去风险战略

Search documents
欧盟豪赌彻底失败!解散危机不再是假设,中方千人工厂赴欧直击产业软肋,地缘经济博弈真相曝光!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-03 02:48
尽管采取了如此封闭的姿态,也未能带来产业的真正复兴。但随2024年欧盟对华电动汽车的17%-35%的关税的下一脚刚 落,中国的出口量才仅仅下滑了五分之一,而欧洲的本土电动车的产量却惨淡的仅仅增幅了4.2%,这本就不太正常,但更 为可笑的是这把贸易的壁垒都给推高了欧洲的车企的成本。 中企赴欧建厂的行动,如同一面照妖镜,映出欧洲制造业的残酷现实。宁德时代西班牙工厂的推进,并非简单资本输出, 而是直指欧洲新能源产业链的致命短板——电池技术、稀土加工、智能系统的全面依赖。 欧盟豪赌彻底失败!解散危机不再是假设,中方千人工厂赴欧直击产业软肋,地缘经济博弈真相曝光! 时间的推移之际,2025年的欧洲已陷入一团复杂的战略之网,不自觉地为自己打下了一个又一个的潜在的陷阱。正当欧盟 委员会的主席冯德莱恩在斯特拉斯堡对中国的"倾销产能"大加抨击之时,西班牙的阿拉贡平原上却悄悄地为宁德时代的这 座电池工厂的基业打下了坚实的基础,2000名来自中国的工程师与工人也带着一批批的先进的技术设备悄然的进驻了欧盟 的腹地。 但在这幕欧洲的"大戏"中,却恰恰揭开了其最深的伤疤——以产业的空心化为代表的生存危机与政治的分裂无奈的两重 性。 "右 ...
美国关税战压顶,欧盟扛不住,冯德莱恩访华前先去日本,事情不简单
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-26 10:05
Group 1 - The core issue is the escalating trade tensions between the EU and the US, particularly due to the US imposing significant tariffs on EU goods, which has prompted EU leaders to seek support from allies like Japan [1][3][4] - The US has implemented a series of tariffs, including a 10% basic tariff on most EU exports, a 25% tariff on imported cars and parts, and a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum products, with further threats of a 30% tariff on EU goods starting August 1 [3][4] - The potential impact of these tariffs is severe, with 70% of the €530 billion worth of goods exported from the EU to the US being affected, leading to reduced profit margins and increased prices for EU manufacturers, particularly in the automotive sector [4][6] Group 2 - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's visit to Japan aims to establish a "competitiveness alliance" focused on developing rare earth resources, reducing reliance on China [6][9] - The EU's relationship with China is complex, with recent tensions arising from trade barriers and restrictions on Chinese companies, despite a history of strong economic cooperation [6][7] - The EU is encouraged to recognize mutual interests with China and engage in sincere dialogue to foster cooperation in trade and global governance, which could stabilize and enhance EU-China relations [9]
欧洲这次终于低头了?7月22日,中欧谈判传来最新消息
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-22 22:31
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of China-Europe relations, highlighting the complexities and contradictions in European politicians' approaches towards China, particularly in the context of trade and geopolitical tensions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - European leaders, particularly Ursula von der Leyen, exhibit contradictory behavior by criticizing China while simultaneously seeking business opportunities [3][9]. - The EU's recent sanctions against Russia inadvertently affected Chinese companies, showcasing a lack of coherence in their strategy [3][9]. - China's response emphasizes a desire for a "comprehensive, dialectical, and developmental" relationship with Europe, indicating a push for mutual respect and understanding [5][10]. Group 2: Economic Interactions - The trade volume between China and Europe has reached a historical high, exceeding $800 billion, with daily trade surpassing $2 billion [7][9]. - Despite the significant trade relationship, the EU's "de-risking" strategy is perceived as a thinly veiled form of "China threat" rhetoric [9][10]. - The upcoming visit by European leaders is framed as a "consultation" rather than an "invitation," suggesting a shift in the power dynamics of the relationship [13][15]. Group 3: Internal EU Conflicts - There is a notable divide within the EU, with Eastern European countries seeking Chinese investment while Western nations prioritize ideological concerns [11][15]. - Von der Leyen faces challenges in balancing the interests of different EU member states, reflecting the internal conflicts that complicate a unified approach towards China [11][15]. - The article suggests that the EU's decision-making process resembles negotiating with multiple stakeholders, complicating the relationship with China [15][18]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The article posits that the future of China-Europe relations hinges on the ability of European leaders to engage in equitable dialogue and cooperation [17][18]. - Establishing a rules-based framework for interactions could mitigate future conflicts, while continued unilateral actions may exacerbate tensions [18].
王毅表态之际,70岁的默克尔,送给欧盟一个忠告,美国彻底急了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-07 07:58
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the strategic dialogue between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and EU's High Representative Josep Borrell, signaling important developments in China-EU relations [1][3] - Merkel's call for EU unity against US tariff threats emphasizes the need for Europe to adopt an independent policy towards China, reflecting a shift in the EU's approach to its relationship with China [3][5] - The economic ties between China and the EU are strong, with daily trade exceeding $2.7 billion, positioning China as the EU's second-largest trading partner [3][5] Group 2 - The EU's internal policy divisions regarding China are becoming more pronounced, with the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen favoring a tougher stance, while Germany's position is crucial in shaping the overall EU approach [3][5] - Merkel's statements indicate a potential correction in the EU's China policy, advocating for a strategy based on European interests rather than blind alignment with US pressures [3][5] - The article discusses the growing awareness in Europe regarding strategic autonomy, with calls for reduced reliance on US military protection and a more independent stance in international affairs [5][7] Group 3 - The article outlines the broad cooperation potential between China and the EU in global governance areas such as climate change and biodiversity, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts [5][7] - The complexities of the EU's decision-making process, influenced by the diverse interests of its 27 member states, pose challenges for a unified China strategy [7] - The dialogue between Wang Yi and Merkel's remarks suggest a pivotal moment for China-EU relations, with an emphasis on pragmatic cooperation and the necessity for enhanced communication to address global challenges [7]