问：据报道，5月31日，美国防长赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上发表演讲，大肆渲染中国威胁，就涉台、 南海等问题发表消极言论。请问中方对此有何评论？ 答：赫格塞思无视地区国家求和平谋发展的呼声，兜售阵营对抗的冷战思维，抹黑攻击中国，大肆渲 染"中国威胁论"，充满挑衅挑拨。中方对此强烈不满和坚决反对，已向美方提出严正交涉。 6月1日，外交部网站发布外交部发言人就美国防长赫格塞思在香格里拉对话会上涉华消极言论答记者 台湾问题纯属中国内政，任何外国无权干涉。美方不要妄想把台湾问题当作遏制中国的筹码，勿要玩火。 中方敦促美方切实恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报，停止为"台独"势力撑腰打气。南海的航行和飞 越自由从来都不存在任何问题。中国在南海问题上始终坚持同有关国家通过对话协商妥善处理分歧，坚持 依法依规维护领土主权和海洋权益。美国才是破坏南海和平稳定的最大因素。 问。 中方敦促美方切实尊重地区国家维护和平稳定的努力，停止蓄意破坏地区和平稳定环境，渲染冲突对抗、 加剧地区局势紧张。 事实上，美国才是世界上名副其实的霸权国家，是破坏亚太地区和平稳定的最大因素。美国为维护自身霸 权，推进所谓"印太战略"，在南海地区部署进攻性 ...

【文/观察者网 王一】当今全球人工智能（AI）竞赛愈演愈烈，各国都在大力投资AI以期率先掌握这项 事关未来的技术。英国政府今年1月发布报告称，美国和中国在AI领域正取得进展，而英国作为全球第 三大AI市场，正面临着落后的风险。 为消除这一风险，英国政府想出的办法似乎是：渲染中国威胁，蹭上美国AI发展的快车。 5月27日，去年刚就任的英国驻美国大使彼得·曼德尔森（Peter Mandelson）在美国智库大西洋理事会主 办的一场活动上又扯上中国炒作称，"在这个世界上，没有什么比中国赢得技术主导地位更让我担心的 了"，中国"经济成熟、高度创新、战略耐心"，是美国和英国面临的"明显共同威胁"。 渲染完所谓的中国威胁论后，曼德尔森"建言"称，英国和美国应该"联合起来"，"推动定义本世纪的科 学突破"，AI应该成为两国合作的"先锋"。 曼德尔森称，10%的关税税率不太可能继续下降了，但英美可以"在这个基准内"降低关税和非关税壁 垒，"这对我们双方都有利"。 但比较微妙的是，《独立报》称，工党自上台以来一直试图缓和与中国的关系，外交大臣戴维·拉米、 财政大臣蕾切尔·里夫斯等英国官员接连访华都说明了这一点，而特朗普对中国一 ...

美国霸道再上一层楼，竟然威逼国际金融机构，只为给中国下绊子，阴谋能够成功吗？ 日前，美债收益率集体大涨，各期限美债收益率都超过了4%。一般来讲，美债收益率暴涨，很可能和美债遭到市场抛售有关，4月美债收益率曾一度激增， 当时日本就有媒体称很可能是因为特朗普政府的关税政策，促使中国大幅减持美债，反制美国。但中方还没表态，美国就有媒体宣称，美债的确遭到了抛 售，但不是中国在抛，是谁呢？恰恰是暗戳戳把火往中国身上引的日本。吓的日方连忙跑出来辩解，称自己不会用抛售美债来针对美国。 相比于美国满世界挑起动荡不安甚至制造战火的行径，中国秉持开放和包容的姿态，为常年被迫沦为美国"后花园"甚至"垃圾堆"的拉美国家带来发展的契 机，主动提出合作，拉美国家高兴还来不及。就在日前，巴西总统卢拉还高调访华，可见当下很多拉美国家对中国是欢迎之至的。然而现在美方因为害怕中 方发展超过自己，加上担心以后不能将拉美当"后花园"了，就不许国际金融机构为中企提供贷款，可谓把美国自私自利、恶人先告状的本质暴露的淋漓尽 致。 可笑的是，美国这回通告全球，强行对华使绊子，然而中方还未出手，没料到美债就先崩了，显示如今的美国，正面临一大堆现实问题，甚至可 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Congress has issued subpoenas to three Chinese telecom companies—China Mobile, China Telecom, and China Unicom—regarding potential data acquisition through their cloud services and internet operations in the U.S. This reflects a pattern of U.S. actions against Chinese firms under the guise of "national security" [1] - The U.S. has consistently made accusations against Chinese entities without providing substantial evidence, relying instead on presumption of guilt and selective intelligence disclosures to create a narrative of threat [1][2] - The investigation extends beyond traditional telecom services to emerging sectors like cloud services and data centers, indicating U.S. anxiety over China's technological advancements and its competitive position in the cybersecurity field [2] Group 2 - There is a notable double standard in the U.S. scrutiny of Chinese companies compared to European telecom firms and American tech giants, which have not faced similar investigations despite their significant data holdings [3] - The actions of the U.S. Congress reflect political opportunism, with a coordinated effort among intelligence agencies, tech companies, and media to construct a narrative that benefits political and financial interests, particularly in the context of increasing cybersecurity budgets [3] - China's response to U.S. accusations emphasizes dialogue and cooperation, advocating for multilateralism and the establishment of international rules to address cybersecurity issues, contrasting with the U.S. approach [4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent NATO report labels China as a "systemic challenge," claiming its expanding nuclear arsenal threatens NATO member states' interests, security, and values. The Chinese defense spokesperson refutes these claims, asserting that China does not intend to challenge or threaten anyone and maintains a stable and defensive nuclear policy [1]. Group 1: NATO's Position on China - NATO's annual report indicates that China has become a significant challenge, emphasizing its rapid nuclear arsenal expansion [1]. - The report suggests that China's policies pose threats to the interests and security of NATO member countries [1]. Group 2: China's Response - The Chinese defense spokesperson, Zhang Xiaogang, criticizes NATO's report as being rooted in Cold War mentality and misrepresenting the situation [1]. - China maintains that its nuclear policy is characterized by stability, continuity, and predictability, adhering to a self-defense nuclear strategy that keeps its nuclear capabilities at the minimum level necessary for national security [1]. Group 3: NATO's Nuclear Practices - The spokesperson highlights NATO's recent actions, including its expansion of power and involvement in the Asia-Pacific region, which disrupt regional peace and stability [1]. - NATO's "nuclear sharing" arrangements and significant investments by some member states to upgrade strategic forces are noted as contributing to the largest nuclear arsenal globally [1]. - Plans for cooperation involving the proliferation of weapons-grade nuclear materials to non-nuclear weapon states are criticized as violations of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and global strategic stability [1].

文|翎谕 关税战中，特朗普对一些国家"选择性豁免"，但唯独对中国层层加码。 这不是美国第一次针对中国了： 从2018年的贸易战，再到渲染"中国威胁论"等等。 明明这么做对美国来说好处不大，甚至还让美国民众为之买单。 但美国就像"狗皮膏药"一样，似乎要跟中国死磕到底。 对此英国专家给出了答案，这是因为中国犯了一个重要的"原罪"！ 美国4月初开始对全球各国增加关税。 然而在反对声音冒出之后，美国做了一个很明显的针对行为。 信息源：本文陈述所有内容皆有可靠信息来源赘述在文章结尾 那就是给一些国家的加关税先按下暂停键，但是却对中国关税是加了又加。 这么做的目的，仅仅是因为中国没有选择低头吗？ 从美国长期以来的行为来看，他们对中国的针对性有点太强了。 近年来，美国一直在世界上宣传他们所谓的"中国威胁论"。 涉及的范围是越来越大，从环境威胁到食品威胁，再到计算机威胁。 比如去年美国和欧盟一起给中国新能源车加税。 他们一直强调"中国的产能过剩"对他们造成了影响。 还被爆出美国每年花费上亿元，买抹黑中国的稿子。 在美国军费排名世界第一的情况下，却炒作中国在大幅度增长军费。 就连美国总统都下场，前几天特朗普发了几张中国环境污染 ...

看ip，我到苏州了，这次来看周六周蕙的演唱会都不用住酒店，直接住丈母娘家就好了。 后来周蕙遭遇经纪合约的变故，错过了职业发展的黄金期，渐渐就没热度了。新闻上说她被经纪人季忠平给骗了，我心说季忠平好眼熟，查了一下， 原来齐秦的悬崖，许茹芸的如果云知道都是他的作品，去ktv点歌的时候经常能看到这个名字。 周蕙不火了以后，媒体就把她剔出四小天后，梁静茹崛起补位，组成了第二个版本的四小天后。 之前读者说周蕙是个只有一首歌的过气歌手，过气是客观事实，但代表作并不只有约定，她出道即巅峰，2000-2003还是挺红的，唱片能卖到上百 万。当时萧亚轩、蔡依林、孙燕姿、周蕙被媒体评为四小天后，咖位在华语乐坛是准一线。 这五个女歌手活跃的黄金期就是我读高中、大学的那几年，既是人生中的黄金年龄，也是听歌最多的那几年，所以我对她们的印象都很好。之前去济 南看过梁静茹演唱会，这次来苏州看周蕙，另外3位我后面也会去看的，岁月不等人，她们年纪也不小了。 话说艺人，包括现在的抖音网红，真的不是一个理想的职业，年轻的时候因为机缘巧合的作品突然就成功了，名和利都来的太快，而自己的人生阅历 又往往无法将它消化。短暂辉煌过后，大部分人都会不可避免的 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the potential transfer of control over Panama Canal ports from Li Ka-shing's company to American interests, amidst ongoing U.S.-China tensions [1][4] - The Aponti family from Italy is emerging as a leading consortium to acquire 43 ports from Li Ka-shing's company, while BlackRock will only manage the operations of the ports at both ends of the Panama Canal [1][4] - The U.S. is exerting pressure on Panama to reclaim control over the canal, with recent visits from U.S. defense officials emphasizing the need to counteract Chinese influence in the region [4][6] Group 2 - The Panama Canal is viewed as a strategic asset for the U.S., crucial for supply chain security and military logistics, particularly in the context of U.S.-China rivalry [6][8] - The U.S. is concerned about its influence being challenged in its "backyard," and is taking military and diplomatic actions to ensure control over the canal [8][9] - The Panamanian government's stance is critical, as they hold the ownership of the ports, and any decision to breach contracts with Li Ka-shing's company could signal a shift in control [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the trade war and tariff policies initiated by the U.S. have no winners and are detrimental to all parties involved, urging the U.S. to abandon its extreme pressure tactics and resolve issues through dialogue based on equality and mutual respect [2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policies - The U.S. has implemented a tariff policy that includes both exemptions and additional tariffs, which has been criticized as harmful and counterproductive [2]. - The Chinese government asserts that the U.S. is using tariffs as a weapon for unilateralism and economic bullying, which undermines global interests, including those of China and the EU [6]. Group 2: China-Latin America Relations - China maintains that its cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries is based on mutual support and does not involve geopolitical calculations, contrasting with U.S. actions that are seen as attempts to control the region [5]. - The article highlights that the U.S. has been accused of using tariffs and other means to exert pressure on Latin American countries, which is viewed as a form of neo-Monroeism [8]. Group 3: China-EU Coordination - China and the EU, as major global economies, are coordinating their responses to U.S. tariff policies, emphasizing the need for stability and certainty in the global economy [6]. - Both parties advocate for a multilateral trading system centered around the World Trade Organization (WTO) and aim to maintain healthy and stable global trade relations [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative remarks made by U.S. officials regarding China, which were strongly rebutted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry, labeling them as outright lies and fallacies [1] Group 1: U.S. Officials' Statements - U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin emphasized the need to counter the "Chinese threat" during the 2025 Central America Security Conference in Panama City, claiming that the U.S. must prevent "war from breaking out" [1] - U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman stated that only trusted suppliers should be allowed to participate in 5G, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence collaborations to prevent Chinese involvement [1] Group 2: Chinese Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian criticized the U.S. statements as filled with ideological bias and Cold War mentality, asserting that they are complete lies and fallacies [1] - Lin Jian highlighted that the U.S. has historically viewed Latin America and the Caribbean as its "backyard," engaging in "new Monroeism" and interfering in the internal affairs of these nations [1] - The spokesperson reiterated that China engages with Latin American and Caribbean countries based on principles of equality and mutual benefit, without seeking spheres of influence or targeting any third parties [1]