国发动的关税战，已经让美国自己陷入了一场危机，实际上美国发动的关税战一点都不如意，连作为美国长期盟友的日本，都已经敢于和美国硬碰硬，就是 不同意美国提出的条件，以至于美国坚持要对日本产品加征10%的基本关税。原本美国是要拿日本作为样板，从而推动在全世界的谈判，但是如今看来美国 是踢到了铁板，烽火线分析认为，中国坚持反制美国的关税战，已经让其他国家看到了希望，既然美国要威胁脱钩，美国的贸易伙伴就可以威胁美国，为此 就有了如今的局面。 烽火线分析认为，美国是在不断制造热点，从而掩饰内心的担忧，实际上如今的美国已经处于商品匮乏危机之中，因为美国发动关税战之后，已经有大量的 货物没有发往美国，显然如果没有全世界提供物资，美国普通民众的生活会遭遇严重的冲击。从美国媒体发布的信息来看，许多电商和超市出售的商品虽然 没有了关税附加费，却有了相当多的运费成本，并且是要普通消费者承担的，显然如今的美国是自欺欺人，因此也是莫大的讽刺。 美国白宫日常就在渲染美国赢了，美国总统也是如此，如今在不同的场合还在宣称贸易伙伴会和美国达成协议，然而从4月2日至今，没有任何的一个贸易伙 伴同意美国提出的要求。显然如今美国已经被自己搞得灰头土脸 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the aggressive unilateralism and expansionism of the Trump administration, particularly through a global tariff war aimed at China, with tariffs on Chinese goods skyrocketing from 34% to 245% in a short span [1][3] - In response to U.S. tariffs, China retaliated by raising tariffs on U.S. goods to a maximum of 125%, indicating a potential stalemate in trade relations if tariffs continued to escalate [3][5] - The Chinese government utilized strategic communication, such as the release of a video titled "Not Kneeling," to unify domestic opinion and bolster morale against U.S. tariff aggression [5][12] Group 2 - The article discusses how Trump's core interest lies in maintaining his power and political base, rather than purely financial gains, which influenced his approach to negotiations with China [7][9] - The U.S. strategy shifted to countering China's influence in Asia and ASEAN, with Trump sending tariff letters to various Asian countries to isolate China from global supply chains [11][12] - The article notes that despite the appearance of a thaw in U.S.-China relations, the underlying strategy of containment and competition against China remains consistent across U.S. political parties [9][12] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the U.S. is attempting to create a facade of improved relations with China to mislead other countries and undermine their ties with China [12][14] - Southeast Asian nations are increasingly recognizing the U.S. tactics and are expressing support for multilateral cooperation, indicating a potential shift in regional alliances [16]

Core Points - Trump's unpredictable actions in his second term have led to a significant shift in U.S. foreign relations, distancing allies and creating global instability [1][2] - A recent poll indicates Trump's approval rating has dropped to 39%, the lowest for any U.S. president in their first 100 days, with a majority of Americans concerned about his economic policies [1][5] - Experts warn that the current global order, established post-World War II, is under threat due to Trump's unilateral approach and disregard for multilateral organizations [6][11] Group 1: Domestic Impact - 72% of Americans believe Trump's economic policies could lead to a recession, and 53% feel the economy has worsened since he took office [1] - Trump's actions have been criticized domestically for contributing to a perceived "democratic backslide," including attacks on judges and immigration policies [2] Group 2: International Relations - Trump's "America First" agenda has alienated allies and emboldened adversaries, raising questions about the future of U.S. foreign policy [2][10] - European nations are increasing defense spending and reducing reliance on U.S. military support in response to Trump's policies [4][9] Group 3: Economic Policies - Trump's imposition of tariffs is seen as a disruptive force in global markets, with potential risks of economic slowdown and recession [6][11] - The administration's approach to trade negotiations is characterized by a lack of clarity regarding long-term goals, leading to uncertainty among trading partners [6][10] Group 4: Global Order - The established global order based on free trade and rule of law is being challenged, with Trump's actions viewed as a departure from traditional U.S. leadership [6][11] - Concerns are growing that Trump's foreign policy may lead to a realignment of global alliances, with some countries considering closer ties with China as a counterbalance [10]