Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the trade war initiated by the U.S. has backfired, leading to a crisis within the U.S. itself, as even long-time allies like Japan are resisting U.S. demands [1] - The U.S. is facing a shortage of goods due to the trade war, which has resulted in many products not being shipped to the U.S., impacting the daily lives of ordinary Americans [7] - Despite the U.S. administration's claims of winning the trade war, no trade partner has agreed to the U.S. demands since April 2, indicating a significant failure in U.S. trade negotiations [9] Group 2 - The U.S. President has made threats regarding the annexation of Greenland and Canada, showcasing a shift towards aggressive expansionist rhetoric as a distraction from domestic issues [3][5] - The justification for the annexation of Greenland is framed around security concerns, particularly in relation to perceived threats from China and Russia, indicating a strategic narrative being constructed by the U.S. administration [5] - The ongoing trade war and the resulting economic challenges are leading the U.S. to create new geopolitical tensions to divert attention from its internal struggles [7]

Group 1 - The article highlights the aggressive unilateralism and expansionism of the Trump administration, particularly through a global tariff war aimed at China, with tariffs on Chinese goods skyrocketing from 34% to 245% in a short span [1][3] - In response to U.S. tariffs, China retaliated by raising tariffs on U.S. goods to a maximum of 125%, indicating a potential stalemate in trade relations if tariffs continued to escalate [3][5] - The Chinese government utilized strategic communication, such as the release of a video titled "Not Kneeling," to unify domestic opinion and bolster morale against U.S. tariff aggression [5][12] Group 2 - The article discusses how Trump's core interest lies in maintaining his power and political base, rather than purely financial gains, which influenced his approach to negotiations with China [7][9] - The U.S. strategy shifted to countering China's influence in Asia and ASEAN, with Trump sending tariff letters to various Asian countries to isolate China from global supply chains [11][12] - The article notes that despite the appearance of a thaw in U.S.-China relations, the underlying strategy of containment and competition against China remains consistent across U.S. political parties [9][12] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the U.S. is attempting to create a facade of improved relations with China to mislead other countries and undermine their ties with China [12][14] - Southeast Asian nations are increasingly recognizing the U.S. tactics and are expressing support for multilateral cooperation, indicating a potential shift in regional alliances [16]

Core Points - Trump's unpredictable actions in his second term have led to a significant shift in U.S. foreign relations, distancing allies and creating global instability [1][2] - A recent poll indicates Trump's approval rating has dropped to 39%, the lowest for any U.S. president in their first 100 days, with a majority of Americans concerned about his economic policies [1][5] - Experts warn that the current global order, established post-World War II, is under threat due to Trump's unilateral approach and disregard for multilateral organizations [6][11] Group 1: Domestic Impact - 72% of Americans believe Trump's economic policies could lead to a recession, and 53% feel the economy has worsened since he took office [1] - Trump's actions have been criticized domestically for contributing to a perceived "democratic backslide," including attacks on judges and immigration policies [2] Group 2: International Relations - Trump's "America First" agenda has alienated allies and emboldened adversaries, raising questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy [2][10] - European nations are increasing defense spending and reducing reliance on U.S. military support in response to Trump's policies [4][9] Group 3: Economic Policies - Trump's imposition of tariffs is seen as a disruptive force in global markets, with potential risks of economic slowdown and recession [6][11] - The administration's approach to trade negotiations is characterized by a lack of clarity regarding long-term goals, leading to uncertainty among trading partners [6][10] Group 4: Global Order - The established global order based on free trade and rule of law is being challenged, with Trump's actions viewed as a departure from traditional U.S. leadership [6][11] - Concerns are growing that Trump's foreign policy may lead to a realignment of global alliances, with some countries considering closer ties with China as a counterbalance [10]