登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2025年12月31日，上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰代理的帕瓦股份（688184）涉嫌虚假陈述引发 的投资者索赔案再向上海金融法院提交一次立案。（许峰律师专栏） 此前许峰律师代理的帕瓦股份投资者索赔案已获得法院立案，律师团队还在继续推进后续案件的立案工 作，还在继续接受后续投资者的索赔委托。 2025年9月8日，帕瓦股份公告收到证监会对公司送达的《立案告知书》，张宝收到中国证监会对其送达 的《立案告知书》，公司及张宝因涉嫌信息披露违法违规，根据《证券法》《行政处罚法》等法律法 规，决定对公司及张宝立案。 前期，2025年3月25日公司收到浙江证监局《关于对浙江帕瓦新能源股份有限公司及相关人员采取出具 警示函措施的决定》，2025年8月1日公司收到公安机关出具的《立案决定书》，公司共同实际控制人之 一、董事张宝涉嫌职务侵占被公安机关立案侦查。 专门从事股票索赔法律事务的上海久诚律师事务所主任许峰律师认为，在2022年9月19日到2025年3月26 日之间买入帕瓦股份股票，并且在2025年3月26日后卖出或继续持有股票的投资者，目前还可发起索 赔。（帕瓦股份 ...

深圳上市国企特发信息（000070）被合同诈骗、职务侵占一案，迎来重要节点。 十年前收购埋下隐患 特发信息被合同诈骗、职务侵占一案，源于10年前其对特发东智的收购案。 2015年4月8日，特发信息与陈传荣等4名深圳东志科技有限公司（简称"深圳东志"，后更名为"特发东智"）股东签订《发行股份及支付现金购买资产协 议》，以支付现金和发行股份方式购买深圳东志100%股权。 一审判决出炉 12月11日晚间，特发信息公告称，针对公司因收购深圳特发东智科技有限公司（简称"特发东智"）被合同诈骗、职务侵占一案，公司于近日收到广东省深 圳市中级人民法院出具的《刑事判决书》。 经依法审理，被告人陈传荣、易宗湘、刘颖、王凌以非法占有为目的，在签订、履行协议过程中，通过财务造假的方式，骗取特发信息财物，数额特别巨 大，其四人的行为均已构成合同诈骗罪；被告人陈传荣、刘冰还利用职务上的便利，将单位财物非法占为己有，数额巨大，其二人行为均构成职务侵占 罪。 根据公告，一审判决追缴被告人陈传荣合同诈骗的全部犯罪所得，包括其未售的特发信息股票和现金1.45亿元（已扣减利润补偿款1.2亿元及王凌退缴的 165.5万元）；判决追缴被告人陈传荣、 ...

中国经济网北京12月12日讯 特发信息（000070）(000070.SZ)昨晚发布关于收到《刑事判决书》的公 告。公司于近日收到广东省深圳市中级人民法院出具的《刑事判决书》【（2024）粤03刑初021号、 （2024）粤03刑初285号、（2025）粤03刑初263号】。 针对公司因收购深圳特发东智科技有限公司（以下简称特发东智）被合同诈骗、职务侵占一案，公司于 2022年7月18日收到深圳市公安局关于立案侦查的《立案告知书》，并由深圳市公安局于后续移送案件 至广东省深圳市人民检察院起诉。 根据《发行股份及支付现金购买资产协议》，经交易各方友好协商，深圳东志100.00%股权的交易作价 为19,000.00万元，成都傅立叶100.00%股权的交易作价为25,000.00万元。 上市公司与交易对方深圳东志股东陈传荣、胡毅、殷敬煌、曜骏实业已完成了深圳东志100.00%股权过 户事宜。2015年11月4日，深圳市市场监督管理局已出具变更后的《企业法人营业执照》。上市公司直 接持有深圳东志100.00%股权，深圳东志成为上市公司的全资子公司。 上市公司与交易对方成都傅立叶股东戴荣、阴陶、林峰、陈宇、张红霞、新余 ...

证券代码：000070 证券简称：特发信息（维权） 公告编号：2025-53 深圳市特发信息股份有限公司 关于收到《刑事判决书》的公告 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2.被害单位：深圳市特发信息股份有限公司 二、案件基本情况 针对公司因收购深圳特发东智科技有限公司（以下简称特发东智）被合同诈骗、职务侵占一案，公司于 2022年7月18日收到深圳市公安局关于立案侦查的《立案告知书》，并由深圳市公安局于后续移送本案 件至广东省深圳市人民检察院起诉，详见公司于2022年7月20日、2023年7月29日在巨潮资讯网 （www.cninfo.com.cn）披露的《关于公司收到〈立案告知书〉的公告》（2022-66），《关于公司收到 〈被害人诉讼权利义务告知书〉的公告》（2023-69）。 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 特别提示： 1.案件所处的诉讼阶段：一审判决 2.上市公司所处的当事人地位：被害人 3.对上市公司损益产生的影响：对公司本期利润和期后利润的影响存在一定不确定性。 深圳市特发信息股份有限公司（以下简称公司或特发信息）于 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Tefa Information, has received a first-instance criminal judgment regarding a contract fraud and embezzlement case related to its acquisition of Shenzhen Tefa Dongzhi Technology Co., Ltd, highlighting its commitment to protecting shareholder interests and legal rights [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - On July 18, 2022, Tefa Information received a notice from the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau regarding the case, and subsequently cooperated with the investigation, which was transferred to the Shenzhen People's Procuratorate in 2023 [1]. - The defendants, including Chen Chuanrong, Yi Zongxiang, Liu Ying, and Wang Ling, were found guilty of contract fraud and embezzlement through financial deception during the agreement process [1]. Group 2: Judgment Details - The first-instance judgment mandates the recovery of the defendants' criminal proceeds, including approximately 145 million yuan in unsold Tefa Information stocks and cash after deductions, along with embezzled amounts totaling approximately 2.7642 million yuan from Chen Chuanrong and Liu Bing, 24.5506 million yuan from Yi Zongxiang, and 4.1842 million yuan from Liu Ying [2]. - Wang Ling has returned approximately 1.6545 million yuan, which will also be returned to Tefa Information [2]. Group 3: Company Response and Governance - Tefa Information, as the victim, has prioritized shareholder interests and actively pursued legal avenues to safeguard its rights, reflecting a strong sense of corporate governance responsibility [2]. - The criminal judgment represents a significant step in the company's efforts to protect its legal rights, although the final judgment and subsequent execution remain uncertain [2].

Group 1 - The case involves a duty-free shop on a cruise ship where high-end brand watches were found to be counterfeit, leading to a reported loss of over 240,000 yuan [1] - An investigation revealed that the suspect, Liu, used his position to swap genuine watches with counterfeit ones purchased online, resulting in illegal profits exceeding 200,000 yuan and causing the company losses of over 1 million yuan [2] - Liu has been arrested for embezzlement, and the police are conducting further investigations into the case [3] Group 2 - The police have advised companies dealing with valuable goods to enhance internal security management, implementing a dual verification and full traceability system for managing high-value items [3] - Recommendations include maintaining detailed records and video surveillance during the storage and sales processes, and promptly reporting any losses to law enforcement to facilitate quick investigations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The core issue revolves around the administrative penalties imposed on the actual controller of Baoneng New Energy, Ye Huanneng, for failing to disclose shareholding arrangements and engaging in illegal share reductions, which has raised concerns about corporate governance and compliance within the company [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Ye Huanneng received a warning and a fine of 2 million yuan from the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau for not disclosing the shareholding arrangement of Baoneng New Energy [1]. - The illegal share reduction involved a 1.1% reduction of shares, amounting to 141 million yuan, during the period from December 20 to December 27, 2021 [1]. - The regulatory body also plans to confiscate illegal gains of 25.5429 million yuan and impose an additional fine of 10 million yuan on Ye Huanneng [1]. Group 2: Company Operations - Baoneng New Energy stated that the regulatory issues do not involve current directors or senior management and will not affect the company's normal production and operational activities [2]. - The company’s operational status remains normal despite the ongoing regulatory scrutiny [2]. Group 3: Background Information - In April of the previous year, Baoneng New Energy issued a correction and apology regarding Ye Huanneng's acquisition of Hong Kong residency and the shareholding arrangement [3]. - The former chairman, Ning Yuanxi, along with the former general manager of Baoli Group, was previously convicted of embezzlement but is currently undergoing a retrial due to unclear facts in the original judgment [3][4]. - The retrial of Ning Yuanxi's case has drawn significant attention, with court proceedings lasting 46 days and extending the review period until December 11 [4].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1][5]. Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [5]. - Notably, Sun Bin, a representative from the securities service intermediary, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [5]. - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 after several executives resigned [5]. Group 2: Financing History - Since its listing in 2011, Sierte has conducted four refinancing activities from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities [5]. - Sun Bin was involved in two significant financing projects: a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Sun Bin has been withdrawing from multiple ongoing projects since June 2025, raising market speculation about his status prior to the confirmation of his involvement in the Sierte case [6].

Core Points - The announcement by Sier Te (002538.SZ) on September 29 revealed that the Xuancheng Public Security Bureau has transferred a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the Xuancheng People's Procuratorate for review and prosecution [1] - The case involves ten suspects, including former Chairman Jin Guoqing and former General Manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [1] - The implicated securities service intermediary, Guoyuan Securities, had representatives involved in Sier Te's financing projects from 2011 to 2019, including key fundraising efforts [1] Financing Projects - Guoyuan Securities' representative Sun Bin was involved in two significant financing projects for Sier Te: a directed issuance raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [2] - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, Guizhou Lufang, after a change in shareholders at the end of 2023 [2] - Following the resignation of several former executives, including Jin Zhenghui, Sier Te reported the case on January 17, 2024 [2] Executive Changes - Sun Bin has been withdrawing from multiple listed company supervision projects since June 2025, indicating potential implications for his professional standing and the companies involved [2]

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [4][5] - Sun Bin, a representative from Guoyuan Securities, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [4][6] Group 2: Financial Background - Sierte has conducted four refinancing projects from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities, including a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5] - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 [5] Group 3: Implications for Securities Industry - Sun Bin has recently withdrawn from multiple ongoing projects, raising market speculation about his status prior to the case's escalation [6] - The case highlights potential risks associated with the oversight and accountability of securities service intermediaries in financing projects [5][6]