登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ●案件所处的诉讼阶段：法院已立案受理，尚未开庭。 ●当事人所处的地位：云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控股子公司唐县汇银木业有限公 司（以下简称"汇银木业"）、汇银木业原实际控制人崔会军、王兰存为被告。 ●涉案金额：汇银木业本次收到的河北省唐县人民法院（以下简称"唐县法院"）送达的三份《民事起诉 状》《应诉通知书》等相关法律文书涉三起案件，合计涉案金额包括本金1,257.65万元及相应利息。 ●是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，诉讼的结果尚存在不确定性，对 公司本期利润及期后利润的影响具有不确定性，最终影响以法院判决为准。 ●截至本公告日，公司控股子公司汇银木业涉及财产保全及诉讼事项累计15项，涉案金额合计约为 10,772.42万元（诉讼本金，不包括相应利息，最终以收到的立案文书等为准），占最近一期公司经审计 归属于上市公司股东的净资产的113.27%；已披露涉诉事项累计7项 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ●云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控股子公司唐县汇银木业有限公司（以下简称"汇银木 业"）于近日收到河北省唐县人民法院（以下简称"唐县人民法院"）送达的《民事裁定书》【（2025） 冀0627民初3345号】和《查封（扣押、冻结）财产清单》【（2025）冀0627执保453号】，申请人刘静 超向唐县人民法院请求对被申请人汇银木业名下价值7,198,600元财产进行保全。 根据《执行笔录》，上述被查封的财产暂由汇银木业负责保管，可正常使用，但不得恶意转移、变卖、 毁损、过度使用。 ●截至本公告日，公司控股子公司汇银木业涉及诉讼事项累计6项，涉案金额合计约为6,690万元（诉讼 本金，不包括相应利息，最终以收到的立案文书等为准），占最近一期公司经审计归属于上市公司股东 的净资产的70.34%；已披露涉诉事项累计4项，详情可见《公司2024年年度报告》中第十节财务报告 之"十六、承诺及或有事项"和《关于控股子 ...

Core Viewpoint - ST Jinggu (SH600265) is facing significant financial distress due to multiple lawsuits against its subsidiary, Huiyin Wood Industry, which has accumulated debts and is involved in civil loan disputes totaling approximately 66.9 million yuan [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Issues and Financial Liabilities - Huiyin Wood Industry is currently involved in six lawsuits, with a total claim amount of about 66.9 million yuan, which represents 70.34% of the company's latest audited net assets attributable to shareholders [4]. - The lawsuits primarily stem from civil loans, with four cases already filed but not yet heard, and two cases awaiting acceptance notifications [2][4]. - In addition to the lawsuits, Huiyin Wood Industry's former controlling shareholders, Cui Huijun and Wang Lansun, have outstanding loans totaling approximately 30.89 million yuan [4]. Group 2: Company Performance and Management - ST Jinggu's acquisition of a 51% stake in Huiyin Wood Industry in 2023 aimed to enhance operational efficiency through management synergies, but the expected performance improvements have not materialized [5]. - Following the acquisition, ST Jinggu recorded an additional goodwill of 91.95 million yuan, but Huiyin Wood Industry failed to meet its profit commitments for 2024, leading to a goodwill impairment of 83.32 million yuan [5]. - Since 2018, ST Jinggu has reported negative net profits, with losses increasing over the years, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the investment from its major shareholder, Chow Tai Fook [6].

重要内容提示： ●云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控股子公司唐县汇银木业有限公司（以下简称"汇银木 业"）于近日收到河北省唐县人民法院（以下简称"唐县人民法院"）送达的《保管财产委托书》 【（2025）冀0627执保443号】。根据唐县人民法院出示的《民事裁定书》【（2025）冀0627民初3294 号】，申请人赵全来向唐县人民法院申请进行财产保全，请求对被申请人汇银木业、汇银木业原控股股 东王兰存、崔会军名下股权等财产进行查封、冻结、扣押等保全措施，保全标的金额为10,930,666.67 元。 ●截至本公告日，公司控股子公司汇银木业涉及诉讼事项累计5项，涉案金额合计为5,970万元(诉讼本 金，不包括相应利息)，占最近一期公司经审计归属于上市公司股东的净资产的62.77%；已披露涉诉事 项累计4项（不含本次），详见《公司2024年年度报告》中第十节财务报告之"十六、承诺及或有事 项"和《关于控股子公司涉及诉讼事项的公告》（公告编号：2025-053），涉案金额合计为4,970万元 （诉讼本金，不包括相应利息），占最近一期公司经审计归属于上市公司股东的净资产的52.26%。 ●根据公司初步自查， ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券简称：广东明珠 证券代码：600382 编号：临2025-053 广东明珠集团股份有限公司 关于全资子公司收到省高院《民事裁定书》的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 案件所处的诉讼阶段：执行阶段。 ● 上市公司子公司所处的当事人地位：申请执行人。 ● 涉案金额：借款本金433,624,807.88元以及截至2022年11月28日的利息91,538,479.86 元(包括逾期利息), 并支付以实欠本金为基数，按全国银行间同业拆借中心公布的一年期贷款市场报价利率的四倍标准计算 自2022年11月29日至款项还清之日止的利息。 ●是否会对上市公司损益产生影响：本案件已审查终结，处于执行阶段，由于本案件的执行结果存在不 确定性，公司收回相应借款本金、利息等的时间尚存在不确定性，暂无法判断本次诉讼对公司本期利润 的影响。公司将根据法律法规的规定，对相关诉讼的进展情况及时履行信息披露义务，敬请广大投资者 注意投资风险。 一、案件的基本情况 广东明 ...

证券简称：广东明珠 证券代码：600382 编号：临 2025-053 一、案件的基本情况 广东明珠集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）之全资子公司广东明珠集 团置地有限公司（以下简称"置地公司"）与兴宁市祺盛实业有限公司（以下简 称"祺盛实业"）关于共同合作投资"联康城（六、七期）"房地产开发项目（以 下简称"联康城项目"）所签署的合作合同及相关补充协议已于 2021 年 11 月 15 日到期。经置地公司与祺盛实业多次沟通，为尽快落实联康城项目到期的解决方 案，结合祺盛实业的实际情况，2022 年 3 月 14 日，置地公司与祺盛实业、刘伟权、 叶庆清、黄浪涛签署了《广东明珠集团置地有限公司与兴宁市祺盛实业有限公司 之抵债协议》（以下简称"抵债协议"），并收到了祺盛实业支付的首期还款额 签订的抵债协议的约定：1.首期还款后，剩余债务分四期支付，祺盛实业需于 2022 年 9 月 30 日前归还第一期还款共 17,562,665.65 元（其中：本金 15,093,963.98 元，利息 2,468,701.67 元）；2.祺盛实业需于 2022 年 9 月 30 日前完成抵债资产 中的 100 套住宅或商 ...

Core Viewpoint - ST Jinggu's subsidiary, Huiyin Wood Industry, is embroiled in a civil loan dispute, leading to asset seizures and a significant impact on its financial performance [1][3][5] Group 1: Legal Issues - The court has seized Huiyin Wood Industry's finished goods warehouse and all finished board goods, with an estimated asset value of approximately 50 million yuan [1][3] - The main bank account of Huiyin Wood Industry has been frozen, with approximately 800,000 yuan in funds [4] - The lawsuits involve three plaintiffs claiming a total of 40.7 million yuan in principal and interest from Huiyin Wood Industry and its shareholders [3][5] Group 2: Financial Performance - In 2023, ST Jinggu acquired a 51% stake in Huiyin Wood Industry for about 270 million yuan, resulting in an 83.7% appreciation and goodwill of 92 million yuan [2] - Huiyin Wood Industry's performance has deteriorated, with a net profit of 4.7 million yuan in 2023 but failing to meet performance commitments in 2024 [5][6] - The actual revenue for 2024 was 389 million yuan, with a net loss of 32 million yuan, significantly deviating from the forecasted revenue of 564 million yuan and net profit of 58 million yuan [5][6] Group 3: Market Conditions - The competitive landscape in the particle board and fiberboard industry has changed significantly, leading to price declines as companies reduce prices to capture market share [6] - The company attributes the substantial drop in profitability to industry-wide price transmission effects and increased competition [6]

Core Viewpoint - The company is currently involved in multiple lawsuits concerning financial disputes, with a total amount of approximately 40.7 million RMB in principal and interest at stake, which may impact its financial performance depending on the court's ruling [2][9]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Status - The court has accepted the case, but hearings have not yet commenced [2]. - The company’s subsidiary, Tangxian Huiyin Wood Industry Co., Ltd., along with its former controlling shareholders, are defendants in the lawsuits [2]. Financial Implications - The total amount involved in the lawsuits includes a principal of 40.7 million RMB and associated interest [2]. - The company’s assets, including a finished goods warehouse valued at approximately 50 million RMB and bank accounts with around 800,000 RMB, have been frozen as part of the legal proceedings [2][8]. Details of the Lawsuits - Three separate cases have been filed against the company: 1. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1696: Plaintiff Wang Sanquan claims a loan of 37.2 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 13.8% [3][4]. 2. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1697: Plaintiff Wang Dongxian claims a loan of 1.5 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 13.8% [5][6]. 3. Case (2025) Ji 0636 Minchu 1698: Plaintiff Wang Xinwang claims a loan of 2 million RMB plus interest at an annual rate of 12% [7][8]. Company Response - The company has established a special task force to address the lawsuits, including members from intermediary institutions and legal counsel to protect its and shareholders' rights [10]. - The company will continue to monitor the situation and fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required [11].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Xiaoqing Jewelry (Ningbo) Co., Ltd. is involved in a legal dispute regarding a loan of over 449,000 yuan, linked to allegations of tax evasion and fraudulent invoicing [1][3] Group 1 - Liu Xiaoqing has been reported for tax evasion involving 3.3 million yuan, allegedly converting a loan into personal income through a small enterprise [1][2] - The Shanghai tax authority has initiated an investigation into the allegations made by Wang, who claims that Liu Xiaoqing issued invoices to evade over 27% personal income tax [1][3] - Liu Xiaoqing publicly denied knowing Wang and stated that the allegations are false and malicious, expressing willingness to cooperate with tax authorities [2][3] Group 2 - Wang has indicated that the tax evasion amount may exceed 3.3 million yuan and plans to pursue legal action regarding the execution of the case [3] - The Shenzhen Futian District People's Court has served legal documents related to the case to Liu Xiaoqing and associated parties, with a hearing scheduled for September 12 [3]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the ongoing litigation involving New Dazhou Holdings Co., Ltd. and the implications of a recent ruling by the Supreme People's Court of China regarding a loan dispute with Cai Laiyin, which has led to the freezing of certain assets and a potential sale of shares to settle debts [2][3]. Group 1: Litigation Overview - New Dazhou disclosed the lawsuit initiated by Cai Laiyin against multiple parties, including New Dazhou, in October 2019, related to a loan dispute [2]. - The Guangdong High People's Court ruled that New Dazhou is liable for half of the unpaid loan principal and interest owed to Cai Laiyin [2]. - As a result of the litigation, several bank accounts and equity interests of New Dazhou have been frozen, including profits from its stake in Inner Mongolia Yakeshi Wujiu Coal Group Co., Ltd. [2]. Group 2: Recent Developments - On June 6, 2025, New Dazhou received a civil ruling from the Supreme People's Court, which accepted its application for retrial regarding the previous judgment [3]. - The ruling includes a suspension of the execution of the original judgment, which had ordered the auction of New Dazhou's 44.918% stake in Wujiu Group to satisfy the debt [5]. - The company continues to accrue interest based on the original judgment while awaiting the outcome of the retrial [5]. Group 3: Impact on the Company - The suspension of the original judgment's execution may provide temporary relief for New Dazhou, but the final outcome of the retrial remains uncertain [5]. - The board of directors will monitor the situation closely and fulfill disclosure obligations as required by law [5].