoing Legal Proceedings - There is no statute of limitations on the crimes committed by Japanese militarists, and legal proceedings against relevant individuals are still ongoing [1] - In 2026, Russia plans to continue revealing the crimes of Japanese militarism to the public [1]

2026年1月2日出版的《学习时报》在第2版刊发国防大学政治学院马克思主义理论系副主任许恒兵的文 章《警惕日本军国主义在文体领域的渗透》。 文章开篇介绍：一段时期以来，日本文体界接连出现夹带军国主义元素的行为。在体育领域，足球运动 员三笘薰与二战战犯相关卡片合影、乒乓球运动员张本智和等人参拜供奉侵略战争战犯的东乡神社；在 文艺领域，偶像团体Snow Man在专辑预告中植入刻有战犯名字和侵略战争年份的武士刀，动漫、电竞 等作品中屡次出现"旭日旗""731部队"等象征符号。 文章认为，这些行为并非孤例，而是日本极右翼势力有组织地利用文体活动影响公众认知、美化侵略历 史的具体表现，已引发曾饱受日本军国主义侵略的亚洲各国人民的强烈不满。此类行径不仅严重伤害受 害国民众感情，也对地区和平稳定构成现实威胁，国际社会必须予以高度警惕并采取必要措施加以应 对。 对此，许恒兵分析认为，日本极右翼势力借文体领域传播军国主义思想的动向，呈现出三个需高度警惕 的特征。 首先，利用文体活动的大众属性与情感纽带，将政治意图进行日常渗透。无论是运动员在赛场内外的表 现，还是动漫、游戏中的符号化植入，其共同点在于隐匿军国主义历史的残酷性与侵 ...

《学习时报》2026年1月2日第2版刊发国防大学政治学院马克思主义理论系副主任许恒兵的文章《警惕日 本军国主义在文体领域的渗透》。以下为全文： 02 | 學習時报 3028年1月2日 #5 对话平台交易量最为当平新时代 手官网眼因公壁印 以相争式及生因在 分，且国持"两个黄金"。我们马克示 本义国际关系国论创新的国大或果。因 분中国外交配套作的数年发重的区分 创新的国大飞艇，为新时代新创阳发区 展現台出身邊積極的工基因を目前位 ( 纲县) 系统 前景了 新着代 新桂贸 对S平外交营模的最新发展。 式发国发展的外部并提出团员官 位作曲新的單大判断，才也平外交流 概分我们或操判断得负，但学院知道 景绿有了里是年论依据。在今天赋说 杜会主义组代化园家，向第二个营学 单斗目标签写的新型风上,我国的第 是邻说国贸伯格划宣宗安化 （梁昆） 相击，当前，世界官年未有本大安易 加盟黄佳，世界年史，时代文史。后 史文安国以前所会有的方式要讲。因 如此目印度以保障局面深。除期和流程 AMEL #美味电影主要 r80年的城市等生盘新的语各外部风 胜利率，单是对和平。宜蘭，合作。 共首的历史期的不可以担保持国会信 心，增强舉辦立力， ...