年半年度报告为准。 证券代码：002878 证券简称：元隆雅图 公告编号：2025-036 北京元隆雅图文化传播股份有限公司 本公司及全体董事会成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、本期业绩预计情况 项 目 本报告期 上年同期 亏损：500 万元–1,000 万元 归属于上市公司 股东的净利润 比 上 年 同 期 下 降 ： 119.39% - 盈利：2,578.76 万元 归属于上市公司 亏损：800 万元–1,300 万元 股东的扣除非经 盈利：2,334.51 万元 常性损益后的净 比 上 年 同 期 下 降 ： 134.27% - 利润 155.69% 基本每股收益 亏损：0.02 元/股–0.04 元/股 盈利：0.10 元/股 注： （1）上年同期数据为公司 2024 年半年度报告披露数据。由于受到下述"三、业绩变动原因 说明"中提到的案件的影响，上述金额可能需要进行差错更正，具体金额尚待公安机关侦查 确认。 （2）本报告期预测数据已考虑下述"三、业绩变动原因说明"中提到的案件的影响。 二、与会计师事务所沟通情况 公司本次业绩预告未经注册会计师审计。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current management of Jiaoda Onlly is pursuing accountability for former executives involved in a controversial insurance refund scheme, emphasizing the need for legal action and transparency [2][5][7]. Group 1: Allegations and Evidence - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter indicating that Jiaoda Onlly had issues with the disclosure of executive compensation in the 2016 and 2018 annual reports [5]. - Former executives, including Yang Guoping, allegedly used company funds to purchase group insurance and subsequently refunded the premiums to their personal accounts, totaling approximately 3.79 million yuan in 2017 and 1.28 million yuan in 2018 [6][7]. - The current management has submitted new evidence, including reports from third-party firms, indicating that the actions of former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate legal regulations [7][8]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Impact - Since March 2023, Jiaoda Onlly's current management has initiated multiple lawsuits against former executives, discovering that their actions resulted in a loss of approximately 21 million yuan in principal and interest [8][9]. - The company has reported difficulties in obtaining original documents related to the insurance transactions, which complicates the investigation [9]. - The management plans to apply for administrative review following the police's refusal to file a case based on the initial report [9]. Group 3: Corporate Governance and Shareholder Dynamics - The current management asserts that the pursuit of accountability from former executives is unrelated to the ongoing power struggle within the company, which began in 2022 [10][14]. - As of the first quarter of 2025, Shanghai Yunjian Industrial Development Co., Ltd. and its affiliates hold over 30% of Jiaoda Onlly's shares, while Dazhong Transportation holds 14.48% [15]. - The chairman of Jiaoda Onlly, Ji Min, emphasized that the accountability measures align with the interests of Dazhong Transportation as a shareholder [17].

Core Viewpoint - The current management of Jiaoda Onlly is committed to holding former executives accountable for their alleged misconduct involving insurance purchases and refunds, which have resulted in significant financial losses for the company [6][9][21]. Summary by Sections Background of the Case - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Commission issued a warning letter indicating that Jiaoda Onlly had issues with the disclosure of executive compensation in its 2016 and 2018 annual reports [5]. - The current management revealed that former executives, including Yang Guoping, used company funds to purchase group insurance and subsequently refunded the premiums to their personal accounts [5][6]. Details of the Insurance Transactions - In October 2016, Jiaoda Onlly transferred 3.8 million yuan to Tianan Life for group insurance premiums, with the insured being former executives [8]. - In November 2017, Yang Guoping signed for a refund of 1.0936 million yuan, with a total of 3.7924 million yuan refunded to five former executives [8]. - In January 2018, the company paid a total of 12.84 million yuan for another group insurance policy, with refunds occurring in January 2019 totaling 1.584 million yuan to the same group of executives [8]. Legal and Compliance Issues - The management stated that these transactions were not disclosed publicly and lacked proper decision-making processes, including board resolutions and contract approvals [9]. - Legal opinions indicated that the actions of the former executives potentially violated laws regarding the misappropriation of company assets, constituting a crime of embezzlement [9][11]. Current Management Actions - Since March 2023, the current management has initiated legal actions against the former executives, discovering that their actions resulted in a loss of 21 million yuan in principal and interest [11]. - The management has reported the case to the police and submitted additional evidence, although they faced challenges in obtaining some information due to the covert nature of the transactions [13][14]. Shareholder Dynamics - The current management emphasized that their pursuit of accountability is aligned with the interests of their major shareholder, Dazhong Transportation, which holds a significant stake in Jiaoda Onlly [21]. - As of the first quarter of 2025, the major shareholders include Shanghai Yun Jian Industrial Development Co., which holds over 30% of the shares, while Dazhong Transportation holds 14.48% [19][21].

记者丨赵云帆 编辑丨巫燕玲 金珊 针对举报交大昂立前高管杨国平等人涉嫌违规退保贪墨事宜，7月10日，交大昂立再度举行新 闻发布会， 详细披露了公司发现高管违规退保，并逐步搜集证据，多次提起诉讼请求的具体 情况 。 来源：21世纪经济报道记者摄 此前，交大昂立公告，公司以前高管退保贪墨为由，诉相关人员涉嫌职务侵占案件，已于6月 24日向上海市公安局松江分局刑事报案并获受理，同时法院裁定准予民事诉讼撤诉。 夏景华指出， 上述保险费相关审批流程仅有付款审批，缺失薪酬委员会议案、董事会议案及 股东会审议内容，这背后实则是五名前高管涉嫌违法巨额退保 。 记者获得的一份由交大昂立提供的投诉材料显示，2016-2019年期间，交大昂立前董事长杨国 平，前副董事长兼总裁朱敏骏，前副总裁兼财务总监娄健颖，前董事会秘书李红，前副总裁 李康明等五名核心高管获得了公司为高管购买年金型、分红型商业保险，并通过退保取回的 1693.7214万元。 对此，公司认为，上述五人通过让公司先购买保险、后退保至个人账户的方式，既未经董事 会决议，也未经股东大会决议，属于"暗箱操作"。而前高管称"购保退保是公司给予的薪酬"， 按照相关法规及公司章程 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiaoda Onlly, is involved in a legal dispute regarding allegations of former executives engaging in illegal insurance policy cancellations and misappropriation of funds, leading to criminal and civil actions against them [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Actions - Jiaoda Onlly reported that it discovered former executives' illegal insurance policy cancellations, prompting multiple lawsuits and a criminal report to the police [1][2]. - The company filed a criminal report on June 24, which was accepted by the police, but later received a notice of non-filing on July 10 [1][3]. - The company plans to appeal the police's decision and continue to submit evidence against the former executives [6]. Group 2: Financial Irregularities - The company identified irregularities in insurance purchases dating back to 2018, totaling 12.84 million yuan, with missing policy contracts [2][3]. - Five former executives allegedly received a total of 16.94 million yuan from insurance policy cancellations without proper board or shareholder approval, constituting "dark box operations" [3][6]. - The former executives claimed that the insurance purchases and cancellations were part of their compensation, which the company disputes as lacking legal basis [3]. Group 3: Corporate Governance Changes - In August 2022, the company underwent a change in control, with Shanghai Yunjian Industrial Development Co., Ltd. becoming the controlling shareholder [4]. - Following the change, the new controlling party conducted a review of past financial statements, leading to allegations of financial misstatements and non-compliance [4][5]. - The current management denies any threat to control from the previous major shareholder, Dazhong Transportation [5]. Group 4: Shareholding Structure - The current major shareholders include Shanghai Yunjian Industrial and several other entities, with the actual controller holding a 30.062% stake, while Dazhong Transportation holds 19.89% [6]. - Legal opinions indicate that executive compensation must be approved by the board and shareholders, which was not adhered to in the case of the disputed insurance transactions [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiao Da Ang Li, is involved in a legal case against five former executives for allegedly harming the company's interests through illegal insurance purchases and tax evasion practices [2][10]. Group 1: Case Details - The company discovered irregularities in insurance payments totaling 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.28 billion) made in 2018, which lacked the required insurance contracts [2]. - The former executives, including Yang Guoping and others, are accused of purchasing large insurance policies and subsequently cashing out through refunds to their personal accounts [4][10]. - The company reported that similar practices occurred in 2016, with insurance payments amounting to 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion) [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The company filed a criminal report with the Shanghai police, which was not accepted for further investigation, prompting the company to seek administrative review [3]. - Legal opinions suggest that the actions of the former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate company laws, as the insurance purchases were not approved by the board or shareholders [10][11]. Group 3: Financial Transactions - The first insurance contract was established in October 2016 with a total premium of 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion), and the executives received refunds totaling 3.79 million yuan (approximately 0.38 billion) after cancellation [5][7]. - In 2018, the company made additional insurance payments exceeding 10 million yuan (approximately 1 billion) to another insurance provider, with subsequent refunds being funneled back to the executives [8][9]. Group 4: Governance and Compliance Issues - The company failed to disclose these significant transactions in its annual reports, which is a violation of disclosure regulations for publicly listed companies [11]. - The case highlights potential governance failures within the company, as the former executives allegedly exploited their positions to benefit personally without proper oversight [12].

Core Viewpoint - The company is facing legal issues related to former executives who allegedly misappropriated company funds for personal insurance policies, leading to significant financial implications and potential criminal charges against those involved [2][5][12]. Group 1: Legal Issues and Developments - The company reported that the police decided not to file a case against the former executives involved in the alleged misconduct, prompting the company to apply for administrative review [2]. - The company has submitted new evidence, including a legal opinion from a law firm, indicating that the actions of the former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate laws regarding the misappropriation of company assets [2][12]. - The company filed a criminal report with the police on June 24, 2023, against five former executives for damaging company interests, which was accepted by the authorities [2][5]. Group 2: Background of the Company - Founded in December 1997, the company is a well-known player in China's health food industry and went public in 2021, focusing on health products and elderly care services [4]. - The company has undergone multiple changes in its controlling shareholders, with the latest change occurring in August 2022, when the controlling shareholder shifted to Shanghai Yunjian Industrial Development Co., Ltd. [4]. Group 3: Details of the Alleged Misconduct - Between 2016 and 2019, the former executives purchased group insurance policies using company funds and subsequently received refunds to their personal accounts, totaling approximately 16.93 million yuan [6][8]. - The first insurance contract was initiated in October 2016, with a payment of 3.8 million yuan made to Tianan Life Insurance, covering six individuals, including the former chairman and other key executives [6][8]. - The company discovered that there were no formal approval processes or documentation supporting the insurance purchases, raising significant compliance concerns [7][12]. Group 4: Evidence and Findings - The company conducted an internal review following a request from the tax bureau, which led to the discovery of irregularities in the insurance payments made in 2018 [10][11]. - Independent third-party reports have indicated that the actions of the former executives violated company regulations and relevant laws, further supporting the company's claims against them [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The company disclosed that five former executives, including Yang Guoping, engaged in illegal activities related to the purchase and cancellation of insurance policies, resulting in significant financial misconduct [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Discovery - The company discovered the misconduct during a self-inspection prompted by a notice from the tax bureau on November 23, 2022, regarding insurance fees and tax payments [2]. - A total of 12.84 million yuan (approximately 1.28 million) in insurance fees from 2018 was identified without corresponding insurance contracts, alongside an additional 3.8 million yuan (approximately 0.38 million) from 2016 [2]. Group 2: Misconduct Details - From 2016 to 2019, the five former executives used company funds to purchase insurance policies and subsequently withdrew 16.9372 million yuan (approximately 1.69 million) to their personal accounts through policy cancellations [3]. - The actions of the executives were characterized as "dark box operations," lacking necessary approvals from the board and shareholders, which is a violation of company regulations [3]. Group 3: Legal Actions - The company filed a criminal report with the local police in June 2023, seeking accountability for the actions of the five former executives [4]. - Following the report, the police did not initiate a case, prompting the company to apply for administrative review and submit additional evidence [4]. Group 4: Company Commitment - The company expressed its commitment to pursue accountability for the former executives' illegal actions to protect the rights of the company and its shareholders [5].

近日，曾在《爱情公寓》中饰演秦羽墨的演员赵文琪在社交媒体发布视频，自曝遭合伙人欺诈，公司资金被转空，运营陷 入停滞。 此外，赵文琪怀疑二股东有点好看公司涉嫌长期非法侵占公司核心资产，该公司公章、员工劳动合同、银行U盾等重要物品 被其牢牢掌控，导致身为大股东的赵文琪方完全无法干预公司日常运营决策。不仅如此，二股东还存在诸多不合理行为， 如利用赵文琪个人流量为关联品牌招商，收取"羽墨美学"35%加盟费分成；强制"羽墨美学"共用人力资源，却让其独自承担 40%人力成本，致使该公司服务质量下降。 针对此事，有律师表示，若赵文琪表述属实，本案可能涉及职务侵占或挪用资金，但需结合具体证据定性。若二股东利用 职务便利，将公司资金非法占为己有，金额较大（≥6 万元）即构成犯罪。关键证据在于资金流向证明（银行流水显示异常 转账）以及二股东未获股东会/董事会授权转移资金的证据。 赵文琪在视频中称，其于今年1月注册成立杭州羽墨品牌管理有限公司，大股东为杭州天天开心科技有限公司，由其母亲持 股50%；二股东杭州有点好看品牌管理有限公司持股40%；杭州飞了个飞科技有限公司持股 10%，主营美甲连锁品牌"羽墨 美学"。 今年3月初，羽墨 ...

一起跑车法拍，牵出一桩银行董事长职务侵占案。 近日，阿里资产司法拍卖平台显示，一辆京牌迈凯伦豪华跑车最终以89.28万元的起拍价成 交。据第三方网站报价，2014年其指导价为406.80万元，目前已经停产。此次拍卖吸引一万 余人围观，但仅有1人报名竞拍。 值得注意的是，上述迈凯伦原车主正是吉林省白山市江源农商银行原董事长董英直，其因犯 职务侵占罪，被判处有期徒刑10年6个月，并处没收个人财产450万元。 400万迈凯伦89万成交，原车主为一银行董事长 阿里资产司法拍卖平台显示，一辆京牌迈凯伦被拍卖，起拍价为89.28万元，评估价为99.2万 元，最终以起拍价成交。 此次拍卖吸引了一万余人围观，但仅有1人报名竞拍。据第三方网站报价，2014年该款车的 指导价达406.80万元，目前已经停产。 来源：阿里资产司法 公告显示，上述车辆的出厂日期在2014年7月（制造年月），行驶证初次登记日期为2017年7 月11日，行驶里程5600公里。 不过，虽然该车行驶里程仅5600公里，但从平台公开的车内照片看，疑似多处已经发霉长 毛。 来源：阿里资产司法 竞买公告的瑕疵说明显示，车辆因案件审理期间原因长期扣押，年检及保险情 ...