市场概况 10月9日两市ETF两融余额为1135.95亿元，较前一交易日增加25.3亿元。其中融资余额为1061.09亿元， 较前一交易日增加24.58亿元；融券余额为74.86亿元，较前一交易日增加7190.79万元。 分市场来看，沪市ETF两融余额为780.42亿元，较前一交易日增加15.9亿元。其中融资余额为714.8亿 元，较前一交易日增加15.31亿元；融券余额为65.62亿元，较前一交易日增加5833.58万元。深市ETF两 融余额为355.53亿元，较前一交易日增加9.4亿元。其中融资余额为346.29亿元，较前一交易日增加9.27 亿元；融券余额为9.24亿元，较前一交易日增加1357.21万元。 ETF融资融券余额 ETF融券卖出额 10月9日ETF融券卖出额前三位分别为：华泰柏瑞沪深300ETF（5962.98万元）、华夏上证50ETF （1910.76万元）和南方中证500ETF（1658.69万元），前10具体见下表： ETF融资买入额 10月9日ETF融资买入额前三位分别为：易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF(25.35亿元)、华泰柏瑞南方东 英恒生科技指数(QDII-ETF)(17. ...

市场概况 | 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资买入额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 513090.SH | 易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF | 24.96亿元 | | 511360.SH | 海富通中证短融ETF | 13.46亿元 | | 513120.SH | 广发中证香港创新药(QDII-ETF) | 12.97亿元 | | 513130.SH | 华泰柏瑞南方东英恒生科技指数(QDII-ETF) | 11.63亿元 | | 511380.SH | 博时中证可转债及可交换债券ETF | 9.8亿元 | | 588000.SH | 华夏上证科创板50成份ETF | 7.43亿元 | | 518880.SH | 华安易富黄金ETF | 6.89亿元 | | 512880.SH | 国泰中证全指证券公司ETF | 6.36亿元 | | 513330.SH | 华夏恒生互联网科技业(QDII-ETF) | 5.96亿元 | | 513180.SH | 华夏恒生科技(QDII-ETF) | 5.89亿元 | ETF融资净买入额 9月30日ETF融资净买入额前三位分别为：广发中证香港创新药(QDII ...

（原标题：23只ETF融资余额上月增逾亿元） 最新两市ETF两融余额为1110.65亿元，较8月末环比增加23.65亿元，其中，ETF融资余额环比增加24.04亿元，融券余额环比减少3890.68万元。 证券时报•数据宝统计显示，截至9月30日，两市ETF两融余额为1110.65亿元，较8月末增加23.65亿元，增幅为2.18%，其中，ETF融资余额为 1036.51亿元，较8月末增加24.04亿元，增长2.37%，ETF融券余额为74.14亿元，较8月末减少3890.68万元，下降0.52%。 具体来看，深市ETF最新两融余额346.12亿元，较8月末增加4.69亿元，增幅1.37%，其中，ETF融资余额337.02亿元，较8月末增加4.94亿元，增幅 1.49%，融券余量4.46亿份，较8月末减少4428.27万份，降幅9.04%，ETF最新融券余额9.10亿元，较8月末减少2486.80万元。 沪市ETF最新两融余额764.53亿元，较8月末增加18.96亿元，增幅2.54%，其中，ETF融资余额699.49亿元，较8月末增加19.10亿元，融券余量19.51 亿份，较8月末减少406.12万份，降幅0 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints The report comprehensively analyzes the secondary market and ETF products from multiple perspectives. It presents the performance of major indexes and industries, and details the market performance, fund flows, trading volume, margin trading, and new issuance and listing of ETFs during the sample period from September 22 to September 26, 2025 [1][10]. Summary According to the Directory 1. Secondary Market Overview - **Index Performance**: During the sample period, the Science and Technology Innovation 50, SGE Gold 9999, and ChiNext Index ranked among the top in terms of weekly returns, with 6.47%, 3.32%, and 1.96% respectively. The PE valuation quantile of the S&P 500 was the highest at 99.20%, while that of the Nikkei 225 was the lowest at 85.66% [10]. - **Industry Performance**: In the sample period, the power equipment, non - ferrous metals, and electronics industries ranked among the top in terms of returns, with 3.86%, 3.52%, and 3.51% respectively. The social services, comprehensive, and commercial retail industries ranked relatively low, with - 5.92%, - 4.61%, and - 4.32% respectively. In terms of valuation, the non - ferrous metals, power equipment, and electronics industries had the highest valuation quantiles, at 99.59%, 99.59%, and 98.36% respectively, while the non - bank finance, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery, and comprehensive industries had relatively low valuation quantiles, at 23.36%, 36.07%, and 42.42% respectively [14]. 2. ETF Product Overview 2.1 ETF Market Performance - **By Product Type**: Commodity ETFs had the best average performance, with a weighted average return of 3.19%, while style ETFs had the worst average performance, with a weighted average return of - 0.75% [18]. - **By Listing Plate**: ETFs related to the Science and Technology Innovation Board and the Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship 50 had better market performance, with weighted average returns of 5.81% and 4.32% respectively. The CSI 2000 and Hong Kong stock ETFs had relatively poor performance, with weighted average returns of - 1.14% and - 0.39% respectively [18]. - **By Industry Sector**: The technology sector ETFs had the best average performance, with a weighted average return of 3.29%, while the consumer sector ETFs had the worst average performance, with a weighted average return of - 2.81% [19]. - **By Theme**: Chip semiconductor and new energy ETFs had better performance, with weighted average returns of 8.94% and 4.53% respectively. Innovative drug and non - bank ETFs had relatively poor performance, with weighted average returns of - 1.62% and - 0.87% respectively [19]. 2.2 ETF Fund Inflows and Outflows - **By ETF Category**: Bond ETFs had the largest net inflow of funds, reaching 780.27 billion yuan, while QDII ETFs had the smallest net inflow, at - 27.15 billion yuan [23]. - **By Tracking Index and Listing Plate**: ChiNext - related ETFs had the largest net inflow of funds, at 5.49 billion yuan, while CSI 300 ETFs had the smallest net inflow, at - 38.82 billion yuan [23]. - **By Industry Sector**: Technology sector ETFs had the largest net inflow of funds, at 168.58 billion yuan, while cyclical sector ETFs had the smallest net inflow, at - 16.01 billion yuan [25]. - **By Theme**: Chip semiconductor and robot ETFs had the largest net inflows of funds, at 100.50 billion yuan and 40.39 billion yuan respectively. New energy and central state - owned enterprise ETFs had the smallest net inflows, at - 9.15 billion yuan and - 5.19 billion yuan respectively [25]. 2.3 ETF Trading Volume - **By ETF Category**: QDII ETFs had the largest increase in the average daily trading volume change rate, at 0.86%, while bond ETFs had the largest decrease, at - 12.18% [28]. - **By Tracking Index and Listing Plate**: US stock ETFs had the largest increase in the average daily trading volume change rate, at 26.66%, while the CSI 1000 had the largest decrease, at - 26.70% [31]. - **By Industry Sector**: The technology sector had the largest increase in the average daily trading volume change rate, at 3.39%, while the biomedical sector had the largest decrease, at - 32.00% [34]. - **By Theme**: Non - bank and chip semiconductor ETFs had the largest average daily trading volumes in the past 5 days, at 185.49 billion yuan and 156.03 billion yuan respectively. Chip semiconductor and consumer electronics ETFs had the largest increases in the average daily trading volume change rate, at 23.15% and 12.23% respectively. Innovative drug and military industry ETFs had the largest decreases, at - 33.90% and - 24.21% respectively [36]. 2.4 ETF Margin Trading During the sample period, the net margin purchase of all stock - type ETFs was - 0.80 billion yuan, and the net short - selling was - 1.13 billion yuan. The E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF had the largest net margin purchase, and the GF CSI 1000 ETF had the largest net short - selling [42]. 2.5 ETF New Issuance and Listing During the sample period, 11 funds were established and 21 funds were listed [3][44].

市场概况 9月26日两市ETF两融余额为1117.18亿元，较前一交易日减少49.45亿元。其中融资余额为1039.93亿元， 较前一交易日减少46.25亿元；融券余额为77.25亿元，较前一交易日减少3.2亿元。 分市场来看，沪市ETF两融余额为770.55亿元，较前一交易日减少45.77亿元。其中融资余额为702.66亿 元，较前一交易日减少42.62亿元；融券余额为67.89亿元，较前一交易日减少3.15亿元。深市ETF两融 余额为346.63亿元，较前一交易日减少3.68亿元。其中融资余额为337.27亿元，较前一交易日减少3.63亿 元；融券余额为9.35亿元，较前一交易日减少473.45万元。 ETF融资融券余额 9月26日ETF两融余额前三位分别为：华安易富黄金ETF（73.93亿元）、易方达黄金ETF（58.55亿元） 和华夏恒生(QDII-ETF)（41.29亿元），前10具体见下表： | 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资融券余额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 518880.SH | 华安易富黄金ETF | 73.93亿元 | | 159934.SZ | 易方达黄金ETF | ...

（原标题：两市ETF融资余额减少46.25亿元） 最新两市ETF两融余额为1117.18亿元，环比上一交易日减少49.45亿元，其中，ETF融资余额环比减少46.25亿元，融券余额环比减少3.20亿元。 证券时报•数据宝统计显示，截至9月26日，两市ETF两融余额为1117.18亿元，较上一交易日减少49.45亿元，环比减少4.24%，其中，ETF融资余额 为1039.93亿元，较上一交易日减少46.25亿元，环比减少4.26%。 具体来看，深市ETF最新两融余额346.63亿元，较上一日减少3.68亿元，ETF融资余额337.27亿元，环比减少3.63亿元，融券余量4.70亿份，环比增 加517.74万份，增幅1.11%，ETF最新融券余额9.35亿元，环比减少473.45万元。沪市ETF最新两融余额770.55亿元，较上一日减少45.77亿元，ETF 融资余额702.66亿元，环比减少42.62亿元，融券余量20.39亿份，环比减少4783.00万份，降幅2.29%，ETF最新融券余额67.89亿元，环比减少3.15 亿元。 相关标的ETF中，最新融资余额超亿元的有124只，融资余额最多的是华安黄金易(E ...

市场概况 ETF融资买入额 9月25日两市ETF两融余额为1166.63亿元，较前一交易日增加12.37亿元。其中融资余额为1086.18亿元， 较前一交易日增加12.22亿元；融券余额为80.45亿元，较前一交易日增加1466.84万元。 分市场来看，沪市ETF两融余额为816.33亿元，较前一交易日增加8.78亿元。其中融资余额为745.28亿 元，较前一交易日增加8.72亿元；融券余额为71.04亿元，较前一交易日增加593.4万元。深市ETF两融 余额为350.3亿元，较前一交易日增加3.59亿元。其中融资余额为340.9亿元，较前一交易日增加3.5亿 元；融券余额为9.4亿元，较前一交易日增加873.44万元。 ETF融资融券余额 | 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资融券余额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 518880.SH | 华安易富黄金ETF | 73.66亿元 | | 159934.SZ | 易方达黄金ETF | 58.68亿元 | | 511520.SH | 富国中债7-10年政策性金融债ETF | 42.75亿元 | | 159920.SZ | 华夏恒生(QDII-ETF) ...

市场概况 9月24日两市ETF两融余额为1154.26亿元，较前一交易日增加3.37亿元。其中融资余额为1073.97亿元， 较前一交易日增加1.71亿元；融券余额为80.3亿元，较前一交易日增加1.66亿元。 分市场来看，沪市ETF两融余额为807.55亿元，较前一交易日增加3.04亿元。其中融资余额为736.56亿 元，较前一交易日增加1.5亿元；融券余额为70.98亿元，较前一交易日增加1.54亿元。深市ETF两融余 额为346.72亿元，较前一交易日增加3376.93万元。其中融资余额为337.4亿元，较前一交易日增加 2146.91万元；融券余额为9.31亿元，较前一交易日增加1230.02万元。 ETF融资净买入额 9月24日ETF融资净买入额前三位分别为：海富通中证短融ETF（1.77亿元）、国泰中证半导体材料设备 主题ETF（1.75亿元）和博时中证可转债及可交换债券ETF（1.09亿元），前10具体见下表： | 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资净买入额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 511360.SH | 海富通中证短融ETF | 1.77亿元 | | 159516.SZ | ...

市场概况 ETF融资买入额 9月23日ETF融资买入额前三位分别为：华泰柏瑞南方东英恒生科技指数(QDII-ETF)(14.18亿元)、博时 中证可转债及可交换债券ETF(14.12亿元)和易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF(12.24亿元)，前10具体见 下表： | 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资买入额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 513130.SH | 华泰柏瑞南方东英恒生科技指数(QDII-ETF) | 14.18亿元 | | 511380.SH | 博时中证可转债及可交换债券ETF | 14.12亿元 | | 513090.SH | 易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF | 12.24亿元 | | 511360.SH | 海富通中证短融ETF | 9.85亿元 | | 513180.SH | 华夏恒生科技(QDII-ETF) | 9.29亿元 | | 588000.SH | 华夏上证科创板50成份ETF | 8.47亿元 | | 159915.SZ | 易方达创业板ETF | 7.67亿元 | | 513330.SH | 华夏恒生互联网科技业(QDII-ETF) | 7.58亿元 | | ...

| 代码 | 基金名称 | 融资买入额 | | --- | --- | --- | | 511360.SH | 海富通中证短融ETF | 35.16亿元 | | 511520.SH | 富国中债7-10年政策性金融债ETF | 26.79亿元 | | 513130.SH | 华泰柏瑞南方东英恒生科技指数(QDII-ETF) | 15.36亿元 | | 513090.SH | 易方达中证香港证券投资主题ETF | 10.8亿元 | | 513180.SH | 华夏恒生科技(QDII-ETF) | 10.71亿元 | | 511380.SH | 博时中证可转债及可交换债券ETF | 9.93亿元 | | 588000.SH | 华夏上证科创板50成份ETF | 8.48亿元 | | 159650.SZ | 博时中债0-3年国开行债券ETF | 8.11亿元 | | 513330.SH | 华夏恒生互联网科技业(QDII-ETF) | 5.78亿元 | | 159915.SZ | 易方达创业板ETF | 5.54亿元 | 9月22日两市ETF两融余额为1147.26亿元，较前一交易日增加37.05亿元。其中融资余额 ...