近日，日本民间团体在东京新宿车站附近集会，抗议高市早苗错误言行。 本报记者 刘文璋摄 近日，日本"继承和发展村山谈话会"在东京举行集会，抗议日本首相高市早苗涉台错误言论及强军扩武 行径。集会人士强烈谴责高市早苗错误言行严重损害中日关系，加剧地区紧张局势；担忧政府进一步推 进日本"再军事化"、漠视民生福祉，对日本经济社会发展造成严重冲击。 "高市早苗错误言论具有高度危险性，存在严重历史认知偏差" 参加集会的当地民众奥内对记者表示，"高市早苗错误言论具有高度危险性，存在严重历史认知偏差， 是对中国的严重挑衅。世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国不可分割的一部分，这是举世公认的事实。" "日本军国主义死灰复燃的危险正日益加剧" 前不久，高市早苗不顾国内各方反对，宣布解散众议院、提前举行大选。"高市早苗此次解散众议院， 实质是为了巩固执政基础，以便继续推进其所谓'军事大国路线'。"藤田高景表示，自高市早苗上台以 来，日本国家发展方向加速"右转"，政府不仅未能有效应对物价上涨等民生难题，还将扩充军备列为优 先事项，严重动摇日本战后和平体制，明显背离国民利益。 日本青山学院大学名誉教授羽场久美子指出，高市早苗的涉台错误言论受到 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's remarks regarding Taiwan are seen as a serious interference in China's internal affairs, damaging the political foundation of Japan-China relations, and must be retracted [1] - Participants at a study meeting expressed that Japan has historically recognized Taiwan as an inseparable part of China, and Takashi's statement about deploying the Japanese Self-Defense Forces in the event of a "Taiwan emergency" is unacceptable from both the government's and citizens' perspectives [1] - There is significant discontent regarding Takashi's decision to dissolve the House of Representatives without sufficient discussion in the Diet, which participants deemed unreasonable [2] Group 2 - International figures have warned that Takashi's erroneous statements threaten regional stability and raise concerns about the resurgence of Japanese militarism [3] - Former UN Deputy Secretary-General Pino Araki emphasized the need to remain vigilant against the remnants of Japanese militarism, recalling Japan's historical invasions and atrocities against China [3] - Former spokesperson for the Congolese government, Atipo, stated that Takashi's remarks aim to revive expansionism and militarism, which could lead to disaster for Japan and are unlikely to succeed [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to the military cooperation between Japan and the Philippines, emphasizing the need to resist the resurgence of Japanese militarism and maintain regional peace and stability [1]. Group 1: Military Cooperation - Japan and the Philippines have signed an agreement to enhance military logistics cooperation, with Japan pledging to provide millions of dollars in security assistance to strengthen their so-called "quasi-alliance" [1]. - The Chinese government asserts that cooperation between countries should not target third parties or undermine their interests, nor should it disrupt regional peace and stability [1]. Group 2: Historical Context - The spokesperson highlights Japan's militaristic past, specifically its invasion of the Philippines during World War II, which involved the persecution of Filipino people and the killing of Chinese diplomatic officials [1]. - There is a call for remembrance of this history and a demand for accountability regarding Japan's past actions [1]. Group 3: Regional Reactions - There is a growing criticism from Southeast Asian countries and the international community regarding Japan's military security movements [1]. - The spokesperson accuses Japan of not reflecting on its past and instead fabricating excuses to expand its military capabilities, revealing intentions of re-militarization and military expansion [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry firmly opposes the resurgence of Japanese militarism and its re-militarization, emphasizing the need for peace and stability in the region in light of Japan's military cooperation with the Philippines [1]. Group 1: Japan-Philippines Military Cooperation - Japan and the Philippines have signed an agreement to enhance military logistics cooperation, with Japan pledging to provide millions of dollars in security assistance to strengthen their so-called "quasi-alliance" [1]. - The Chinese government expresses concern that such cooperation may undermine regional peace and stability, asserting that international cooperation should not target third parties or harm their interests [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Criticism - The Chinese Foreign Ministry recalls Japan's historical aggression during World War II, particularly its invasion of the Philippines, and stresses the importance of remembering this history and addressing past grievances [1]. - There is a growing criticism from Southeast Asian countries and the international community regarding Japan's military security movements, which are perceived as attempts to revive militarism and expand military capabilities [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to the military agreement between Japan and the Philippines, emphasizing that cooperation between nations should not target third parties or undermine regional peace and stability [1] Group 1: Historical Context - The spokesperson highlights Japan's militaristic past, specifically its invasion of the Philippines during World War II, which involved violence and persecution against the Filipino people and allied soldiers [1] - The historical grievances are framed as debts that must be acknowledged and repaid, indicating a call for accountability regarding past actions [1] Group 2: Regional Reactions - There is a growing criticism from Southeast Asian countries and the international community regarding Japan's military security movements, suggesting a lack of self-reflection from Japan [1] - The spokesperson accuses Japan of using fabricated excuses to expand its military capabilities and export lethal weapons, revealing intentions of militarization and military expansion [1] Group 3: Call to Action - The statement urges all peace-loving nations and peoples to resist the resurgence of Japanese militarism and its re-militarization efforts, advocating for the maintenance of regional peace and stability [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to the military cooperation agreement between Japan and the Philippines, emphasizing that such collaborations should not target third parties or undermine regional peace and stability [1] Group 1: Historical Context - The spokesperson highlights Japan's militaristic past, specifically its invasion of the Philippines during World War II, which involved violence and oppression against the Filipino people [1] - The historical grievances include the brutal killing of Chinese diplomatic officials by Japanese forces, which the spokesperson insists must be remembered and addressed [1] Group 2: Current Military Dynamics - There is a growing criticism from Southeast Asian countries and the international community regarding Japan's military security movements, which are perceived as a resurgence of militarism [1] - Japan is accused of fabricating excuses to expand its military capabilities and export lethal weapons, indicating a push from right-wing factions in Japan for re-militarization and military expansion [1] Group 3: Call to Action - The spokesperson urges all peace-loving nations and peoples to firmly resist the resurgence of Japanese militarism and re-militarization, advocating for the maintenance of regional peace and stability [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights Japan's increasing militarization and its controversial plans to acquire nuclear capabilities, which are seen as a threat by the international community, particularly in Southeast Asia [1] - Japan's government is significantly increasing its budget for "government security capability enhancement support," which includes providing advanced military equipment and supplies to countries in Southeast Asia [1] - The article emphasizes that Japan's actions are driven by right-wing forces aiming to revive militarism, and it calls for global awareness to prevent the resurgence of Japanese militarism and to maintain international peace and stability [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's military expansion and nuclear ambitions, highlighting concerns from the international community, particularly regarding Japan's potential re-militarization and the implications for regional stability [3]. Group 1 - Japan is reportedly considering nuclear capabilities and has increased its defense budget significantly to enhance security support for Southeast Asian countries, including the provision of advanced military equipment [3]. - The international community, including Southeast Asian nations, has expressed ongoing criticism of Japan's military actions, which are perceived as aggressive and provocative [3]. - The article emphasizes the need for peace-loving nations to recognize Japan's militaristic intentions and to work together to maintain post-war international order and regional stability [3].

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi have sparked strong criticism from various sectors in Japan, with concerns about a resurgence of militarism and the violation of constitutional and international laws [1][3]. Group 1: Criticism of Takaichi's Remarks - Takaichi's statements are seen as a betrayal of the Japan-China Peace and Friendship Treaty, suggesting a potential for conflict [1]. - The President of the Japan-China Labor Exchange Association, Akira Ito, emphasizes that Takaichi's comments violate Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution and international law [1]. Group 2: Concerns about Militarism - There is a growing worry about the revival of militarism in Japan, fueled by right-wing narratives and historical revisionism [1]. - Ito points out that the manipulation of public opinion by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is evident in education and media, which raises concerns about the younger generation's understanding of peace [3]. Group 3: Youth Support for Militaristic Views - A segment of the Japanese youth supports Takaichi's views, influenced by the education they received in a controlled environment [3]. - Ito stresses the importance of teaching peace and history, arguing against the notion that increased defense spending equates to peace [3].

Group 1 - The article highlights China's serious concerns regarding Japan's shift from cyber defense to cyber offense, as Japan's cabinet has authorized proactive countermeasures against cyber attacks, indicating a significant policy change [2] - Japan's defense budget for the fiscal year 2026 has been approved at approximately 9.04 trillion yen, marking a historical high, which reflects the rising militarization and intentions of Japan's right-wing forces [3] - China urges Japan to confront and reflect on its history of aggression, particularly in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, emphasizing the need for Japan to show remorse for its militaristic past [4] Group 2 - The article mentions that Japan's recent military security moves have drawn increasing criticism from the international community, yet Japan plans to significantly increase its defense budget, revealing its dangerous intentions [3] - China expresses appreciation for Russia's suggestion that Japan should build a memorial for victims of its militarism, reinforcing the call for Japan to acknowledge its historical wrongdoings [4] - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining international peace and stability by preventing the resurgence of Japanese militarism, with China willing to collaborate with the international community to uphold the outcomes of World War II [4]